Perceptions and correlates of pubic hair removal and grooming among college-aged women: a mixed methods approach
Andrea L. DeMaria A D , Beth Sundstrom B , Stephanie M. McInnis B and Emily Rogers C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Department of Health and Human Performance, College of Charleston, 66 George Street, Charleston, SC 29424-0001, USA.
B Department of Communication, College of Charleston, 66 George Street, Charleston, SC 29424-0001, USA.
C Women’s and Gender Studies Program, College of Charleston, 66 George Street, Charleston, SC 29424-0001, USA.
D Corresponding author. Email: demariaa@cofc.edu
Sexual Health 13(3) 248-256 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH15034
Submitted: 3 March 2015 Accepted: 9 January 2016 Published: 18 February 2016
Abstract
Background: Although much is known about behavioural indicators of pubic hair removal, current research lacks deeper cognitive reasoning and understanding through utilising quantitative and qualitative methodologies. The purpose of this study was to: (1) describe and understand pubic hair removal behaviours using a quantitative survey; and (2) examine the relationship between pubic hair removal, sexual behaviours and genital self-image using in-depth interviews. Methods: Data were collected from women aged 18–24 years living in the United States. Overall, 663 participants completed an online survey and 53 completed in-depth interviews. Questions asked related to pubic hair removal and sexual history. Results: Participants removed hair for hygiene, comfort and sensation purposes, which was a personal decision influenced by family, friends and the media. Race, pubic hair removal initiation age, genital image and sexual behaviours were significantly related to pubic hair removal. Conclusions: Data from this study prove that further education regarding safe pubic hair removal methods is needed, especially for those who initiate pubic hair removal and sexual behaviours concurrently.
Additional keyword: sexual behaviour.
References
[1] Basow SA. Women and their body hair. Psychol Women Q 1991; 15 83–96.| Women and their body hair.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[2] Braun V, Tricklebank G, Clarke V. It shouldn’t stick out from your bikini at the beach”: meaning, gender, and the hairy/hairless body. Psychol Women Q 2013; 37 478–93.
| It shouldn’t stick out from your bikini at the beach”: meaning, gender, and the hairy/hairless body.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[3] Ramsey S, Sweeney C, Fraser M, Oades G. Pubic hair and sexuality: a review. J Sex Med 2009; 6 2102–10.
| Pubic hair and sexuality: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19453886PubMed |
[4] Tiggemann M, Hodgson S. The hairlessness norm extended: reasons for and predictors of women’s body hair removal at different body sites. Sex Roles 2008; 59 889–97.
| The hairlessness norm extended: reasons for and predictors of women’s body hair removal at different body sites.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[5] Tiggemann M, Kenyon SJ. The hairlessness norm: the removal of body hair in women. Sex Roles 1998; 39 873–85.
| The hairlessness norm: the removal of body hair in women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[6] Toerien M, Wilkinson S, Choi PYL. Body hair removal: the “Mundane” production of normative femininity. Sex Roles 2005; 52 399–406.
| Body hair removal: the “Mundane” production of normative femininity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] McDougall LJ. Towards a clean slit: how medicine and notions of normality are shaping female genital aesthetics. Cult Health Sex 2013; 15 774–87.
| Towards a clean slit: how medicine and notions of normality are shaping female genital aesthetics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23656558PubMed |
[8] DeMaria AL, Berenson AB. Prevalence and correlates of pubic hair grooming among low-income Hispanic, Black, and White women. Body Image 2013; 10 226–31.
| Prevalence and correlates of pubic hair grooming among low-income Hispanic, Black, and White women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23394967PubMed |
[9] Fitzpatrick M. Brazilian bikini wax and the designer vagina. Br J Gen Pract 2007; 57 1005
| Brazilian bikini wax and the designer vagina.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[10] Boroughs M, Cafri G, Thompson JK. Male body depilation: prevalence and associated features of body hair removal. Sex Roles 2005; 52 637–44.
| Male body depilation: prevalence and associated features of body hair removal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[11] Brailey S. The politics of pubic hair. Pract Midwife 2009; 12 27–8.
| 20063574PubMed |
[12] Smolak L, Murnen SK. Gender, self-objectification and pubic hair removal. Sex Roles 2011; 65 506–17.
| Gender, self-objectification and pubic hair removal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[13] Butler S, Smith NK, Collazo E, Caltabiano L, Herbenick D. Pubic hair preferences, reasons for removal and associated genital symptoms: comparisons between men and women. Sex Med 2014; 12 48–58.
[14] Lewis JM. Caucasian body hair management: a key to gender and species identification in U.S. culture? J Am Cult 1987; 10 7–14.
| Caucasian body hair management: a key to gender and species identification in U.S. culture?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[15] Basow SA, Willis J. Perceptions of body hair on white women: effects of labeling. Psychol Rep 2001; 89 571–6.
| Perceptions of body hair on white women: effects of labeling.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FpsFGmsg%3D%3D&md5=3531157fb73917dc9ec537a62483cba8CAS | 11824718PubMed |
[16] DeMaria AL, Flores M, Hirth JM, Berenson AB. Complications related to pubic hair removal. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210 528.e1–e5.
| Complications related to pubic hair removal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[17] Herbenick D, Hensel D, Smith NK, Schick V, Reece M, Sanders SA, Fortenberry JD. Pubic hair removal and sexual behavior: findings from a prospective daily diary study of sexually active women in the United States. J Sex Med 2013; 10 678–85.
| Pubic hair removal and sexual behavior: findings from a prospective daily diary study of sexually active women in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23237246PubMed |
[18] Herbenick D, Schick V, Reece M, Sanders S, Fortenberry JD. Pubic hair removal among women in the United States: prevalence, methods, and characteristics. J Sex Med 2010; 7 3322–30.
| Pubic hair removal among women in the United States: prevalence, methods, and characteristics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20646183PubMed |
[19] Glass AS, Bagga HS, Tasian GE, Fisher PB, McCulloch CE, Blaschko SD, McAninch JW, Breyer BN. Pubic hair grooming injuries presenting to U.S. Emergency Departments. Urology 2012; 80 1187–91.
| Pubic hair grooming injuries presenting to U.S. Emergency Departments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23040729PubMed |
[20] Castronovo C, Lebas E, Nikkels-Tassoudji N, Nikkels AF. Viral infections of the pubis. Int J STD AIDS 2012; 23 48–50.
| Viral infections of the pubis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC383mtVSmtA%3D%3D&md5=8202ae9ee414b7ba6e59755054881bf0CAS | 22362688PubMed |
[21] Desruelles F, Cunningham SA, Dubois D. Pubic hair removal: a risk factor for “minor” STI such as molluscum contagiosum? Sex Transm Infect 2013; 89 216
| Pubic hair removal: a risk factor for “minor” STI such as molluscum contagiosum?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23512968PubMed |
[22] Bowring AL, Peeters A, Freak-Poli R, Lim MS, Gouillou M, Hellard M. Measuring the accuracy of self-reported height and weight in a community-based sample of young people. BMC Med Res Methodol 2012; 12 175
| Measuring the accuracy of self-reported height and weight in a community-based sample of young people.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23170838PubMed |
[23] Craig BM, Adams AK. Accuracy of body mass index categories based on self-reported height and weight among women in the United States. Matern Child Health J 2009; 13 489–96.
| Accuracy of body mass index categories based on self-reported height and weight among women in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18607705PubMed |
[24] Huber LRB. Validity of self-reported height and weight in women of reproductive age. Matern Child Health J 2007; 11 137–44.
| Validity of self-reported height and weight in women of reproductive age.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[25] Spencer EA, Appleby PN, Davey GK, Key TJ. Validity of self-reported height and weight in 4808 EPIC–Oxford participants. Public Health Nutr 2002; 5 561–5.
| Validity of self-reported height and weight in 4808 EPIC–Oxford participants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12186665PubMed |
[26] Herbenick D, Reece M. Original research—outcomes assessment: development and validation of the female genital self-image scale. J Sex Med 2010; 7 1822–30.
| Original research—outcomes assessment: development and validation of the female genital self-image scale.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20233278PubMed |
[27] DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. Chapel Hill, NC: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2003.
[28] Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Analysing qualitative data. BMJ 2000; 320 114–6.
| Analysing qualitative data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FptVOgug%3D%3D&md5=709bbf210702991689f1f5136c6b8d5aCAS | 10625273PubMed |
