Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Sexual behaviours, sex toy and sexual safety methods reported by women who have sex with women and men

Vanessa Schick A E , Brian Dodge B , Barbara Van Der Pol C , Aleta Baldwin B and J. Dennis Fortenberry D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Division of Management, Policy, and Community Health, School of Public Health, 1200 Pressler Street, Rm E-917, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

B Indiana University - Bloomington, Center for Sexual Health Promotion, 1025 E.7th Street SPH 116, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.

C University of Alabama at Birmingham, Division of Infectious Diseases, 1900 University Boulevard, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.

D Indiana University School of Medicine, Division of Adolescent Medicine, 410 West 10th Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.

E Corresponding author. Email: Vanessa.Schick@uth.tmc.edu

Sexual Health 12(4) 287-299 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH14045
Submitted: 7 March 2014  Accepted: 29 January 2015   Published: 1 June 2015

Abstract

Background: Relative to women who engage in sex with exclusively men or women, women who have sex with women and men (WSWM) are more likely to report a history of sexually transmissible infections. Knowledge of the diversity and specificity of the sexual behaviours in which they engage may provide insight into the behavioural modes of infection. The present study sought to document a range of behaviours including concurrent multi-person sexual activity (e.g. orgy, threesome), anal sexual activity and sex toy use. Barrier use methods during specific behaviours were also assessed. Methods: Eighty women who reported recent genital contact with at least one man and one woman were recruited via targeted Internet, venue-based and snowball sampling methods. Consenting participants were directed to an online survey. During an in-person timeline follow-back interview (the SEQUENCE© calendar method), a subset of participants (n = 53) provided detailed sexual behaviour data for each sexual partner over the previous 12 months. Results: Almost three-quarters of the sample reported at least one concurrent multi-person sexual activity. Nearly two-thirds of participants reported engaging in sexual behaviour that involved their own (66.7%) or their partner’s (49.4%) anus in the past year. Barrier use for sexual behaviours other than penile-vaginal intercourse was uncommon. Behaviours and safety strategies were similar with men and women regardless of partner gender. Conclusions: The sexual repertoires reported by participants in this study were diverse. Understanding the range of diverse sexual behaviours of the participants may enable the construction of tailored recommendations for sexual health maintenance among WSWM.

Additional keywords: anal sex, bisexual, condom use, group sex, mixed-methods, threesome, timeline follow-back methods.


References

[1]  Lindley LL, Barnett CL, Brandt HM, Hardin JW, Burcin M. STDs among sexually active female college students: does sexual orientation make a difference? Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2008; 40 212–7.
STDs among sexually active female college students: does sexual orientation make a difference?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19067934PubMed |

[2]  Everett BG. Sexual orientation disparities in sexually transmitted infections: examining the intersection between sexual identity and sexual behavior. Arch Sex Behav 2013; 42 225–36.
Sexual orientation disparities in sexually transmitted infections: examining the intersection between sexual identity and sexual behavior.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22350122PubMed |

[3]  Gonzales V, Washienko KM, Krone MR, Chapman LI, Arredondo EM, Huckeba HJ, Downer A. Sexual and drug-use risk factors for HIV and STDs: a comparison of women with and without bisexual experiences. Am J Public Health 1999; 89 1841–6.
Sexual and drug-use risk factors for HIV and STDs: a comparison of women with and without bisexual experiences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2Fls1Kqsw%3D%3D&md5=b46e464f041d24a25b791a6710763f0dCAS | 10589313PubMed |

[4]  Diamant AL, Wold C, Spritzer K, Gelberg L. Health behaviors, health status, and access to and use of health care: a population-based study of lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual women. Arch Fam Med 2000; 9 1043–51.
Health behaviors, health status, and access to and use of health care: a population-based study of lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FoslSquw%3D%3D&md5=80e6dd7660f71998f639583b433d7299CAS | 11115206PubMed |

[5]  Koh AS, Gómez CA, Shade S, Rowley E. Sexual risk factors among self-identified lesbians, bisexual women, and heterosexual women accessing primary care settings. Sex Transm Dis 2005; 32 563–9.
Sexual risk factors among self-identified lesbians, bisexual women, and heterosexual women accessing primary care settings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16118605PubMed |

[6]  Lorvick J, Martinez A, Gee L, Kral AH. Sexual and injection risk among women who inject methamphetamine in San Francisco. J Urban Health 2006; 83 497–505.
Sexual and injection risk among women who inject methamphetamine in San Francisco.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16739050PubMed |

[7]  Schick V, Herbenick D, Rosenberger JG, Reece M. Variations in the sexual repertoires of bisexually-identified women from the United States and the United Kingdom. J Bisex 2012; 12 198–213.
Variations in the sexual repertoires of bisexually-identified women from the United States and the United Kingdom.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[8]  Smith AMA, Rissel CE, Richters J, Grulich AE, de Visser RO. Sex in Australia: sexual identity, sexual attraction and sexual experience among a representative sample of adults. Aust N Z J Public Health 2003; 27 138–45.
Sex in Australia: sexual identity, sexual attraction and sexual experience among a representative sample of adults.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[9]  Chandra A, Copen CE, Mosher WD. Sexual behavior, sexual attraction, and sexual identity in the United States: data from the 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth. International Handbook on the Demography of Sexuality. In: Baurmle AK, editor. Dordrecht: Springer; 2013. pp. 45–66.

[10]  Schick V, Herbenick D, Rosenberger JG, Reece M. Prevalence and characteristics of vibrator use among women who have sex with women. J Sex Med 2011; 8 3306–15.
Prevalence and characteristics of vibrator use among women who have sex with women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21981632PubMed |

[11]  Champion J, Wilford K, Shain R, Piper J. Risk and protective behaviours of bisexual minority women: a qualitative analysis. Int Nurs Rev 2005; 52 115–22.
Risk and protective behaviours of bisexual minority women: a qualitative analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M3gvVyqtg%3D%3D&md5=d9ad675e30cb8828818c87a327780a01CAS | 15842324PubMed |

[12]  Schick V, Rosenberger JG, Herbenick D, Reece M. Sexual behaviour and risk reduction strategies among a multinational sample of women who have sex with women. Sex Transm Infect 2012; 88 407–12.
Sexual behaviour and risk reduction strategies among a multinational sample of women who have sex with women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22563015PubMed |

[13]  Marrazzo JM, Coffey P, Bingham A. Sexual practices, risk perception and knowledge of sexually transmitted disease risk among lesbian and bisexual women. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2005; 37 6–12.
Sexual practices, risk perception and knowledge of sexually transmitted disease risk among lesbian and bisexual women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15888397PubMed |

[14]  Carroll N, Goldstein RS, Lo W, Mayer KH. Gynecological infections and sexual practices of Massachusetts lesbian and bisexual women. J Gay Lesbian Med Assoc 1997; 1 15–23.
Gynecological infections and sexual practices of Massachusetts lesbian and bisexual women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[15]  US Census Bureau. State and county quickfacts Washington, DC: US Census Bureau; 2010. Available online at: http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/18000.html [verified February 2015].

[16]  Herbenick D, Reece M, Schick V, Sanders SA, Dodge B, Fortenberry JD. Sexual behavior in the United States: results from a national probability sample of men and women ages 14–94. J Sex Med 2010; 7 255–65.
Sexual behavior in the United States: results from a national probability sample of men and women ages 14–94.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21029383PubMed |

[17]  Dodge B, Schnarrs PW, Reece M, Goncalves G, Martinez O, Nix R, Malebranche D, Van Der Pol B, Murray M, Fortenberry JD. Community involvement among behaviourally bisexual men in the Midwestern USA: experiences and perceptions across communities. Cult Health Sex 2012; 14 1095–110.
Community involvement among behaviourally bisexual men in the Midwestern USA: experiences and perceptions across communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22978551PubMed |

