Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
EDITORIAL

Chaperones: protecting the patient or protecting the doctor?

Karen E. Rogstad
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, S10 2JF, UK. Email: karen.rogstad@sth.nhs.uk

Sexual Health 4(2) 85-87 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH07022
Submitted: 11 April 2007  Accepted: 26 April 2007   Published: 23 May 2007

Abstract

The routine use of chaperones during medical examinations, including intimate examinations, is variable. Practice varies between countries and also within them. Use of a chaperone may protect patients from sexual abuse by medical or nursing practitioners. An appropriate chaperone may also protect healthcare practitioners from false accusations. This article considers issues surrounding the use of chaperones and suggests a chaperoning policy for sexual health clinics, while acknowledging that it may not be appropriate or acceptable to all patients or medical staff, or for different parts of the world.

Additional keywords: intimate examinations, sexual health.


References


[1] NHS Clinical Governance Support Team. Guidance on the role and effective use of chaperones in primary and community care settings. London: NHS; 2005. Available online at: http://www.cgsupport.nhs.uk/downloads/Primary_Care/Chaperone_Framework.pdf [verified 2 April 2007]

[2] Hinsliff G . Betrayal: the sex-hungry doctors who prey on patients. The Observer January 28, 2007. Available online at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/medicine/story/0,2000434,00.html [verified 27 April 2007]

[3] Lewis P . Woman jailed for nine years over harassment. The Guardian January 20, 2007. Available online at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/crime/article/0,1994872,00.html [verified 27 April 2007]

[4] General Medical Council. Intimate examinations. London: General Medical Council Standards Committee December; 2001. Available online at: http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/current/library/intimate_examinations.asp [verified 2 April 2007]

[5] Baber JA,  Davies SC,  Dayan LS. An extra pair of eyes: do patients want a chaperone when having an anogenital examination? Sex Health 2007; 4 89–93.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | [verified 15 February 2007]

[7] Medical Practitioners Board of Victoria. Professional boundaries: a guide for patients and doctors. Melbourne: Medical Practitioners Board of Victoria. Available online at: http://www.medicalboardvic.org.au/content.php?sec=55 [verified 10 January 2007]

[8] Rogstad K . Intimate examinations in genitourinary medicine clinics. London: BASHH; 2003. Available online at: http://www.bashh.org/agum_archive_public/misc/intimate_examinations_rcpfinal040703 [verified 2 April 2007]

[9] Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Gynaecological examinations: guidelines for specialist practice. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2002.

[10] Newton DC,  Fairley CK,  Teague R,  Donovan B,  Bowden FJ,  Bilardi J, et al. Australian sexual health practitioners’ use of chaperones for genital examinations: a survey of attitudes and practice. Sex Health 2007; 4 95–7.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |