Non-consensual sharing of personal sexually explicit imagery among young people in Australia: results from an online survey
Caitlin H. Douglass A B E , Cassandra J. C. Wright A C , Angela C. Davis A D and Megan S. C. Lim A B DA Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, Vic. 3004, Australia.
B School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 235 Bouverie Street, Carlton, Vic. 3053, Australia.
C School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Plenty Road and Kingsbury Drive, Bundoora, Vic. 3086, Australia.
D School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, Vic. 3004, Australia.
E Corresponding author. Email: caitlin.douglass@burnet.edu.au
Sexual Health 17(2) 182-186 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH19147
Submitted: 29 August 2019 Accepted: 20 November 2019 Published: 6 March 2020
Abstract
Consensual sharing of personal sexually explicit imagery (SEI) is part of young people’s sexual practise; however, harms arise if content is shared without consent. Australians aged 15–29 years were recruited for an online survey. Participants indicated if they had ever sent SEI of themselves to someone else, received SEI directly from the person in the imagery and whether they thought it was illegal to forward SEI without consent. Participants reported whether anyone shared their SEI without permission, if they told people, made official reports or if there were consequences for perpetrator(s). Logistic regression was used to identify associations between victimisation, gender, age group, sexual identity and knowledge of SEI-related law. In total, 1007 participants (65% female, mean age 23 years, 67% heterosexual) were recruited; 63% sent personal SEI to another person, 71% received SEI from the person pictured and 77% correctly identified it is illegal to forward SEI without consent. Thirteen percent (n = 126) indicated another person forwarded personal SEI without consent. In univariate analysis, victimisation was associated with identifying as non-heterosexual (odds ratio = 1.51, confidence interval = 1.03–2.22), but was independent from age group, gender and knowledge. In multivariate analysis, sexual identity, age group, gender and knowledge were not significantly associated with victimisation. Among participants who experienced non-consensual sharing of personal SEI, 63% told friends, 10% told family, 93% made no official report and 94% reported no consequences for perpetrator(s). Initiatives are needed to promote legal rights and enable young people to seek support.
Additional keywords: Internet, public health, risk behaviours, sexual violence, youth.
References
[1] Van Ouytsel J, Van Gool E, Walrave M, Ponnet K, Peeters E. Sexting: adolescents’ perceptions of the applications used for, motives for, and consequences of sexting. J Youth Stud 2017; 20 446–70.| Sexting: adolescents’ perceptions of the applications used for, motives for, and consequences of sexting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[2] Burkett M. Sex(t) talk: a qualitative analysis of young adults’ negotiations of the pleasures and perils of sexting. Sex Cult 2015; 19 835–63.
| Sex(t) talk: a qualitative analysis of young adults’ negotiations of the pleasures and perils of sexting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[3] Walker S, Sanci L, Temple-Smith M. Sexting: young women’s and men’s views on its nature and origins. J Adolesc Health 2013; 52 697–701.
| Sexting: young women’s and men’s views on its nature and origins.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23587784PubMed |
[4] Yeung TH, Horyniak DR, Vella AM, Hellard ME, Lim MSC. Prevalence, correlates and attitudes towards sexting among young people in Melbourne, Australia. Sex Health 2014; 11 332–9.
| Prevalence, correlates and attitudes towards sexting among young people in Melbourne, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25087581PubMed |
[5] Mitchell KJ, Finkelhor D, Jones LM, Wolak J. Prevalence and characteristics of youth sexting: a national study. Pediatrics 2012; 129 13–20.
| Prevalence and characteristics of youth sexting: a national study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22144706PubMed |
[6] Matthews SJ, Giuliano TA, Thomas KH, Straup ML, Martinez MA. Not cool, dude: perceptions of solicited vs. unsolicited sext messages from men and women. Comput Human Behav 2018; 88 1–4.
| Not cool, dude: perceptions of solicited vs. unsolicited sext messages from men and women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Holoyda B, Landess J, Sorrentino R, Friedman SH. Trouble at teens’ fingertips: youth sexting and the law. Behav Sci Law 2018; 36 170–81.
| Trouble at teens’ fingertips: youth sexting and the law.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29498094PubMed |
[8] Klettke B, Hallford DJ, Mellor DJ. Sexting prevalence and correlates: a systematic literature review. Clin Psychol Rev 2014; 34 44–53.
| Sexting prevalence and correlates: a systematic literature review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24370714PubMed |
[9] Lim MS, Vella AM, Horyniak DR, Hellard ME. Exploring attitudes towards sexting of young people: a cross-sectional study. Sex Health 2016; 13 530–5.
| Exploring attitudes towards sexting of young people: a cross-sectional study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27712613PubMed |
[10] Powell A, Henry N. Policing technology-facilitated sexual violence against adult victims: police and service sector perspectives. Policing Soc 2016; 28 291–307.
| Policing technology-facilitated sexual violence against adult victims: police and service sector perspectives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[11] Burén J, Lunde C. Sexting among adolescents: a nuanced and gendered online challenge for young people. Comput Human Behav 2018; 85 210–7.
