Chaperones – are there other options?
Anna McNulty A B and Vickie Knight A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Sydney Sexual Health Centre, South Eastern Sydney and Illawarra Area Health Service, PO Box 1614, Sydney, NSW 2001, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: Anna.McNulty@sesiahs.health.nsw.gov.au
Sexual Health 4(3) 206-206 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH07049
Submitted: 4 July 2007 Accepted: 17 July 2007 Published: 23 August 2007
References
[1] Baber JA, Davies SC, Dayan L. An extra pair of eyes: do patients want a chaperone when having an anogenital examination? Sex Health 2007; 4 89–93.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[2] Rogstad KE. Chaperones: protecting the patient or protecting the doctor? Sex Health 2007; 4 85–7.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[3] Sharma A, Beveridge HA, Fallowfield LJ, Jacobs IJ, Menon U. Postmenopausal women undergoing transvaginal ultrasound screening prefer not to have chaperones. BJOG 2006; 113 954–7.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[4] Fiddes P, Scott A, Fletcher J, Glasier A. Attitudes towards pelvic examination and chaperones: a questionnaire survey of patients and providers. Contraception 2003; 67 313–7.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
[5] Whitford DL, Karim M, Thompson G. Attitudes of patients towards the use of chaperones in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2001; 51 381–3.
| PubMed |
[6] Khan NS, Kirkman R. Intimate examinations: use of chaperones in community-based family planning clinics. BJOG 2000; 107 130–2.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
