Guideline evaluation: tricky business
Jeffrey D. Klausner
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A STD Prevention and Control Services Section, San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, California, USA.
B Divisions of AIDS and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 1360 Mission Street, Suite #401, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA. Email: Jeff.Klausner@sfdph.org
Sexual Health 4(4) 253-254 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH07091
Submitted: 9 November 2007 Accepted: 12 November 2007 Published: 23 November 2007
References
[1] Cluzeau FA, Littlehons P, Grimshaw JM, Feder G, Moran SE. Development and application of generic methodology to assess the quality of clinical guidelines. Int J Qual Health Care 1999; 11 21–8.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[2] The AGREE Collaboration. Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care 2003; 12 18–23.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[3] Baird A, Olarinde O, Talbot M.. An evaluation, using two assessment instruments, of the American and British national guidelines for the management of sexually transmissible and genital infections. Sex Health 2007; 4 255–60.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[4] Vlayen J, Aertgeerts B, Hannes K, Sermeus W, Ramaekers D. A systematic review of appraisal tools for clinical practice guidelines: multiple similarities and one common deficity. Int J Qual Health Care 2005; 17 235–42.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[5] Rolfs RT, Joesoef MR, Hendershot EF, Rompalo AM, Augenbraun MH, Chiu M, et al. A randomized trial of enhanced therapy for early syphilis in patients with and without human immunodeficiency virus infection. The Syphilis and HIV Study Group. N Engl J Med 1997; 337 307–14.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
