Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Low yield of anogenital examination among asymptomatic clients of an urban sexual health clinic

Jun Yong Ma A , Nathan Ryder A B , Lynne Wray A B C and Anna McNulty A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia.

B Sydney Sexual Health Centre, Sydney Hospital, GPO Box 1614, Sydney, NSW 2001, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: lynne.wray@sesiahs.health.nsw.gov.au

Sexual Health 8(1) 90-94 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH10024
Submitted: 24 February 2010  Accepted: 24 May 2010   Published: 24 January 2011

Abstract

Background: The use of self-collected specimens to test for sexually transmissible infections (STI) has reduced the opportunity for physical examination. Physical examination has been found to be of limited value in asymptomatic heterosexual women and men; however, prior studies have excluded higher risk populations. We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study to determine the diagnostic yield of physical examination among all clients attending our sexual health service. Methods: The Sydney Sexual Health Centre database was used to identify asymptomatic clients attending for the first time between January and June 2009. Demographic and behavioural data were extracted from the database for all clients. Medical records were then manually reviewed to determine the number and nature of diagnoses related to the examination and whether this varied by sex and sex of sexual partners. Results: Of the 590 clients included, 450 (76%) received anogenital examinations. Ten (2.2%; 95% confidence interval 1.1–4.1%) STI were found, including four cases of cervicitis, four of anogenital warts and two of molluscum. Nineteen (4.2%) other non-STI conditions were detected, mostly in heterosexual women and men who have sex with men (MSM). Conclusion: Physical examination of asymptomatic clients attending our sexual health clinic was of limited value, even among higher risk individuals such as MSM. Sexual health clinics should direct resources currently used to examine clients towards increasing the STI testing rate.

Graphical Abstract Image

Additional keywords: MSM, screening sexually transmissible infections.


Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the contribution of Heng Lu, SSHC data manager, for performing the data extraction and the administrative staff for assisting with the medical records.


References


[1] Donovan B. Sexually transmissible infections other than HIV. Lancet 2004; 363 545–56.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | [verified November 2009].

[7] British Association for Sexual Health and HIV (BASHH). Sexually transmitted infections: UK national screening and testing guidelines. London: BASHH; 2006. Available online at: http://www.bashh.org/documents/59/59.pdf [verified November 2009].

[8] World Health Organization (WHO). Sexually transmitted and other reproductive tract infections: a guide to essential practice. Geneva: WHO; 2005. Available online at: http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/publications/rtis_gep/ [verified May 2009].

[9] Lee DM,  Chen MY,  Bradshaw CS,  Fairley CK. Is routine vaginal examination necessary for asymptomatic women attending sexual health services? Int J STD AIDS 2006; 17 631–2.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |

[10] Green P,  Lacey H,  Kasperowcz R. Genital examination, microscopy and high vaginal swabs: are these valuable components of a sexually transmitted infection screen in asymptomatic women? Int J STD AIDS 2007; 18 85–8.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[11] Singh RH,  Erbelding EJ,  Zenilman JM,  Ghanem KG. The role of speculum and bimanual examinations when evaluating attendees at a sexually transmitted diseases clinic. Sex Transm Infect 2007; 83 206–10.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[12] Shamos SJ,  Mettenbrink CJ,  Subiadur JA,  Mitchell BL,  Rietmeijer CA. Evaluation of a testing-only “express” visit option to enhance efficiency in a busy STI clinic. Sex Transm Dis 2008; 35 336–40.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[13] Hounsfield VL,  Freedman E,  McNulty A,  Bourne C. Transgender people attending a Sydney sexual health service over a 16-year period. Sex Health 2007; 4 189–93.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[14] Lusk JM,  Konecny P. Cervictis: a review. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2008; 21 49–55.
PubMed |

[15] Newall AT,  Brotherton ML,  Quinn HE,  McIntyre PB,  Backhouse J,  Gilbert L, et al. Population seroprevalence of human papillomavirus types 6, 11, 16, and 18 in men, women and children in Australia. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 46 1647–55.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[16] Holmes KK , Sparling PF , Stamm WE , Piot P , Wasserheit JN , Corey L et al (Editors). Sexually transmitted diseases. 4th edition. New York: McGraw Hill Medical; 2008.

[17] Donovan B. Asymptomatic non-chlamydial, non-gonococcal urethritis – an iatrogenic disease? Sex Health 2004; 1 65–7.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[18] Heijman TLJ,  Van Der Bij AK,  De Vries HJC,  Van Leent EJM,  Thiesbrummel HFJ,  Fennema HAS. Effectiveness of a risk-based visitor-prioritizing system at a sexually transmitted infection outpatient clinic. Sex Transm Dis 2007; 34 508–12.
PubMed |

[19] Borrelli JM , Paneth-Pollack R , Wright S , Schillinger JA , Harvey K , Blank S . The impact of introducing ‘express visits’ for asymptomatic persons seeking STD services in a busy urban STD clinic system, New York City, 2005–2006. National STD Prevention Conference, Chicago; 2008.

[20] Chernesky MA,  Hook EW,  Martin DH,  Lane J,  Johnson R,  Jordan JA, et al. Women find it easy and prefer to collect their own vaginal swabs to diagnose Chlamydia trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections. Sex Transm Dis 2005; 32 729–33.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |