Women’s barrier contraceptive methods as modern methods
Erica Gollub
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8th, Miami, FL 33199, USA. Email: elgollub@gmail.com
Sexual Health 8(1) 128-129 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH10104
Submitted: 29 August 2010 Accepted: 3 September 2010 Published: 24 January 2011
References
[1] Holmes W. Adding to the menu of modern methods – the diaphragm. Sex Health 2010; 7 101–2.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | [verified September 2010].
[5] Susser I. Sexual negotiations in relation to political mobilization: the prevention of HIV in a comparative context. AIDS Behav 2001; 5 163–72.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[6] Coffey PS, Kilbourne-Brook M. Wear and care of the SILCS diaphragm: experience from three countries. Sex Health 2010; 7 159–64.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[7] Shervington D. The acceptability of the female condom among low-income African-American women. J Natl Med Assoc 1993; 85 341–7.
| CAS | PubMed |
[8]
[9] Gollub EL. Choice is empowering: getting strategic about preventing HIV infection in women. Int Fam Plann Persp 2006; 32 209–12.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[10] Gollub EL, Armstrong K, Boney T, Mercer D, Chattre S, Fiore D. Correlates of trichomonas prevalence among street-recruited, drug-using women enrolled in a randomized trial. Subst Use Misuse 2010;
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
