Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
REVIEW

Chemsex as edgework: towards a sociological understanding

Ford Hickson
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK.
Email: ford.hickson@lshtm.ac.uk

Sexual Health 15(2) 102-107 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH17166
Submitted: 5 September 2017  Accepted: 22 November 2017   Published: 11 January 2018

Abstract

Sexual sessions between men, organised through mobile technologies and combined with stimulants intended to extend and intensify the session have been reified into the phenomena of ‘chemsex’. Understanding chemsex requires multiple levels of analysis and interpretation. This paper considers chemsex through the lens of edgework, a sociological category for voluntary risk taking identified in 1990 by Stephen Lyng. Edgework activities involve a clear and present danger to the self, intense emotions and sensations and an opportunity to exercise specialist skills. Using published research and other cultural products, this paper demonstrates that chemsex fully exhibits all the defining features of edgework. Chemsex is then positioned as an activity that epitomises the (gay) citizen as consumer in a technocapitalist age of pharmacopornographic consumption.


References

[1]  Giami A, Perrey C. Transformations in the medicalization of sex: HIV prevention between discipline and biopolitics. J Sex Res 2012; 49 353–61.
Transformations in the medicalization of sex: HIV prevention between discipline and biopolitics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[2]  Preciado PB. Testo junkie: sex, drugs, and biopolitics in the pharmacopornographic era. Translated by Bruce Benderson. New York: Feminist Press; 2013.

[3]  Wharton J. Something for the Weekend: Life in the Chemsex Underworld. London: Biteback Publishing; 2017.

[4]  Smith DK, Pals SL, Herbst JH, Shinde S, Carey JW. Development of a clinical screening index predictive of incident HIV infection among men who have sex with men in the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2012; 60 421–7.
Development of a clinical screening index predictive of incident HIV infection among men who have sex with men in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[5]  Hegazi A, Lee MJ, Whittaker W, Green S, Simms R, Cutts R, Nagington M, Nathan B, Pakianathan MR. Chemsex and the city: sexualised substance use in gay bisexual and other men who have sex with men attending sexual health clinics. Int J STD AIDS 2017; 28 362–6.
Chemsex and the city: sexualised substance use in gay bisexual and other men who have sex with men attending sexual health clinics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC28bpt1yntw%3D%3D&md5=07ed5b11243d7184b344c3d86c169424CAS |

[6]  Gray J. Straw Dogs. London: Granta Books; 2003.

[7]  Giorgetti R, Tagliabracci A, Schifano F, Zaami S, Marinelli E, Busardò FP. When “chems” meet sex: a rising phenomenon called “chemsex”. Curr Neuropharmacol 2017; 15 762–70.
| 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2sXhtFSlsr3J&md5=111096346462431563f0ce655da8c77bCAS |

[8]  Lyng S. Edgework: A Social Psychological Analysis of Voluntary Risk Taking. American Journal of Sociology 1990; 95 851–86.

[9]  Worthen MGF, Baker SA. Pushing up on the glass ceiling of female muscularity: women’s bodybuilding as edgework. Deviant Behav 2016; 37 471–95.
Pushing up on the glass ceiling of female muscularity: women’s bodybuilding as edgework.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[10]  Kong TSK. Buying sex as edgework: Hong Kong male clients in commercial sex. Br J Criminol 2016; 56 105–22.
Buying sex as edgework: Hong Kong male clients in commercial sex.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[11]  Fynbo L. Risk, control and self-identity: young drunk drivers’ experiences with driving under the influence of alcohol and drugs. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 2014; 31 229–43.
Risk, control and self-identity: young drunk drivers’ experiences with driving under the influence of alcohol and drugs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[12]  Worrall A, Mawby RC. Probation worker responses to turbulent conditions: constructing identity in a tainted occupation. Aust N Z J Criminol 2013; 46 101–18.
Probation worker responses to turbulent conditions: constructing identity in a tainted occupation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[13]  Laurendeau J. “He didn’t go in doing a skydive”: sustaining the illusion of control in an edgework activity. Sociol Perspect 2006; 49 583–605.
“He didn’t go in doing a skydive”: sustaining the illusion of control in an edgework activity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[14]  Zwick D. Where the action is: internet stock trading as edgework. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2005; 11 Article number UNSP 2.

[15]  Holmes D, O’Bryne P, Gastaldo D. Raw sex as limit experience: a Foucaulian analysis of unsafe anal sex between men. Soc Theory Health 2006; 4 319–33.
Raw sex as limit experience: a Foucaulian analysis of unsafe anal sex between men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[16]  Tomso G. Viral sex and the politics of life. In: Hall DE, Jagose A, editors. The Routledge Queer Studies Reader. Abingdon; Routledge; 2012. pp. 180–193.

[17]  Preston A, Jones R. Slamming. London; Exchange Supplies; 2017.

[18]  Ahmed AK, Weatherburn P, Reid D, Hickson F, Torres-Rueda S, Steinberg P, Bourne A. Social norms related to combining drugs and sex (“chemsex”) among gay men in South London. Int J Drug Policy 2016; 38 29–35.
Social norms related to combining drugs and sex (“chemsex”) among gay men in South London.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[19]  Bourne A, Reid D, Hickson F, Torres-Rueda S, Steinberg P, Weatherburn P. “Chemsex” and harm reduction need among gay men in South London. Int J Drug Policy 2015; 26 1171–6.
“Chemsex” and harm reduction need among gay men in South London.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[20]  Weatherburn P, Hickson F, Reid D, Torres-Rueda S, Bourne A. Motivations and values associated with combining sex and illicit drugs (‘chemsex’) among gay men in South London: findings from a qualitative study. Sex Transm Infect 2017; 93 203–6.
Motivations and values associated with combining sex and illicit drugs (‘chemsex’) among gay men in South London: findings from a qualitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC2szgtlyrtA%3D%3D&md5=0fb5dca6d581719792c5a488f34536edCAS |

[21]  Amaro R. Taking chances for love? reflections on love, risk, and harm reduction in a gay slamming subculture. Contemp Drug Probl 2016; 43 216–27.
Taking chances for love? reflections on love, risk, and harm reduction in a gay slamming subculture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[22]  Bourne A, Reid D, Hickson F, Torres Rueda S, Weatherburn P. The chemsex study: drug use in sexual settings among gay and bisexual men in Lambeth, Southwark and Lewisham. London: Sigma Research; 2014. Available at: www.sigmaresearch.org.uk/chemsex [verified 4 December 2017]

[23]  Kahneman D. Thinking Fast and Slow. London: Penguin; 2011.

[24]  Southgate S, Hopwood M. The role of folk pharmacology and lay experts in harm reduction: Sydney gay drug using networks. Int J Drug Policy 2001; 12 321–35.
The role of folk pharmacology and lay experts in harm reduction: Sydney gay drug using networks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[25]  Van Schipstal I, Mishra S, Berning M, Murray H. Harm reduction from below: on sharing and caring in drug use. Contemp Drug Probl 2016; 43 199–215.
Harm reduction from below: on sharing and caring in drug use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[26]  Daskalopoulou M, Rodger A, Phillips AN, Sherr L, Speakman A, Collins S, Elford J, Johnson MA, Gilson R, Fisher M, Wilkins E, Anderson J, McDonnell J, Edwards S, Perry N, O’Connell R, Lascar M, Jones M, Johnson AM, Hart G, Miners A, Geretti A-M, Burman WJ, Lampe FC. Recreational drug use, polydrug use, and sexual behaviour in HIV-diagnosed men who have sex with men in the UK: results from the cross-sectional ASTRA study. The Lancet HIV 2014; 1 e22–e31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(14)70001-3

[27]  Vosburgh HW, Mansergh G, Sullivan PS, Purcell DW. A review of the literature on event-level substance use and sexual risk behaviour among men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav 2012; 16 1394–410.
A review of the literature on event-level substance use and sexual risk behaviour among men who have sex with men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[28]  Melendez-Torres GJ, Hickson F, Reid D, Weatherburn P, Bonell C. Findings from within-subjects comparisons of drug use and sexual risk behaviour in men who have sex with men in England. Int J STD AIDS 2017; 28 250–8.
Findings from within-subjects comparisons of drug use and sexual risk behaviour in men who have sex with men in England.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC28fjs1Cltg%3D%3D&md5=fb5e2f9e1670f46fa35f1551f8e61facCAS |

[29]  Melendez-Torres GJ, Bonell C. Littoral spaces of performance: findings from a systematic review and re-analysis of qualitative studies on men who have sex with men, substance use and social venues. Sexuality Research and Social Policy 2016;
Littoral spaces of performance: findings from a systematic review and re-analysis of qualitative studies on men who have sex with men, substance use and social venues.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[30]  Downs A. The velvet rage overcoming the pain of growing up gay in a straight man’s world. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books; 2005.

[31]  Todd M. Straight jacket: how to be gay and happy. London: Bantham Press; 2016.

[32]  Harry J. Sports ideology, attitudes towards women and antihomosexual attitudes. Sex Roles 1995; 32 109–16.

[33]  Connell RW. Masculinities, 2nd edition. Cambridge; Polity Press; 2005.

[34]  Halperin DM. What do gay men want? An essay on sex, risk and subjectivity. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 2007.

[35]  Reith G. On the edge: drugs and the consumption of risk in late modernity. In Lyng S, editor. Edgework. New York: Routledge; 2005. pp. 227–245.

[36]  Florêncio J. Chemsex: why is gay sex causing straight panic? The Conversation, 12 April 2016. Available at: https://theconversation.com/chemsex-why-is-gay-sex-causing-straight-panic-56541 [verified 4 December 2017]

[37]  Crossley ML. Making sense of barebacking: gay men’s narratives, unsafe sex and the ‘resistance habitus’. Br J Soc Psychol 2004; 43 225–44.
Making sense of barebacking: gay men’s narratives, unsafe sex and the ‘resistance habitus’.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[38]  Dávila PF. ‘Chemsex in the sauna’: an ethnographic study on the use of drugs in a gay sex venue in Barcelona. Presented at The European ChemSex Forum, London, 6–8 April 2016.

[39]  Sandel M. What money can’t buy. New York; Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 2012.

[40]  Gaissad L. Expending ourselves at “La Démence? ”: gay party circuit from consumption to consummation. Ethnol Fr 2013; 43 409–16.
Expending ourselves at “La Démence? ”: gay party circuit from consumption to consummation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |