Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Coupled influences of topography and wind on wildland fire behaviour

Rodman Linn A C , Judith Winterkamp A , Carleton Edminster B , Jonah J. Colman A and William S. Smith A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Earth and Environmental Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.

B USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 2500 S. Pine Knoll Dr, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA.

C Corresponding author. Email: rrl@lanl.gov

International Journal of Wildland Fire 16(2) 183-195 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF06078
Published: 30 April 2007

Abstract

Ten simulations were performed with the HIGRAD/FIRETEC wildfire behaviour model in order to explore its utility in studying wildfire behaviour in inhomogeneous topography. The goal of these simulations is to explore the potential extent of the coupling between the fire, atmosphere, and topography. The ten simulations described in this paper include five different topographies, each run with two different ambient wind speeds of 6 and 12 m s–1. The five topologies explored are: an idealised hill (which serves as the base centerline for the other topographies), two variations of the hill with lateral gradients downwind from the ignition line (one sloping up from the ‘hill’ at the centerline to form an upward sloping canyon parallel to the ambient wind, and the other sloping down from the centerline to form a ridge parallel to the ambient flow), one with a second hill upwind of the ignition line such that the fire is ignited in the bottom of a canyon that runs perpendicular to the ambient wind, and finally a flat terrain. The four non-trivial topographies have the same profile along the centerline downwind of the ignition line to help assess the impacts of topographic gradients that are perpendicular to the ambient wind. It is hoped that analysis of these simulations will help reveal where point-functional models are sufficient, where topographically modified wind fields are needed, and where fully coupled fire and transport models are necessary to properly describe wildfire behaviour.

Additional keywords: fire propagation, FIRETEC, slope effects.


Acknowledgements

Critical computing resources for this work were provided by the Los Alamos National Laboratory Institutional Computing Program. Equally important financial support for this work was provided by the USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station, Joint Fire Science Program, and the National Fire Plan.


References


Bossert JE, Linn RR, Reisner JM, Winterkamp JL, Dennison P, Roberts D (2000) Coupled atmosphere-fire behavior model sensitivity to spatial fuels characterization. In ‘Proceedings of the third symposium on fire and forest meteorology’. January 2000, Long Beach, California.

Clark TL, Coen J , Lathan D (2004) Description of a coupled atmosphere-fire model. International Journal of Wildland Fire  13, 49–63.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Coen JL (2000) Coupled atmosphere-fire model dynamics of a fireline crossing a hill. In ‘Proceedings of the third symposium on fire and forest meteorology’. January 2000, Long Beach, California.

Colman JJ , Linn RR (2007) Separating combustion from pyrolysis in HIGRAD/FIRETEC I.  International Journal of Wildland Fire  16,
Dupuy JL (1997) Mieux comprendre et prèdire la propagation des feux de forêts: expérimentation, test et proposition de modèles. PhD thesis, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon.

Dupuy JL (2005) Numerical study of a crown fire spreading toward a fuel break using a multiphase physical model. International Journal of Wildland Fire  14, 141–151.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Forthofer JM, Butler BW, Shannon KS, Finney MA, Bradshaw LS, Stratton R (2003) Predicting surface winds in complex terrain for use in fire spread models. In ‘Proceedings of the fifth symposium on fire and forest meteorology’. November 2003, Orlando, FL.

Linn RR (1997) Transport model for prediction of wildfire behavior. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Scientific Report LA13334-T.

Linn RR , Cunningham P (2005) Numerical simulations of grass fires using a coupled atmosphere–fire model: Basic fire behavior and dependence on wind speed. Journal of Geophysical Research  110(D13), D13107.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Reisner JM, Bossert J, Winterkamp J (1998) Numerical simulation of two wildfire events using a combined modeling system (HIGRAD/BEHAVE). In ‘Proceedings of the second symposium on fire and forest meteorology’. January 1998, Phoenix, Arizona.

Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Research Paper INT-115. (Ogden, UT)

Rothermel RC (1983) How to predict the spread and intensity of forest and range fires. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station General Technical Report INT-143. (Ogden, UT)

Viegas DX (2004) Slope and wind effects on fire propagation. International Journal of Wildland Fire  13, 143–156.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Weise DR (1993) Modelling wind and slope-induced wildland fire behavior. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.

Weise DR (2005) Fire spread in chaparral – ‘go or no-go?’. International Journal of Wildland Fire  14, 99–106.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |