Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A survey of partner notification practices among general practitioners and their use of an internet resource for partner notification for Chlamydia trachomatis

Jane E. Tomnay A B C , Rachelle L. Gebert B and Christopher K. Fairley A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Public Health, University of Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australia.

B Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, 580 Swanston Street, Carlton, Vic. 3053, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: jtomnay@mshc.org.au

Sexual Health 3(4) 217-220 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH05052
Submitted: 18 October 2005  Accepted: 4 April 2006   Published: 17 November 2006

Abstract

Objectives: To determine in which circumstances Victorian general practitioners (GPs) offer chlamydia testing to patients, the attitudes of GPs in relation to contact tracing, how often GPs use a pre-printed partner letter and patient brochure and what proportion of GPs have immediate internet access in their consulting rooms. Methods: This study involved two parts, an initial survey of a sample of GPs in Victoria and a study of GP use of a website that provided treatment guidelines, a printable client brochure and a partner letter. Results: Of 418 eligible GPs, 221 (53%, 48–58%, 95% CI) returned completed surveys. Of these, 213 (97%, 93–99%, 95% CI) GPs believed that patients were largely responsible for notifying partners. Partner letters were rarely used: 167 (76%, 70–81%, 95% CI) GPs reported they never used partner letters, 18 (8%, 5–13%, 95% CI) GPs reported rare use and 23 (10%, 7–15%, 95% CI) GPs reportedusing them sometimes. Of the GPs, 181 (82%, 77–87%, 95% CI) reported they would find a partner letter and patient brochure on a website helpful. During the study, the website was accessed by 28 GPs (25%, 17–34%, 95% CI) in Gippsland and 17 GPs (8%, 5–13%, 95% CI) in Geelong who received positive chlamydia results on 110 and 208 clients respectively. Conclusions: GPs mostly considered patients responsible for partner notification but uncommonly used partner letters or an information brochure to assist them. Importantly, GPs reported that they could improve partner notification if further support was provided. In addition, when a website was provided with useful documents on it, up to 25% of GPs used it. This indicates that simple and inexpensive interventions can support GPs with strategies that may improve the control of chlamydia.


Acknowledgements

Special thanks to Neville Pattle and Dr Owen Harris for assistance in providing the website address and password to GPs in Gippsland and Geelong via their respective laboratories.


References


[1] Grulich AE,  de Visser RO,  Smith AM,  Rissel CE,  Richters J. Sex in Australia: sexually transmissible infection and blood-borne virus history in a representative sample of adults. Aust N Z J Public Health 2003; 27(2): 234–41.
PubMed |

[2] Mulvey G,  Temple-Smith MJ,  Keogh LA. Sexually transmissible diseases—knowledge and practices of general practitioners in Victoria, Ausatralia. Genitourin Med 1997; 73(6): 533–7.
PubMed |

[3] Dunne MP,  George M,  Byrne D. The sexual health caseloads of general practitioners in Queeensland. Venereology 1995; 8 71–5.


[4] Australian Government, Department of Health and Ageing. Communicable Diseases Network Australia. 2004. www.health.gov.au/internet/wcms/publishing.nsf/Content/Nationally+notifiable+diseases+%28NNDSS%29-2h

[5] LaMontagne D,  Fenton K,  Randall S,  Anderson S,  Carter P. Establishing the National Chlamydia Screening Programme in England: results from the first full year of screening. Sex Transm Infect 2004; 80 335–41.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[6] Hocking J,  Fairley CK. Need for screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health 2003; 27(1): 80–1.
PubMed |

[7] Keogh L,  Hammond J,  Mulvey G,  Temple-Smith M. Contact tracing for sexually transmissible diseases in general practice in Victoria, Australia. Venereology 1998; 11(1): 32–7.