Validation of FIRETEC wind-flows over a canopy and a fuel-break
François Pimont A D , Jean-Luc Dupuy A , Rodman R. Linn B and Sylvain Dupont CA INRA (Institut National pour la Recherche Agronomique), Unité de Recherches Forestières Méditerranéennes, Equipe de Prévention des Incendies de Forêt, UR629, F-84914, Avignon, France.
B Earth and Environmental Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, NM, 87544, USA.
C INRA, UR1263 EPHYSE, 71 Avenue Edouard Bourlaux, F-33883, Villenave d’Ornon, France.
D Corresponding author. Email: pimont@avignon.inra.fr
International Journal of Wildland Fire 18(7) 775-790 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF07130
Submitted: 7 September 2007 Accepted: 22 December 2008 Published: 27 October 2009
Abstract
The wildfire model FIRETEC simulates the large coherent eddies of the wind-flows induced by the canopy. It has been qualitatively validated in its ability to simulate fire behavior, but there is still a need to validate physical submodels separately. In the present study, the dynamics and turbulence of the flow simulated by FIRETEC are validated in a manner similar to other air-flow models without fire, through comparison with measurements associated with flows within continuous and discontinuous forests captured through in situ and wind-tunnel experiments with neutral thermal stratification. The model is shown to be able to reproduce accurately all essential features of turbulent flow over both forests. Moreover, a short sensitivity study shows that the model is not very sensitive to uncertain parameters such as vegetation drag coefficient. Finally, it is shown in the discontinuous forest case that wind gusts on fuel-breaks can be very strong and significantly higher than in surrounding canopies, even if their directions are more stable. These results and others briefly reviewed in the present paper allow better understanding of wind-flow perturbations induced by fuel-breaks. This new validation added to previous ones confirms the ability of FIRETEC for investigating effects of fuel-break design on fire propagation.
Additional keywords: forest canopy, forest edge, HIGRAD, large-eddy simulation, wildfire.
Acknowledgements
This study has been partially funded by the European Commission in the frame of the FIREPARADOX research program (contract FP6–018505) and the large computations for this work have been made possible by the Los Alamos National Laboratory Institutional Computing resources.
Amiro BD (1990) Comparison of turbulence statistics within three boreal forest canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 51, 99–121.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brunet Y, Finnigan JJ , Raupach MR (1994) A wind-tunnel study of air flow in waving wheat: single-point velocity statistics. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 70, 95–132.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Catchpole WR, Catchpole EA, Butler BW, Rothermel RC, Morris CA , Latham DJ (1998) Rate of spread of free-burning fires in woody fuels in a wind tunnel. Combustion Science and Technology 131, 1–37.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS |
Cheney NP, Gould JS , Catchpole WR (1998) Prediction of fire spread in grasslands. International Journal of Wildland Fire 8(1), 1–13.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dupont S , Brunet Y (2006) Simulation of turbulent flow in an urban forested park damaged by a windstorm. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 120, 133–161.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kanda M , Hino M (1994) Organized structures in developing turbulent-flow within and above a plant canopy, using a LES. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 68(3), 237–257.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Linn RR , Cunningham P (2005) Numerical simulations of grass fires using a coupled atmosphere–fire model: basic fire behavior and dependence on wind speed. Journal of Geophysical Research 110, D13107.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Linn RR, Reisner J, Colman JJ , Winterkamp J (2002) Studying wildfire behavior using FIRETEC. International Journal of Wildland Fire 11, 233–246.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Raupach MR, Coppin PA , Legg BJ (1986) Experiments on scalar dispersion within a model plant canopy. Part I: The turbulence structure. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 35, 21–52.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Raupach MR, Finnigan JJ , Brunet Y (1996) Coherent eddies and turbulence in vegetation canopies: the mixing-layer analogy. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 78, 351–382.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shaw RH , Patton EG (2003) Canopy element influences on resolved- and subgrid-scale energy within a large-eddy simulation. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 115, 5–17.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Smolarkiewicz PK , Margolin LG (1998) MPDATA: a finite-difference solver for geophysical flows. Journal of Computational Physics 140, 459–480.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Yang B, Raupach M, Shaw RH, Paw UKT , Morse AP (2006a) Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows across a forest edge. Part I: Flow statistics. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 120, 377–412.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Yang B, Morse AP, Shaw RH , Paw UKT (2006b) Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow across a forest edge. Part II: Momentum and turbulence kinetic energy budgets. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 121, 433–457.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |