HIV results: practice at public sexual health clinics in New South Wales
Loretta M. Healey A C and David J. Templeton A BA RPA Sexual Health, Building 21, 25 Lucas Street, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia.
B National Centre in HIV Epidemiology and Clinical Research, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: healeyl@email.cs.nsw.gov.au
Sexual Health 8(2) 264-265 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH11007
Submitted: 19 January 2011 Accepted: 3 March 2011 Published: 18 May 2011
Abstract
New South Wales (NSW) Health guidelines recommend all HIV results be given in person, however this practice fails to achieve high levels of result collection. Fourteen of all 38 NSW public sexual health clinics (37%) surveyed offer HIV results by telephone to low-risk patients, although all positive results are given in person. Efficiency of result-giving, accessibility to results, patient acceptability and awareness of more flexible national guidelines were cited as reasons for varying practice from state guidelines. NSW guidelines require revision to allow clinicians to determine the most effective and efficient mode of HIV result delivery to their patients.
References
[1] Healey LM, O’Connor CC, Templeton DJ. HIV result giving. Is it time to change our thinking? Sex Health 2010; 7 8–10.| HIV result giving. Is it time to change our thinking?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20152089PubMed |
[2] Erbelding E, Chung S, Zenilman J. Following-up for HIV test results: what limits return in an STD clinic population? Int J STD AIDS 2004; 15 29–32.
| Following-up for HIV test results: what limits return in an STD clinic population?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c%2FmvVarsg%3D%3D&md5=2aa5dbed69db47ddd34c1b19bc3d9696CAS | 14769168PubMed |
[3] Tsu R, Burm M, Gilhooly J, Sells C. Telephone vs. face-to-face notification of HIV results in high-risk youth. J Adolesc Health 2002; 30 154–60.
| Telephone vs. face-to-face notification of HIV results in high-risk youth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11869921PubMed |
[4] Schluter W, Judson FN, Baro’n AE, McGill WL, Marine WM, Douglas JM. Usefulness of human immunodeficiency virus post-test counselling by telephone for low-risk clients of an urban sexually transmitted diseases clinic. Sex Transm Dis 1996; 23 190–7.
| Usefulness of human immunodeficiency virus post-test counselling by telephone for low-risk clients of an urban sexually transmitted diseases clinic.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK28zjt12ktg%3D%3D&md5=bbdcb1b1c7bb6dbd7fa4649a678c7eb7CAS | 8724508PubMed |
[5] McKinstry L, Goldbaum G, Meischke H. Telephone notification of HIV test results: impact in King County, Washington. Sex Transm Dis 2007; 34 796–800.
| 17479067PubMed |
[6] Wiley D, Ralph R, Ford W, Simon P. Failure to learn human immunodeficiency virus test results in Los Angeles public sexually transmitted disease clinics. Sex Transm Dis 1998; 25 342–5.
| Failure to learn human immunodeficiency virus test results in Los Angeles public sexually transmitted disease clinics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1cznvFGguw%3D%3D&md5=9b28b790f7d97e344ff3198563acba93CAS | 9713912PubMed |
[7] Wright S, Ryder N, McNulty AM. HIV results by phone: can we predict who will test HIV-negative? Sex Health 2010; 7 417–9.
| HIV results by phone: can we predict who will test HIV-negative?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21062580PubMed |
[8] National HIV Testing Policy 2006. Available online at: http://www.health.sa.gov.au/PEHS/PDF-files/hiv-testing-policy-2006.pdf [verified March 2011].
[9] British Association of Sexual Health and HIV. UK national guidelines for HIV testing 2008. Available online at: www.bhiva.org/documents/Guidelines/Testing/GlinesHIVTest08.pdf [verified January 2011].
[10] MMWR. Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents and pregnant women in health-care settings 2006. Available online at: www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5514a1.htm [verified January 2011].
[11] Victoria Public Health and Wellbeing Regulations 2009, Section 78. Available online at: http://www.legislation.vic.gov.au/Domino/Web_Notes/LDMS/LTObject_Store/LTObjSt5.nsf/DDE300B846EED9C7CA257616000A3571/81610ECA2B033283CA257782001CC857/$FILE/09-178sr002.pdf [verified February 2011].
[12] Health NSW. HIV antibody testing counselling guidelines. Sydney: NSW Health; 2005. Available online at: http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/policies/PD/2005/PD2005_048.html [verified January 2011].
[13] Queensland Health. Sexual health, HIV/AIDS and viral hepatitis. Available online at: www.health.qld.gov.au/sexhealth/clinical/counselling.asp [verified January 2011].
[14] Bush MR, Williams H, Fairley CK. HIV is rare among low-risk heterosexual men and significant potential savings could occur through phone results. Sex Health 2010; 7 495–7.
| HIV is rare among low-risk heterosexual men and significant potential savings could occur through phone results.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21062593PubMed |
[15] Hopkins CA, Cummings RA, Read TRH, Fairley CK. Characteristics of Australian women who test positive for HIV: implications for giving test results. Med J Aust 2007; 186 327
| 17371227PubMed |
