Interventions aimed at increasing syphilis screening among non-pregnant individuals in healthcare settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Leah Moncrieff
A * , Morgan O’Reilly A , Leanne Hall A and Clare Heal A
A
Abstract
Syphilis remains a pressing public health concern with potential severe morbidity if left untreated. To improve syphilis screening, targeted interventions are crucial, especially in at-risk populations. This systematic review synthesises studies that compare syphilis screening in the presence and absence of an intervention. A systematic search of four databases was conducted (Medline, Embase, Cinahl and Scopus). The primary outcomes evaluated included syphilis screening, re-screening and detection rates. Findings were synthesised narratively. Where multiple studies were clinically heterogenous, a pooled odds ratio was calculated. Twenty-four studies were included. A variety of interventions showed promise including clinician alerts, which increased syphilis screening rate (OR range, 1.25–1.45) and patient SMS reminders that mostly improved re-screening/re-attendance rates (OR range, 0.93–4.4). Coupling syphilis serology with routine HIV monitoring increased the proportion of HIV-positive individuals undergoing both tests. However, pooling three studies with this intervention using the outcome of syphilis detection rate yielded inconclusive results (pooled OR 1.722 [95% CI 0.721–2.723], I2 = 24.8%, P = 0.264). The introduction of hospital-based packaged testing for screening high-risk individuals is unique given hospitals are not typical locations for public health initiatives. Nurse-led clinics and clinician incentives were successful strategies. Including syphilis screening with other existing programs has potential to increase screening rates (OR range, 1.06–2.08), but requires further investigation. Technology-driven interventions produced cost-effective, feasible and positive outcomes. Challenges were evident in achieving guideline-recommended screening frequencies for men who have sex with men, indicating the need for multifaceted approaches. Wider application of these interventions may improve syphilis screening and detection rates.
Keywords: health facilities and services, HIV, men who have sex with men, screening, sexual health, sexually transmitted infections, syphilis, systematic review.
References
1 Tudor ME, Al Aboud AM, Lesie SW, et al. Syphilis. StatPearls. 2023. Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK534780/#:~:text=The%20classic%20primary%20syphilis%20presentation,%2C%20tonsils%2C%20and%20oral%20mucosa [accessed 26 July 2023]
2 Wu MY, Gong HZ, Hu KR, Zheng H, Wan X, Li J. Effect of syphilis infection on HIV acquisition: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Transm Infect 2021; 97: 525-533.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
3 Buchacz K, Patel P, Taylor M, et al. Syphilis increases HIV viral load and decreases CD4 cell counts in HIV-infected patients with new syphilis infections. AIDS 2004; 18(15): 2075-2079.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
4 World Health Organization. Vulnerable groups and key populations at increased risk of HIV. World Health Organization; 2023. Available at https://www.emro.who.int/asd/health-topics/vulnerable-groups-and-key-populations-at-increased-risk-of-hiv.html [accessed 26 July 2023]
5 Tuite AR, Fisman DN, Mishra S. Screen more or screen more often? Using mathematical models to inform syphilis control strategies. BMC Public Health 2013; 13: 606.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
6 Tuite AR, Shaw S, Reimer JN, Ross CP, Fisman DN, Mishra S. Can enhanced screening of men with a history of prior syphilis infection stem the epidemic in men who have sex with men? A mathematical modelling study. Sex Transm Infect 2018; 94(2): 105-110.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
7 Gray RT, Hoare A, Prestage GP, Donovan B, Kaldor JM, Wilson DP. Frequent testing of highly sexually active gay men is required to control syphilis. Sex Transm Dis 2010; 37(5): 298-305.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
8 Hui BB, Ward JS, Guy R, Law MG, Gray RT, Regan DG. Impact of testing strategies to combat a major syphilis outbreak among Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples: a mathematical modeling study. Open Forum Infect Dis 2022; 9(5): 119.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
9 Mitchell KM, Cox AP, Mabey D, Tucker JD, Peeling RW, Vickerman P. The impact of syphilis screening among female sex workers in China: a modelling study. PLoS ONE 2013; 8: e55622.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
10 U.S Preventive Services Task Force. Syphilis infection in nonpregnant adolescents and adults: screening. U.S Preventive Services Task Force; 2022. Available at https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/syphilis-infection-nonpregnant-adults-adolescents-screening [accessed 27 July 2023]
11 Australian STI Management Guidelines. Men who have sex with men. Australian STI Management Guidelines for use in Primary Care; 2021. Available at https://sti.guidelines.org.au/populations-and-situations/men-who-have-sex-with-men/ [accessed 27 July 2023]
12 An Q, Wejnert C, Bernstein K, Paz-Bailey G, for the NHBS Study Group. Syphilis screening and diagnosis among men who have sex with men, 2008–2014, 20 U.S. Cities. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2017; 75(3): S363-S369.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
13 Guy R, Wand H, Holt M, et al. High annual syphilis testing rates among gay men in Australia, but insufficient retesting. Sex Transm Dis 2012; 39(4): 268-275.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
14 Footman A, Dagama D, Smith CH, Van Der Pol B. A systematic review of new approaches to sexually transmitted infection screening framed in the capability, opportunity, motivation, and behavior model of implementation science. Sex Transm Dis 2021; 48(8): S58-S65.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
15 Taylor MM, Frasure-Williams J, Burnett P, Park IU. Interventions to improve sexually transmitted disease screening in clinic-based settings. Sex Transm Dis 2016; 43: S28-S41.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
16 Desai M, Woodhall SC, Nardone A, Burns F, Mercey D, Gilson R. Active recall to increase HIV and STI testing: a systematic review. Sex Transm Infect 2015; 91(5): 314-323.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
17 Zou H, Fairley CK, Guy R, Chen MY. The efficacy of clinic-based interventions aimed at increasing screening for bacterial sexually transmitted infections among men who have sex with men: a systematic review. Sex Transm Dis 2012; 39(5): 382-387.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
18 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6(7): e1000097.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
19 Veritas Health Innovation. Covidence systematic review software. Version 2. Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia; 2014. Available at www.covidence.org [accessed 8 July 2023]
20 Richardson WS, Wilson MC, Nishikawa J, Hayward RSA. The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions. ACP J Club 1995; 123(3): A12-A13.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
21 StataCorp LLC. STATA. Version 18. StataCorp LLC, College Station, Texas; 2023. Available at https://www.stata.com/ [accessed 17 August 2023]
22 Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI manual for evidence synthesis. Joanna Briggs Institute; 2020. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-01 [accessed August 2023]
23 Turpin R, Rosario AD, Dyer T. Barriers to syphilis testing among men who have sex with men: a systematic review of the literature. Sex Health 2020; 17(3): 201-213.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
24 Bissessor M, Fairley CK, Leslie D, Chen MY. Use of a computer alert increases detection of early, asymptomatic syphilis among higher-risk men who have sex with men. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 53: 57-58.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
25 Scarborough AP, Slome S, Hurley LB, Park IU. Improvement of sexually transmitted disease screening among HIV-infected men who have sex with men through implementation of a standardized sexual risk assessment tool. Sex Transm Dis 2015; 42(10): 595-598.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
26 Bourne C, Knight V, Guy R, Wand H, Lu H, McNulty A. Short message service reminder intervention doubles sexually transmitted infection/HIV re-testing rates among men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Infect 2011; 87(3): 229-231.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
27 Burton J, Brook G, McSorley J, Murphy S. The utility of short message service (SMS) texts to remind patients at higher risk of STIs and HIV to reattend for testing: a controlled before and after study. Sex Transm Infect 2014; 90: 11-13.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
28 Nyatsanza F, McSorley J, Murphy S, Brook G. ‘It’s all in the message’: the utility of personalised short message service (SMS) texts to remind patients at higher risk of STIs and HIV to reattend for testing – a repeat before and after study. Sex Transm Infect 2016; 92(5): 393-395.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
29 Zou H, Fairley CK, Guy R, et al. Automated, computer generated reminders and increased detection of gonorrhoea, chlamydia and syphilis in men who have sex with men. PLoS ONE 2013; 8(4): e61972.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
30 Bissessor M, Fairley CK, Leslie D, Howley K, Chen MY. Frequent screening for syphilis as part of HIV monitoring increases the detection of early asymptomatic syphilis among HIV-positive homosexual men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2010; 55(2): 211-216.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
31 Burchell AN, Tan DHS, Grewal R, et al. Routinized syphilis screening among men living with human immunodeficiency virus: a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis 2022; 74(5): 846-853.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
32 Callander D, Baker D, Chen M, Guy R. Including syphilis testing as part of standard HIV management checks and improved syphilis screening in primary care. Sex Transm Dis 2013; 40(4): 338-340.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
33 Cheeks MA, Fransua M, Stringer HG, Jr, Silva S, Relf M. A quality improvement project to increase early detection of syphilis infection or re-infection in HIV-infected men who have sex with men. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care 2016; 27(2): 143-152.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
34 Winston A, Hawkins D, Mandalia S, Boag F, Azadian B, Asboe D. Is increased surveillance for asymptomatic syphilis in an HIV outpatient department worthwhile? Sex Transm Infect 2003; 79(3): 257-259.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
35 Cohen CE, Winston A, Asboe D, et al. Increasing detection of asymptomatic syphilis in HIV patients. Sex Transm Infect 2005; 81(3): 217-219.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
36 Trubiano JA, Hoy JF. Taming the great: enhanced syphilis screening in HIV-positive men who have sex with men in a hospital clinic setting. Sex Health 2015; 12(2): 176-178.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
37 Guy R, El-Hayek C, Fairley CK, et al. Opt-out and opt-in testing increases syphilis screening of HIV-positive men who have sex with men in Australia. PLoS ONE 2013; 8(8): e71436.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
38 Rieg G, Lewis RJ, Miller LG, Witt MD, Guerrero M, Daar ES. Asymptomatic sexually transmitted infections in HIV-infected men who have sex with men: prevalence, incidence, predictors, and screening strategies. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2008; 22(12): 947-954.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
39 Tang EC, Vittinghoff E, Philip SS, et al. Quarterly screening optimizes detection of sexually transmitted infections when prescribing HIV preexposure prophylaxis. AIDS 2020; 34(8): 1181-1186.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
40 Lipps AA, Bazan JA, Lustberg ME, et al. A collaborative intervention between emergency medicine and infectious diseases to increase syphilis and HIV screening in the emergency department. Sex Transm Dis 2022; 49(1): 50-54.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
41 Marks LR, Reno H, Liang SY, et al. Value of packaged testing for sexually transmitted infections for persons who inject drugs hospitalized with serious injection-related infections. Open Forum Infect Dis 2021; 8(11): ofab489.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
42 Snow AF, Vodstrcil LA, Fairley CK, et al. Introduction of a sexual health practice nurse is associated with increased STI testing of men who have sex with men in primary care. BMC Infect Dis 2013; 13: 298.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
43 Hamlyn E, Barrett S, Kelsey J, Lockyer S, Welz T, Poulton M. Improvement in screening for sexually transmitted infections in HIV-positive patients following implementation of a nurse-led clinic. Int J STD AIDS 2007; 18(6): 424-426.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
44 Kelly C, Johnston J, Carey F. Evaluation of a partnership between primary and secondary care providing an accessible Level 1 sexual health service in the community. Int J STD AIDS 2014; 25(10): 751-757.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
45 Zhang W, Luo H, Ma Y, et al. Monetary incentives for provision of syphilis screening, Yunnan, China. Bull World Health Organ 2017; 95(9): 657-662.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
46 Barbee LA, Tat S, Dhanireddy S, Marrazzo JM. Implementation and operational research: effectiveness and patient acceptability of a sexually transmitted infection self-testing program in an HIV care setting. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2016; 72(2): e26-e31.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
47 Botes LP, McAllister J, Ribbons E, Jin F, Hillman RJ. Significant increase in testing rates for sexually transmissible infections following the introduction of an anal cytological screening program, targeting HIV-positive men who have sex with men. Sex Health 2011; 8: 76-78.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
48 Rosenman M, Wang J, Dexter P, Overhage JM. Computerized reminders for syphilis screening in an urban emergency department. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003; 2003: 987.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |
49 Lim MSC, Hocking JS, Hellard ME, Aitken CK. SMS STI: a review of the uses of mobile phone text messaging in sexual health. Int J STD AIDS 2008; 19(5): 287-290.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
50 Lim MSC, Sacks-Davis R, Aitken CK, Hocking JS, Hellard ME. Randomised controlled trial of paper, online and SMS diaries for collecting sexual behaviour information from young people. J Epidemiol Community Health 2010; 64(10): 885-889.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
51 Australian STI Management Guidelines for use in Primary Care. People living with HIV. Australian STI Management Guidelines for use in Primary Care; 2021. Available at https://sti.guidelines.org.au/populations-and-situations/people-living-with-hiv/ [accessed 3 August 2023]
52 ASHM. HIV monitoring tool: new patient. Australasian Society for HIV, Viral Hepatitis and Sexual Health Medicine; 2021. Available at https://ashm.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/ASHM-HIV-Monitoring-Tool_FA_web-1.pdf [accessed 3 August 2023]
53 ASHM. Clinical follow-up and monitoring of patients on PrEP. Australasian Society for HIV, Viral Hepatitis and Sexual Health Medicine; 2019. Available at https://prepguidelines.com.au/clinical-follow-up-and-monitoring-of-patients-on-prep/ [accessed 3 August 2023]
54 Lal L, Audsley J, Murphy DA, et al. Medication adherence, condom use and sexually transmitted infections in Australian preexposure prophylaxis users. AIDS 2017; 31(12): 1709-1714.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
55 Ong JJ, Fu H, Baggaley RC, et al. Missed opportunities for sexually transmitted infections testing for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis users: a systematic review. J Int AIDS Soc 2021; 24(2): e25673.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
56 Larios Venegas A, Melbourne HM, Castillo IA, et al. Enhancing the routine screening infrastructure to address a syphilis epidemic in Miami-Dade County. Sex Transm Dis 2020; 47(5): S61-S65.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
57 Stanford KA, Hazra A, Friedman E, et al. Opt-out, routine emergency department syphilis screening as a novel intervention in at-risk populations. Sex Transm Dis 2021; 48(5): 347-352.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
58 Yax JA, Niforatos JD, Summers DL, et al. A model for syphilis screening in the emergency department. Public Health Rep 2021; 136(2): 136-142.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
59 Alarcón Gutiérrez M, Fernández Quevedo M, Martín Valle S, et al. Acceptability and effectiveness of using mobile applications to promote HIV and other STI testing among men who have sex with men in Barcelona, Spain. Sex Transm Infect 2018; 94(6): 443-448.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
60 Lampkin D, Crawley A, Lopez TP, Mejia CM, Yuen W, Levy V. Reaching suburban men who have sex with men for STD and HIV services through online social networking outreach: a public health approach. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2016; 72(1): 73-78.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
61 Su J-Y, Holt J, Payne R, Gates K, Ewing A, Ryder N. Effectiveness of using Grindr to increase syphilis testing among men who have sex with men in Darwin, Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health 2015; 39(3): 293-294.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
62 Dowshen N, Lee S, Matty Lehman B, Castillo M, Mollen C. IknowUshould2: feasibility of a youth-driven social media campaign to promote STI and HIV testing among adolescents in Philadelphia. AIDS Behav 2015; 19(S2): 106-111.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
63 Montoya JA, Kent CK, Rotblatt H, McCright J, Kerndt PR, Klausner JD. Social marketing campaign significantly associated with increases in syphilis testing among gay and bisexual men in San Francisco. Sex Transm Dis 2005; 32(7): 395-399.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
64 Plant A, Javanbakht M, Montoya JA, Rotblatt H, O’Leary C, Kerndt PR. Check Yourself: a social marketing campaign to increase syphilis screening in Los Angeles County. Sex Transm Dis 2014; 41: 50-57.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
65 Wilkinson AL, Pedrana AE, El-Hayek C, et al. The impact of a social marketing campaign on HIV and sexually transmissible infection testing among men who have sex with men in Australia. Sex Transm Dis 2016; 43: 49-56.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
66 Plant A, Montoya JA, Rotblatt H, et al. Stop the sores: the making and evaluation of a successful social marketing campaign. Health Promot Pract 2010; 11: 23-33.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
