Where would young people using an online STI testing service want to be treated? A survey of young Australians
Olivia Walsh
A , Ethan T. Cardwell A , Jane S. Hocking A , Fabian Y. S. Kong A # and Teralynn Ludwick A # *
A
Abstract
Although there has been growth in online STI testing services, more attention is needed to understand how to facilitate effective treatment pathways for users. This study investigated where young people want to be treated for gonorrhoea and syphilis if they test positive using an online service.
We conducted an online survey of Australians aged 16–29 years that included multiple choice and free-text questions about their preferred location for receiving injectable antibiotics. Multivariable multinomial logistic regression examined associations between respondent characteristics and service preferences. Content analysis was used to code free-text responses.
Among 905 survey respondents, 777 (85.9%) answered questions on treatment preferences. Respondents most commonly preferred injectable antibiotics provided by a sexual health clinic (294; 37.8%) or a nurse in a pharmacy (208; 26.8%). Gender/sexually diverse respondents were more likely to select sexual health clinics over general practice (MSM RRR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1–5.7; WSW RRR 2.6, 95% CI 1.1–5.7; trans/non-binary RRR 2.5; 95% CI 1.0–6.0). Older respondents (aged 25–29 years) were more likely to choose all alternatives over general practice, with the reverse found for those who had previously tested. From open-text answers, pharmacies were valued for their convenience, and sexual health clinics for providing non-judgemental, free services by specialists.
Differences in treatment preferences by certain groups of young people suggest that different service offerings may influence treatment-seeking outcomes from online STI testing services
Keywords: digital health, health services, injectable antibiotics, sexual health, STIs, STI testing, STI treatment, young people.
References
1 Cardwell ET, Ludwick T, Fairley C, Bourne C, Chang S, Hocking S, et al. Web-based STI/HIV testing services available for access in Australia: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25(25): e45695.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
2 Spence T, Kander I, Walsh J, Griffiths F, Ross J. Perceptions and experiences of internet-based testing for sexually transmitted infections: systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22(8): e17667.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
3 Gilbert M, Hottes TS, Kerr T, Taylor D, Fairley CK, Lester R, et al. Factors associated with intention to use internet-based testing for sexually transmitted infections among men who have sex with men. J Med Internet Res 2013; 15(11): e254.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
4 Wilson E, Leyrat C, Baraitser P, Free C. Does internet-accessed STI (e-STI) testing increase testing uptake for chlamydia and other STIs among a young population who have never tested? Secondary analyses of data from a randomised controlled trial. Sex Transm Infect 2019; 95(8): 569-574.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
5 Sumray K, Lloyd KC, Estcourt CS, Burns F, Gibbs J. Access to, usage and clinical outcomes of, online postal sexually transmitted infection services: a scoping review. Sex Transm Infect 2022; 98(7): 528-535.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
6 Wilson E, Free C, Morris TP, Syred J, Ahamed I, Menon-Johansson AS, et al. Internet-accessed sexually transmitted infection (e-STI) testing and results service: a randomised, single-blind, controlled trial. PLoS Med 2017; 14(12): e1002479.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
7 Griner SB, Reeves JM, Webb NJ, Johnson KC, Kline N, Thompson EL. Consumer-based sexually transmitted infection screening among young adult women: the negative influence of the social system. Sex Transm Dis 2022; 49(9): 596-600.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
8 Ludwick T, Walsh O, Cardwell T, Chang S, Kong F, Hocking JS. Moving towards online-based STI testing and treatment services for young people: who will use it and what do they want? Sex Transm Dis 2023; 51: 220-226.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
9 Koh CS, Kang M, Usherwood T. ‘I demand to be treated as the person I am’: experiences of accessing primary health care for Australian adults who identify as gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender or queer. Sex Health 2014; 11(3): 258.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
10 Rietmeijer CA. Improving care for sexually transmitted infections. J Int AIDS Soc 2019; 22(S6): e25349.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
11 Ali H, Donovan B, Fairley CK, Chen MY, O’Connor CC, Grulich AE, et al. Increasing access by priority populations to Australian sexual health clinics. Sex Transm Dis 2013; 40(10): 819-821.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
12 Lichtenstein B. Stigma as a barrier to treatment of sexually transmitted infection in the American deep south: issues of race, gender and poverty. Soc Sci Med 2003; 57(12): 2435-2445.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
13 Tilson EC, Sanchez V, Ford CL, Smurzynski M, Leone PA, Fox KK, et al. Barriers to asymptomatic screening and other STD services for adolescents and young adults: focus group discussions. BMC Public Health 2004; 4(1): 21.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
14 Cassell JA. Treating sexually transmitted infections in primary care: a missed opportunity? Sex Transm Infect 2003; 79(2): 134-136.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
15 Hambly S, Luzzi G. Sexual health services – a patient preference survey. Int J STD AIDS 2006; 17(6): 372-374.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
16 NSW Health. Pharmacy reform to expand community health care. Sydney: NSW Health; 2022. Available at https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/news/Pages/20221113_00.aspx
17 Wood H, Gudka S. Pharmacist-led screening in sexually transmitted infections: current perspectives. Integr Pharm Res Pract 2018; 7: 67-82.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
