Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Validation of FIRETEC wind-flows over a canopy and a fuel-break

François Pimont A D , Jean-Luc Dupuy A , Rodman R. Linn B and Sylvain Dupont C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A INRA (Institut National pour la Recherche Agronomique), Unité de Recherches Forestières Méditerranéennes, Equipe de Prévention des Incendies de Forêt, UR629, F-84914, Avignon, France.

B Earth and Environmental Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, NM, 87544, USA.

C INRA, UR1263 EPHYSE, 71 Avenue Edouard Bourlaux, F-33883, Villenave d’Ornon, France.

D Corresponding author. Email: pimont@avignon.inra.fr

International Journal of Wildland Fire 18(7) 775-790 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF07130
Submitted: 7 September 2007  Accepted: 22 December 2008   Published: 27 October 2009

Abstract

The wildfire model FIRETEC simulates the large coherent eddies of the wind-flows induced by the canopy. It has been qualitatively validated in its ability to simulate fire behavior, but there is still a need to validate physical submodels separately. In the present study, the dynamics and turbulence of the flow simulated by FIRETEC are validated in a manner similar to other air-flow models without fire, through comparison with measurements associated with flows within continuous and discontinuous forests captured through in situ and wind-tunnel experiments with neutral thermal stratification. The model is shown to be able to reproduce accurately all essential features of turbulent flow over both forests. Moreover, a short sensitivity study shows that the model is not very sensitive to uncertain parameters such as vegetation drag coefficient. Finally, it is shown in the discontinuous forest case that wind gusts on fuel-breaks can be very strong and significantly higher than in surrounding canopies, even if their directions are more stable. These results and others briefly reviewed in the present paper allow better understanding of wind-flow perturbations induced by fuel-breaks. This new validation added to previous ones confirms the ability of FIRETEC for investigating effects of fuel-break design on fire propagation.

Additional keywords: forest canopy, forest edge, HIGRAD, large-eddy simulation, wildfire.


Acknowledgements

This study has been partially funded by the European Commission in the frame of the FIREPARADOX research program (contract FP6–018505) and the large computations for this work have been made possible by the Los Alamos National Laboratory Institutional Computing resources.


References


Alexander ME (1998) Crown fire thresholds in exotic plantations of Australasia. Ph.D. thesis, Australian National University, Canberra.

Amiro BD (1990) Comparison of turbulence statistics within three boreal forest canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorology  51, 99–121.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Andrews PL (1986) BEHAVE: fire behaviour prediction and fuel modelling system – BURN subsystem, Part 1. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Research paper INT-194. (Ogden, UT)

Brunet Y, Finnigan JJ , Raupach MR (1994) A wind-tunnel study of air flow in waving wheat: single-point velocity statistics. Boundary-Layer Meteorology  70, 95–132.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Butler B, Forthofer J, Finney M, McHugh C, Stratton R, Bradshaw L (2006) The impact of high-resolution wind field simulations on the accuracy of fire growth predictions. In ‘Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Forest Fire Research’, 27–30 November 2006, Figueira da Foz, Portugal. (Ed. DX Viegas) (Elsevier B.V.: Amsterdam)

Canfield FM, Linn RR, Cunningham P, Goodrick SL (2005) Modelling effects of atmospheric stability on wildfire behaviour. In ‘Proceedings 6th Fire and Forest Meteorology Symposium and 19th Interior West Fire Council Meeting’, 25–27 October 2005, Canmore, AB, Canada. (American Meteorological Society) [Abstract]

Catchpole WR, Catchpole EA, Butler BW, Rothermel RC, Morris CA , Latham DJ (1998) Rate of spread of free-burning fires in woody fuels in a wind tunnel. Combustion Science and Technology  131, 1–37.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | Chen JM, Black TA, Novak MD, Adams RS (1995) A wind tunnel study of turbulent airflow in forest clearcuts. In ‘Wind and Trees’. (Eds MP Coutts, J Grace) pp. 71–87. (Cambridge University Press: London)

Cheney NP, Gould JS , Catchpole WR (1998) Prediction of fire spread in grasslands. International Journal of Wildland Fire  8(1), 1–13.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Cruz MG (2004) Ignition of crown fuels above a spreading surface fire. Ph.D. thesis, University of Montana, Missoula.

