Dual use of condoms and contraceptives in the USA
Jenny A. Higgins A B C and Anne D. Cooper A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
B Department of Gender and Women’s Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
C Corresponding author. Email: jenny.a.higgins@gmail.com
Sexual Health 9(1) 73-80 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH11004
Submitted: 14 January 2011 Accepted: 27 June 2011 Published: 7 November 2011
Abstract
Background: Use of condoms in conjunction with other contraceptive methods has multiple benefits: prevention of unintended pregnancy, protection against sexually transmissible infections (STI), and sequentially, defence against the threat of infertility. However, few reviews compare dual method use prevalence or trends or systematically review the facilitators and barriers of dual method use across multiple studies. Methods: The authors review the literature on trends and covariates of dual method use in the USA among both nationally representative and smaller samples. Results: Although dual method use prevalence estimates vary widely across study populations, nationally representative estimates are consistently lower than Western European countries, who in turn report lower rates of unintended pregnancies and STI. The majority of published work on dual method use focuses on adolescents. Prior studies have associated dual method use with a range of individual-level factors: socio-demographic variables, such as younger age; STI risk behaviours and risk perception; relationship variables, such as number of partners, relationship length, and partner support of condoms; and educational factors, such as prior exposure to HIV prevention messages. Conclusions: Although dual method use appears to be on the rise, especially among adolescents and young adults, US rates are comparatively low and leave much room for improvement. This review identifies several populations most in need of intervention. However, we encourage public health practitioners to evolve beyond individual-level studies and interventions to focus on the relational, socio-cultural, and structural influences on dual method use. Dual use promotion programs and policies should also equally target men and women, adolescents and adults.
Additional keywords: contraception, dual method use, dual prevention, pregnancy prevention, STI prevention.
References
[1] Berer M. Dual protection: more needed than practised or understood. Reprod Health Matters 2006; 14 162–70.| Dual protection: more needed than practised or understood.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[2] Cates W, Steiner MJ. Dual protection against unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections: what is the best contraceptive approach? Sex Transm Dis 2002; 29 168–74.
| Dual protection against unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections: what is the best contraceptive approach?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[3] Mosher WD, Jones J. Use of contraception in the United States: 1982–2008. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 2010; 23(29). Available online at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_23/sr23_029.pdf [verified July 2011].
[4] Singh S, Darroch JE. Adolescent pregnancy and childbearing: levels and trends in developed countries. Fam Plann Perspect 2000; 32 14–23.
| Adolescent pregnancy and childbearing: levels and trends in developed countries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7ns1SgtQ%3D%3D&md5=13bc2e5553e3b76f1a742bcb4960913bCAS |
[5] Panchaud C, Singh S, Feivelson D, Darroch JE. Sexually transmitted diseases among adolescents in developed countries. Fam Plann Perspect 2000; 32 24–32, 45.
| Sexually transmitted diseases among adolescents in developed countries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7ns1Sgug%3D%3D&md5=e843b188124d6528633bd71895f47655CAS |
[6] Jacobson DL, Peralta L, Graham NM, Zenilman J. Histologic development of cervical ectopy: relationship to reproductive hormones. Sex Transm Dis 2000; 27 252–8.
| Histologic development of cervical ectopy: relationship to reproductive hormones.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czpvFSruw%3D%3D&md5=682ef7414e0c177cfc9b4aa48062d457CAS |
[7] Jacobson DL, Peralta L, Farmer M, Graham NM, Gaydos C, Zenilman J. Relationship of hormonal contraception and cervical ectopy as measured by computerized planimetry to chlamydial infection in adolescents. Sex Transm Dis 2000; 27 313–9.
| Relationship of hormonal contraception and cervical ectopy as measured by computerized planimetry to chlamydial infection in adolescents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FlvVehsg%3D%3D&md5=14256d95b67cd577ee6e0f8e6c0f5179CAS |
[8] Brady M. Preventing sexually transmitted infections and unintended pregnancy, and safeguarding fertility: triple protection needs of young women. Reprod Health Matters 2003; 11 134–41.
| Preventing sexually transmitted infections and unintended pregnancy, and safeguarding fertility: triple protection needs of young women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[9] Pazol K, Kramer MR, Hogue CJ. Condoms for dual protection: patterns of use with highly effective contraceptive methods. Public Health Rep 2010; 125 208–17.
[10] Trussell J, Kost K. Contraceptive failure in the United States: a critical review of the literature. Stud Fam Plann 1987; 18 237–83.
| Contraceptive failure in the United States: a critical review of the literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL1c%2FntFGrsg%3D%3D&md5=50a852473b4df1ea6dce5537a3480d07CAS |
[11] Trussell J, Hatcher RA, Cates W, Stewart FH, Kost K. A guide to interpreting contraceptive efficacy studies. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76 558–67.
| 1:STN:280:DyaK3czktVKrtw%3D%3D&md5=e46a2f7e265f473707d71e366dc9670dCAS |
[12] Kost K, Singh S, Vaughan B, Trussell J, Bankole A. Estimates of contraceptive failure from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Contraception 2008; 77 10–21.
| Estimates of contraceptive failure from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[13] Finer LB, Henshaw SK. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2006; 38 90–6.
| Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[14] Bearinger LH, Resnick MD. Dual method use in adolescents: a review and framework for research on use of STD and pregnancy protection. J Adolesc Health 2003; 32 340–9.
| Dual method use in adolescents: a review and framework for research on use of STD and pregnancy protection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[15] Bankole A, Darroch JE, Singh S. Determinants of trends in condom use in the United States, 1988–1995. Fam Plann Perspect 1999; 31 264–71.
| Determinants of trends in condom use in the United States, 1988–1995.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FotVWmsQ%3D%3D&md5=f87799468d14002fb95f3a87690205e7CAS |
[16] Anderson JE, Santelli J, Mugalla C. Changes in HIV-related preventive behavior in the US population: data from national surveys, 1987–2002. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2003; 34 195–202.
| Changes in HIV-related preventive behavior in the US population: data from national surveys, 1987–2002.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[17] Abma JC, Martinez GM, Mosher WD, Dawson BS. Teenagers in the United States: Sexual activity, contraceptive use, and childbearing, 2002. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 2004; 23(24). Available online at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_23/sr23_024.pdf [verified July 2011].
[18] Santelli JS, Morrow B, Anderson JE, Lindberg LD. Contraceptive use and pregnancy risk among U.S. high school students, 1991–2003. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2006; 38 106–11.
| Contraceptive use and pregnancy risk among U.S. high school students, 1991–2003.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[19] Sieving RE, Bearinger LH, Resnick MD, Pettingell S, Skay C. Adolescent dual method use: relevant attitudes, normative beliefs and self-efficacy. J Adolesc Health 2007; 40 275 e15–22.
| Adolescent dual method use: relevant attitudes, normative beliefs and self-efficacy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[20] Ford K, Sohn W, Lepkowski J.. Characteristics of adolescents’ sexual partners and their association with use of condoms and other contraceptive methods. Fam Plann Perspect 2001; 33 100–5.
| Characteristics of adolescents’ sexual partners and their association with use of condoms and other contraceptive methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzksVyisA%3D%3D&md5=58dec5b756f6529364df96b0721a44f9CAS |
[21] Anderson JE, Santelli J, Gilbert BC. Adolescent dual use of condoms and hormonal contraception: trends and correlates 1991–2001. Sex Transm Dis 2003; 30 719–22.
| Adolescent dual use of condoms and hormonal contraception: trends and correlates 1991–2001.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[22] Eaton DK, Kann L, Kinchen S, Ross J, Hawkins J, Harris WA, et al Youth risk behavior surveillance–United States, 2005. MMWR Surveill Summ 2006; 55 1–108.
[23] Jones RK, Fennell J, Higgins JA, Blanchard K. Better than nothing or savvy risk-reduction practice? The importance of withdrawal. Contraception 2009; 79 407–10.
| Better than nothing or savvy risk-reduction practice? The importance of withdrawal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[24] Parr N, Siedlecky S. Use of ‘dual protection’ and other combinations of contraceptive methods in Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health 2007; 31 567–70.
| Use of ‘dual protection’ and other combinations of contraceptive methods in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[25] Godeau E, Nic Gabhainn S, Vignes C, Ross J, Boyce W, Todd J. Contraceptive use by 15-year-old students at their last sexual intercourse: results from 24 countries. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2008; 162 66–73.
| Contraceptive use by 15-year-old students at their last sexual intercourse: results from 24 countries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[26] Darroch JE, Singh S, Frost JJ. Differences in teenage pregnancy rates among five developed countries: the roles of sexual activity and contraceptive use. Fam Plann Perspect 2001; 33 244–50.
| Differences in teenage pregnancy rates among five developed countries: the roles of sexual activity and contraceptive use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FnslOrtQ%3D%3D&md5=7b0d2b907a68f7d4b09e98c4be1984ddCAS |
[27] Darroch JE, Frost JJ, Singh S. Teenage sexual and reproductive behavior in developed countries: can progress be made? New York City: The Alan Guttmacher Institute; 2001.
[28] Berne L, Huberman B. European approaches to adolescent sexual behavior and responsibilty. Washington, DC: Advocates for Youth; 1999.
[29] Schalet A. Must we fear adolescent sexuality? Medscape Gen Med 2004; 6 44
[30] Schalet A. Sexual subjectivity revisited: The significance of relationships in Dutch and American girls’ experiences of sexuality. Gend Soc 2010; 24 304–29.
| Sexual subjectivity revisited: The significance of relationships in Dutch and American girls’ experiences of sexuality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[31] Santelli J, Sandfort T, Orr M. Transnational comparisons of adolescent contraceptive use: what can we learn from these comparisons? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2008; 162 92–4.
| Transnational comparisons of adolescent contraceptive use: what can we learn from these comparisons?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[32] Harvey SM, Henderson JT, Branch MR. Protecting against both pregnancy and disease: predictors of dual method use among a sample of women. Women Health 2004; 39 25–43.
| Protecting against both pregnancy and disease: predictors of dual method use among a sample of women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[33] Santelli JS, Warren CW, Lowry R, Sogolow E, Collins J, Kann L, et al The use of condoms with other contraceptive methods among young men and women. Fam Plann Perspect 1997; 29 261–7.
| The use of condoms with other contraceptive methods among young men and women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FptFOjtA%3D%3D&md5=4914828b747efce8f3516a80373275d2CAS |
[34] Cushman LF, Romero D, Kalmuss D, Davidson AR, Heartwell S, Rulin M. Condom use among women choosing long-term hormonal contraception. Fam Plann Perspect 1998; 30 240–3.
| Condom use among women choosing long-term hormonal contraception.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1cvltlejuw%3D%3D&md5=0008d9e097a1410a3bf08e5605581934CAS |
[35] Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Poindexter AN. Planned condom use among women undergoing tubal sterilization. Sex Transm Dis 1998; 25 335–41.
| Planned condom use among women undergoing tubal sterilization.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1cznvFGgug%3D%3D&md5=2c1d9143de652ce0124d1421fe7b4f80CAS |
[36] Marston C, King E. Factors that shape young people’s sexual behaviour: a systematic review. Lancet 2006; 368 1581–6.
| Factors that shape young people’s sexual behaviour: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[37] Darney PD, Callegari LS, Swift A, Atkinson ES, Robert AM. Condom practices of urban teens using Norplant contraceptive implants, oral contraceptives, and condoms for contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180 929–37.
| Condom practices of urban teens using Norplant contraceptive implants, oral contraceptives, and condoms for contraception.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3itFGjug%3D%3D&md5=e4bb36a55e52874af5352f9b0761840fCAS |
[38] Sayegh MA, Fortenberry JD, Shew M, Orr DP. The developmental association of relationship quality, hormonal contraceptive choice and condom non-use among adolescent women. J Adolesc Health 2006; 39 388–95.
| The developmental association of relationship quality, hormonal contraceptive choice and condom non-use among adolescent women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[39] Berenson AB, Wiemann CM. Use of levonorgestrel implants versus oral contraceptives in adolescence: a case-control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172 1128–37.
| Use of levonorgestrel implants versus oral contraceptives in adolescence: a case-control study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3ktleisQ%3D%3D&md5=44ef1bdae00b0244f48c62d185a4edc1CAS |
[40] Santelli JS, Davis M, Celentano DD, Crump AD, Burwell LG. Combined use of condoms with other contraceptive methods among inner-city Baltimore women. Fam Plann Perspect 1995; 27 74–8.
| Combined use of condoms with other contraceptive methods among inner-city Baltimore women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2MzhslCjsA%3D%3D&md5=e5e9dee6ea61da8d03ad5c1f5af7224fCAS |
[41] Hatcher RA. Contraceptive technology. 19th rev. edn. New York: Ardent Media; 2007.
[42] Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Horth F, Poindexter AN. Condom use among sterilized and nonsterilized Hispanic women. Sex Transm Dis 2001; 28 546–51.
| Condom use among sterilized and nonsterilized Hispanic women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvnsFGltw%3D%3D&md5=eaf8a9ac80503318498018d92ae62143CAS |
[43] Semaan S, Lauby J, Walls C. Condom use with main partners by sterilized and non-sterilized women. Women Health 1997; 25 65–85.
| Condom use with main partners by sterilized and non-sterilized women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2svisVyktA%3D%3D&md5=0d65d1087e953041695fd698e5949a1aCAS |
[44] Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Posner SF, Poindexter AN. Consistency of condom use among low-income hormonal contraceptive users. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2005; 37 184–91.
| Consistency of condom use among low-income hormonal contraceptive users.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[45] Roye CF. Condom use by Hispanic and African-American adolescent girls who use hormonal contraception. J Adolesc Health 1998; 23 205–11.
| Condom use by Hispanic and African-American adolescent girls who use hormonal contraception.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1cvjsVWhsg%3D%3D&md5=4b504fdaacca2d035ddc6164ad4ff69aCAS |
[46] Polaneczky M, Slap G, Forke C, Rappaport A, Sondheimer S. The use of levonorgestrel implants (Norplant) for contraception in adolescent mothers. N Engl J Med 1994; 331 1201–6.
| The use of levonorgestrel implants (Norplant) for contraception in adolescent mothers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2FitFGltg%3D%3D&md5=84a40a568d20f4f03a76bf7d3ba55411CAS |
[47] Riehman KS, Sly DF, Soler H, Eberstein IW, Quadagno D, Harrison DF. Dual-method use among an ethnically diverse group of women at risk of HIV infection. Fam Plann Perspect 1998; 30 212–7.
| Dual-method use among an ethnically diverse group of women at risk of HIV infection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1cvltlejtg%3D%3D&md5=739fec3c6c649e1b677a39a697147847CAS |
[48] Crosby RA, DiClemente RJ, Wingood GM, Sionean C, Cobb BK, Harrington K, et al Correlates of using dual methods for sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancy prevention among high-risk African-American female teens. J Adolesc Health 2001; 28 410–4.
| Correlates of using dual methods for sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancy prevention among high-risk African-American female teens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzlsFyrtg%3D%3D&md5=ffddb56bbac42ca28b5caf7aa5fbef31CAS |
[49] Lindberg LD, Ku L, Sonenstein FL. Adolescent males’ combined use of condoms with partners’ use of female contraceptive methods. Matern Child Health J 1998; 2 201–9.
| Adolescent males’ combined use of condoms with partners’ use of female contraceptive methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7pt1Ghsw%3D%3D&md5=cb7d4896ebc927511d9b84efd3279314CAS |
[50] Fortenberry JD, Tu W, Harezlak J, Katz BP, Orr DP. Condom use as a function of time in new and established adolescent sexual relationships. Am J Public Health 2002; 92 211–3.
| Condom use as a function of time in new and established adolescent sexual relationships.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[51] Ott MA, Adler NE, Millstein SG, Tschann JM, Ellen JM. The trade-off between hormonal contraceptives and condoms among adolescents. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2002; 34 6–14.
| The trade-off between hormonal contraceptives and condoms among adolescents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[52] Poppen PJ, Reisen CA. Women’s use of dual methods of sexual self-protection. Women Health 2000; 30 53–66.
| Women’s use of dual methods of sexual self-protection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[53] Woodsong C, Koo HP. Two good reasons: women’s and men’s perspectives on dual contraceptive use. Soc Sci Med 1999; 49 567–80.
| Two good reasons: women’s and men’s perspectives on dual contraceptive use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1MznvFCrsQ%3D%3D&md5=c21a7bf30386e4b33927c8d90e17f24cCAS |
[54] Grady WR, Klepinger DH, Billy JO, Cubbins LA. The role of relationship power in couple decisions about contraception in the US. J Biosoc Sci 2010; 42 307–23.
| The role of relationship power in couple decisions about contraception in the US.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[55] Weisman CS, Plichta S, Nathanson CA, Ensminger M, Robinson JC. Consistency of condom use for disease prevention among adolescent users of oral contraceptives. Fam Plann Perspect 1991; 23 71–4.
| Consistency of condom use for disease prevention among adolescent users of oral contraceptives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK3M3osFSrtw%3D%3D&md5=9b8959e43be2be757097adb0c50984b5CAS |
[56] Bull SS, Shlay JC. Promoting “dual protection” from pregnancy and sexually transmitted disease: a social ecological approach. Health Promot Pract 2005; 6 72–80.
| Promoting “dual protection” from pregnancy and sexually transmitted disease: a social ecological approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[57] Merkh RD, Whittaker PG, Baker K, Hock-Long L, Armstrong K. Young unmarried men’s understanding of female hormonal contraception. Contraception 2009; 79 228–35.
| Young unmarried men’s understanding of female hormonal contraception.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[58] Mosher WD, Chandra A, Jones J. Sexual behavior and selected health measures: Men and women ages 15–44 years of age. Adv Data 2004; 1–56.
[59] Reece M, Herbenick D, Schick V, Sanders SA, Dodge B, Fortenberry JD. Condom use rates in a national probability sample of males and females ages 14 to 94 in the United States. J Sex Med 2010; 7 266–76.
| Condom use rates in a national probability sample of males and females ages 14 to 94 in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[60] Cates W, Stone KM. Family planning, sexually transmitted diseases and contraceptive choice: a literature update–Part II. Fam Plann Perspect 1992; 24 122–8.
| Family planning, sexually transmitted diseases and contraceptive choice: a literature update–Part II.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[61] Fox LJ, Williamson NE, Cates W, Dallabetta G. Improving reproductive health: integrating STD and contraceptive services. J Am Med Womens Assoc 1995; 50 129–36.
| 1:STN:280:DyaK2Mzos1ynsA%3D%3D&md5=c5b8e76497b6f4d61fbdbfe50df5cab4CAS |
[62] Peipert J, Redding CA, Blume J, Allsworth JE, Iannuccillo K, Lozowski F, et al Design of a stage-matched intervention trial to increase dual method contraceptive use (Project PROTECT). Contemp Clin Trials 2007; 28 626–37.
| Design of a stage-matched intervention trial to increase dual method contraceptive use (Project PROTECT).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[63] Mantell JE, Hoffman S, Exner TM, Stein ZA, Atkins K. Family planning providers’ perspectives on dual protection. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2003; 35 71–8.
| Family planning providers’ perspectives on dual protection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[64] Berer M. Dual protection: making sex safer for women. In: Ravindran TKS, Berer M, Cottingham J, editors. Beyond acceptability: users’ perspectives on contraception. London: Reproductive Health Matters for WHO; 1997. pp. 109–21.
[65] Crosby R, Sanders S, Yarber WL, Graham CA. Condom-use errors and problems: a neglected aspect of studies assessing condom effectiveness. Am J Prev Med 2003; 24 367–70.
| Condom-use errors and problems: a neglected aspect of studies assessing condom effectiveness.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[66] Crosby RA, Sanders SA, Yarber WL, Graham CA, Dodge B. Condom use errors and problems among college men. Sex Transm Dis 2002; 29 552–7.
| Condom use errors and problems among college men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[67] Sanders SA, Graham CA, Yarber WL, Crosby RA. Condom use errors and problems among young women who put condoms on their male partners. J Am Med Womens Assoc 2003; 58 95–8.
