Men’s attitudes towards chlamydia screening: a narrative review
Myles Balfe A C , Ruairi Brugha A , Emer O’Connell B , Deirdre Vaughan B and Diarmuid O’Donovan B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Department of Epidemiology and Public Health Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Republic of Ireland.
B Department of Health Promotion, Clinical Science Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway, Republic of Ireland.
C Corresponding author. Email: M.Balfe@hud.ac.uk
Sexual Health 9(2) 120-130 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH10094
Submitted: 5 August 2010 Accepted: 27 May 2011 Published: 25 November 2011
Abstract
Objectives: Chlamydia trachomatis is a sexually transmissible infection (STI) that affects significant numbers of men. Research on men’s perspectives on chlamydia screening (or testing) has been limited. We conducted a narrative review to examine: (1) what factors encourage or discourage men from attending health services for chlamydia screening, and/or from accepting screening once it has been offered to them, and (2) where men want chlamydia screening services to be located. Methods: A narrative review of the recent peer-reviewed literature (published between 1999 and 2009) on men’s attitudes towards chlamydia screening. To be included, articles had to explore men’s perspectives on screening (which could be ascertained through quantitative or qualitative studies, or from relevant discussion papers or reviews). Results: Forty-eight articles were included in all. Men’s attitudes towards chlamydia screening are influenced by their knowledge about the infection, their perceived vulnerability to the infection, the degree of embarrassment and shame that they associate with screening and the stigma that they associate with screening. Men prefer to be offered urine testing for chlamydia. Men want to be offered screening by non-judgemental professionals. Men’s attitudes towards screening for chlamydia in general practice, genito-urinary medicine clinics, home and outreach settings are also explored in this review. Conclusions: Several factors influence men’s attitudes towards screening. Two central themes underlie and influence many of these factors: men’s needs to make positive impressions on others, and men’s identification with particular ideals of masculinity. The review concludes with suggestions for future research on this topic.
Additional keywords: gender, opportunistic, interview, STI, survey.
References
[1] Peipert J. Genital chlamydia infections. N Engl J Med 2003; 349 2424–30.| Genital chlamydia infections.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXpvFGqur0%3D&md5=f77e04988e400e9cd28d05814ee2b227CAS | 14681509PubMed |
[2] Rietmeijer C, Hopkins E, Geisler W, Orr D, Kent C. Chlamydia trachomatis positivity rates among men tested in selected venues in the United States: a review of the recent literature. Sex Transm Dis 2008; 35 S8–18.
| Chlamydia trachomatis positivity rates among men tested in selected venues in the United States: a review of the recent literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18449072PubMed |
[3] Johnson D, Harrison P, Sidebottom A. Providing sexually transmitted disease education and risk assessment to disengaged young men through community outreach. Am J Men’s Health 2009; 4 305–12.
[4] Simms I, Talebi A, Rhia J, Horner P, French R, Sarah R, et al The English National Chlamydia Screening Programme: variations in positivity in 2007/2008. Sex Transm Dis 2009; 36 522–7.
| The English National Chlamydia Screening Programme: variations in positivity in 2007/2008.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19455079PubMed |
[5] Hocking J, Walker J, Regan D, Chen M, Fairley C. Chlamydia screening: Australia should strive to achieve what others have not. Med J Aust 2008; 188 106–8.
| 18205585PubMed |
[6] Kong F, Guy R, Hocking J, Merritt T, Pirotta M, Heal C, et al Australian general practitioner chlamydia testing rates among young people. Med J Aust 2011; 194 249–52.
| 21381999PubMed |
[7] Centre for Disease Control. STD surveillance 2009. Atlanta: CDC; 2009.
[8] Kalmuss D, Austrian K. Real men do…real men don’t: young Latino and African-American men’s discourses regarding sexual healthcare utilization. Am J Men’s Health 2009; 4 218–30.
[9] Lindberg C, Lewis-Spruill C, Crownover R. Barriers to sexual and reproductive health care: urban male adolescents speak out. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs 2006; 29 73–88.
| Barriers to sexual and reproductive health care: urban male adolescents speak out.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16772237PubMed |
[10] McKay A. Chlamydia screening programs: a review of the literature. Part 1: issues in the promotion of chlamydia testing of youth by primary care physicians. Can J Hum Sex 2006; 15 1–11.
[11] Hart G, Duncan B, Fenton K. Chlamydia screening and sexual health. Trop Med Int Health 2002; 5 A37–44.
[12] Trent M, Millstein SG, Ellen JM. Gender-based differences in fertility beliefs and knowledge amongst adolescents from high sexually transmitted disease prevalence communities. J Adolesc Health 2006; 38 282–7.
| Gender-based differences in fertility beliefs and knowledge amongst adolescents from high sexually transmitted disease prevalence communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16488827PubMed |
[13] Lewis D. Improving men’s sexual health: a challenge for today. Sex Transm Infect 2004; 80 423–4.
| Improving men’s sexual health: a challenge for today.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2crpvFGlsQ%3D%3D&md5=55dc02280e7df38a4f0d48343a50ea1fCAS | 15572605PubMed |
[14] Marrazzo J, Scholes D. Acceptability of urine-based screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in asymptomatic young men: a systematic review. Sex Transm Dis 2008; 35 S28–33.
| Acceptability of urine-based screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in asymptomatic young men: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18418291PubMed |
[15] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Screening for chlamydia infection: a focused evidence update for the U.S. preventative services task force. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2007.
[16] Health Protection Agency. National Chlamydia Screening Programme. Involving young men in chlamydia screening. London: HPA; 2009.
[17] Public Health Agency of Canada. Revised version of the Canadian STI guidelines – 2006 edition. Ottowa: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2006.
[18] Mimiaga M, Goldhammer H, Belanoff C, Tetu A, Mayer K. Men who have sex with men: perceptions about sexual risk, HIV and sexually transmitted disease testing, and provider communication. Sex Transm Dis 2007; 34 113–9.
| Men who have sex with men: perceptions about sexual risk, HIV and sexually transmitted disease testing, and provider communication.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16810121PubMed |
[19] Barth K, Cook R, Downs J, Switzer G, Fischoff B. Social stigma and negative consequences: factors that influence college students’ decisions to seek testing for sexually transmitted infections. Am J College Health 2002; 50 153–9.
| Social stigma and negative consequences: factors that influence college students’ decisions to seek testing for sexually transmitted infections.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[20] Goldenberg S, Shoveller J, Ostry A, Koehoorn M. Sexually transmitted infection testing among young oil and gas workers: the need for innovative, place-based approaches to STI control. Can J Public Health 2008; 99 350–4.
| 18767285PubMed |
[21] Tilson E, Sanchez V, Ford C, Smurzynski M, Leone P, Fox K, et al Barriers to asymptomatic and other STD services for adolescents and young adults: focus group discussions. BMC Public Health 2004; 4 21
| Barriers to asymptomatic and other STD services for adolescents and young adults: focus group discussions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15189565PubMed |
[22] Chaudhary R, Heffernan C, Illsley A, Jarviel L, Lattimer C, Nwubal A, et al Opportunistic screening for chlamydia: a pilot study into male perspectives on provision of chlamydia screening in a UK university. J Public Health 2008; 30 466–71.
| Opportunistic screening for chlamydia: a pilot study into male perspectives on provision of chlamydia screening in a UK university.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[23] Mason L. Knowledge of sexually transmitted infections and sources of information amongst men. J R Soc Promot Health 2005; 125 266–71.
| Knowledge of sexually transmitted infections and sources of information amongst men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16353457PubMed |
[24] Henning D, Alice R, Sanci L, Dunning T. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: barriers for homeless young people. Aust J Adv Nurs 2007; 24 8–13.
| 17518159PubMed |
[25] Beck A, Majumdar Estcourt C, Petrak J. We don’t really have cause to discuss these things because they don’t really affect us: a collaborative model for developing culturally appropriate sexual health services with the Bangladeshi community of Tower Hamlets. Sex Transm Infect 2005; 81 158–62.
| We don’t really have cause to discuss these things because they don’t really affect us: a collaborative model for developing culturally appropriate sexual health services with the Bangladeshi community of Tower Hamlets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M7mvVyhsQ%3D%3D&md5=77114f00c5fdf7bfdd160004a00d8c9eCAS | 15800096PubMed |
[26] Langille D, Flowerdew G, Aquino-Russell C, Strang R, Proudfoot K, Forward K. Gender differences in knowledge about chlamydia among rural high school students in Nova Scotia, Canada. Sex Health 2009; 6 11–4.
| Gender differences in knowledge about chlamydia among rural high school students in Nova Scotia, Canada.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19254486PubMed |
[27] Greaves A, Lonsdale S, Whinney S, Hood E, Mossop H, Olowokure B. University undergraduates’ knowledge of chlamydia screening services and chlamydia infection following the introduction of a national chlamydia screening programme. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2009; 14 61–8.
| University undergraduates’ knowledge of chlamydia screening services and chlamydia infection following the introduction of a national chlamydia screening programme.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19241303PubMed |
[28] Blake D, Kearney M, Oakes J, Druker S, Bibace R. Improving participation in chlamydia screening programs: perspectives of high-risk youth. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2003; 157 523–9.
| Improving participation in chlamydia screening programs: perspectives of high-risk youth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12796231PubMed |
[29] Lorimer J, Reid M, Hart G. It has to speak to people’s everyday lives: a qualitative study of men and women’s willingness to participate in a non-medical approach to Chlamydia trachomatis screening. Sex Transm Infect 2009; 85 201–5.
| It has to speak to people’s everyday lives: a qualitative study of men and women’s willingness to participate in a non-medical approach to Chlamydia trachomatis screening.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MznsFCkuw%3D%3D&md5=536c1add5ca17be987756b674b21e2eaCAS |
[30] Rose S, Smith M, Lawton B. If everyone does it, it’s not a big deal: young people talk about chlamydia testing. N Z Med J 2008; 121 33–42.
| 18392060PubMed |
[31] Domeika M, Oscarrsson L, Hallen A, Hjelm E, Sylvan S. Mailed urine samples are not an effective screening approach for Chlamydia trachomatis case finding among young men. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2007; 21 789–94.
| Mailed urine samples are not an effective screening approach for Chlamydia trachomatis case finding among young men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2szltlOgsQ%3D%3D&md5=14cccbcfc5f1ca949553ce08c63c5f45CAS | 17567309PubMed |
[32] Pearson S. Promoting sexual health services to young men: findings from focus group discussions. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2003; 29 194–8.
| Promoting sexual health services to young men: findings from focus group discussions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14662051PubMed |
[33] Zakher B, Kang M. Attitudes to chlamydia screening in general practice among Australian university students: a pilot study. Sex Health 2008; 5 359–63.
| Attitudes to chlamydia screening in general practice among Australian university students: a pilot study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19061556PubMed |
[34] Darroch J, Myers L, Cassell J. Sex differences in the experience of testing positive for genital chlamydia infection: a qualitative study with implications for public health and for a national screening programme. Sex Transm Infect 2003; 79 372–3.
| Sex differences in the experience of testing positive for genital chlamydia infection: a qualitative study with implications for public health and for a national screening programme.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3srgslKhuw%3D%3D&md5=f88140dd731d7cd85cbbe81962d0710aCAS | 14573831PubMed |
[35] Mulholland E, van Wersh A. Sexually transmitted infections, stigma and the GUM clinic: a critical evaluation of the theory of planned behaviour. J Health Psychol 2007; 12 17–31.
| Sexually transmitted infections, stigma and the GUM clinic: a critical evaluation of the theory of planned behaviour.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17158837PubMed |
[36] Mill J, Jackson R, Worthington C, Archibald C, Wong T, Meyers T, et al HIV testing and care in Canadian Aboriginal youth: a community based mixed-methods study. BMC Infect Dis 2008; 8 132
| HIV testing and care in Canadian Aboriginal youth: a community based mixed-methods study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18840292PubMed |
[37] Blake D, Lemay C, Indurkhya A. Correlates of readiness to receive chlamydia screening among 2 populations of youth. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007; 161 1088–94.
| Correlates of readiness to receive chlamydia screening among 2 populations of youth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17984412PubMed |
[38] Mills N, Daker-White G, Graham A, Campbell R. Population screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the UK: a qualitative study of the experiences of those screened. Fam Pract 2006; 23 550–7.
| Population screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the UK: a qualitative study of the experiences of those screened.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16790452PubMed |
[39] Heritage J, Jones M. A study of young people’s attitudes to opportunistic testing in UK general practice. Reprod Health 2008; 5 11
| A study of young people’s attitudes to opportunistic testing in UK general practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19099571PubMed |
[40] Valentine J. Impact of attitudes and beliefs regarding African-American sexual behavior on STD prevention and control in African-American communities: unintended consequences. Sex Transm Dis 2008; 35 S23–9.
| Impact of attitudes and beliefs regarding African-American sexual behavior on STD prevention and control in African-American communities: unintended consequences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18923333PubMed |
[41] Foster L, Byers E. Predictors of stigma and shame related to sexually transmitted infections: attitudes, education and knowledge. Can J Hum Sex 2008; 17 193–202.
[42] Lichenstein B. Stigma as a barrier to treatment of sexually transmitted infection in the American Deep South: issues of race, gender and poverty. Soc Sci Med 2003; 57 2345–445.
[43] Arkell J, Osborn D, Ivens D, King M. Factors associated with anxiety in patients attending a sexually transmitted infection clinic: a qualitative survey. Int J STD AIDS 2006; 17 299–303.
| Factors associated with anxiety in patients attending a sexually transmitted infection clinic: a qualitative survey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD283jsleitg%3D%3D&md5=2dd383ee75e539954ca6066688c8d3c3CAS | 16643678PubMed |
[44] Kangas I, Andersen B, Olesen F, Moller J, Ostergard L. Psychosocial impact of Chlamydia trachomatis testing in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 2006; 529 687–93.
[45] Piercy H. ‘It feels good to be told that I’m all clear’: patients’ accounts of retesting following genital chlamydia infection. Sex Transm Infect 2006; 82 330–3.
| ‘It feels good to be told that I’m all clear’: patients’ accounts of retesting following genital chlamydia infection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28vlsVejtg%3D%3D&md5=6637c4f75e2aea35462ac84e5a2f89a5CAS | 16877587PubMed |
[46] Christianson M, Johannsson E, Emmelin E, Westman G. ‘One-night stands’ – risky trips between lust and trust: qualitative interviews with Chlamydia trachomatis infected youth in north Sweden. Scand J Public Health 2003; 31 44–50.
| ‘One-night stands’ – risky trips between lust and trust: qualitative interviews with Chlamydia trachomatis infected youth in north Sweden.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12623524PubMed |
[47] Piercy H. The importance of contextualization in giving a diagnosis of genital chlamydial infection: findings from a qualitative study. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2006; 32 227–30.
| The importance of contextualization in giving a diagnosis of genital chlamydial infection: findings from a qualitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17032509PubMed |
[48] Griffiths C, Gerressu M, French R. Are one-stop shops acceptable? Perspectives on one-stop shop models of sexual health service provision in the UK. Sex Transm Infect 2008; 84 395–9.
| Are one-stop shops acceptable? Perspectives on one-stop shop models of sexual health service provision in the UK.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1cnhslyqsQ%3D%3D&md5=cf3ee1f941e244e7bdf5ef13f06a1ec8CAS | 18596071PubMed |
[49] Cunningham S, Tschann J, Gurvey J, Fortenberry JE. Attitudes about sexual disclosure and perceptions of stigma and shame. Sex Transm Infect 2002; 78 334–8.
| Attitudes about sexual disclosure and perceptions of stigma and shame.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38nkvVCksw%3D%3D&md5=fe37c2ce605ef7e811bf9a9a31c924a0CAS | 12407233PubMed |
[50] Duncan B, Hart G. A social science perspective on screening for Chlamydia trachomatis. Sex Transm Infect 1999; 75 239–41.
| A social science perspective on screening for Chlamydia trachomatis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2Fot1Wksw%3D%3D&md5=b890bbda4ccdbfbbe9994471d377ab24CAS | 10615309PubMed |
[51] Hyde A, Drennan J, Howlett E, Brady D. Safer heterosex: perspectives from young men in Ireland. Sex Health 2008; 5 25–30.
| Safer heterosex: perspectives from young men in Ireland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18361851PubMed |
[52] Nwokolo N, McOwan A, Hennebry G, Chislett L, Mandalia S. Young people’s views on provision of sexual health services. Sex Transm Infect 2002; 78 342–5.
| Young people’s views on provision of sexual health services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38nkvVSktw%3D%3D&md5=2bc9167e0c3f40043523dd1eaa217852CAS | 12407236PubMed |
[53] Miller C, Tebb K, Williams J, Neuhaus J, Shafer M. Chlamydia screening in urgent care visits. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007; 161 777–82.
| Chlamydia screening in urgent care visits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17679660PubMed |
[54] Shoveller J, Johnson J, Rosenberg M, Greaves L, Patrick D, Oliffe J, et al Youth’s experiences with STI testing in four communities in British Columbia, Canada. Sex Transm Infect 2009; 85 397–401.
| Youth’s experiences with STI testing in four communities in British Columbia, Canada.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MnjvFOmsQ%3D%3D&md5=f35f6505721f68288b526d4123b77814CAS | 19508967PubMed |
[55] Llewellyn C, Pollard A, Smith H, Fisher M. Are home sampling kits for sexually transmitted infections acceptable among men who have sex with men? J Health Serv Res Policy 2009; 14 35–43.
| Are home sampling kits for sexually transmitted infections acceptable among men who have sex with men?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19103915PubMed |
[56] Sosman J, MacGowan R, Margolis A, Eldridge G, Flanigan T, Vardaman J, et al Screening for sexually transmitted diseases and hepatitis in 18–29 year old men recently released from prison: feasibility and acceptability. Int J STD AIDS 2005; 16 117–22.
| Screening for sexually transmitted diseases and hepatitis in 18–29 year old men recently released from prison: feasibility and acceptability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M7ptF2rsg%3D%3D&md5=fbc108c023d95d7197e478147d3df788CAS | 15825246PubMed |
[57] Farrow J. Male sexual health during adolescence and young adulthood: contemporary issues. American J Men’s Health 2009; 6 177–82.
| Male sexual health during adolescence and young adulthood: contemporary issues.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[58] Evans J, Cross J. Community sexually transmitted infections services are good enough: a qualitative study of clients’ experiences. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2007; 33 259–62.
| Community sexually transmitted infections services are good enough: a qualitative study of clients’ experiences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17925109PubMed |
[59] Kong F, Hocking J, Link C, Chen M, Hellard M. Sex and sport: chlamydia screening in rural sporting clubs. BMC Infect Dis 2009; 9 73
| Sex and sport: chlamydia screening in rural sporting clubs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19470183PubMed |
[60] Hancock J. Sexual health pilot projects? Sex Transm Infect 2004; 80 484–7.
| Sexual health pilot projects?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2crpvFGktQ%3D%3D&md5=0851fedaaa2aba3b1fa83ff18f470d66CAS | 15572620PubMed |
[61] Stephenson J, Carder C, Copas A, Robinson A, Ridgway G, Haines A. Home screening for chlamydial genital infection: is it acceptable to young men and women? Sex Transm Infect 2000; 76 25–7.
| Home screening for chlamydial genital infection: is it acceptable to young men and women?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3nslWlsw%3D%3D&md5=df80b458edf58228fe944c1698f6941eCAS | 10817064PubMed |
[62] Campbell R, Mills N, Sanford E, Graham A, Low N, Peter T. Does population screening for Chlamydia trachomatis raise anxiety among those tested? Findings from a population based chlamydia screening study. BMC Public Health 2006; 6 106
| Does population screening for Chlamydia trachomatis raise anxiety among those tested? Findings from a population based chlamydia screening study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16638147PubMed |
[63] Gotz H, Veldhuijzen I, van Bergen J, Hoebe C, de Zwart O, Richardus J, et al Acceptability and consequences of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis by home-based urine testing. Sex Transm Dis 2005; 32 557–62.
| Acceptability and consequences of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis by home-based urine testing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16118604PubMed |
