Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Frequent condom use with casual partners varies by sexual position among younger gay and bisexual men in New Zealand: national behavioural surveillance 2006–2011

Nathan J. Lachowsky A B J , Peter J. W. Saxton C , Anthony J. Hughes D , Nigel P. Dickson E , Robin R. Milhausen F , Cate E. Dewey G H and Alastair J. S. Summerlee I
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Division of AIDS, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 608–1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.

B Division of Epidemiology and Population Health, British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, 608–1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.

C Department of Social and Community Health, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland Mail Centre, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.

D Research Analysis and Information Unit, New Zealand AIDS Foundation, 31 Hargreaves Street, St. Mary’s Bay, Auckland, 1011, New Zealand.

E AIDS Epidemiology Group, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand.

F Department of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, N1G 2W1, Canada.

G Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, N1G 2W1, Canada.

H Centre for Public Health and Zoonoses, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, N1G 2W1, Canada.

I Department of Biomedical Science, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, N1G 2W1, Canada.

J Corresponding author. Email: nlachowsky@cfenet.ubc.ca

Sexual Health 13(1) 81-86 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH14220
Submitted: 21 November 2014  Accepted: 21 August 2015   Published: 19 October 2015

Abstract

Background: Condom promotion remains a cornerstone of HIV/STI control, but must be informed by evidence of uptake and address disparities in use. This study sought to determine the prevalence of, and demographic, behavioural and relational factors associated with, condom use during insertive and receptive anal intercourse with casual partners among younger gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (YMSM) in New Zealand. Methods: The 2006–2011 national HIV behavioural surveillance data for YMSM aged 16–29 years was pooled. Separately for each sexual position, frequent (always/almost always) versus infrequent condom use was regressed onto explanatory variables using manual backward stepwise multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: Three-quarters of YMSM reported frequent condom use during insertive (76.0%) and receptive (73.8%) anal intercourse. YMSM who were exclusively insertive were more likely to report frequent condom use than versatile YMSM. Factors positively associated with frequent condom use, irrespective of sexual position were: in-person versus web-based recruitment, testing HIV negative versus never testing or testing HIV positive, having no recent sex with women, reporting two to five versus one male sexual partner in the past 6 months, reporting no current regular partner, but if in a regular relationship, reporting a boyfriend-type versus fuckbuddy-type partner, and frequent versus infrequent regular partner condom use. Pacific ethnicity and less formal education were negatively associated with frequent condom use only during receptive anal intercourse. Conclusions: The findings from this study demonstrate that condom norms can be actively established and maintained among YMSM. Condom promotion efforts must increase YMSM’s capacity, agency and skills to negotiate condom use, especially for the receptive partner.


References

[1]  Mustanski BS, Newcomb ME, Du Bois SN, Garcia SC, Grov C. HIV in young men who have sex with men: a review of epidemiology, risk and protective factors, and interventions. J Sex Res 2011; 48 218–53.
HIV in young men who have sex with men: a review of epidemiology, risk and protective factors, and interventions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21409715PubMed |

[2]  Balaji AB, Bowles KE, Le BC, Paz-Bailey G, Oster AM, NHBS Study Group High HIV incidence and prevalence and associated factors among young MSM, 2008. AIDS 2013; 27 269–78.
High HIV incidence and prevalence and associated factors among young MSM, 2008.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23079807PubMed |

[3]  Janiec J, Haar K, Spiteri G, Likatavicius G, Van de Laar M, Amato A. Surveillance of human immunodeficiency virus suggests that younger men who have sex with men are at higher risk of infection, European Union, 2003 to 2012. Euro Surveill 2013; 18: pii–20644. Available online at: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=20644 [verified 11 April 2014].

[4]  Saxton P, Dickson N, Hughes T. GAPSS 2006 findings from the Gay Auckland Periodic Sex Survey. 2006. Available online at: http://www.nzaf.org.nz/files/2006_GAPSS_Report.pdf [verified 11 April 2014].

[5]  Rosenberger JG, Reece M, Schick V,, Herbenick D, Novak DS, Van Der Pol B, Fortenberry JD.. Condom use during most recent anal intercourse event among a U.S. sample of men who have sex with men. J Sex Med 2012; 9 1037–47.
Condom use during most recent anal intercourse event among a U.S. sample of men who have sex with men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22353190PubMed |

[6]  Balthasar H, Jeannin A, Lociciro S, Dubois-Arber F. Intentional risk reduction practices of men in Switzerland who have anal intercourse with casual male partners. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2010; 54 542–7.
Intentional risk reduction practices of men in Switzerland who have anal intercourse with casual male partners.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20531210PubMed |

[7]  Franssens D, Hospers HJ, Kok G. Social-cognitive determinants of condom use in a cohort of young gay and bisexual men. AIDS Care 2009; 21 1471–9.
Social-cognitive determinants of condom use in a cohort of young gay and bisexual men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20024726PubMed |

[8]  Galvin SR, Cohen MS. The role of sexually transmitted diseases in HIV transmission. Nat Rev Microbiol 2004; 2 33–42.
The role of sexually transmitted diseases in HIV transmission.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXht1KrsL8%3D&md5=7a36d50919c035a788429d7e6f980b45CAS | 15035007PubMed |

[9]  Mayer KH, Venkatesh KK. Interactions of HIV, other sexually transmitted diseases, and genital tract inflammation facilitating local pathogen transmission and acquisition. Am J Reprod Immunol 2011; 65 308–16.
Interactions of HIV, other sexually transmitted diseases, and genital tract inflammation facilitating local pathogen transmission and acquisition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21214660PubMed |

[10]  Ward H, Ronn M. Contribution of sexually transmitted infections to the sexual transmission of HIV. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 2010; 5 305–10.
Contribution of sexually transmitted infections to the sexual transmission of HIV.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20543605PubMed |

[11]  Dougan S, Evans BG, Elford J. Sexually transmitted infections in Western Europe among HIV-positive men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Dis 2007; 34 783–90.
| 17495592PubMed |

[12]  Holt M, Murphy DA, Callander D, Ellard J, Rosengarten M, Kippax SC, De Wit JBF. Willingness to use HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis and the likelihood of decreased condom use are both associated with unprotected anal intercourse and the perceived likelihood of becoming HIV positive among Australian gay and bisexual men. Sex Transm Infect 2012; 88 258–63.
Willingness to use HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis and the likelihood of decreased condom use are both associated with unprotected anal intercourse and the perceived likelihood of becoming HIV positive among Australian gay and bisexual men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22290327PubMed |

[13]  Baggaley RF, White RG, Boily M. HIV transmission risk through anal intercourse: systematic review, meta-analysis and implications for HIV prevention. Int J Epidemiol 2010; 39 1048–63.
HIV transmission risk through anal intercourse: systematic review, meta-analysis and implications for HIV prevention.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20406794PubMed |

[14]  Rosenberger JG, Reece M, Schick V, Herbenick D, Novak DS, Van Der Pol B, Fortenberry JD. Sexual behaviors and situational characteristics of most recent male-partnered sexual event among gay and bisexually identified men in the United States. J Sex Med 2011; 8 3040–50.
Sexual behaviors and situational characteristics of most recent male-partnered sexual event among gay and bisexually identified men in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21883941PubMed |

[15]  Lyons A, Pitts M, Smith G, Grierson J, Smith A, McNally S, Couch M. Versatility and HIV vulnerability: investigating the proportion of Australian gay men having both insertive and receptive anal intercourse. J Sex Med 2011; 8 2164–71.
Versatility and HIV vulnerability: investigating the proportion of Australian gay men having both insertive and receptive anal intercourse.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21269403PubMed |

[16]  Johns MM, Pingel E, Eisenberg A, Santana ML, Bauermeister J. Butch tops and femme bottoms? Sexual positioning, sexual decision making, and gender roles among young gay men. Am J Men Health 2012; 6 505–18.
Butch tops and femme bottoms? Sexual positioning, sexual decision making, and gender roles among young gay men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[17]  Pachankis JE, Buttenwieser IG, Bernstein LB, Bayles DO. A longitudinal, mixed methods study of sexual position identity, behavior, and fantasies among young sexual minority men. Arch Sex Behav 2013; 42 1241–53.
A longitudinal, mixed methods study of sexual position identity, behavior, and fantasies among young sexual minority men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23605572PubMed |

[18]  Saxton PJ, Dickson NP, Hughes AJ. Who is omitted from repeated offline HIV behavioural surveillance among MSM?: implications for interpreting trends. AIDS Behav 2013; 17 3133–44.
Who is omitted from repeated offline HIV behavioural surveillance among MSM?: implications for interpreting trends.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[19]  Lachowsky NJ, Saxton PJ, Dickson NP, Hughes AJ, Summerlee AJS, Dewey CE. Factors associated with recent HIV testing among younger gay and bisexual men in New Zealand, 2006–2011. BMC Public Health 2014; 14 294
Factors associated with recent HIV testing among younger gay and bisexual men in New Zealand, 2006–2011.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24684728PubMed |

[20]  Holt M. Enacting and imagining gay men: the looping effects of behavioural HIV surveillance in Australia. Crit Public Health 2013; 23 404–17.
Enacting and imagining gay men: the looping effects of behavioural HIV surveillance in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[21]  European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Technical report: mapping of HIV/STI behavioural surveillance in Europe; 2009. Available online at: http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/publications/0909_ter_mapping_of_hiv_sti_behavioural_surveillance_in_europe.pdf [verified 11 April 2014].

[22]  Finlayson TJ, Le B, Smith A, Bowles K, Cribbin M, Miles I, Oster AM, Martin T, Edwards A, DiNenno E. HIV risk, prevention, and testing behaviors among men who have sex with men: National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System, 21 US cities, United States, 2008. MMWR Surveill Summ 2011; 60 1–34.
| 22031280PubMed |

[23]  Rosenberger JG, Reece M, Schick V, Herbenick D, Novak DS, Van Der Pol B, Fortenberry JD. Condom use during most recent anal intercourse event among a US sample of men who have sex with men. J Sex Med 2012; 9 1037–47.
Condom use during most recent anal intercourse event among a US sample of men who have sex with men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22353190PubMed |

[24]  Saxton P, Dickson N, Hughes A. GAPSS 2006 findings from the Gay Auckland Periodic Sex Survey. Auckland, New Zealand; 2006. Available online at: http://www.nzaf.org.nz/assets/ee-uploads/files/061201_2006_GAPSS_Report.pdf [verified 11 April 2014].

[25]  Grov C, Hirshfield S, Remien RH, Humberstone M, Chiasson MA. Exploring the venue’s role in risky sexual behavior among gay and bisexual men: an event-level analysis from a national online survey in the U.S. Arch Sex Behav 2013; 42 291–302.
Exploring the venue’s role in risky sexual behavior among gay and bisexual men: an event-level analysis from a national online survey in the U.S.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22012413PubMed |

[26]  Sullivan PS, Carballo-Diéguez A, Coates T, Goodreau SM, McGowan I, Sanders EJ, Smith A, Goswami P, Sanchez J. Successes and challenges of HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. Lancet 2012; 380 388–99.
Successes and challenges of HIV prevention in men who have sex with men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22819659PubMed |

[27]  Fields EL, Bogart LM, Smith KC, Malebranche DJ, Ellen J, Schuster MA. HIV risk and perceptions of masculinity among young black men who have sex with men. J Adolesc Health 2012; 50 296–303.
HIV risk and perceptions of masculinity among young black men who have sex with men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22325136PubMed |

[28]  Reid A, Hughes T, Worth H, Saxton P, Robinson E, Segedin R, Aspin C. Male Call/Waea Mai, Tane Ma Report No. 4 Casual sex between men. Auckland: New Zealand AIDS Foundation; 1997. Available online at: www.nzaf.org.nz/files/Male_Call_Report_4_Casual_sex_between_men.pdf. [verified 11 April 2014].

[29]  McMillan K, Worth H. The impact of socio-cultural context on young people’s condom use: evidence from two Pacific Island countries. Cult Health Sex 2011; 13 313–26.
The impact of socio-cultural context on young people’s condom use: evidence from two Pacific Island countries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21077010PubMed |

[30]  Margolis AD, Joseph H, Belcher L, Hirshfield S, Chiasson MA. ‘Never testing for HIV’ among men who have sex with men recruited from a sexual networking website, United States. AIDS Behav 2012; 16 23–9.
‘Never testing for HIV’ among men who have sex with men recruited from a sexual networking website, United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21279431PubMed |

[31]  Wohlfeiler D, Hecht J, Fisher Raymond H, Kennedy T, McFarland W. How can we improve HIV and STD prevention online for MSM? Assessing the preferences of website owners, website users and HIV/STD directors. AIDS Behav 2013; 17 3024–33.
How can we improve HIV and STD prevention online for MSM? Assessing the preferences of website owners, website users and HIV/STD directors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23180156PubMed |

[32]  Allison SM, Adam D, Klindera KC, Poteat T, Wolf RC. Innovative uses of communication technology for HIV programming for MSM and TG population. J Int AIDS Soc 2014; 17 19041
| 25280864PubMed |