[18]  Pathela P, Hajat A, Schillinger J, Blank S, Sell R, Mostashari F. Discordance between sexual behavior and self-reported sexual identity: a population-based survey of New York City men. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145 416–25.
Discordance between sexual behavior and self-reported sexual identity: a population-based survey of New York City men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16983129PubMed |

[19]  Schick V, Rosenberger JG, Herbenick D, Calabrese SK, Reece M. Bidentity: sexual behavior/identity congruence and women’s sexual, physical and mental well-being. J Bisex 2012; 12 178–97.
Bidentity: sexual behavior/identity congruence and women’s sexual, physical and mental well-being.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[20]  Niekamp A, Mercken LA, Hoebe CJ, Dukers-Muijrers NH. A sexual affiliation network of swingers, heterosexuals practicing risk behaviours that potentiate the spread of sexually transmitted infections: a two-mode approach. Soc Networks 2013; 35 223–36.
A sexual affiliation network of swingers, heterosexuals practicing risk behaviours that potentiate the spread of sexually transmitted infections: a two-mode approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[21]  Friedman SR, Bolyard M, Khan M, Maslow C, Sandoval M, Mateu-Gelabert P, Krauss B, Aral SO. Group sex events and HIV/STI risk in an urban network. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2008; 49 440–6.
Group sex events and HIV/STI risk in an urban network.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19186355PubMed |

[22]  Friedman SR, Mateu-Gelabert P, Sandoval M. Group sex events amongst non-gay drug users: an understudied risk environment. Int J Drug Policy 2011; 22 1–8.
Group sex events amongst non-gay drug users: an understudied risk environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20800465PubMed |

[23]  McNair R. Risks and prevention of sexually transmissible infections among women who have sex with women. Sex Health 2005; 2 209–17.
Risks and prevention of sexually transmissible infections among women who have sex with women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16402667PubMed |

[24]  Darragh TM, Winkler B. Anal cancer and cervical cancer screening: key differences. Cancer Cytopathology 2011; 119 5–19.
Anal cancer and cervical cancer screening: key differences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21319310PubMed |

[25]  Goldie SJ, Kuntz KM, Weinstein MC, Freedberg KA, Welton ML, Palefsky JM. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening for anal squamous intraepithelial lesions in homosexual and bisexual HIV-positive men. J Am Med Assoc 1999; 281 1822–1829.
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening for anal squamous intraepithelial lesions in homosexual and bisexual HIV-positive men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3ntVWqtw%3D%3D&md5=31770afa15c0ed9cd8eb99ac8dcdfd58CAS |

[26]  Fethers KA, Fairley CK, Hocking JS, Gurrin LC, Bradshaw CS. Sexual risk factors and bacterial vaginosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 47 1426–35.
Sexual risk factors and bacterial vaginosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18947329PubMed |

[27]  Kirkman M, Rosenthal D, Smith A. Adolescent sex and the romantic narrative: why some young heterosexuals use condoms to prevent pregnancy but not disease. Psychol Health Med 1998; 3 355–70.
Adolescent sex and the romantic narrative: why some young heterosexuals use condoms to prevent pregnancy but not disease.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[28]  Stevens PE, Hall JM. Sexuality and safer sex: the issues for lesbians and bisexual women. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2001; 30 439–47.
Sexuality and safer sex: the issues for lesbians and bisexual women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FitlChug%3D%3D&md5=51fefec055ff0641c90c0b92cac545acCAS | 11461028PubMed |

[29]  Katz-Wise SL, Hyde JS. Sexual fluidity and related attitudes and beliefs among young adults with a same-gender orientation. Arch Sex Behav, ;
Sexual fluidity and related attitudes and beliefs among young adults with a same-gender orientation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |