Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
REVIEW

Current issues in the use of colposcopy for examination of sexual assault victims

David J. Templeton A B C D G and Angela Williams E F
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Sexual Health Service, Greater Western Area Health Service, 203 Brisbane St, Dubbo, NSW 2830, Australia.

B Sexual Health Service, Sydney South West Area Health Service, 182 Livingstone Rd, Marrickville, NSW 2204, Australia.

C Liverpool & Fairfield Sexual Assault Service, PO Box 3084, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia.

D School of Rural Health, University of Sydney, Dubbo Campus, PO Box 1043, Dubbo, NSW 2830, Australia.

E Division of Clinical Forensic Medicine, Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine, Melbourne, VIC 3006, Australia.

F Department of Forensic Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3006, Australia.

G Corresponding author. Email: david.templeton@email.cs.nsw.gov.au

Sexual Health 3(1) 5-10 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH05028
Submitted: 10 May 2005  Accepted: 2 November 2005   Published: 20 February 2006

Abstract

Colposcopic examination is considered the gold standard in child sexual abuse evaluations in Australia. However, there remain contentious issues with its use, especially in adult victims, which we sought to address by a review of the literature. Colposcopy has been shown to be a sensitive and acceptable tool for detection of anogenital abnormalities in children. The significance of some genital findings remains controversial, especially when images are interpreted by inexperienced clinicians. Its use in adult assessments is hampered by a lack of comparative studies on colposcopically detected genital injuries in adults following consensual v. non-consensual sexual intercourse. Further research is urgently needed before the use of colposcopy can be routinely recommended for adult victims.

Additional keywords: child abuse, rape.


Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the doctors involved in sexual abuse examinations from around the world who responded to the email survey on availability of national and international guidelines for colposcopic sexual assault/abuse assessments. Special thanks to Associate Professor David Wells for use of his photograph and Dr Terence Donald, Dr Anne Smith, Dr Anne Piper, Dr Jane MacDonald and Mr Colin Borg for their comments and assistance with distribution of the email guideline enquiries.


References


[1] Muram D,  Elias S. Child sexual abuse-genital tract findings in prepubertal girls. II. Comparison of colposcopic and unaided examinations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160 333–5.
PubMed |

[2] Hobbs C,  Wynne J. Use of the colposcope in examination for sexual abuse. Arch Dis Child 1996; 75 539–42.
PubMed |

[3] Teixeira WR. Hymenal colposcopic examination in sexual offences. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1981; 2 209–15.
PubMed |

[4] Wells DL,  Ogden EJ,  Young SJ. Examination of child victims of alleged sexual assault. Med J Aust 1991; 154 711.
PubMed |

[5] Steward MS,  Schmitz M,  Steward DS,  Joye NR,  Reinhart M. Children’s anticipation of and response to colposcopic examination. Child Abuse Negl 1995; 19 997–1005.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[6] Rambow B,  Adkinson C,  Frost T,  Peterson G. Female sexual assault: medical and legal implications. Ann Emerg Med 1992; 21 727–30.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[7] Slaughter L,  Brown CR. Colposcopy to establish physical findings in rape victims. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166 83–6.
PubMed |

[8] Patel HC,  Courtney GM,  Forster GE. Colposcopy and rape. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168 1334–5.
PubMed |

[9] Woodling BA,  Heger A. The use of the colposcope in the diagnosis of sexual abuse in the pediatric age group. Child Abuse Negl 1986; 10 111–4.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[10] O’Brien C. Improved forensic documentation of genital injuries with colposcopy. J Emerg Nurs 1997; 23 460–2.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[11] Lenahan LC,  Ernst A,  Johnson B. Colposcopy in evaluation of the adult sexual assault victim. Am J Emerg Med 1998; 16 183–4.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[12] Slaughter L,  Brown CRV,  Crowley S,  Peck R. Patterns of genital injury in female sexual assault victims. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176 609.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[13] Adams JA,  Girardin B,  Faugno D. Adolescent sexual assault: documentation of acute injuries using photo-colposcopy. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2001; 14 175–80.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[14] Rimsza ME,  Niggemann EH. Medical evaluation of sexually abused children: a review of 311 cases. Pediatrics 1982; 69 8–14.
PubMed |

[15] McCann J. Use of the colposcope in childhood sexual abuse examinations. Pediatr Clin North Am 1990; 37 863–80.
PubMed |

[16] Finkel MA. Technical conduct of the child sexual abuse medical examination. Child Abuse Negl 1998; 22 555–66.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[17] Muram D,  Arheart KL,  Jennings SG. Diagnostic accuracy of colposcopic photographs in child sexual abuse evaluations. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 1999; 12 58–61.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[18] Siegel RM,  Hill TD,  Henderson VA,  Daniels K. Comparison of an intraoral camera with colposcopy in sexually abused children. Clin Pediatr 1999; 38 375–6.


[19] Norvell MK,  Benrubi GI,  Thompson RJ. Investigation of microtrauma after sexual intercourse. J Reprod Med 1984; 29 269–71.
PubMed |

[20] Dyer C. Judge questions use of colposcopy photos in child abuse cases. BMJ 2004; 328 10.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[21] Sinal SH,  Lawless MR,  Rainey DY,  Everett VD,  Runyan DK,  Frothingham T, et al. Clinician agreement on physical findings in child sexual abuse cases. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1997; 151 497–501.
PubMed |

[22] Brayden R. Normal versus abnormal genital finding in children: how well do examiners agree? Child Abuse Negl 1994; 18 887–9.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[23] Adams JA,  Wells R. Normal versus abnormal genital findings in children: How well do examiners agree? Child Abuse Negl 1993; 17 663–75.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[24] Roberts I,  Moran K. Inter-rater reliability in the medical diagnosis of child sexual abuse. J Pediatr Child Health 1995; 31 290.


[25] Mears CJ,  Heflin AH,  Finkel MA,  Deblinger E,  Steer RA. Adolescents’ responses to sexual abuse evaluation including the use of video colposcopy. J Adolesc Health 2003; 33 18–24.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[26] Palusci VJ,  Cyrus TA. Reaction to videocolposcopy in the assessment of child sexual abuse. Child Abuse Negl 2001; 25 1535–46.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[27] Anonymous . AMA issues diagnostic and treatment guidelines on child sexual abuse. Am Fam Physician 1993; 47 1519–20.
PubMed |