Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Sexual mixing patterns among male–female partnerships in Melbourne, Australia

Kate E. Greaves A B , Christopher K. Fairley https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9081-1664 A B , Jaimie L. Engel A B , Jason J. Ong https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5784-7403 A B , Elena Rodriguez A , Tiffany R. Phillips https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6920-7710 A B # and Eric P. F. Chow https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1766-0657 A B C # *
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Vic. 3053, Australia.

B Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic. 3004, Australia.

C Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic. 3053, Australia.

* Correspondence to: eric.chow@monash.edu
# These authors contributed equally to this paper

Handling Editor: Matthew Hogben

Sexual Health 19(1) 33-38 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH21161
Submitted: 25 August 2021  Accepted: 2 December 2021   Published: 8 March 2022

© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Background: Individuals who have both opposite- and same-sex partners have the potential to pass sexually transmitted infections (STIs) between high- and low-risk populations. Our aim was to examine assortative sexual mixing in terms of same-sex activity among male–female partnerships.

Methods: This was a retrospective repeated cross-sectional study of male–female partnerships attending the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (MSHC) from 2015 to 2019. Sex of sexual partners was collected via computer-assisted self-interview. We calculated the proportion of partnerships where at least one individual reported same-sex partners in the previous 12 months and the degree of assortativity by bisexuality.

Results: A total of 2112 male–female partnerships (i.e. 4224 individuals) were included, with a median age of 27 years (IQR 23–31). Overall, 89.3% (1885/2112) of male–female partnerships did not report any other same-sex partners; however, in 9.5% (201/2112) of partnerships, same-sex partners were reported by one individual and in 1.2% (26/2112) of partnerships, both individuals reported same-sex partners. Bisexuality appeared to be slightly assortative in male–female partnerships (r = 0.163, 95% CI: 0.150–0.176; P < 0.001).

Conclusion: One in 10 individuals in male–female partnerships had at least one same-sex partner within the previous 12 months. Individuals were minorly selective by bisexuality, suggesting the patterns of bisexual mixing in male–female partners are more variable and this may have a significant impact on STI transmission in heterosexual populations.

Keywords: assortativity, bisexual, heterosexual, mixing, opposite-sex, same-sex, sexual activity, sexual behaviour, sexual mixing, sexual networks, sexual orientation, sexual partners, sexual practice.


References

[1]  Jasek E, Chow EPF, Ong JJ, Bradshaw CS, Chen MY, Hocking JS, Lee D, Phillips T, Temple-Smith M, Fehler G, Fairley CK. Sexually transmitted infections in Melbourne, Australia from 1918 to 2016: nearly a century of data. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep 2017; 41 E212–22.
| 29720070PubMed |

[2]  Kirby Institute. National update on HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmissible infections in Australia: 2009–2018. Sydney: Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney; 2020.

[3]  Williamson DA, Chow EPF, Gorrie CL, Seemann T, Ingle DJ, Higgins N, et al. Bridging of Neisseria gonorrhoeae lineages across sexual networks in the HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis era. Nat Commun 2019; 10 3988
Bridging of Neisseria gonorrhoeae lineages across sexual networks in the HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis era.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31488838PubMed |

[4]  Martín-Sánchez M, Case R, Fairley C, Hocking JS, Bradshaw C, Ong J, et al. Trends and differences in sexual practices and sexually transmitted infections in men who have sex with men only (MSMO) and men who have sex with men and women (MSMW): a repeated cross-sectional study in Melbourne, Australia. BMJ Open 2020; 10 e037608
Trends and differences in sexual practices and sexually transmitted infections in men who have sex with men only (MSMO) and men who have sex with men and women (MSMW): a repeated cross-sectional study in Melbourne, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33234617PubMed |

[5]  Engel JL, Fairley CK, Greaves KE, Vodstrcil LA, Ong JJ, Bradshaw CS, Chen MY, Phillips TR, Chow EPF. Patterns of sexual practices, sexually transmitted infections and other genital infections in women who have sex with women only (WSWO), women who have sex with men only (WSMO) and women who have sex with men and women (WSMW): findings from a sexual health clinic in Melbourne, Australia, 2011–2019. Archives of Sexual Behavior. In press.

[6]  Newman ME. Mixing patterns in networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys 2003; 67 026126
Mixing patterns in networks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[7]  Chow EPF, Read TRH, Law MG, Chen MY, Bradshaw CS, Fairley CK. Assortative sexual mixing patterns in male–female and male–male partnerships in Melbourne, Australia: implications for HIV and sexually transmissible infection transmission. Sex Health 2016; 13 451–6.
Assortative sexual mixing patterns in male–female and male–male partnerships in Melbourne, Australia: implications for HIV and sexually transmissible infection transmission.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28636867PubMed |

[8]  Melbourne Sexual Health Centre. Melbourne Sexual Health Centre Annual Report 2019. Melbourne: Melbourne Sexual Health Centre; 2019.

[9]  Prah P, Copas AJ, Mercer CH, Nardone A, Johnson AM. Patterns of sexual mixing with respect to social, health and sexual characteristics among heterosexual couples in England: analyses of probability sample survey data. Epidemiol Infect 2015; 143 1500–10.
Patterns of sexual mixing with respect to social, health and sexual characteristics among heterosexual couples in England: analyses of probability sample survey data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25167088PubMed |

[10]  Maliepaard E. Disclosing bisexuality or coming out? Two different realities for bisexual people in The Netherlands. J Bisex 2018; 18 145–67.
Disclosing bisexuality or coming out? Two different realities for bisexual people in The Netherlands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[11]  Rissel C, Badcock PB, Smith AM, Richters J, de Visser RO, Grulich AE, et al. Heterosexual experience and recent heterosexual encounters among Australian adults: the second Australian Study of Health and Relationships. Sex Health 2014; 11 416–26.
Heterosexual experience and recent heterosexual encounters among Australian adults: the second Australian Study of Health and Relationships.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25376995PubMed |