Dupont S , Brunet Y (2006) Simulation of turbulent flow in an urban forested park damaged by a windstorm. Boundary-Layer Meteorology  120, 133–161.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Kaimal JC, Finnigan JJ (1994) ‘Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flows. Their Structure and Measurements.’ (Oxford University Press: New York)

Kanda M , Hino M (1994) Organized structures in developing turbulent-flow within and above a plant canopy, using a LES. Boundary-Layer Meteorology  68(3), 237–257.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Linn RR (1997) A transport model for prediction of wildfire behavior. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Science Report LA-13334-T. (Los Alamos, NM)

Linn RR , Cunningham P (2005) Numerical simulations of grass fires using a coupled atmosphere–fire model: basic fire behavior and dependence on wind speed. Journal of Geophysical Research  110, D13107.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Linn RR, Canfield J, Winterkamp J, Cunningham P, Colman JJ, Edminster C, Goddrick SL (2005b) Numerical simulations of fires similar to the International Crown Fire Modeling Experiment. In ‘Proceedings 6th Fire and Forest Meteorology Symposium and 19th Interior West Fire Council Meeting’, 25–27 October, Canmore, Alberta. (American Meteorological Society) [Abstract]

Linn RR, Reisner J, Colman JJ , Winterkamp J (2002) Studying wildfire behavior using FIRETEC. International Journal of Wildland Fire  11, 233–246.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Pope SB (2000) ‘Turbulent Flows.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

Raupach MR, Coppin PA , Legg BJ (1986) Experiments on scalar dispersion within a model plant canopy. Part I: The turbulence structure. Boundary-Layer Meteorology  35, 21–52.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Raupach MR, Bradley EF, Ghadiri H (1987) A wind tunnel investigation into aerodynamic effect of forest clearing on the nesting of Abbott’s Booby on Christmas Island. CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Centre for Environmental Mechanics, Technical Report T12. (Canberra, Australia)

Raupach MR, Finnigan JJ , Brunet Y (1996) Coherent eddies and turbulence in vegetation canopies: the mixing-layer analogy. Boundary-Layer Meteorology  78, 351–382.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Reisner JM, Knoll DA, Mousseau VA, Linn RR (2000b) New numerical approaches for coupled atmosphere–fire models. In ‘Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Fire and Forest Meteorology’, January 2000, Long Beach, CA. pp. 11–14. (American Meteorology Society: Boston, MA)

Rigolot E, Costa M (2000) ‘Conception des Coupures de Combustible.’ Réseau Coupures de Combustible RCC no. 4. (Editions de la Cardère: Morières, France)

Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-115. (Ogden, UT)

Shaw RH , Patton EG (2003) Canopy element influences on resolved- and subgrid-scale energy within a large-eddy simulation. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology  115, 5–17.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Smith WS, Brown MJ, DeCroix DS (2002) Evaluation of CFD simulations using laboratory data and urban field experiments. In ‘Proceedings of American Meteorological Society 4th Symposium on the Urban Environment’, May 2002, Norfolk, VA. LA-UR-02-1099. (American Meteorology Society: Boston, MA)

Smolarkiewicz PK , Margolin LG (1998) MPDATA: a finite-difference solver for geophysical flows. Journal of Computational Physics  140, 459–480.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Winterkamp J, Linn RR, Colman J, Smith S, Edminster CB, Weise DR (2006) Interaction between wildfires, atmosphere, and topography. In ‘Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Forest Fire Research’, 27–30 November 2006, Figueira da Foz, Portugal. (Ed. DX Viegas) (Elsevier B.V.: Amsterdam)

Yang B, Raupach M, Shaw RH, Paw UKT , Morse AP (2006a) Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows across a forest edge. Part I: Flow statistics. Boundary-Layer Meteorology  120, 377–412.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Yang B, Morse AP, Shaw RH , Paw UKT (2006b) Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow across a forest edge. Part II: Momentum and turbulence kinetic energy budgets. Boundary-Layer Meteorology  121, 433–457.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |