Why not the GP? Client preferences for sexually transmissible infection testing in Western Sydney
Karen Biggs A B C and Jennifer Walsh AA Western Sydney Sexual Health Centre, 162 Marsden Street, Parramatta, NSW 2150, Australia.
B University of Sydney, Sydney Nursing School, 88 Mallett Street, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: Karen.biggs@health.nsw.gov.au
Sexual Health 12(5) 463-464 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH15073
Submitted: 8 April 2015 Accepted: 21 May 2015 Published: 13 July 2015
Abstract
Background: Publicly funded sexual health services (PFSHS) in NSW use triage to prioritise access for people at increased risk of infection and refer people at lower risk to General Practitioners (GPs). This study aimed to determine why people in Western Sydney attend a PFSHS in preference to their GP, whether they would be willing to see their GP for sexual health services and what factors were important when making this decision. Methods: An anonymous self-administered questionnaire was used for this study. Results: In total, 228/249 (92%) of all respondents had visited a GP in the previous 12 months; 192/249 (77%) knew the GP could perform sexually transmissible infection testing (STI) testing; 124/249 (50%) had ever had a STI check with a GP and 101/249 (41%) were willing to attend a GP service for STI-related care in the future. Factors relating to the health service staff and client comfort emerged as strong reasons for choice of health service. One-third of non-priority clients (33%) were unwilling to see a GP for STI testing in the future. Respondents raised concerns regarding perceived issues with confidentiality and lack of confidence in the GP’s expertise in sexual health. Conclusions: The underlying factors relating to sexual health care with the GP, whether real or perceived, need to be addressed in order for PFSHS to successfully triage out attendees who are at a lower STI risk.
Additional keywords: general practice, PFSHS, priority populations, publicly-funded sexual health service, triage.
References
[1] NSW Department of Health (NSW DoH). NSW sexually transmissible infections strategy, 2006–2009. Sydney: NSW DoH; 2006.[2] NSW Ministry of Health (NSW MoH). NSW HIV strategy 2012–2015: a new era. Sydney MoH; 2012. Available online at: http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/publications/Publications/nsw-hiv-strategy-2012-15.pdf [Verified 17 March 2015].
[3] Ryder N, McNulty AM. Confidentiality and access to sexual health services. Sex Health 2009; 6 153–5.
| Confidentiality and access to sexual health services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19457295PubMed |
[4] Llewellyn C, Pollard A, Miners A, Richardson D, Fisher M, Cairns J, Smith H. Understanding patient choices for attending sexually transmitted infection testing services: a qualitative study. Sex Transm Infect 2012; 88 504–9.
| Understanding patient choices for attending sexually transmitted infection testing services: a qualitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22628665PubMed |
[5] Hambly S, Luzzi G. Sexual health services – a patient preference survey. Int J STD AIDS 2006; 17 372–4.
| Sexual health services – a patient preference survey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16734956PubMed |
