How does grinding affect the mid-infrared spectra of soil and their multivariate calibrations to texture and organic carbon?
F. Le Guillou A B , W. Wetterlind A C , R. A. Viscarra Rossel A E , W. Hicks A , M. Grundy D and S. Tuomi AA CSIRO Land & Water, PO Box 1666, Canberra ACT2601, Australia.
B Agrocampus Ouest, 65 rue de Saint Brieuc, 35042 Rennes cedex, France.
C Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Soil and Environment, Box 234 532 23 Skara, Sweden.
D CSIRO Agriculture, Queensland Biosciences Precinct, 306 Carmody Rd, St Lucia, QLD 4067, Australia.
E Corresponding authors. Email: m.rezaeirashti@griffith.edu.au; raphael.viscarra-rossel@csiro.au
Soil Research 53(8) 913-921 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR15019
Submitted: 22 January 2014 Accepted: 4 June 2015 Published: 1 October 2015
Abstract
Mid-infrared (mid-IR) diffuse reflectance spectroscopy can be used to effectively analyse soil, but the preparation of soil samples by grinding is time consuming. Soil samples are usually finely ground to a particle size of less than 0.250 mm because the spectrometer’s beam aperture is approximately 1–2 mm in diameter. Larger particles can generate specular reflections and spectra that do not adequately represent the soil sample. Grinding soil to small particle sizes enables the diffuse reflectance of light and more representative sample measurements. Here, we report on research that investigates the effect that grinding to different particle sizes have on soil mid-IR spectra. Our aims were to compare the effect of grinding soil to different particle sizes (2.000 mm, 1.000 mm, 0.500 mm, 0.250 mm and 0.106 mm) on the frequencies of mid-IR spectra, and compare the effect of these particle sizes on the accuracy of spectroscopic calibrations to predict organic carbon, sand, silt and clay contents. Using the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation’s (CSIRO) National visible–near infrared database, we selected 227 soil samples from the National Soil Archive for our experiments, and designed an experiment whereby each soil sample was ground in triplicate to the different particle sizes. These ground samples were measured using an FT-IR spectrometer with a spectral range of 4000–600 cm–1. Grinding to particle sizes that are ≤2.000 mm reduces subsample variability. Smaller particle sizes produce finer and sharper absorption features, which are related to organic carbon, and clay and sand mineralogies. Generally, better predictions for clay, sand and soil organic carbon contents were achieved using soil that is more finely ground, but there were no statistically significant differences between predictions that use soil ground to 1 mm, 0.5 mm, 0.25 mm. Grinding did not affect predictions of silt content. Recommendations on how much grinding is required for mid-IR analysis should also consider the time, cost and effort needed to prepare the soil samples as well as the purpose of the analysis.
Additional keywords: mid infrared, mid-IR diffuse reflectance spectroscopy, FT-IR, particle size, sample preparation, sand, silt, clay, organic carbon.
References
Fontan JM, Calvache S, Lopez-Bellido RJ, Lopez-Bellido L (2010) Soil carbon measurement in clods and sieved samples in a Mediterranean vertisol by visible and near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Geoderma 156, 93–98.Fystro G (2002) The prediction of c and n content and their potential mineralisation in heterogeneous soil samples using vis–nir spectroscopy and comparative methods. Plant and Soil 246, 139–149.
Janik LJ, Merry RH, Skjemstad JO (1998) Can mid infrared diffuse reflectance analysis replace soil extractions?. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 38, 681–696.
Madari BE, Reeves JB, III, Machado PLOA, Guimarães CM, Torres E, McCarty GW (2006) Mid- and near-infrared spectroscopic assessment of soil compositional parameters and structural indices in two ferralsols. Geoderma 136, 245–259.
Martens H, Naes T (1991) ‘Multivariate calibration.’ (Wyley)
McCarty GW, Reeves JB, III, Reeves VB, Follett R, Kimble JM (2002) Mid-infrared and near-infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for soil carbon measurement. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66, 640–646.
Miltz J, Don A (2012) Optimising sample preparation and near infrared spectra measurements of soil samples to calibrate organic carbon and total nitrogen content. Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy 20, 695–706.
Minasny B, McBratney AB (2006) A conditioned latin hypercube method for sampling in the presence of ancillary information. Computers & Geosciences 32, 1378–1388.
| A conditioned latin hypercube method for sampling in the presence of ancillary information.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nguyen TT, Janik LJ, Raupach M (1991) Diffuse reflectance infrared fourier transform (drift) spectroscopy in soil studies. Australian Journal of Soil Research 29, 49–67.
Reeves J, III, Smith D (2009) The potential of mid- and near-infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for determining major- and trace-element concentrations in soils from a geochemical survey of north America. Applied Geochemistry 24, 1472–1481.
Russell CA (2003) Sample preparation and prediction of soil organic matter properties by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 34, 1557–1572.
Savitzky A, Golay MJE (1964) Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Analytical Chemistry 36, 1627–1639.
| Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaF2cXksVCjur8%3D&md5=4fb4e5dcbbc075a1e81bb144100fa09eCAS |
Stenberg B, Viscarra Rossel RA, Mouazen AM, Wetterlind J (2010) Visible and near infrared spectroscopy in soil science. Advances in Agronomy 107, 163–215.
Stumpe B, Weihermuller L, Marschner B (2011) Sample preparation and selection for qualitative and quantitative analyses of soil organic carbon with mid-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. European Journal of Soil Science 62, 849–862.
Tan K (2005) Soil sampling, preparation, and analysis. In ‘Infrared spectroscopy’. Ch 16. 2nd edn. pp. 415–437. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL)
Viscarra Rossel R (2007) Robust modelling of soil diffuse reflectance spectra by bagging-partial least squares regression. Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy 15, 39–47.
| Robust modelling of soil diffuse reflectance spectra by bagging-partial least squares regression.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Viscarra Rossel R (2008) Parles: Software for chemometric analysis of spectroscopic data. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 90, 72–83.
| Parles: Software for chemometric analysis of spectroscopic data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhsVSgsrfF&md5=8b8748cec5c653264b3eaf0d7ad1afeaCAS |
Viscarra Rossel RA, Jeon Y, Odeh I, McBratney A (2008) Using a legacy soil sample to develop a mid-ir spectral library. Soil Research 46, 1–16.
Viscarra Rossel RA, Walvoort DJJ, McBratney AB, Janik LJ, Skjemstad JO (2006) Visible, near infrared, mid infrared or combined diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for simultaneous assessment of various soil properties. Geoderma 131, 59–75.
Viscarra Rossel RA, Webster R (2011) Discrimination of Australian soil horizons and classes from their visible-near infrared spectra. European Journal of Soil Science 62, 637–647.
| Discrimination of Australian soil horizons and classes from their visible-near infrared spectra.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Viscarra Rossel RA, Webster R (2012) Predicting soil properties from the Australian soil visible–near infrared spectroscopic database. European Journal of Soil Science 63, 848–860.
| Predicting soil properties from the Australian soil visible–near infrared spectroscopic database.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
White J, Roth C (1986) ‘Methods of soil analysis Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods.’ Agronomy Monograph no. 9. (American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI)
