Sexual concurrency: driver or passenger in the spread of sexually transmissible infections?

References

[1]  Sawers L, Stillwaggon E. Concurrent sexual partnerships do not explain the HIV epidemics in Africa: a systematic review of the evidence. J Int AIDS Soc 2010; 13
| Concurrent sexual partnerships do not explain the HIV epidemics in Africa: a systematic review of the evidence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[2]  Boily MC, Alary M, Baggaley RF. Neglected issues and hypotheses regarding the impact of sexual concurrency on HIV and sexually transmitted infections. AIDS Behav 2011;

[3]  Epstein H, Morris M. Concurrent partnerships and HIV: an inconvenient truth. J Int AIDS Soc 2011; 14 13
| Concurrent partnerships and HIV: an inconvenient truth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[4]  Goodreau SM. A decade of modelling research yields considerable evidence for the importance of concurrency: a response to Sawers and Stillwaggon. J Int AIDS Soc 2011; 14
| A decade of modelling research yields considerable evidence for the importance of concurrency: a response to Sawers and Stillwaggon.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[5]  Mah TL, Shelton JD. Concurrency revisited: increasing and compelling epidemiological evidence. J Int AIDS Soc 2011; 14
| Concurrency revisited: increasing and compelling epidemiological evidence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[6]  Gorbach PM, Stoner BP, Aral SO, H Whittington WL, Holmes KK. “It takes a village”: understanding concurrent sexual partnerships in Seattle, Washington. Sex Transm Dis 2002; 29 453–62.
| “It takes a village”: understanding concurrent sexual partnerships in Seattle, Washington.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[7]  Hess KL, Gorbach PM, Manhart LE, Stoner BP, Martin DH, Holmes KK. Risk behaviours by type of concurrency among young people in three STI clinics in the United States. Sex Health 2012; 9 280–287.