Condoms and US college-aged men and women: briefly assessing attitudes toward condoms and general condom use behaviours
Brandon J. Hill A B E , Erick E. Amick C D and Stephanie A. Sanders A B DA The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction, Morrison Hall 313, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
B Department of Gender Studies, Memorial Hall E 130, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
C Department of Applied Health Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
D Center for Sexual Health Promotion, Health, Physical Education & Recreation 116, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
E Corresponding author. Email: brjhill@indiana.edu
Sexual Health 8(3) 372-377 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH10058
Submitted: 21 May 2010 Accepted: 13 April 2011 Published: 17 August 2011
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to develop an abbreviated reliable tool for assessing the attitudes US college-aged men and women have about condoms and condom use. Method: An online questionnaire was constructed and completed by 674 participants incorporating modified items from the Attitudes Towards Condom Scale (1984) and the Multidimensional Condom Attitude Scale (1994), with the addition of gender-neutral worded and condom positive or erotic items. Results: The original 40 items were reduced to 18 Likert-type items comprising the Brief Condom Attitude Scale (BCAS). Gender comparisons on a subset of 584 self-identified heterosexual participants indicated that women were significantly more likely to consider condoms as less protective, while men were significantly more likely to consider condoms as more interruptive. Additional analyses examining partnership indicated that monogamous participants were significantly more likely to view condoms as less interruptive, more erotic and less negative than non-monogamous participants. Conclusions: The BCAS appears to be a reliable measure for assessing US college-aged individuals’ attitudes about condoms.
Additional keywords: college students, condom attitudes, condom attitudes scale, gender differences.
References
[1] Helweg-Larsen M, Collins BE. The UCLA multidimensional condom attitude scale: documenting the complex determinants of condom use in college students. Health Psychol 1994; 13 224–37.| The UCLA multidimensional condom attitude scale: documenting the complex determinants of condom use in college students.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2czjtlaktg%3D%3D&md5=8a1af1f8f97f2d769f832672a9882ed2CAS |
[2] Warner DL, Hatcher RA. Male condoms. In: Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Stewart F, editors. Contraceptive technology. New York: Irvington Publishers; 1998. pp. 325–352.
[3] Reece M, Herbenick D, Hollub AV, Hensel DJ, Middlestadt SE. A psychometric assessment of the Multi-factor attitude toward condom scale (MFACS). Int J Sex Health 2010; 22 119–29.
| A psychometric assessment of the Multi-factor attitude toward condom scale (MFACS).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[4] Carver K, Joyner K, Udry JR. National estimates of adolescent romantic relationships. In: Florsheim P, editor. Adolescent Romantic Relations and Sexual Behavior. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2004; pp. 23–56.
[5] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Fact sheet: estimates of new HIV infections in the United States; August 2008. Atlanta: CDC; 2008. Available online at: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/resources/factsheets/pdf/incidence.pdf [verified February 2010].
[6] Crosby RA, Yarber WL, Sanders SA, Graham CA. Condom discomfort and associated problems with their use among university students. Am J College Health 2005; 54 143–7.
| Condom discomfort and associated problems with their use among university students.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Reece M, Herbenick D, Monohan P, Temkit M, Yarber WL. Breakage, slippage, and acceptability outcomes of a condom fitted to penile dimensions. Sex Transm Infect 2008; 84 143–9.
| Breakage, slippage, and acceptability outcomes of a condom fitted to penile dimensions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c3htVSrug%3D%3D&md5=4557fe79c75bfb19795880e60232648fCAS |
[8] Sanders SA, Graham CA, Yarber WL, Crosby RA. Condom use errors and problems among young women who apply condoms on males. JAMWA 2003; 58 95–8.
[9] Graham CA, Crosby RA, Sanders SA, Yarber WL. Assessment of condom use in men and women. Annu Rev Sex Res 2005; 16 20–52.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28vovFGltw%3D%3D&md5=e347e7e9567681158c6cefdaf6f53955CAS |
[10] Crosby RA, Sanders SA, Yarber WL, Graham CA. Condom use errors and problems: the neglected aspect of studies assessing condom effectiveness. Am J Prev Med 2003; 24 367–70.
| Condom use errors and problems: the neglected aspect of studies assessing condom effectiveness.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[11] Randolph ME, Pinkerton SD, Bogart LM, Cecil H, Abramson PR. Sexual pleasure and condom use. Arch Sex Behav 2007; 36 844–8.
| Sexual pleasure and condom use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[12] Choi KH, Rickman R, Catania JA. What heterosexual adults believe about condoms. N Engl J Med 1994; 331 406–7.
| What heterosexual adults believe about condoms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2czgtFeksA%3D%3D&md5=5b4b92bd18125e4b9c703593bcdbf846CAS |
[13] Conley TD, Collins BE. Differences between condom users and condom nonusers in their multidimensional condom attitudes. J Appl Soc Psychol 2005; 35 603–20.
| Differences between condom users and condom nonusers in their multidimensional condom attitudes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[14] Albarracin D, Johnson BT, Fishbein M, Muellerleile PA. Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 2001; 127 142–61.
| Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: a meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ntFequg%3D%3D&md5=5eb207648d861308f00093fd8818422aCAS |
[15] Boyd B, Wandersman A. Predicting undergraduate condom use with the Fishbein and Ajzen and the Triadis Attitude–Behavior Models: implications for public health interventions. J Appl Soc Psychol 1991; 21 1810–30.
| Predicting undergraduate condom use with the Fishbein and Ajzen and the Triadis Attitude–Behavior Models: implications for public health interventions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[16] Campbell SM, Peplau LA, DeBro SC. Women, men, and condoms: attitudes and experiences of heterosexual college students. Psychol Women Q 1992; 16 273–88.
| Women, men, and condoms: attitudes and experiences of heterosexual college students.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38rlt12msQ%3D%3D&md5=79a14386a93d701dc0c3f6d1b8332f46CAS |
[17] Beckman LJ, Harvey SM, Tiersky LA. Attitudes about condoms and condom use among college students. J Am Coll Health 1996; 44 243–50.
| Attitudes about condoms and condom use among college students.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK28zhvVaqtg%3D%3D&md5=14f9e989b4f4aa72e1c8b273e0d0244aCAS |
[18] Baffi CR, Schroeder KK, Redican KJ, McCluskey L. Factors influencing selected heterosexual male college students’ condom use. J Am Coll Health 1989; 38 137–41.
| Factors influencing selected heterosexual male college students’ condom use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK3c%2Fjsl2qtQ%3D%3D&md5=7164716a672197ea8c58b7fc8cd2f811CAS |
[19] Brown IS. Development of a scale to measure attitude toward the condom as a method of birth control. J Sex Res 1984; 20 255–63.
| Development of a scale to measure attitude toward the condom as a method of birth control.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[20] Koop CE. Surgeon General’s report on Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome. Washington, DC: US Public Health Service; 1986.
[21] Conant M, Spicer D, Levy JA. Condoms prevent transmission of AIDS-associated retrovirus. JAMA 1986; 255 1706
| 1:STN:280:DyaL287ksVahug%3D%3D&md5=d311a8cf735edbacafe1884174cfcd95CAS |
[22] Sacco WP, Levine B, Reed DL, Thompson K. Attitudes about condom use as an AIDS-relevant behavior: their factor structure and relation to condom use. Psychol Assess 1991; 3 265–72.
| Attitudes about condom use as an AIDS-relevant behavior: their factor structure and relation to condom use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[23] Brown IS. Attitude toward condoms scale. In: Davis CM, Yarber WL, Bauserman R, Schreer G, Davis SL. editors. Handbook of sexuality-related measures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Inc.; 1998. pp. 136–137.
