Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Prevalence and correlates of HIV testing among college students: an exploratory study

Richard A. Crosby A D , Kim H. Miller B , Ruth R. Staten C and Melody Noland B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, 121 Washington Ave, Room 111C, Lexington, KY 40506-0003, USA.

B Department of Kinesiology and Health Promotion, University of Kentucky.

C College of Nursing, University of Kentucky.

D Corresponding author. Email: crosby@uky.edu

Sexual Health 2(1) 19-22 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH04047
Submitted: 26 October 2004  Accepted: 17 February 2005   Published: 22 March 2005

Abstract

Objectives: Whether college students who are most at-risk of HIV infection are being tested is unknown. This exploratory study identified the prevalence and correlates of ever having an HIV test among college students. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among a probability sample of 903 college students. Measures of sexual risk behaviour were assessed. Results: Of the students surveyed, 22.5% reported they had been tested for HIV. Testing was more likely among those 20 years of age or older (27.8% v. 14.7%; P = 0.0001), females (25.4% v. 17.8%; P = 0.01), and members of racial/ethnic minorities (42.7% v. 20.3%; P = 0.0001). After adjusting for these covariates, those who reported ever having vaginal sex (AOR = 5.5; 95% CI = 3.1–9.6); anal sex (AOR = 2.4; 95% CI = 1.6–3.6), and oral sex (AOR = 6.3; 95% CI = 3.0–13.3) were significantly more likely to report being tested. Students having vaginal sex in the past 12 months were significantly more likely to report testing (AOR = 5.3; 95% CI = 3.1–9.1). Those reporting vaginal sexual debut (AOR = 1.9; 95% CI = 1.2–3.1) or oral sexual debut (AOR = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.1–2.5) ≤age 15 were significantly more likely to be tested. Students reporting four or more sex partners were significantly more likely to be tested than sexually experienced students reporting fewer partners (AOR = 3.2; 95% CI = 2.2–4.6). Finally, those reporting at least one episode of forced vaginal sex (AOR = 3.9; 95% CI = 2.1–7.2) and reporting at least one episode of any forced sex (vaginal, anal, oral) (AOR = 3.0; 95% CI = 1.8–5.0) were significantly more likely to report being tested. Conclusions: Within this population, demographically controlled findings suggest that those most at-risk of HIV infection are indeed being tested for the virus.


Acknowledgement

This study was funded by the University of Kentucky Prevention Research Center


References


[1] Janssen RS,  Holtgrave DR,  Valdiserri RO, et al. The serostatus approach to fighting the HIV epidemic: prevention strategies for infected individuals. Am J Public Health 2001; 91 1019–24.
PubMed | (accessed 20 July 2004).

[11] Sheeran P,  Abraham C,  Orbell S. Psychosocial correlates of heterosexual condom use: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 1999; 125 90–132.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[12] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV testing — United States, 2001. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2003; 52(1): 540–5.


[13] Renzi C,  Zantedeschi E,  Signorelli C. Voluntary HIV testing in Europe. Scand J Public Health 2004; 32 102–10.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |