Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Making sense of syphilis: beliefs, behaviours and disclosure among gay men recently diagnosed with infectious syphilis and the implications for prevention

Natalie L. Lambert A , John Imrie A B D , Martin J. Fisher A , Alan Phillips A , Rod Watson C and Gill Dean A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A HIV/GUM Research Department, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton BN2 5BE, UK.

B Centre for Sexual Health and HIV Research, University College London, London WC1E 6AU, UK.

C Terrence Higgins Trust South, 61 Ship Street, Brighton BN1 1AE, UK.

D Corresponding author. Email: jimrie@gum.ucl.ac.uk

Sexual Health 3(3) 155-161 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH06028
Submitted: 2 May 2006  Accepted: 8 May 2006   Published: 29 August 2006

Abstract

Background: The resurgence of syphilis in men who have sex with men (MSM) has proved remarkably resilient in the face of innovative control and prevention interventions. Understanding the determinants of the current outbreaks has been restricted by the available data. Qualitative work is needed to understand individual and community experiences of syphilis and to help guide new prevention and control efforts. Methods: An exploratory study using semi-structured interviews with a convenience sample of MSM (n = 15), recently diagnosed with infectious syphilis, attending sexual health and HIV-outpatient services in Brighton, England. Results: Analysis focussed on men’s beliefs about syphilis, their experience of testing and being given a syphilis diagnosis, mediators of ‘risky’ sexual behaviour and disclosure to social and sexual contacts. Two beliefs — ‘syphilis is rare’ and ‘syphilis is dirty’ — dominated respondents’ accounts. These beliefs coloured every aspect of respondents’ clinical and social experience of syphilis, and impeded disclosure and partner notification. They also contributed to misconceptions about behaviours with increased syphilis transmission risk, the mechanics of disease acquisition, health-seeking behaviours and risk-reduction strategies. Conclusions: The apparent failure of syphilis control measures so far may be due to our limited understanding of MSM’s views and experience of STIs other than HIV. Syphilis prevention needs to tackle MSM’s widely held beliefs about sexual communication, risk behaviour and other STIs. The most useful health education interventions are likely to be those that build on MSM’s significant knowledge base and address both the current syphilis crisis and wider sexual health promotion goals.

Additional keywords: attitudes and beliefs, gay/homosexual men, prevention, UK.


Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge and thank all the study participants, the UK Department of Health and Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust for providing funding, and the staff of the Claude Nicol Centre and Lawson Unit, Royal Sussex County Hospital, for their commitment and support of this study.


References


[1] Simms I,  Fenton KA,  Ashton M,  Turner KM,  Crawley-Boevey EE,  Gorton R, et al. The re-emergence of syphilis in the United Kingdom: the new epidemic phases. Sex Transm Dis 2005; 32 220–6.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | [verified July 2006].

[9] Poulton M,  Dean GL,  Williams DI,  Carter P,  Iversen A,  Fisher MJ. Surfing for spirochetes: an ongoing syphilis outbreak in Brighton. Sex Transm Infect 2001; 77 319–21.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[10] Bellis MA,  Cook P,  Clark P,  Syed Q,  Hoskins A. Re-emerging syphilis in gay men: a case-control study of behavioural risk factors and HIV status. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002; 56 235–6.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[11] Lambert NL,  Fisher M,  Imrie J,  Watson R,  Mercer CH,  Parry JV, et al. Community based syphilis screening: feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness in case finding. Sex Transm Infect 2005; 81 213–316.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[12] Fenton KA,  Imrie J. Increasing rates of sexually transmitted diseases in homosexual men in Western Europe and the United States. Why? Infect Dis Clin North Am 2005; 19 311–31.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[13] Doherty L,  Fenton K,  Jones J,  Paine TC,  Higgins SP,  Williams D, et al. Syphilis: old problem, new strategy. BMJ 2002; 325 153–6.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[14] Imrie J,  Lambert NL,  Mercer CH,  Copas AJ,  Phillips A,  Dean G, et al. Refocusing health promotion for syphilis prevention: results of a case-control study of men who have sex with men on England’s south coast. Sex Transm Infect 2006; 82 80–3.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[15] Wallace LA.. Syphilis in Scotland 2003. SCIEH Weekly Report 2004; 38 38–9.


[16] Lambert N, Fisher M, Imrie J, Watson R, Mercer CH, Philips A et al. Evaluation of local measures to control the syphilis outbreak in Brighton. London: Department of Health; 2004.

[17] Flick U. An introduction to qualitative research. London: Sage Publishers; 1998.

[18] Nandwani R, Fisher M, on behalf of the MSSVD Clinical Effectiveness Group. Clinical standards for the screening and management of acquired syphilis in HIV-positive adults. London: BASSH; 2002. Available online at: http://www.bashh.org/Committees/SIG/HIV_SIG/Syphilis_HIV_Summary_V8.pdf [verified July 2006].

[19] Smith AMA,  Grierson J,  Wain D,  Pitts M,  Pattison P. Associations between the sexual behaviour of men who have sex with men and the structure and composition of their social networks. Sex Transm Infect 2004; 80 455–8.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[20] Steele MS,  Bukusi E,  Cohen CR,  Shell-Duncan BA,  Holmes KK. Male genital hygiene beliefs and practices in Nairobi, Kenya. Sex Transm Infect 2004; 80 471–6.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[21] Transmission of primary and secondary syphilis by oral sex—Chicago, Illinois, 1998–2002. Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep 2004; 53: 966–8. Available online at: www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5341a2.htm [verified July 2006]

[22] Kohl KS,  Farley TA,  Ewell J,  Scioneaus J. Usefulness of partner notification for syphilis control. Sex Transm Dis 1999; 26 201–7.
PubMed |

[23] Rosengarten M, Race K, Kippax S. ‘Touch wood, everything will be OK’ — gay men’s understanding of clinical markers in sexual practice. Sydney: National Centre for HIV Social Research; 2000.

[24] Van de Ven P,  Kippax S,  Crawford J,  Rawstone P,  Prestage G,  Grulich A, et al. In a minority of gay men, sexual risk practices indicate strategic positioning for perceived risk reduction rather than unbridled sex. AIDS Care 2002; 14 1035–9.


[25] Smith AMA,  Grierson J,  Wain D,  Pitts M,  Pattison P. Associations between the sexual behaviour of men who have sex with men and the structure and composition of their social networks. Sex Transm Infect 2004; 80 455–8.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[26] Klausner JD,  Wolf W,  Fisher-Ponce L,  Zolt I,  Katz MH. Tracing a syphilis outbreak through cyberspace. JAMA 2000; 284 447–9.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[27] Tomnay JE,  Pitts MK,  Fairley CK. New technology and partner notification — why aren’t we using them? Int J STD AIDS 2005; 16 19–22.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[28] Rotello G. Sexual ecology–AIDS and the destiny of gay men. London: Penguin/Plume; 1998.

[29] Klausner JD,  Levine DK,  Kent CK. Internet-based site-specific interventions for syphilis prevention among gay and bisexual men. AIDS Care 2004; 16 964–70.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[30] Levine DK,  Scott KC,  Klausner JD.. Online syphilis testing — confidential and convenient. Sex Transm Dis 2005; 32 139–41.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |