Prevalence and correlates of condom use among sexually active men who have sex with men in the United States: findings from the National Survey of Family Growth, 2002, 2006–10 and 2011–13
Winston E. Abara A C , Emeka Oraka B , William L. Jeffries
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV, Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, MS G-37, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
B ICF International at the Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV, Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, MS G-37, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
C Corresponding author. Email: Winston_abara@yahoo.com
Sexual Health 14(4) 363-371 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH16034
Submitted: 1 March 2016 Accepted: 27 March 2017 Published: 8 June 2017
Abstract
Background: Men who have sex with men (MSM) are disproportionately at risk of contracting HIV and other sexually transmissible infections (STIs). Correct and consistent condom use is the most effective method to prevent HIV and other STIs among sexually active MSM. Methods: Using data from the 2002, 2006–10, 2011–13 cycles of the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), the overall prevalence of condom use at last sex and by sexual risk behaviours (sex with ≥2 same-sex partners, sex with ≥2 opposite sex partners, sex with a person who injects drugs, sex with an HIV-positive person and exchanged sex for money or drugs) among sexually active MSM (reported oral or anal sex with a male in the preceding 12 months) was estimated. The association between condom use at last sex and demographic and sexual behaviour variables was also evaluated. Results: Approximately 31% of all respondents (n = 618; weighted n = 1 596 702) reported condom use at last sex. Among MSM who reported ≥1 sexual risk behaviour in the past year, prevalence of condom use at last sex ranged from 30 to 38%. After adjusting for covariates, Hispanic MSM [adjusted prevalence ratio (APR) = 1.81, 95%CI = 1.27–2.58] were more likely than White MSM to report condom use at last sex; MSM with a recently diagnosed STI (APR = 1.71, 95%CI = 1.04–2.80) were more likely than MSM without a recently diagnosed STI to report condom use at last sex; and married or cohabitating MSM (APR = 0.29, 95%CI = 0.13–0.66) were less likely than unmarried and not cohabitating MSM to report condom use at last sex. There was no difference in temporal trends in condom use at last sex across the three NSFG cycles [2002 (33.8%); 2006–10 (25.6%); 2011–13 (40.6%), P = 0.926]. Conclusions: This study data suggest that prevalence of condom use among MSM is low, even among MSM who report sexual risk behaviours. The continued promotion of consistent condom use as an effective primary HIV/STI risk-reduction strategy is important because it mitigates HIV and STI risk and also complements the effectiveness of newer HIV prevention approaches such as pre-exposure prophylaxis.
References
[1] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV surveillance report, 2014; vol. 26. 2015. Available online at: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/library/reports/surveillance/cdc-hiv-surveillance-report-us.pdf [verified 26 February 2016].[2] Purcell DW, Johnson CH, Lansky A, Prejean J, Stein R, Denning P, Gau Z, Weinstock H, Su J, Crepaz N. Estimating the population size of men who have sex with men in the United States to obtain HIV and syphilis rates. Open AIDS J 2012; 6 98–107.
| Estimating the population size of men who have sex with men in the United States to obtain HIV and syphilis rates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[3] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Estimated HIV incidence in the United States, 2007–2010. HIV Surveillance Supplemental Report 2012; 17: 1–26. Available online at: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/statistics_hssr_vol_17_no_4.pdf [verified 26 February 2016].
[4] Varghese B, Maher JE, Peterman TA, Branson BM, Steketee RW. Reducing the risk of sexual HIV transmission: quantifying the per-act risk for HIV on the basis of choice of partner, sex act, and condom use. Sex Transm Dis 2002; 29 38–43.
| Reducing the risk of sexual HIV transmission: quantifying the per-act risk for HIV on the basis of choice of partner, sex act, and condom use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[5] Patel P, Borkowf CB, Brooks JT, Lasry A, Lansky A, Mermin J. Estimating per-act HIV transmission risk: a systematic review. AIDS 2014; 28 1509–19.
| Estimating per-act HIV transmission risk: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[6] Abara WE, Hess KL, Fanfair RN, Bernstein KT, Paz-Bailey G. Syphilis trends among men who have sex with men in the United States and Western Europe: a systematic review of trend studies published between 2004 and 2015. PLoS One 2016; 11 e0159309
| Syphilis trends among men who have sex with men in the United States and Western Europe: a systematic review of trend studies published between 2004 and 2015.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Koblin BA, Husnik MJ, Colfax G, Huang Y, Madison M, Mayer K, Barresi PJ, Coates TJ, Chesney MA, Buchbinder S. Risk factors for HIV infection among men who have sex with men. AIDS 2006; 20 731–9.
| Risk factors for HIV infection among men who have sex with men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[8] Rosenberg ES, Sullivan PS, DiNenno EA, Salazar LF, Sanchez TH. Number of casual male sexual partners and associated factors among men who have sex with men: results from the National HIV Behavioral Surveillance system. BMC Public Health 2011; 11 1–9.
| Number of casual male sexual partners and associated factors among men who have sex with men: results from the National HIV Behavioral Surveillance system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[9] Holmes KK, Levine R, Weaver M. Effectiveness of condoms in preventing sexually transmitted infections. Bull World Health Organ 2004; 82 454–61.
[10] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection in the United States – 2014 Clinical Practice Guideline. Available online at: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/PrEPguidelines2014.pdf [verified 10 May 2015].
[11] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Condom fact sheet in brief. 2015. Available online at: http://www.cdc.gov/condomeffectiveness/docs/condomfactsheetinbrief.pdf [verified 24 August 2015].
[12] Ostergren JE, Rosser BS, Horvath KJ. Reasons for non-use of condoms among men who have sex with men: a comparison of receptive and insertive role in sex and online and offline meeting venue. Cult Health Sex 2011; 13 123–40.
| Reasons for non-use of condoms among men who have sex with men: a comparison of receptive and insertive role in sex and online and offline meeting venue.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[13] Frye V, Koblin B, Chin J, Beard J, Blaney S, Halkitis P. Neighborhood-level correlates of consistent condom use among men who have sex with men: a multi-level analysis. AIDS Behav 2010; 14 974–85.
| Neighborhood-level correlates of consistent condom use among men who have sex with men: a multi-level analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[14] Carballo-Dieguez A, Dolezal C. HIV risk behaviors and obstacles to condom use among Puerto Rican men in New York City who have sex with men. Am J Public Health 1996; 86 1619–22.
| HIV risk behaviors and obstacles to condom use among Puerto Rican men in New York City who have sex with men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2Fntl2rsA%3D%3D&md5=943a5e80f41d3d04f78b907f0382ed36CAS |
[15] Adam BD, Husbands W, Murray J, Maxwell J. AIDS optimism, condom fatigue, or self‐esteem? Explaining unsafe sex among gay and bisexual men. J Sex Res 2005; 42 238–48.
| AIDS optimism, condom fatigue, or self‐esteem? Explaining unsafe sex among gay and bisexual men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[16] Rhodes SD, Hergenrather KC, Yee LJ, Knipper E, Wilkin AM, Omli MR. Characteristics of a sample of men who have sex with men, recruited from gay bars and Internet chat rooms, who report methamphetamine use. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2007; 21 575–83.
| Characteristics of a sample of men who have sex with men, recruited from gay bars and Internet chat rooms, who report methamphetamine use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[17] McFarland W, Chen YH, Nguyen B, Grasso M, Levine D, Stall R, Colfax G, Robertson T, Troung H-H M, Raymond HF. Behavior, intention or chance? A longitudinal study of HIV seroadaptive behaviors, abstinence and condom use. AIDS Behav 2012; 16 121–31.
| Behavior, intention or chance? A longitudinal study of HIV seroadaptive behaviors, abstinence and condom use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[18] D’Anna LH, Margolis AD, Warner L, Korosteleva OA, O’Donnell L, Rietmeijer CA, Klausner JD, Nomura W, Malotte CK, the Sage City Study Group Condom use problems during anal sex among men who have sex with men (MSM): findings from the Safe in the City Study. AIDS Care 2012; 24 1028–38.
| Condom use problems during anal sex among men who have sex with men (MSM): findings from the Safe in the City Study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC38rms1GrsA%3D%3D&md5=d646b1a72e6d008dcb2f6577ec35c92dCAS |
[19] Rietmeijer CA, Lansky A, Anderson JE, Fichtner RR. Developing standards in behavioral surveillance for HIV/STD prevention. AIDS Educ Prev 2001; 13 268–78.
| Developing standards in behavioral surveillance for HIV/STD prevention.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2Fit1KlsA%3D%3D&md5=20c152c1c639745c72dd97eb0b41bc35CAS |
[20] Young SN, Salazar LF, Crosby RF, DiClemente RJ, Wingood GM, Rose E. Condom use at last sex as a proxy for other measures of condom use: is it good enough? Adolescence 2008; 43 927-931
[21] Anderson JE. Condom use and HIV risk among US adults. Am J Public Health 2003; 93 912–4.
| Condom use and HIV risk among US adults.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[22] Anderson JE, Warner L, Macaluso M. Condom use among US adults at last sexual intercourse, 1996–2008: an update from national survey data. Sex Transm Dis 2011; 38 919–21.
| Condom use among US adults at last sexual intercourse, 1996–2008: an update from national survey data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[23] Jeffries WL, Dodge B. Male bisexuality and condom use at last sexual encounter: results from a national survey. J Sex Res 2007; 44 278–89.
| Male bisexuality and condom use at last sexual encounter: results from a national survey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[24] Lepkowski JM, Mosher WD, Davis KE, Groves RM, Van Hoewyk J. The 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth: sample design and analysis of a continuous survey. National Center for Health Statistics Vital Health Stat. 2010; 150 1–36.
[25] Lepkowski JM, Mosher WD, Groves RM, et al. Responsive design, weighting, and variance estimation in the 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 2013; 158 1–52.
[26] Anderson J, Rietmeijer C, Wilson R, Barker P. Asking about condom use: is there a standard approach that should be adopted across surveys? 1998 Proceedings, American Statistical Association, Section on Survey Research Methods. 1998; St. Louis, MO: American Statistical Association; 1998. p. 873–7.
[27] U.S Department of Health and Human Services. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. Prior HHS poverty guidelines and federal register references. Available online at: http://aspe.hhs.gov/prior-hhs-poverty-guidelines-and-federal-register-references [verified 24 August 2015].
[28] Rosenberger JG, Reece M, Schick V, Herbenick D, Novak DS, Van Der Pol B, Fortenberry JD. Sexual behaviors and situational characteristics of most recent male‐partnered sexual event among gay and bisexually identified men in the United States. J Sex Med 2011; 8 3040–50.
| Sexual behaviors and situational characteristics of most recent male‐partnered sexual event among gay and bisexually identified men in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[29] Paz-Bailey G, Mendoza M, Finlayson T, Wejnert C, Le B, Rose C, Raymond HF, Prejean J. Trends in condom use among men who have sex with men in the United States: the role of antiretroviral therapy and sero-adaptive strategies. AIDS 2016; 20 731–9.
[30] Valdiserri RO. Mapping the roots of HIV/AIDS complacency: implications for program and policy development. AIDS Educ Prev 2004; 16 426–39.
| Mapping the roots of HIV/AIDS complacency: implications for program and policy development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[31] Drummond F, Guy R, Kaldor JM, Donovan B. The intersection between HIV and syphilis in men who have sex with men: some fresh perspectives. HIV Ther 2010; 4 661–73.
| The intersection between HIV and syphilis in men who have sex with men: some fresh perspectives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[32] Snowden JM, Wei C, McFarland W, Raymond HF. Prevalence, correlates and trends in seroadaptive behaviors among men who have sex with men from serial cross-sectional surveillance in San Francisco, 2004–2011. Sex Transm Infect 2014; 90 498–504.
| Prevalence, correlates and trends in seroadaptive behaviors among men who have sex with men from serial cross-sectional surveillance in San Francisco, 2004–2011.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[33] Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, McMahan V, Liu AY, Vargas L, et al. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med 2010; 363 2587–99.
| Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXit1ansg%3D%3D&md5=0341ee2cfaa1dd3a056b90f732e92218CAS |
[34] Smith D, Grant R, Weidle P, Lansky A, Mermin J, Fenton K. Interim guidance: preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection in men who have sex with men. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2011; 60 65–8.
[35] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention. Available online at: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/PrEP_fact_sheet_final.pdf [verified 9 September 2015].
[36] Harawa NT, Greenland S, Bingham TA, Johnson DF, Cochran SD, Cunningham WE, Celentano DD, Koblin BA, LaLota M, MacKellar DA, McFarland W, Shehan D, Stoyanoff S, Thiede H, Torian L, Valleroy LA. Associations of race/ethnicity with HIV prevalence and HIV-related behaviors among young men who have sex with men in 7 urban centers in the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2004; 35 526–36.
| Associations of race/ethnicity with HIV prevalence and HIV-related behaviors among young men who have sex with men in 7 urban centers in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[37] Millett GA, Peterson JL, Flores SA, Hart TA, Jeffries WL, Wilson PA, Rourke SB, Heilig CM, Elford J, Fenton KA, Remis RS. Comparisons of disparities and risks of HIV infection in black and other men who have sex with men in Canada, UK, and USA: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2012; 380 341–8.
| Comparisons of disparities and risks of HIV infection in black and other men who have sex with men in Canada, UK, and USA: a meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[38] Mansergh G, Naorat S, Jommaroeng R, Jenkins RA, Stall R, Jeeyapant S, Phanuphak P, Tappero JW, van Griensven F. Inconsistent condom use with steady and casual partners and associated factors among sexually-active men who have sex with men in Bangkok, Thailand. AIDS Behav 2006; 10 743–51.
| Inconsistent condom use with steady and casual partners and associated factors among sexually-active men who have sex with men in Bangkok, Thailand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[39] Frost DM, Stirratt MJ, Ouellette SC. Understanding why gay men seek HIV‐seroconcordant partners: intimacy and risk reduction motivations. Cult Health Sex 2008; 10 513–27.
| Understanding why gay men seek HIV‐seroconcordant partners: intimacy and risk reduction motivations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[40] Eisenberg A, Bauermeister JA, Pingel E, Johns MM, Santana ML. Achieving safety safer sex, communication, and desire among young gay men. J Adolesc Res 2011; 26 645–69.
| Achieving safety safer sex, communication, and desire among young gay men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[41] Sullivan PS, Salazar L, Buchbinder S, Sanchez TH. Estimating the proportion of HIV transmissions from main sex partners among men who have sex with men in five US cities. AIDS 2009; 23 1153–62.
| Estimating the proportion of HIV transmissions from main sex partners among men who have sex with men in five US cities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[42] Kamb ML, Fishbein M, Douglas JM, Rhodes F, Rogers J, Bolan G, Zenilman J, Hoxworth T, Malote CK, Iatesta M, Kent C, Lentz A, Graziano S, Byers RH, Peterman TA. Efficacy of risk-reduction counseling to prevent human immunodeficiency virus and sexually transmitted diseases: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1998; 280 1161–7.
| Efficacy of risk-reduction counseling to prevent human immunodeficiency virus and sexually transmitted diseases: a randomized controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1cvkvFantA%3D%3D&md5=a32b738793191de3cf3934462a9e2697CAS |
[43] Beyrer C, Trapence G, Motimedi F, Umar E, Iipinge S, Dausab F, Baral S. Bisexual concurrency, bisexual partnerships, and HIV among South African men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Infect 2010; 86 323–7.
| Bisexual concurrency, bisexual partnerships, and HIV among South African men who have sex with men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[44] Wejnert C, Le B, Rose C, Oster AM, Smith AJ, Zhu J. HIV infection and awareness among men who have sex with men—20 cities, United States, 2008 and 2011. PLoS One 2013; 8 e76878
| HIV infection and awareness among men who have sex with men—20 cities, United States, 2008 and 2011.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhslWgsb7O&md5=5e36f6cc917f7b4deb7c606d1f393425CAS |
[45] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention HIV testing and risk behaviors among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men — United States. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2013; 62 958–62.
[46] Eaton LA, Kalichman SC, O’Connell DA, Karchner WD. A strategy for selecting sexual partners believed to pose little/no risks for HIV: serosorting and its implications for HIV transmission. AIDS Care 2009; 21 1279–88.
| A strategy for selecting sexual partners believed to pose little/no risks for HIV: serosorting and its implications for HIV transmission.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[47] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Start Talking. Stop HIV. Available online at: http://www.cdc.gov/actagainstaids/campaigns/starttalking/index.html [verified 1 August 2015].
[48] Charania MR, Crepaz N, Guenther-Gray C, Henny K, Liau A, Willis LA, Lyles CM. Efficacy of structural-level condom distribution interventions: a meta-analysis of US and international studies, 1998–2007. AIDS Behav 2011; 15 1283–97.
| Efficacy of structural-level condom distribution interventions: a meta-analysis of US and international studies, 1998–2007.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[49] Marks G, Crepaz N, Senterfitt JW, Janssen RS. Meta-analysis of high-risk sexual behavior in persons aware and unaware they are infected with HIV in the United States: implications for HIV prevention programs. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2005; 39 446–53.
| Meta-analysis of high-risk sexual behavior in persons aware and unaware they are infected with HIV in the United States: implications for HIV prevention programs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[50] Smith DK, Herbst JH, Rose CE. Estimating HIV protective effects of method adherence with combinations of preexposure prophylaxis and condom use among African American men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Dis 2015; 42 88–92.
| Estimating HIV protective effects of method adherence with combinations of preexposure prophylaxis and condom use among African American men who have sex with men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[51] Turner CF, Lessler J, Devore J. Effects of mode of administration and wording on reporting of drug use. In Turner C, Lessler J, Gfroerer J, editors. Survey measurement of drug use: methodological studies. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 1992. pp. 177–220. DHHS publication ADM-92–1929.
