Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
RESEARCH ARTICLE

University students’ perceptions of environmental risks to infertility

Olivia Remes A , Amanda N. Whitten A , Kelley-Anne Sabarre A and Karen P. Phillips A B C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Interdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, 35 University Private, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 6N5.

B Institute of Population Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 6N5.

C Corresponding author. Email: Karen.Phillips@uottawa.ca

Sexual Health 9(4) 377-383 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH11090
Submitted: 21 June 2011  Accepted: 27 January 2012   Published: 11 May 2012

Abstract

Background: Canadian young adults may be at risk of future infertility due to the high incidence of sexually transmissible infections (STIs) in this population. Young adults’ perceptions of environmental risks, including contaminants, STIs and lifestyle habits on infertility, have not been examined. We have therefore designed a qualitative study to explore risk perceptions, awareness and knowledge of common environmental risk factors for infertility in a multiethnic sample of young adults. Methods: Semistructured interviews were carried out with 40 university undergraduate students (16 men and 24 women) in Ottawa, Canada, followed by qualitative analysis of interview transcripts to identify major themes. Results: The following broad themes described participants’ risk perceptions about infertility and (1) environmental contaminants: knowledge gaps, media reports and negative perception of chemicals; (2) STIs: superficial understanding of their role in infertility, general awareness, associations with sexual behaviours and knowledge gaps; and (3) lifestyle: protective benefits of healthy lifestyle, dose or exposure effects for smoking and alcohol, and knowledge gaps. Students demonstrated a superficial understanding of environmental risks, at times relying on media reports and anecdotal information to support their beliefs. Conclusions: This next generation of potential infertility patients exhibits a general understanding of environmental risks to infertility; however, young adults are overly optimistic that healthy lifestyle behaviours will safeguard future fertility. STIs represent the most significant modifiable risk factors for this age group; a message that can be supported by sexual and reproductive health education and promotion with greater emphasis on the long-term outcomes of STIs, including infertility.

Additional keywords: Canada, lifestyle, sexually transmissible infections, young adults.


References

[1]  Tuerlings JH, Kremer JA. Genetics of male factor subfertility. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000; 89 117–21.
Genetics of male factor subfertility.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7ptFKqsw%3D%3D&md5=90024f7807bfd5bf47be6618eda0a019CAS |

[2]  Adamson GD, Baker VL. Subfertility: causes, treatment and outcome. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 17 169–85.
Subfertility: causes, treatment and outcome.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[3]  Bulletti C, Flamigni C, Giacomucci E. Reproductive failure due to spontaneous abortion and recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod Update 1996; 2 118–36.
Reproductive failure due to spontaneous abortion and recurrent miscarriage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3jtlaiuw%3D%3D&md5=e9bb55e668f511232485a27bb308f60fCAS |

[4]  Foster WG, Neal MS, Han M-S, Dominguez MM. Environmental contaminants and human infertility: hypothesis or cause for concern? J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 2008; 11 162–76.
Environmental contaminants and human infertility: hypothesis or cause for concern?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXjslWis70%3D&md5=22e4377dbb9c987b1c45597fd36aa3f2CAS |

[5]  Phillips KP, Tanphaichitr N. Human exposure to endocrine disrupters and semen quality. J Toxicol Environ Health 2008; 11 188–220.
| 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXjslWis7s%3D&md5=981029256d141eb8b11769b2d2815134CAS |

[6]  Phillips KP, Tanphaichitr N. Mechanisms of obesity-induced male infertility. Expert Review of Endocrinology and Metabolism 2010; 5 229–51.
Mechanisms of obesity-induced male infertility.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[7]  Homan GF, Davies M, Norman R. The impact of lifestyle factors on reproductive performance in the general population and those undergoing infertility treatment: a review. Hum Reprod Update 2007; 13 209–23.
The impact of lifestyle factors on reproductive performance in the general population and those undergoing infertility treatment: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2s3jsVKltg%3D%3D&md5=618bba12563f1964f8df677829eed571CAS |

[8]  Bonde JP. Male reproductive organs are at risk from environmental hazards. Asian J Androl 2010; 12 152–6.
Male reproductive organs are at risk from environmental hazards.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXisFehtLc%3D&md5=57e3a2200edf87d39ea4ef4931f5e80fCAS |

[9]  US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Special report on environmental endocrine disruption: an effects assessment and analysis. Washington DC: US EPA; 1997.

[10]  Sadeu JC, Hughes CL, Agarwal S, Foster WG. Alcohol, drugs, caffeine, tobacco, and environmental contaminant exposure: reproductive health consequences and clinical implications. Crit Rev Toxicol 2010; 40 633–52.
Alcohol, drugs, caffeine, tobacco, and environmental contaminant exposure: reproductive health consequences and clinical implications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXptFGku7Y%3D&md5=1be1ef291e9646524a0aa09c22b4adddCAS |

[11]  Weselak M, Arbuckle TE, Walker MC, Krewski D. The influence of the environment and other exogenous agents on spontaneous abortion risk. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 2008; 11 221–41.
The influence of the environment and other exogenous agents on spontaneous abortion risk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXjslWis7g%3D&md5=65362f8118f507917ede401f08ef26c6CAS |

[12]  Paavonen J. Chlamydia trachomatis infections of the female genital tract: state of the art. Annals of Medicine 2011;

[13]  Lareau SM, Beigi RH. Pelvic inflammatory disease and tubo-ovarian abscess. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2008; 22 693–08.
Pelvic inflammatory disease and tubo-ovarian abscess.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[14]  Ochsendorf FR. Sexually transmitted infections: impact on male fertility. Andrologia 2008; 40 72–5.
Sexually transmitted infections: impact on male fertility.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c7nvVequw%3D%3D&md5=e35c7ee6718dc23229fcf319f4f6e769CAS |

[15]  Cunningham KA, Beagley KW. Male genital tract chlamydial infection: implications for pathology and infertility. Biol Reprod 2008; 79 180–9.
Male genital tract chlamydial infection: implications for pathology and infertility.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXovFWms78%3D&md5=e2c9b6ee035d48ccdaa4d7d2366c9e6eCAS |

[16]  Joki-Korpela P, Sahrakorpi N, Halttunen M, Surcel HM, Paavonen J, Tiitinen A. The role of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in male infertility. Fertil Steril 2009; 91 1448–50.
The role of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in male infertility.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[17]  Paavonen J, Eggert-Kruse W. Chlamydia trachomatis infection – impact on human reproduction. Hum Reprod Update 1999; 5 433–47.
Chlamydia trachomatis infection – impact on human reproduction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FkslKjtQ%3D%3D&md5=e2c5c02908414cf41f3555dcc2d1d7eeCAS |

[18]  Comhaire FH, Mahmoud AM, Depuydt CE, Zalata AA, Christophe AB. Mechanisms and effects of male genital tract infection on sperm quality and fertilizing potential: the andrologist’s viewpoint. Hum Reprod Update 1999; 5 393–8.
Mechanisms and effects of male genital tract infection on sperm quality and fertilizing potential: the andrologist’s viewpoint.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXnvVShsbY%3D&md5=71220a1c2afb66f1b78d8dbb305919e3CAS |

[19]  Pacey AA. Environmental and lifestyle factors associated with sperm DNA damage. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2010; 13 189–93.
Environmental and lifestyle factors associated with sperm DNA damage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3M%2FgslarsA%3D%3D&md5=de028ca3940f5689cd02a09982d357eeCAS |

[20]  Dechanet C, Anahory T, Mathieu Daude JC, Quantin X, Reyftmann L, Hamamah S, et al Effects of cigarette smoking on reproduction. Hum Reprod Update 2011; 17 76–95.
Effects of cigarette smoking on reproduction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhsF2rsbrM&md5=d771e1a0faf8f6b6e13d205cc6387bc0CAS |

[21]  Augood C, Duckitt K, Templeton AA. Smoking and female infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 1998; 13 1532–9.
Smoking and female infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1czltFKksQ%3D%3D&md5=fd05c14e83c1e16cfe6397cc7a161e20CAS |

[22]  Vine MF. Smoking and male reproduction: a review. Int J Androl 1996; 19 323–37.
Smoking and male reproduction: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3gtlyntA%3D%3D&md5=a58d543f85ab39ed357cfe07a563f582CAS |

[23]  Robbins WA, Elashoff DA, Xun L, Jia J, Li N, Wu G, et al Effect of lifestyle exposures on sperm aneuploidy. Cytogenet Genome Res 2005; 111 371–7.
Effect of lifestyle exposures on sperm aneuploidy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MrhvVektw%3D%3D&md5=f1127a8567ef72bc6bdeed820ae16fc7CAS |

[24]  Robbins WA, Vine MF, Truong KY, Everson RB. Use of FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) to assess effects of smoking, caffeine, and alcohol on aneuploidy load in sperm of healthy men. Environ Mol Mutagen 1997; 30 175–83.
Use of FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) to assess effects of smoking, caffeine, and alcohol on aneuploidy load in sperm of healthy men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXmvFCru7o%3D&md5=e8892f94621600d5fddc1b8eca6aa1d2CAS |

[25]  Anderson K, Nisenblat V, Norman R. Lifestyle factors in people seeking infertility treatment – a review. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2010; 50 8–20.
Lifestyle factors in people seeking infertility treatment – a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[26]  Campbell P. Boundaries and risk: media framing of assisted reproductive technologies and older mothers. Soc Sci Med 2011; 72 265–72.
Boundaries and risk: media framing of assisted reproductive technologies and older mothers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[27]  Davis DA. The politics of reproduction: the troubling case of Nadya Suleman and assisted reproductive technology. Transforming Anthropol 2009; 17 105–16.
The politics of reproduction: the troubling case of Nadya Suleman and assisted reproductive technology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[28]  Health Canada. Canadian guidelines for sexual health education. Ottowa: Health Canada; 2003.

[29]  Ontario Ministry of Education and Training (OMET). The Ontario curriculum, Grades 9 and 10. Health and physical education. Ontario: OMET; 1999. Available online at: http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/secondary/health.html [verified January 2012].

[30]  Martinez A, Phillips KP. Challenging ethno-cultural and sexual inequities: An intersectional feminist analysis of Ottawa teachers, health partners and university students’ views on adolescent sexual and reproductive rights. Can JHuman Sexuality 2008; 17 141–159.

[31]  Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994.

[32]  Evans R, Barer M, Marmour T. Why are some people healthy and others not? The determinants of health of populations. New York: Aldine de Gruyter; 1994.

[33]  Kindig DA. Understanding population health terminology. Milbank Q 2007; 85 139–61.
Understanding population health terminology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[34]  Morse JM. Designing funded qualitative research. In Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of qualitative inquiry. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994. pp. 220–35.

[35]  Morse JM. The significance of saturation. Qual Health Res 1995; 5 147–9.
The significance of saturation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[36]  Bunting L, Boivin J. Knowledge about infertility risk factors, fertility myths and illusory benefits of healthy habits in young people. Hum Reprod 2008; 23 1858–64.
Knowledge about infertility risk factors, fertility myths and illusory benefits of healthy habits in young people.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[37]  Cohall A, Kassotis J, Parks R, Vaughan R, Bannister H, Northridge M. Adolescents in the age of AIDS: myths, misconceptions, and misunderstandings regarding sexually transmitted diseases. J Natl Med Assoc 2001; 93 64–9.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s7jvVaqsg%3D%3D&md5=3aaebbb0b6fb80f1acf2c3e417bd894bCAS |

[38]  Tydén T, Svanberg AS, Karlström PO, Lihoff L, Lampic C. Female university students’ attitudes to future motherhood and their understanding about fertility. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2006; 11 181–9.
Female university students’ attitudes to future motherhood and their understanding about fertility.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[39]  Quach S, Librach C. Infertility knowledge and attitudes in urban high school students. Fertil Steril 2008; 90 2099–106.
Infertility knowledge and attitudes in urban high school students.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[40]  Public Health Agency of Canada. Report on sexually transmitted infections in Canada: 2008. Ottawa: Centre for Communicable Diseases and Infections Control; 2010.

[41]  Martinez A, Phillips KP. La promotion de l’équité en éducation sexuelle dans les écoles secondaires de la région de la capitale nationale. [Promotion of equity in secondary school sexual education in the National Capital Region]. Can J Ed 2009; 32 60–86.

[42]  Martinez A, Phillips KP. Sexual and reproductive health education: contrasting teachers’, health partners’ and former students’ perspectives. Can J Public Health 2010; 101 374–9.

[43]  Public Health Agency of Canada. Update gonorrhea treatment. Ottawa: Community Acquired Infections Division, Centre for Infectious Diseases Prevention and Control, Public Health Agency of Canada; 2006. Available online at: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/std-mts/ud-gonorrhea-200503-eng.php [verified May 2011].

[44]  Brady M. Preventing sexually transmitted infections and unintended pregnancy, and safeguarding fertility: triple protection needs of young women. Reprod Health Matters 2003; 11 134–41.
Preventing sexually transmitted infections and unintended pregnancy, and safeguarding fertility: triple protection needs of young women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[45]  Pitts M, Hanley F. Bringing infertility prevention into focus for young people: “I guess I’m naïve and don’t think it can happen to me.’ Health Educ 2004; 104 100–12.
Bringing infertility prevention into focus for young people: “I guess I’m naïve and don’t think it can happen to me.’Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[46]  Krewski D, Lemyre L, Turner MC, Lee JEC, Dallaire C, Bouchard L, et al Public perception of population health risks in Canada: health hazards and sources of information. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 2006; 12 626–44.
Public perception of population health risks in Canada: health hazards and sources of information.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[47]  Tyshenko M, Phillips KP, Mehta M, Poirier R, Leiss W. Risk communication of endocrine-disrupting chemicals: improving knowledge translation and transfer. J Toxicol Environ Health 2008; 11 345–50.
| 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXjslWisrc%3D&md5=408b84d3a066ab40e365c4406bd06908CAS |

[48]  Leiss W. Into the maze of moral risks. In In the chamber of risks: understanding risk controversies. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press; 2001. pp. 269–77.

[49]  Heffner LJ. Advanced maternal age – how old is too old? N Engl J Med 2004; 351 1927–9.
Advanced maternal age – how old is too old?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXps1Wltr0%3D&md5=2277b57df97540d0de468854a49ac09bCAS |

[50]  Tough SC, Newburn-Cook C, Johnston DW, Svenson LW, Rose S, Belik J. Delayed childbearing and its impact on population rate changes in lower birth weight, multiple birth, and preterm delivery. Pediatrics 2002; 109 399–403.
Delayed childbearing and its impact on population rate changes in lower birth weight, multiple birth, and preterm delivery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[51]  Trent M, Millstein SG, Ellen JM. Gender-based differences in fertility beliefs and knowledge among adolescents from high sexually transmitted disease–prevalence communities. J Adolesc Health 2006; 38 282–7.
Gender-based differences in fertility beliefs and knowledge among adolescents from high sexually transmitted disease–prevalence communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |