Pre-wildfire fuel treatments affect long-term ponderosa pine forest dynamics
Barbara A. Strom A and Peter Z. Fulé A BA School of Forestry and Ecological Restoration Institute, Northern Arizona University, PO Box 15018, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA.
B Corresponding author. Email: pete.fule@nau.edu
International Journal of Wildland Fire 16(1) 128-138 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF06051
Published: 20 February 2007
Abstract
The 2002 Rodeo–Chediski fire, the largest wildfire in south-western USA history, burned over treated stands and adjacent untreated stands in the Apache–Sitgreaves National Forest, setting the stage for a natural experiment testing the effectiveness of fuel reduction treatments under conditions of extraordinary fire severity. In seven pairs of treated–untreated study sites measured 2 years after the fire, thinning was strongly associated with reduced burn severity. Treated areas had more live trees, greater survival, and reduced fire intensity as indicated by crown base height and bole char. Ponderosa pine regeneration was patchy but more dense in treated areas. We assessed decade- to century-long effects of the pre-wildfire fuel treatments using the Forest Vegetation Simulator (FVS). Differences between treated and untreated areas were projected to persist for several decades after the fire in terms of stand structure characteristics and for at least 100 years in terms of species composition, with ponderosa pine making up ~60% of basal area in treated areas but only 35% in untreated areas. Future ecosystem development may take the trajectory of recovery to a ponderosa pine/Gambel oak forest or of a shift to an alternative stable state such as an oak-dominated shrubfield, with untreated areas more apt to undergo a shift to a shrubfield state. Current management decisions about fuel treatments have multi-century legacies.
Additional keywords: Arizona, Forest Vegetation Simulator, fuel reduction Rodeo–Chediski fire.
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Linda Wadleigh, Chad Hoffman, Gayle Richardson, and staff of the Apache–Sitgreaves National Forest for assistance in selecting the study sites and providing data on treatments and fire effects. Staff and students of the Ecological Restoration Institute supported field and laboratory work, especially Matt Tuten, Mark Daniels, and Amanda Kuenzi. Jim Youtz sparked interest in fuel treatment effects on fire behaviour during the Rodeo–Chediski burn. This research was supported by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Joint Venture Agreement #03-JV-11221615-153. Thanks to Carolyn Sieg and Carl Edminster. Two anonymous reviewers and an editor provided helpful comments.
Agee JK , Skinner CN (2005) Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments. Forest Ecology and Management 211, 83–96.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Anderson MJ , Robinson J (2001) Permutation tests for linear models. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics 43, 75–88.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Barton AM (2002) Intense wildfire in south-eastern Arizona: transformation of a Madrean oak–pine forest to oak woodland. Forest Ecology and Management 165, 205–212.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brose P , Wade D (2002) Potential fire behavior in pine flatwood forests following three different fuel reduction techniques. Forest Ecology and Management 163, 71–84.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chambers CL , Mast JN (2005) Ponderosa pine snag dynamics and cavity excavation following wildfire in northern Arizona. Forest Ecology and Management 216, 227–240.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Finney MA (2001) Design of regular landscape fuel treatment patterns for modifying fire growth and behaviour. Forest Science 47, 219–228.
Fulé PZ, Garcia-Arevalo A , Covington WW (2000) Effects of an intense wildfire in a Mexican oak–pine forest. Forest Science 46, 52–61.
He HS, Mladenoff DJ , Gustafson EJ (2002) Study of landscape change under forest harvesting and climate warming-induced fire disturbance. Forest Ecology and Management 155, 257–270.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McHugh CW , Kolb TE (2003) Ponderosa pine mortality following fire in northern Arizona. International Journal of Wildland Fire 12, 7–22.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Petraitis PS , Latham RE (1999) The importance of scale in testing the origins of alternative community states. Ecology 80, 429–442.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stephens SL (1998) Evaluation of the effects of silvicultural and fuels treatment on potential fire behaviour in Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forests. Forest Ecology and Management 105, 21–35.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Swetnam TW , Betancourt JL (1990) Fire–Southern Oscillation relations in the southwestern United States. Science 249, 1017–1020.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wagle RF , Eakle TW (1979) A controlled burn reduces the impact of a subsequent wildfire in a Ponderosa pine vegetation type. Forest Science 25, 123–129.
Waltz AEM, Fulé PZ, Covington WW , Moore MM (2003) Diversity in ponderosa pine forest structure following ecological restoration treatments. Forest Science 49, 885–900.
Weatherspoon CP , Skinner CN (1995) An assessment of factors associated with damage to tree crowns from the 1987 wildfires in northern California. Forest Science 41, 430–451.
Weaver H (1951) Fire as an ecological factor in the southwestern ponderosa pine forests. Journal of Forestry 49, 93–98.
Westerling AL, Hidalgo HG, Cayan DR , Swetnam TW (2006) Warming and earlier spring increase western US forest wildfire activity. Science 313, 940–943.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |