Families of choice and noncollegiate sororities and fraternities among lesbian and bisexual African-American women in a southern community: implications for sexual and reproductive health research
Erika L. Austin A , Lisa L. Lindley B , Leandro A. Mena C , Richard A. Crosby D and Christina A. Muzny A E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1530 3rd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
B Department of Global & Community Health, College of Health & Human Services, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.
C Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39216, USA.
D College of Public Health, Department of Health Behavior, University of Kentucky, 121 Washington Avenue, Lexington, KY 40506, USA.
E Corresponding author. Email: cmuzny@uab.edu
Sexual Health 11(1) 24-30 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH13145
Submitted: 24 September 2013 Accepted: 19 November 2013 Published: 20 January 2014
Abstract
Background: Self-identified lesbian and bisexual African-American women living in the southern United States are a relatively hidden subpopulation within the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community. Existing research suggests that African-American lesbian and bisexual women are at high risk for sexually transmissible infections (STIs), but the sexual and reproductive health needs of this population are just beginning to be understood. Methods: We conducted four focus groups and five individual interviews with 24 lesbian and bisexual African-American women living in the Jackson, Mississippi, metropolitan area, recruited through the local STI clinic and through word of mouth. We aimed to characterise the role of two types of social organisations (lesbian families and noncollegiate lesbian sororities and fraternities) among the local LGBT community, and their influence on the sexual health of their members. Results: Both types of social organisations serve positive functions for their members. Lesbian families provide support and stability; this appears beneficial for younger individuals, who may lack support from biological families. Lesbian sororities and fraternities are visible due to their emphasis on community service, and offer a strong sense of solidarity and belonging. In both organisation types, discussions about sex were common, although members acknowledged a lack of information regarding safer sex among lesbian and bisexual women. Conclusions: Existing social organisations within the LGBT community, such as lesbian families and lesbian sororities and fraternities, should be incorporated into community-based popular opinion leader or lay heath advisor interventions in an effort to meet the sexual and reproductive health needs of marginalised populations.
Additional keywords: focus group discussion, marginalised populations, Mississippi, support, United States, women who have sex with women.
References
[1] Solarz AL, ed. Lesbian health: current assessment and directions for the future. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.[2] Committee on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Health Issues and Research Gaps and Opportunities, Board on the Health of Select Populations, Institute of Medicine.The health of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people: building a foundation for better understanding. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health; 2011.
[3] Meyer I, Wilson P. Sampling lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations. J Couns Psychol 2009; 56 23–31.
| Sampling lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[4] Savin-Williams RC. Then and now: recruitment, definition, diversity, and positive attributes of same-sex populations. Dev Psychol 2008; 44 135–8.
| Then and now: recruitment, definition, diversity, and positive attributes of same-sex populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18194012PubMed |
[5] DeBlaere C, Brewster M, Sarkees A, Moradi B. Conducting research with LGB people of color: methodological challenges and strategies. Couns Psychol 2010; 38 331–62.
| Conducting research with LGB people of color: methodological challenges and strategies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[6] Rothblum E, Ractor R, Aaron D. How did you hear about our study? Or, how to reach lesbian and bisexual women of diverse ages, ethnicity, and educational attainment for research projects. J Gay Lesbian Med Assoc 2002; 6 53–9.
| How did you hear about our study? Or, how to reach lesbian and bisexual women of diverse ages, ethnicity, and educational attainment for research projects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Charlton BM, Corliss HL, Missmer SA, Frazier AL, Rosario M, Kahn JA, et al Reproductive health screening disparities and sexual orientation in a cohort study of U.S. adolescent and young adult females. J Adolesc Health 2011; 49 505–10.
| Reproductive health screening disparities and sexual orientation in a cohort study of U.S. adolescent and young adult females.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22018565PubMed |
[8] Marrazzo JM. Barriers to infectious disease care among lesbians. Emerg Infect Dis 2004; 10 1974–8.
| Barriers to infectious disease care among lesbians.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15550210PubMed |
[9] Tracy J, Lydecker A, Ireland L. Barriers to cervical cancer screening among lesbians. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2010; 19 229–37.
| Barriers to cervical cancer screening among lesbians.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[10] Matthews A, Brandenburg D, Johnson T, Hughes T. Correlates of utilization of gynecological cancer screening among lesbian and heterosexual women. Prev Med 2004; 38 105–13.
| Correlates of utilization of gynecological cancer screening among lesbian and heterosexual women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14672647PubMed |
[11] Cochran SD, Mays VM, Bowen D, Gage S, Bybee D, Roberts SJ, et al Cancer-related risk indicators and preventive screening behaviors among lesbians and bisexual women. Am J Public Health 2001; 91 591–7.
| Cancer-related risk indicators and preventive screening behaviors among lesbians and bisexual women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3ivVKhsA%3D%3D&md5=508e9b46ea489a0e235131ff8dc7619cCAS | 11291371PubMed |
[12] Baunach D, Burgess E. Southern (dis)comfort: sexual prejudice and contact with gay men and lesbians in the South. Sociol Spectr 2009; 30 30–64.
| Southern (dis)comfort: sexual prejudice and contact with gay men and lesbians in the South.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[13] Muzny CA, Sunesara IR, Martin DH, Mena LA. Sexually transmitted infections and risk behaviors among African American women who have sex with women: does sex with men make a difference? Sex Transm Dis 2011; 38 1118–25.
| Sexually transmitted infections and risk behaviors among African American women who have sex with women: does sex with men make a difference?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22082722PubMed |
[14] Ramsey F, Hill MJ, Kellam C. Black lesbians matter: an examination of the unique experiences, perspectives, and priorities of the Black lesbian community. Sacramento, CA: Zuna Institute; 2010.
[15] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2011. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2012.
[16] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Estimated HIV incidence among adults and adolescents in the United States, 2007–2010. HIV Surveillance Supplemental Report 2012; 17 1–26.
[17] Muzny C, Williams B, Mena L. Risk behavior and knowledge of sexually transmitted infections among African American lesbians participating in focus groups in Mississippi. 18th Meeting of the International Society for Sexually Transmitted Diseases Research; 2009 June 28–July 1; London, UK.
[18] Smith J, Harre R, Van Langenhove L. Doing interpretative phenomenological analysis. In Murray M, Chamberlain K, editors. Qualitative health psychology: theories and methods. London: Sage; 1999. pp. 218–40.
[19] Fade S. Using interpretative phenomemological analysis for public health nutrition and dietetic research: a practical guide. Proc Nutr Soc 2004; 63 647–53.
| Using interpretative phenomemological analysis for public health nutrition and dietetic research: a practical guide.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15831138PubMed |
[20] Doyle S. Member checking with older women: a framework for negotiating meaning. Health Care Women Int 2007; 28 888–908.
| Member checking with older women: a framework for negotiating meaning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17987459PubMed |
[21] Carlson JA. Avoiding traps in member checking. Qual Rep 2010; 15 1102–13.
[22] Muzny C, Williams B, Mena L. An exploratory survey of sexual risk behavior and perceived susceptibility to sexually transmitted infections among African American lesbians. 18th Meeting of the International Society for Sexually Transmitted Diseases Research; 2009 June 28–July 1; London, UK.
[23] Dewaele A, Cox N, Van den Berghe W, Vincke J. Families of choice? Exploring the supportive networks of lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals. J Appl Soc Psychol 2011; 41 312–31.
| Families of choice? Exploring the supportive networks of lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[24] Weeks J, Heaphy B, Donovan C. Same sex intimacies: families of choice and other life experiments. London, UK: Routledge; 2001.
[25] Rainbow Greek Network (RGN). Rainbow Greek network: network of LGBT sororities & fraternities and those seeking membership. : RGN; 2012 Available online at: http://www.rainbowgreeknetwork.com [verified September 2013].
[26] Kubicek K, McNeeley M, Holloway IW, Weiss G, Kipke MD. “It’s like our own little world”: resilience as a factor in participating in the Ballroom community subculture. AIDS Behav 2013; 17 1524–39.
| “It’s like our own little world”: resilience as a factor in participating in the Ballroom community subculture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22618891PubMed |
[27] Kipke MD, Kubicek K, Supan J, Weiss G, Schrager S. Laying the groundwork for an HIV prevention intervention: a descriptive profile of the Los Angeles House and Ball communities. AIDS Behav 2013; 17 1068–81.
| Laying the groundwork for an HIV prevention intervention: a descriptive profile of the Los Angeles House and Ball communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22699855PubMed |
[28] Maticka-Tyndale E, Barnett JP. Peer-led interventions to reduce HIV risk of youth: a review. Eval Program Plann 2010; 33 98–112.
| Peer-led interventions to reduce HIV risk of youth: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19647874PubMed |
[29] NIMH Collaborative HIV/STD Prevention Trial Group. The community popular opinion leader HIV prevention programme: conceptual basis and intervention procedures. AIDS 2007; 21 S59–68.
| The community popular opinion leader HIV prevention programme: conceptual basis and intervention procedures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18172393PubMed |
[30] Kelly JA, St Lawrence JS, Diaz YE, Stevenson LY, Hauth AC, Brasfield TL, et al HIV risk behavior reduction following intervention with key opinion leaders of population: an experimental analysis. Am J Public Health 1991; 81 168–71.
| HIV risk behavior reduction following intervention with key opinion leaders of population: an experimental analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK3M7hvFShsQ%3D%3D&md5=8aa2ac3de7ae06ded787684f25240db1CAS | 1990853PubMed |
[31] Bishop C, Earp J, Eng E, Lynch K. Implementing a natural helper lay health advisor program: lessons learned from unplanned events. Health Promot Pract 2002; 3 233–44.
| Implementing a natural helper lay health advisor program: lessons learned from unplanned events.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[32] Shankle M, ed. The handbook of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender public health: a practitioner’s guide to service. Binghamton, NY: Harrington Park Press; 2006.
[33] Kim S, Koniak-Griffin D, Flaskerud JH, Guarnero PA. The impact of lay health advisors on cardiovascular health promotion: using a community-based participatory approach. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2004; 19 192–9.
| The impact of lay health advisors on cardiovascular health promotion: using a community-based participatory approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15191262PubMed |
[34] Moore A, Peele PJ, Siman FM, Earp JA. Lay health advisors make connections for better health. N C Med J 2012; 73 392–3.
| 23189435PubMed |
[35] Israel B. Social networks and social support: implications for natural helper and community level interventions. Health Educ Q 1985; 12 65–80.
| Social networks and social support: implications for natural helper and community level interventions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL2M7ls12lsA%3D%3D&md5=88c35bc0700d9a1327a8ca72f2485467CAS | 3980242PubMed |
[36] Rhodes SD, Daniel J, Alonzo J, Duck S, Garcia M, Downs M, et al A systematic community-based participatory approach to refining an evidence-based community-level intervention: the HOLA intervention for Latino men who have sex with men. Health Promot Pract 2013; 14 607–16.
| A systematic community-based participatory approach to refining an evidence-based community-level intervention: the HOLA intervention for Latino men who have sex with men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23075504PubMed |
[37] Rhodes SD, Kelley C, Siman F, Cashman R, Alonzo J, McGuire J, et al Using community-based participatory research (CBPR) to develop a community-level HIV prevention intervention for Latinas: a local response to a global challenge. Womens Health Issues 2012; 22 e293–301.
| Using community-based participatory research (CBPR) to develop a community-level HIV prevention intervention for Latinas: a local response to a global challenge.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22483581PubMed |
[38] Israel BA, Eng E, Schulz A, Parker E. Introduction to methods in community-based participatory research for health. In Israel BA, Eng E, Schulz A, Parker E, editors. Methods in community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2005. pp. 3–26.
