Young females’ sexual self-efficacy: associations with personal autonomy and the couple relationship
Melanie J. Zimmer-Gembeck
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
School of Applied Psychology and Griffith Health Institute, Behavioural Basis of Health, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Qld 4222, Australia. Email: m.zimmer-gembeck@griffith.edu.au
Sexual Health 10(3) 204-210 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH12139
Submitted: 28 August 2012 Accepted: 8 December 2012 Published: 17 April 2013
Abstract
Background: Theory suggests that young women’s own efficacy for sexual self-protective behaviour is greater when they are more advanced in their cognitive autonomy, and when they have romantic partners who support autonomy rather than engage in coercive behaviours and are warm and accepting rather than rejecting. Methods: A total of 199 women (aged 16 to 25 years) completed questionnaires measuring sexual self-efficacy, autonomy, partner communication and their partners’ behaviours. Hypotheses were tested with structural equation modelling. Results: Correlations showed that young women reported more self-efficacy when they had greater autonomy and reported partners to be more supportive and warmer, and less coercive and rejecting. In structural equation modelling, the association of women’s autonomy with sexual self-efficacy was indirect via their perceived capacity to communicate with their partners. Associations of partner behaviours with sexual self-efficacy were both direct and indirect via the capacity to communicate. Conclusions: Sexual efficacy is enhanced among young women who report a greater general capacity to communicate openly with their partners and have partners who display more warmth and less rejecting behaviours. Young women are also higher in sexual self-efficacy when they report more cognitive autonomy and lower partner coercion, but these associations are completely indirect via females’ greater capacity to communicate openly. The findings provide support for sexual health programs focussing on decision-making skills, personal competence, partners’ behaviours and dyadic communication strategies.
Additional keywords: agency, dating, romantic relationships.
References
[1] Pearson J. Personal control, self-efficacy in sexual negotiation and contraceptive risk among adolescents: the role of gender. Sex Roles 2006; 54 615–25.| Personal control, self-efficacy in sexual negotiation and contraceptive risk among adolescents: the role of gender.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[2] Wang R, Chiou C. Relative contribution of intrapersonal and partner factors to contraceptive behaviour among Taiwanese female adolescents. J Nurs Scholarsh 2008; 40 131–6.
| Relative contribution of intrapersonal and partner factors to contraceptive behaviour among Taiwanese female adolescents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18507567PubMed |
[3] Salazar LF, DiClemente RJ, Wingood GM, et al Self-concept and adolescents’ refusal of unprotected sex: a test of mediating mechanisms among African American girls. Prev Sci 2004; 5 137–49.
| Self-concept and adolescents’ refusal of unprotected sex: a test of mediating mechanisms among African American girls.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15470935PubMed |
[4] Gebhardt WA, Kuyper L. Greunsven G. Need for intimacy in relationships and motives for sex as determinants of adolescent condom use. J Adol Health 2003; 33 154–64.
| Greunsven G. Need for intimacy in relationships and motives for sex as determinants of adolescent condom use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[5] Yarnall KS, McBride CM, Lyna P, et al Factors associated with condom use among at-risk women students and nonstudents seen in managed care. Prev Med 2003; 37 163–70.
| Factors associated with condom use among at-risk women students and nonstudents seen in managed care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12855216PubMed |
[6] Coleman LM, Ingham R. Exploring young people’s difficulties in talking about contraception: how can we encourage more discussion between partners? Health Educ Res 1999; 14 741–50.
| Exploring young people’s difficulties in talking about contraception: how can we encourage more discussion between partners?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FgtF2rsQ%3D%3D&md5=505976352c6c2679931c79889f45b33fCAS | 10585382PubMed |
[7] Widman L, Welsh DP, McNulty JK, et al Sexual communication and contraceptive use in adolescent dating couples. J Adol Health 2006; 39 893–9.
| Sexual communication and contraceptive use in adolescent dating couples.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[8] Giordano PC, Maning WD, Longmore MA. Affairs of the heart: qualities of adolescent romantic relationships and sexual behaviour. J Res Adolesc 2010; 20 983–1013.
| Affairs of the heart: qualities of adolescent romantic relationships and sexual behaviour.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21170165PubMed |
[9] Wight D, Abraham C, Scott S. Towards a psycho-social theoretical framework for sexual health promotion. Health Educ Res 1998; 13 317–30.
| Towards a psycho-social theoretical framework for sexual health promotion.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FisVWktQ%3D%3D&md5=0bd316d03d2d4f9aa8549b557b2c9834CAS | 10186447PubMed |
[10] Halpern-Felsher BL, Kropp RY, Boyer CB, et al Adolescents’ self-efficacy to communicate about sex: its role in condom attitudes, commitment, and use. Adolescence 2004; 39 443–56.
| 15673222PubMed |
[11] Levinson RA, Wan CK, Beamer LJ. The Contraceptive Self-Efficacy Scale: analysis in four samples. J Youth Adolesc 1998; 27 773–93.
| The Contraceptive Self-Efficacy Scale: analysis in four samples.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38ngsFyntw%3D%3D&md5=d277a08ca249e2f7d5c8b424feb37253CAS | 12349803PubMed |
[12] Vogels T, Brugman E, van Zessen G. AIDS-related knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour: a comparison of Dutch students and dropouts. Adolescence 1999; 34 369–79.
| 1:STN:280:DyaK1MvitlWktg%3D%3D&md5=0c89bf5572c0820d08b5335e056a137aCAS | 10494983PubMed |
[13] Kvalem IL, Træen B. Self-efficacy, scripts of love and intention to use condoms among Norwegian adolescents. J Youth Adolesc 2000; 29 337–53.
| Self-efficacy, scripts of love and intention to use condoms among Norwegian adolescents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[14] Noom MJ, Deković M, Meeus W. Conceptual analysis and measurement of adolescent autonomy. J Youth Adolesc 2001; 30 577–95.
| Conceptual analysis and measurement of adolescent autonomy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[15] Connolly JA, Goldberg A. Romantic relationships in adolescence: the role of friends and peers in their emergence and development. In Furman W, Brown BB, Feiring C, editors. The development of romantic relationships in adolescence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999. pp. 266–90.
[16] Zimmer-Gembeck MJ, Ducat W, Collins WA. Development of autonomy. In Brown BB, Prinstein M, editors. Encyclopedia of adolescence. Oxford: Elsevier; 2011. pp. 66–76.
[17] Beyers W, Goossens L, Vansant I, et al Structural model of autonomy in middle and late adolescence: connectedness, separation, detachment, and agency. J Youth Adolesc 2003; 32 351–65.
| Structural model of autonomy in middle and late adolescence: connectedness, separation, detachment, and agency.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[18] Gray M, Steinberg L. Adolescent romance and the parent-child relationship. In Furman W, Brown BB, Feiring C, editors. The development of romantic relationships in adolescence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999. pp. 235–65.
[19] Zimmer-Gembeck MJ, Madsen SD, Hanisch M. Connecting the intrapersonal and the interpersonal: autonomy, voice and relationships with parents and romantic partners during late adolescence. Eur J Dev Psychol
| Connecting the intrapersonal and the interpersonal: autonomy, voice and relationships with parents and romantic partners during late adolescence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[20] Eccles JS, Early D, Frasier K, et al The relation of connection, regulation, and support for autonomy to adolescents’ functioning. J Adolesc Res 1997; 12 263–86.
| The relation of connection, regulation, and support for autonomy to adolescents’ functioning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[21] Smetana J, Gettman DC. Autonomy and relatedness with parents and romantic development in African American adolescents. Dev Psychol 2006; 42 1347–51.
| Autonomy and relatedness with parents and romantic development in African American adolescents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17087567PubMed |
[22] Skinner E, Johnson S, Snyder T. Six dimensions of parenting: a motivational model. Parent Sci Pract 2005; 5 175–235.
| Six dimensions of parenting: a motivational model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[23] Baumeister RF, Leary MR. The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol Bull 1995; 117 497–529.
| The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3ps1ClsQ%3D%3D&md5=5cafecee1f99eaa5013ea53b2ed716abCAS | 7777651PubMed |
[24] Buzwell S, Rosenthal D. Constructing a sexual self: adolescents’ sexual self-perceptions and sexual risk-taking. J Res Adolesc 2006; 6 489–513.
[25] Harter S, Waters PL, Whitesell NR, et al Level of voice among female and male high school students: relational context, support and gender orientation. Dev Psychol 1998; 34 892–901.
| Level of voice among female and male high school students: relational context, support and gender orientation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1cvltFSitA%3D%3D&md5=6217cbb2fdcb3e6504d76e25788f223bCAS | 9779736PubMed |
[26] Ducat WH, Zimmer-Gembeck MJ. Romantic partner behaviours as social context: measuring six dimensions of relationships. J of Rel Res 2010; 1 1–16.
| Romantic partner behaviours as social context: measuring six dimensions of relationships.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[27] Ryan RM, Deci EL, Grolnick WS. Autonomy, relatedness and the self: their relation to development and psychopathology. In Cicchetti D, Cohen D, editors. Developmental psychopathology: theory and methods, Vol. 1. New York: Wiley; 1995. pp. 618–55.
[28] Soenens B, Vansteenkiste M, Lens W, et al Conceptualizing parental autonomy support: Adolescent perceptions of promotion of independence versus promotion of volitional functioning. Dev Psychol 2007; 43 633–46.
| Conceptualizing parental autonomy support: Adolescent perceptions of promotion of independence versus promotion of volitional functioning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17484576PubMed |
[29] Zimmer-Gembeck MJ, Collins WA. Autonomy development during adolescence. In Adams GR, Berzonsky M, editors. Blackwell handbook of adolescence. Oxford: Blackwell; 2003. pp. 175–204.
[30] Crouter AC, Booth A, eds. Romance and sex in adolescence and emerging adulthood: risks and opportunities. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2006.