| Sexting among adolescents: a nuanced and gendered online challenge for young people.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[12] Ringrose J, Harvey L, Gill R, Livingstone S. Teen girls, sexual double standards and ‘sexting’: gendered value in digital image exchange. Fem Theory 2013; 14 305–23.
| Teen girls, sexual double standards and ‘sexting’: gendered value in digital image exchange.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[13] Salter M, Crofts T, Lee M. Beyond criminalisation and responsibilisation: sexting, gender and young people. Curr Issues Crim Justice 2013; 24 301–16.
| Beyond criminalisation and responsibilisation: sexting, gender and young people.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[14] Victoria Legal Aid. Sexting and child pornography. Melbourne: Victoria Legal Aid; 2018. Available online at: https://www.legalaid.vic.gov.au/find-legal-answers/sex-and-law/sexting-and-child-pornography [verified 3 January 2020].
[15] Crofts T, Lievens E. Sexting and the law. In Walrave M, Van Ouytsel J, Ponnet K, Temple JR, editors. Sexting: motives and risk in online sexual self-presentation. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. pp. 119–36.
[16] Flynn A, Henry N. Image-based sexual abuse: an Australian reflection. Women Crim Justice 2019;
| Image-based sexual abuse: an Australian reflection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[17] Albury K, Crawford K, Byron P, Mathews BP. Young people and sexting in Australia: ethics, representation and the law. Sydney: ARC Centre for Creative Industries and Innovation/Journalism and Media Research Centre, The University of New South Wales; 2013.
[18] Australian Government eSafety Commissioner. What’s the law in my state or territory? Canberra: eSafety Commissioner; n.d. Available online at: https://www.esafety.gov.au/key-issues/image-based-abuse/legal-assistance/law-in-my-state-territory [verified 3 January 2020].
[19] Australian Government eSafety Commissioner. Image-based abuse FAQ. Canberra: eSafety Commissioner; n.d. Available online at: https://www.esafety.gov.au/image-based-abuse/faq [verified 3 January 2020].
[20] Vella AM, Agius PA, Bowring AL, Hellard ME, Lim MSC. Early age at first sex: associations with sexual health and sociodemographic factors among a sample of young music festival attendees in Melbourne. Sex Health 2014; 11 359–65.
| Early age at first sex: associations with sexual health and sociodemographic factors among a sample of young music festival attendees in Melbourne.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25167937PubMed |
[21] Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) – a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 377–81.
| Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) – a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18929686PubMed |
[22] Powell A, Henry N, Flynn A, Scott AJ. Image-based sexual abuse: the extent, nature, and predictors of perpetration in a community sample of Australian residents. Comput Human Behav 2019; 92 393–402.
| Image-based sexual abuse: the extent, nature, and predictors of perpetration in a community sample of Australian residents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[23] Döring N. Consensual sexting among adolescents: risk prevention through abstinence education or safer sexting? Cyberpsychology (Brno) 2014; 8 9
| Consensual sexting among adolescents: risk prevention through abstinence education or safer sexting?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[24] Madigan S, Ly A, Rash CL, Van Ouytsel J, Temple JR. Prevalence of multiple forms of sexting behavior among youth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr 2018; 172 327–35.
| Prevalence of multiple forms of sexting behavior among youth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29482215PubMed |
[25] Flynn A, Henry N. Image-based sexual abuse. In Pontell HN, editor. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019. pp. 1–23.
[26] Henry N, Flynn A, Powell A. Image-based sexual abuse: victims and perpetrators. Trends and issues in crime and criminal justice. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology; 2019.
[27] McGlynn C, Rackley E. Image-based sexual abuse. Oxf J Leg Stud 2017; 37 534–61.
| Image-based sexual abuse.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[28] Ruvalcaba Y, Eaton A. Nonconsensual pornography among U.S. adults: a sexual scripts framework on victimization, perpetration, and health correlates for women and men. Psychol Violence 2020; 10 68–78.
| Nonconsensual pornography among U.S. adults: a sexual scripts framework on victimization, perpetration, and health correlates for women and men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[29] Powell A, Henry N. Policing technology-facilitated sexual violence against adult victims: police and service sector perspectives. Policing Soc 2018; 28 291–307.
| Policing technology-facilitated sexual violence against adult victims: police and service sector perspectives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[30] Wright CJC, Davis AC, Vella AM, McGrath-Lester R, Lim M. Young people’s needs and preferences for health resources focused on pornography and sharing of sexually explicit imagery. Public Health Res Pract 2019;
| Young people’s needs and preferences for health resources focused on pornography and sharing of sexually explicit imagery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[31] Davis AC, Wright CJC, Temple-Smith MJ, Hellard ME, Lim MSC. A health education website developed to meet young people’s information needs about web-based pornography and sharing of sexually explicit imagery (SCOPE): usability study JMIR Formative Research 2019; 3 e12824
| A health education website developed to meet young people’s information needs about web-based pornography and sharing of sexually explicit imagery (SCOPE): usability studyCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31411140PubMed |
