Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Demographic and behavioural correlates of six sexting behaviours among Australian secondary school students

Kent Patrick A , Wendy Heywood A B , Marian K. Pitts A and Anne Mitchell A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health & Society (ARCSHS), La Trobe University, 215 Franklin Street, Melbourne, Vic. 3000, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: w.heywood@latrobe.edu.au

Sexual Health 12(6) 480-487 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH15004
Submitted: 13 January 2015  Accepted: 8 June 2015   Published: 17 August 2015

Abstract

Background: There has been increasing attention on assessing rates of sexting in adolescents and of the potential negative effects of the behaviour. Our aim was to assess rates and correlates of sexting in Australian students in years10, 11 and 12. Methods: The current study was part of The Fifth National Survey of Australian Secondary Students and Sexual Health and reports on responses of 2114 students (811 male, 1303 female). Sexting was assessed using six items: sending a sexually explicit written text message; receiving a sexually explicit text message; sending a sexually explicit nude or nearly nude photo or video of themselves; sending a sexually explicit nude or nearly nude photo or video of someone else; receiving a sexually explicit nude or nearly nude photo or video of someone else; and using a social media site for sexual reasons. Results: Approximately half of the students had received (54%, 1139/2097) or sent (43%, 904/2107) a sexually explicit written text message. Sexually explicit images had been received by 42% (880/2098) of students, one in four students had sent a sexually explicit image of themselves (26%, 545/2102) and one in 10 had sent a sexually explicit image of someone else (9%, 180/2095). Finally, 22% (454/2103) of students had used social media for sexual reasons. Sexting was associated with several correlates. Conclusions: Sexting was relatively common in this sample of year 10, 11 and 12 Australian students, particularly among older students, those who are sexually active, and those who use recreational substances.

Additional keywords: adolescent, recreational substances, sexual behaviour, youth.


References

[1]  Gordon-Messer D, Bauermeister JA, Grodzinski A, Zimmerman M. Sexting among young adults. J Adolesc Health 2013; 52 301–6.
Sexting among young adults.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23299018PubMed |

[2]  Mitchell KJ, Finkelhor D, Jones LM, Wolak J. Prevalence and characteristics of youth sexting: a national study. Pediatrics 2012; 129 13–20.
Prevalence and characteristics of youth sexting: a national study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22144706PubMed |

[3]  Katzman DK. Sexting: keeping teens safe and responsible in a technologically savvy world. Paediatr Child Health 2010; 15 41–2.
| 21197169PubMed |

[4]  Wolak J, Finkelhor D, Mitchell KJ. How often are teens arrested for sexting? Data from a national sample of police cases. Pediatrics 2012; 129 4–12.
How often are teens arrested for sexting? Data from a national sample of police cases.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22144707PubMed |

[5]  Mattey B, Diliberto GM. Sexting – it’s in the dictionary. NASN Sch Nurse 2013; 28 94–8.
Sexting – it’s in the dictionary.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23600093PubMed |

[6]  Richards RD, Calvert C. When sex and cell phones collide: inside the prosecution of a teen sexting case. Hastings Comm Entert Law J 2009; 32 1–40.

[7]  Walsh W, Wolak J, Finkelhor D. Sexting: When are state prosecutors deciding to prosecute? Crimes against Children Research Centre, University of New Hampshire; 2013. Available online at: http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/CV294_Walsh_Sexting%20&%20prosecution_2-6-13.pdf [verified 25 May 2015].

[8]  Albury K, Crawford K, Byron P, Mathews B. Young people and sexting in Australia: ethics, representation and the law. Sydney: ARC Centre for Creative Industries and Innovation/Journalism and Media Research Centre, The University of New South Wales, Australia; 2013. Available online at: http://www.cci.edu.au/sites/default/files/Young_People_And_Sexting_Final.pdf [verified 25 May 2015].

[9]  Lenhart A. Teens and sexting; how and why minor teens are sending sexually suggestive nude or nearly nude images via text messaging. Pew Internet and American Life Project; 2009. Available online at: http://ncdsv.org/images/PewInternet_TeensAndSexting_12-2009.pdf [verified 25 May 2015].

[10]  Drouin M, Tobin E. Unwanted but consensual sexting among young adults: relations with attachment and sexual motivations. Comput Human Behav 2014; 31 412–8.
Unwanted but consensual sexting among young adults: relations with attachment and sexual motivations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[11]  Walker S, Sanci L, Temple-Smith M. Sexting: young women’s and men’s views on its nature and origins. J Adolesc Health 2013; 52 697–701.
Sexting: young women’s and men’s views on its nature and origins.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23587784PubMed |

[12]  Simpson B. Challenging childhood, challenging children: children’s rights and sexting. Sexualities 2013; 16 690–709.
Challenging childhood, challenging children: children’s rights and sexting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[13]  Wastler S. The harm in sexting: analyzing the constitutionality of child pornography statutes that prohibit the voluntary production, possession, and dissemination of sexually explicit images by teenagers. The Harv JL Gender 2010; 33 687–702.

[14]  Ahern NR, Mechling B. Sexting: serious problems for youth. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv 2013; 51 22–30.
Sexting: serious problems for youth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23668382PubMed |

[15]  Döring N. Consensual sexting among adolescents: risk prevention through abstinence education or safer sexting? Cyberpsychology 2014; 8 article 9
Consensual sexting among adolescents: risk prevention through abstinence education or safer sexting?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[16]  Drouin M, Vogel KN, Surbey A, Stills JR. Let’s talk about sexting, baby: computer-mediated sexual behaviors among young adults. Comput Human Behav 2013; 29 A25–30.
Let’s talk about sexting, baby: computer-mediated sexual behaviors among young adults.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[17]  Fleschler Peskin M, Markham CM, Addy RC, Shegog R, Thiel M, Tortolero SR. Prevalence and patterns of sexting among ethnic minority urban high school students. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2013; 16 454–9.
Prevalence and patterns of sexting among ethnic minority urban high school students.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23438265PubMed |

[18]  Lounsbury K, Mitchell KJ, Finkerhor D. The true prevalence of “sexting”. Crimes against Children Research Centre, University of New Hampshire; 2011. Available online at: http://cola.unh.edu/sites/cola.unh.edu/files/research_publications/Sexting_Fact_Sheet_4_29_11.pdf [verified 28 May 2015].

[19]  Klettke B, Hallford DJ, Mellor DJ. Sexting prevalence and correlates: a systematic literature review. Clin Psychol Rev 2014; 34 44–53.
Sexting prevalence and correlates: a systematic literature review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24370714PubMed |

[20]  Yeung TH, Horyniak DR, Vella AM, Hellard ME, Lim MSC. Prevalence, correlates and attitudes towards sexting among young people in Melbourne, Australia. Sex Health 2014; 11 332–9.
Prevalence, correlates and attitudes towards sexting among young people in Melbourne, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25087581PubMed |

[21]  Boulat M, Caddaye D, D’Souza H, Glyde M, Hatwal A, Jansz C, Stephens J, Zoppos E. Submission to the Victorian parliament Law Reform Committee’s inquiry into sexting. Available online at: http://www.privacy.vic.gov.au/privacy/web2.nsf/files/inquiry-into-sexting-submission/$file/sexting_inquiry_submission_2012.pdf [verified 28 May 2015].

[22]  Campbell SW, Park YJ. Predictors of mobile sexting among teens: toward a new explanatory framework. Mobile Media Comm 2014; 2 20–39.
Predictors of mobile sexting among teens: toward a new explanatory framework.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[23]  Dake JA, Price JH, Maziarz L, Ward B. Prevalence and correlates of sexting behavior in adolescents. Am J Sex Educ 2012; 7 1–15.
Prevalence and correlates of sexting behavior in adolescents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[24]  Temple JR, Paul JA, van den Berg P, Le VD, McElhany A, Temple BW. Teen sexting and its association with sexual behaviors. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2012; 166 828–33.
Teen sexting and its association with sexual behaviors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22751805PubMed |

[25]  Strassberg DS, McKinnon RK, Sustaíta MA, Rullo J. Sexting by high school students: an exploratory and descriptive study. Arch Sex Behav 2013; 42 15–21.
Sexting by high school students: an exploratory and descriptive study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22674035PubMed |

[26]  Rice E, Rhoades H, Winetrobe H, Sanchez M, Montoya J, Plant A, Kordic T. Sexually explicit cell phone messaging associated with sexual risk among adolescents. Pediatrics 2012; 130 667–73.
Sexually explicit cell phone messaging associated with sexual risk among adolescents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22987882PubMed |

[27]  Temple JR, Le VD, van den Berg P, Ling Y, Paul JA, Temple BW. Brief report: teen sexting and psychological health. J Adolesc 2014; 37 33–6.
Brief report: teen sexting and psychological health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24331302PubMed |

[28]  Angelides S. ‘Technology, hormones, and stupidity’: the affective politics of teenage sexting. Sexualities 2013; 16 665–89.
‘Technology, hormones, and stupidity’: the affective politics of teenage sexting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[29]  Mitchell A, Patrick K, Heywood W, Blackman P, Pitts M. 5th National Survey of Australian Secondary Students and Sexual Health 2013. ARCSHS Monograph Series No. 97. Melbourne: Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University; 2014. Available online at: http://www.latrobe.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/576554/31631-ARCSHS_NSASSSH_FINAL-A-3.pdf [verified 25 May 2015].

[30]  Smith A, Agius P, Mitchell A, Barrett C, Pitts M. 2009. Secondary Students and Sexual Health 2008. ARCSHS Monograph Series No. 70. Melbourne: Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University; 2009. Available online at: http://www.latrobe.edu.au/arcshs/downloads/arcshs-research-publications/secondary-students-and-sexual-health-2008.pdf [verified 25 May 2015].

[31]  Drouin M, Landgraff C. Texting, sexting, and attachment in college students’ romantic relationships. Comput Human Behav 2012; 28 444–9.
Texting, sexting, and attachment in college students’ romantic relationships.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[32]  Benotsch EG, Snipes DJ, Martin AM, Bull SS. Sexting, substance use, and sexual risk behavior in young adults. J Adolesc Health 2013; 52 307–13.
Sexting, substance use, and sexual risk behavior in young adults.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23299017PubMed |

[33]  Hillier L, Jones T, Monagle M, Overton N, Gahan L, Blackman J, Mitchell A. Writing themselves in 3; the third national study on the sexual health and wellbeing of same sex attracted and gender questioning young people. ARCSHS Monograph series no. 78. Melbourne: Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University; 2010. Available online at: http://www.glhv.org.au/files/wti3_web_sml.pdf [verified 25 May 2015].

[34]  Lippman JR, Campbell SW. Damned if you do, damned if you don’t…if you’re a girl: relational and normative contexts of adolescent sexting in the United States. J Child Media 2014; 8 371–86.
Damned if you do, damned if you don’t…if you’re a girl: relational and normative contexts of adolescent sexting in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |