Clinician views and experiences with reproductive coercion screening in a family planning service
Yan Cheng
A , Claire Rogers A , Clare J. Boerma A , Jessica R. Botfield A and Jane Estoesta A *
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Family Planning NSW, 8 Holker Street, Newington, NSW 2127, Australia.
Sexual Health 20(1) 71-79 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH22143
Submitted: 1 September 2022 Accepted: 15 December 2022 Published: 24 January 2023
© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing
Abstract
Background: Reproductive coercion refers to behaviour that interferes with a person’s reproductive autonomy, such as contraceptive sabotage, pregnancy coercion, controlling a pregnancy outcome or forced sterilisation. Routine screening for reproductive coercion, together with clinician education, was implemented at a family planning service in New South Wales, Australia, in December 2018. A study was undertaken to explore the views and experiences of clinicians in undertaking reproductive coercion screening at this service.
Methods: Clinicians were invited to complete an online survey and interview to discuss their understanding of reproductive coercion and their views and experiences of undertaking reproductive coercion screening. Descriptive and thematic content analysis was conducted.
Results: Clinicians deemed reproductive coercion screening to be relevant and important in family planning services. Key barriers to reproductive coercion screening and responding to disclosures included time constraints and limited appropriate referral pathways. Ongoing education and training with resources such as a decision-support tool on reproductive coercion screening and management, as well as effective multi-disciplinary collaboration, were identified as strategies to improve the screening program.
Conclusions: Findings from our study highlight that clinicians’ perceived reproductive coercion screening as a relevant and important component of sexual and reproductive healthcare. Ongoing reproductive coercion education, training and support would ensure the competency and confidence of clinicians undertaking screening. Identifying appropriate referral pathways with multi-disciplinary collaboration (involving clinicians, social workers, support workers and psychologists) would support clinicians in undertaking screening and responding to disclosures of reproductive coercion in Australian health care settings which provide family planning and sexual and reproductive health services.
Keywords: Australia, family planning, health practitioners, mixed method, reproductive coercion, screening program, sexual and reproductive health, women.
References
[1] Grace KT, Anderson JC. Reproductive coercion: a systematic review. Trauma Violence Abuse 2018; 19 371–390.| Reproductive coercion: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[2] Marie Stopes Australia. Hidden Forces: shining a light on reproductive coercion white paper. Marie Stopes Australia; 2018. Available at https://www.mariestopes.org.au/wp-content/uploads/Hidden-Forces_MSA-RC-White-Paper_FINAL_WEB.pdf
[3] Sheeran N, Vallury K, Sharman LS, et al. Reproductive coercion and abuse among pregnancy counselling clients in Australia: trends and directions. Reprod Health 2022; 19 170
| Reproductive coercion and abuse among pregnancy counselling clients in Australia: trends and directions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[4] Samankasikorn W, Alhusen J, Yan G, Schminkey DL, Bullock L. Relationships of reproductive coercion and intimate partner violence to unintended pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2019; 48 50–58.
| Relationships of reproductive coercion and intimate partner violence to unintended pregnancy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[5] Miller E, McCauley HL, Tancredi DJ, Decker MR, Anderson H, Silverman JG. Recent reproductive coercion and unintended pregnancy among female family planning clients. Contraception 2014; 89 122–128.
| Recent reproductive coercion and unintended pregnancy among female family planning clients.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[6] Grace KT, Decker MR, Alexander KA, et al. Reproductive coercion, intimate partner violence, and unintended pregnancy among latina women. J Interpers Violence 2022; 37 1604–1636.
| Reproductive coercion, intimate partner violence, and unintended pregnancy among latina women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Moore AM, Frohwirth L, Miller E. Male reproductive control of women who have experienced intimate partner violence in the United States. Soc Sci Med 2010; 70 1737–1744.
| Male reproductive control of women who have experienced intimate partner violence in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[8] Northridge JL, Silver EJ, Talib HJ, Coupey SM. Reproductive coercion in high school-aged girls: associations with reproductive health risk and intimate partner violence. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2017; 30 603–608.
| Reproductive coercion in high school-aged girls: associations with reproductive health risk and intimate partner violence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[9] Price E, Sharman LS, Douglas HA, Sheeran N, Dingle GA. Experiences of reproductive coercion in Queensland women. J Interpers Violence 2022; 37 NP2823–NP2843.
| Experiences of reproductive coercion in Queensland women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[10] McCauley HL, Falb KL, Streich-Tilles T, Kpebo D, Gupta J. Mental health impacts of reproductive coercion among women in Côte d’Ivoire. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2014; 127 55–59.
| Mental health impacts of reproductive coercion among women in Côte d’Ivoire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[11] Willie TC, Callands TA. Reproductive coercion and prenatal distress among young pregnant women in Monrovia, Liberia. Health Care Women Int 2018; 39 968–974.
| Reproductive coercion and prenatal distress among young pregnant women in Monrovia, Liberia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[12] Department of Health. National women’s health strategy 2020–2030. Department of Health; 2018. Available at https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2021/05/national-women-s-health-strategy-2020-2030.pdf
[13] Kazmerski T, McCauley HL, Jones K, et al. Use of reproductive and sexual health services among female family planning clinic clients exposed to partner violence and reproductive coercion. Matern Child Health J 2015; 19 1490–1496.
| Use of reproductive and sexual health services among female family planning clinic clients exposed to partner violence and reproductive coercion.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[14] Cox P. Violence against women in Australia: additional analysis of the Australian Bureau of Statistics’ Personal Safety Survey, 2012. Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety; 2015.
[15] Feder GS, Hutson M, Ramsay J, Taket AR. Women exposed to intimate partner violence: expectations and experiences when they encounter health care professionals: a meta-analysis of qualitative studies. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166 22–37.
| Women exposed to intimate partner violence: expectations and experiences when they encounter health care professionals: a meta-analysis of qualitative studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[16] Cheng Y, Wilson EG, Botfield JR, et al. Outcomes of routine screening for reproductive coercion in a family planning service. Sex Health 2021; 18 349–357.
| Outcomes of routine screening for reproductive coercion in a family planning service.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[17] Hunter T, Botfield JR, Estoesta J, Markham P, Robertson S, McGeechan K. Experience of domestic violence routine screening in Family Planning NSW clinics. Sex Health 2017; 14 155–163.
| Experience of domestic violence routine screening in Family Planning NSW clinics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[18] Tarzia L, Wellington M, Marino J, Hegarty K. “A Huge, Hidden Problem”: Australian health practitioners’ views and understandings of reproductive coercion. Qual Health Res 2019; 29 1395–1407.
| “A Huge, Hidden Problem”: Australian health practitioners’ views and understandings of reproductive coercion.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[19] Phillips SJ, Bennett AH, Hacker MR, Gold M. Reproductive coercion: an under-recognized challenge for primary care patients. Fam Pract 2016; 33 286–289.
| Reproductive coercion: an under-recognized challenge for primary care patients.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[20] Clark LE, Allen RH, Goyal V, Raker C, Gottlieb AS. Reproductive coercion and co-occurring intimate partner violence in obstetrics and gynecology patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210 42.e1–42.e8.
| Reproductive coercion and co-occurring intimate partner violence in obstetrics and gynecology patients.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[21] Children by Choice. Marie Stopes Australia: reproductive coercion white paper: Children by Choice submission to Marie Stopes Australia reproductive coercion white paper development. Children by Choice; 2018. Available at https://www.childrenbychoice.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/CbyCSubmission_MSAReproductiveCoercionWhitePaper.pdf [Accessed 6 May 2022]
[22] Burton CW, Carlyle KE. Screening and intervening: evaluating a training program on intimate partner violence and reproductive coercion for family planning and home visiting providers. Fam Community Health 2015; 38 227–239.
| Screening and intervening: evaluating a training program on intimate partner violence and reproductive coercion for family planning and home visiting providers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[23] Tarzia L, Wellington M, Marino J, Hegarty K. How do health practitioners in a large Australian public hospital identify and respond to reproductive abuse? A qualitative study. Aust N Z J Public Health 2019; 43 457–463.
| How do health practitioners in a large Australian public hospital identify and respond to reproductive abuse? A qualitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[24] Miller E, McCauley HL, Decker MR, et al. Implementation of a family planning clinic-based partner violence and reproductive coercion intervention: provider and patient perspectives. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2017; 49 85–93.
| Implementation of a family planning clinic-based partner violence and reproductive coercion intervention: provider and patient perspectives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[25] Fay KE, Onwuzurike C, Finley A, Miller E. Integrating anti-violence efforts into sexual and reproductive health: reproductive coercion as a case example. Contraception 2022; 115 75–79.
| Integrating anti-violence efforts into sexual and reproductive health: reproductive coercion as a case example.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[26] O’Doherty L, Hegarty K, Ramsay J, Davidson LL, Feder G, Taft A. Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; CD007007
| Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[27] Miller E, Decker MR, McCauley HL, et al. A family planning clinic partner violence intervention to reduce risk associated with reproductive coercion. Contraception 2011; 83 274–280.
| A family planning clinic partner violence intervention to reduce risk associated with reproductive coercion.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[28] Galrao M, Creagh A, Douglas R, Smith S, Brooker C. Experience of introducing screening for intimate partner violence and reproductive coercion in an urban sexual health clinic. Aust N Z J Publ Health 2022; 46 889–895.
| Experience of introducing screening for intimate partner violence and reproductive coercion in an urban sexual health clinic.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[29] Hegarty K, O’Doherty L, Taft A, et al. Screening and counselling in the primary care setting for women who have experienced intimate partner violence (WEAVE): a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2013; 382 249–258.
| Screening and counselling in the primary care setting for women who have experienced intimate partner violence (WEAVE): a cluster randomised controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[30] Taft AJ, Hooker L, Humphreys C, et al. Maternal and child health nurse screening and care for mothers experiencing domestic violence (MOVE): a cluster randomised trial. BMC Med 2015; 13 150
| Maternal and child health nurse screening and care for mothers experiencing domestic violence (MOVE): a cluster randomised trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
