50. THE MANAGEMENT OF MEN WITH ACUTE CHLAMYDIA-NEGATIVE NON-GONOCOCCAL URETHRITIS: A LACK OF CONSENSUS AMONG AUSTRALIAN SEXUAL HEALTH PHYSICIANS
Sexual Health
4(4) 303 - 304
Published: 23 November 2007
Abstract
Objective: In clinical practice, chlamydia-negative non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU) is a common but poorly understood condition. The purpose of this study was to determine how Australian sexual health physicians manage men with this condition.Methods: In July 2006, a survey was mailed to all members of the Australasian Chapter of Sexual Health Medicine.
Results: Of 166 surveys mailed out, 111 (67%) were returned completed. The majority of sexual health physicians (73%, n = 81) indicated that they believed that female partners of men with acute chlamydia-negative NGU were at risk of adverse reproductive health outcomes. However, only 19% (n = 21) routinely tested men with acute NGU for pathogens other than Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis. Most commonly, this was for M. genitalium (n = 16). While 68% of respondents believed that M. genitalium was a cause of acute NGU, only 27% had access to testing for this organism. Other pathogens that were sometimes tested for included herpes simplex virus, Trichomonas vaginalis and adenovirus. Over half of sexual health physicians indicated that they would usually initiate notification of female sexual partners of men presenting with acute NGU, even before confirmatory test results were available.
Conclusion: There are substantial differences in how acute, chlamydia-negative NGU is managed by Australian sexual health physicians. In part, these may relate to differences in beliefs around which pathogens are responsible for this condition and the availability of testing for particular pathogens. Notification of female partners is commonplace, even though the underlying cause of urethritis in affected men appears to be poorly defined.
https://doi.org/10.1071/SHv4n4Ab50
© CSIRO 2007