Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Assessing the possibilities and challenges of patient involvement in sexual, reproductive and HIV/AIDS services

Jane Meyrick A C , Debra Gray B and Abigail Jones A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A University of the West of England, Frenchay Campus, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, BS16 1QY, UK.

B University of Winchester, Sparkford Road, Winchester, SO22 4NR, UK.

C Corresponding author. Email: jane.meyrick@uwe.ac.uk

Sexual Health 13(3) 213-220 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH15224
Submitted: 17 November 2015  Accepted: 10 February 2016   Published: 21 April 2016

Abstract

Background: Patient and public involvement (PPI) is a key feature of healthcare services in the UK. Sexual and reproductive health and HIV (SRHH) services face unique PPI challenges, as the anonymity and confidentiality required by service users can be a barrier to attracting patient input. PPI could improve sexual health services, through increased trust in services and the ability to tackle sexual health inequalities. However, specific practical guidance on how to address PPI in sexual health and the evidence to support it is sparse. Methods: This research aims to begin building an evidence base for PPI in sexual health services through: 1) an audit of PPI in SRHH in the Bristol region; and 2) a parallel survey of potential users of sexual health services about their experiences of PPI. For the audit, 18 SRHH organisations from all those in the region invited complete a short online survey, representing a range of different service providers. For the survey, participants, through a convenience sample via the University of the West of England and social media, were invited to complete an anonymous online survey of their experiences of PPI in SSRHs; 96 people responded. Results: Reliance on customer satisfaction approaches and patients not being asked for feedback or what PP is for are reported. Services cite under-resourcing and a lack of time as barriers. Conclusions: Improving the use of patient’s voice in SRHH could be supported through clarity of purpose (measured against outcomes), better communication with patients, and the need for flexible methods.


References

[1]  Department of Health. Understanding what matters. A Guide to using patient feedback to transform services. Leeds: Department of Health; 2009. Available from: www.dh.gov.uk/publications [verified 7 March 2016].

[2]  National Institute of Clinical Excellence. Patient and Public Involvement Policy. National Institute of Clinical Excellence. 2013. Available from: www.nice.org.uk [verified 7 March 2016].

[3]  Beresford P. User involvement, research and health inequalities: developing new directions. Health Soc Care Community 2007; 15 306–12.
User involvement, research and health inequalities: developing new directions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17578391PubMed |

[4]  Wakley G. Clinical governance for better sexual health services. J Fam Plan Reprod Health Care 2004; 30 260–2.
Clinical governance for better sexual health services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[5]  National Health Service England. Transforming participation in health and care. 2013. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/trans-part-hc-guid1.pdf [verified 7 March 2016].

[6]  British Association for Sexual Health and HIV. Standards for the management of sexually transmitted diseases (STIs). 2014. Available from: http://www.medfash.org.uk/uploads/files/p18dtqli8116261rv19i61rh9n2k4.pdf [verified 7 March 2016].

[7]  Department of Health. Sexual health: clinical governance. 2013. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/252975/Sexual_Health_Clinical_Governance_final.pdf [verified 7 March 2016].

[8]  Faculty of Reproduction and Sexual Health. Service standards for sexual and reproductive health. 2013. Available from: http://www.fsrh.org/pdfs/All_Service_standards_January_2013.pdf [verified 7 March 2016].

[9]  London Sexual Health Programme. Portal website no longer available at: http://londonsexualhealth.org/projects/patient-public-engagement/ppe-toolbox/the-toolkit.html

[10]  Mockford C, Staniszewska A, Griffiths F, Herron-Marx S. The impact of patient and public involvement on UK NHS health care: a systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care 2012; 24 28–38.
The impact of patient and public involvement on UK NHS health care: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22109631PubMed |

[11]  Ocloo JE, Fulop NJ. Developing a ‘critical’ approach to patient and public involvement in patient safety in the NHS: learning lessons from other parts of the public sector? Health Expect 2012; 15 424–32.
Developing a ‘critical’ approach to patient and public involvement in patient safety in the NHS: learning lessons from other parts of the public sector?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21711471PubMed |

[12]  Bristol City Council. Rapid appraisal of sexual health service provision. 2014. Available from: https://www2.bristol.gov.uk/committee/2014/sc/sc039/0304_7.pdf [verified 7 March 2016].

[13]  Pearson S. Men’s use of sexual health services. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2003; 29 190–4.
Men’s use of sexual health services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14662050PubMed |

[14]  National Institute of Clinical Excellence. Community Engagement, Guidance. 2009. Available from: www.nice.org.uk [verified 7 March 2016].

[15]  Baraitser P, Pearce V, Blake G, Collander-Brown K, Ridley A. Involving service users in sexual health service development. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2005; 31 281–4.
Involving service users in sexual health service development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16274549PubMed |

[16]  Sheriff K. Improving patient satisfaction with a sexual health service. Nurs Stand 2007; 21 44–8.
Improving patient satisfaction with a sexual health service.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17601237PubMed |

[17]  INVOLVE. INVOLVE – National Institute of Health Research Advisory Body. Guidance on the use of use of social media to actively involve people in research. 2014. Available from: http://www.invo.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/9982-Social-Media-Guide-WEB.pdf [verified 7 March 2016].