Domestic mobility and experiences of disconnection from sexual health care among gay and bisexual men in Australia: insights from a qualitative study
Dean Murphy![https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2752-7091](/media/client/orcid_16x16.png)
A The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
B Centre for Social Impact, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Sexual Health 18(6) 508-511 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH21191
Submitted: 29 September 2021 Accepted: 27 October 2021 Published: 17 December 2021
© 2021 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)
Abstract
Background: Previous research on mobility and HIV acquisition among gay and bisexual men (GBM) has focused on: (1) changed sexual practices in the context of travel; and (2) the association between migration and increased HIV risk. To date, little attention has been given to continuity of sexual health and HIV-prevention services in the context of relocating between different cities or regions within the same country.
Methods: Drawing on in-depth interviews with 17 GBM recently diagnosed with HIV, we explored these men’s access to sexual health care in the period prior to diagnosis.
Results: At least five of these 17 men’s accounts provided examples of becoming disconnected from sexual health care because of mobility within Australia. For some men, this disconnection from care also included loss of access to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). In all these men’s accounts, reconnection with services only came about at the time of seeking the HIV test associated with their diagnosis. The fact that men who had previously been well connected to sexual health services (as indicated by early uptake of PrEP, or regular HIV/STI testing) did not easily access similar services after relocating suggest that there are other factors – such as the social and physical environment – that have an important bearing on retention in sexual health care.
Conclusions: There is a need for more comprehensive data collection related to mobility in order to ascertain its relative importance. Regarding policy and practice, there are also opportunities for a more formalised process for interstate referral of clients of sexual health services.
Keywords: Australasia, gay and bisexual men, health care retention, HIV/AIDS, HIV testing, migrant and mobile populations, pre-exposure prophylaxis, sexual health care.
Introduction
There have been two main strands of research on mobility and HIV acquisition among gay and bisexual men (GBM): the first has investigated the effect of travel on HIV risk;1–6 and the second has specifically examined the association between migration and increased HIV risk.7–12 In addition, there has been some research on internal migration and HIV risk, in particular in the US, which has focused on changes in sexual practices after moving to larger urban centres.11,13,14 There has not, however, been any detailed exploration to date of the effect of mobility on men’s access to sexual health care – including HIV testing and use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) – which may increase vulnerability to HIV, and lead to delays in the detection of new HIV infections.
Methods
Participants in a prospective online cohort study of people living with HIV (diagnosed in 2016 or later) were invited to take part in an optional in-depth interview. This qualitative component of the study comprises 24 participants, of whom 17 had any history of male-to-male sex. Almost all (94%) of these participants described their sexual identity as gay or bisexual, 76.5% were born in Australia, and their median age was 32 years (range 24–50 years). The interviews were conducted face-to-face or by telephone/videoconference by authors 1 (DM) and 2 (SP). Data collection occurred between January 2019 and April 2020. Interviews were audio recorded, then transcribed. Members of the research team (authors 1 and 2) coded the materials using an inductive approach,15 as well as drawing on themes in the existing empirical literature.
Ethics approval
The UNSW Human Research Ethics Committee (HC180459) approved this study.
Results
Mobility within Australia in the period prior to acquiring HIV infection was a theme linking at least five of the accounts of the gay and bisexual-identifying men in the study. This mobility, which most often involved relocation between the major cities, was associated with discontinuity in their sexual health care. Loss of access to sexual health care meant certain loss of access to PrEP; and interestingly, loss of access to PrEP also seemed, in turn, to contribute to an extended period of disconnection from sexual health care.
Pre-exposure prophylaxis
Prior to April 2018,16 PrEP was mostly available in Australia through demonstration studies, and the fact that these PrEP access schemes were developed at a local level presented barriers – both perceived and real – for study participants who moved between states. Angus’s (aged 28 years) account provides some insight into this experience.
I moved at the end of 2016, so I was mid-way through the [PrEP study] then. I was still on the trial for the first two months [after moving] and I would go back to [other city] a little bit, so I would replenish the script [there]. […] And then I left that job and was doing something else, so wasn’t going back to [other city]. I tried to get on the trial [here] and they were all full. So, I couldn’t get on PrEP.
Notably, at the time of his diagnosis, approximately a year after relocating, he had still not accessed any general practitioner or sexual health provider locally. The reason for seeking this HIV test was a suspected seroconversion illness.
Like Angus, another participant, Hamish (aged 35 years), had also been accessing PrEP through a demonstration study, and his supply of PrEP ran out around the same time he moved interstate. His sexual practices – involving condomless sex in group settings in the context of injecting crystal methamphetamine – remained quite similar, however, although he tried to reduce risk by selecting partners who were HIV negative or on antiretroviral therapy.
I had been on PrEP previously, and that was quite effective, which is why I sort of kick myself.
Why did you stop?
I’d run out and I’d moved to [current city] and […] I was in a really odd sort of space in my own head, in life, and just couldn’t be bothered with a lot of things. And unfortunately, that was one of them.
The regret and reproval Hamish expressed in his interview suggests he imagines it would have been possible to access PrEP if he’d established a relationship with a local service provider. His first contact with local services, however, was to seek post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for a needlestick injury, and testing at this time revealed established HIV infection.
Sexual health care and HIV testing
Moving states or cities can also create other risks for becoming disconnected from sexual health care. Similar to the accounts above, Dexter (aged 50 years) described relocating between two of Australia’s main cities, albeit several years earlier. This move also involved a change from living in an inner-city ‘gaybourhood’,17 to a more ‘suburban’ setting in another capital city. After relocating, his frequency of HIV and STI testing changed dramatically – from approximately once every 6 months to not testing at all for more than a decade, despite frequently engaging in condomless sex. He describes ‘falling out of the habit’ of testing despite occasionally visiting a general practitioner, because of discomfort around discussing sex and sexual health.
And moving into the suburbs, not having, you know, the cute, gay doctor, and I just got out of the habit. […] So, I ended up just falling out of the habit of actually requesting it to the point where I just didn’t get it done anymore.
Dexter’s account makes a strong connection between living in a gay enclave – as he had previously – and being habituated to regular HIV and sexual health testing. His reason for eventually testing was a suspected seroconversion illness, although he was found to have established HIV infection (with a CD4 count of 260, this was a ‘late’ diagnosis).
Discussion
The accounts of the men in this study suggest that even within a country like Australia, relocating from one city or state to another can present a risk of becoming disconnected from sexual health care. It is also important to note that for all of the men who experienced an interruption to their care, the time between their previous HIV test and the HIV test associated with their diagnosis was more than a year, and in at least one case, several years. Also, these men had a specific reason for seeking out this HIV test, suggesting that these diagnoses may have been further delayed had it not been for these reasons.
A theme that linked some of the accounts of men in the study was that of having previously been on PrEP. The emerging literature on reasons for discontinuing PrEP, however, has not identified mobility. Whereas some studies from the US have identified loss of access to sexual health services as contributing to PrEP discontinuation, this interruption to care has been associated with cost and time of medical visits, and loss of insurance coverage.18–20 In addition, mobility – and its effect on access to sexual health care – have not been well explored in HIV prevention cascades,21–24 which have tended to focus on other factors such as willingness and perceived social norms.
In Australia, community prescribing and dispensing should now reduce barriers to maintaining PrEP use for people who move between jurisdictions, compared to the period when PrEP was available primarily through state-specific studies. However, it is still necessary for men to seek out healthcare providers after they relocate, which based on the accounts of the men in this study, is something that may take some time.
Another interesting finding was that most men had previously been very well connected to sexual health services (as indicated by early uptake of PrEP, or regular HIV/STI testing). However, this history did not mean that they quickly or easily accessed similar services in a new jurisdiction after relocating. These experiences suggest that there are other factors – apart from an individual’s history of service use – that have an important bearing on retention in sexual health care. One participant’s account explicitly noted the role of the social and physical environment on his engagement with sexual health services. There is established international literature on these connections – including with social engagement, health-seeking behaviour, and overall wellbeing14,25–30 – and they are now also receiving increasing attention in Australia.31
It is also worth noting that other mobility-related issues are also still relevant. For example, over one-third of GBM interviewed believed they acquired HIV while travelling, or living temporarily, in other countries.
Conclusion
It is unknown to what extent domestic mobility contributes to interruptions in sexual health care. There is, therefore, a need for more comprehensive data collection related to mobility, including mobility within metropolitan areas, in order to ascertain its relative importance in terms of continuity of sexual health care; for example, via existing cross-sectional surveys and cohort studies (in addition to investigating the association between mobility and HIV diagnosis). Regarding policy and practice, there are also opportunities for a more formalised process for interstate referral of clients of sexual health services (and general practice), which could be facilitated by service providers in both the departure and arrival jurisdictions, and could be promoted by local HIV and community health organisations.
Data availability
The study dataset is available on request.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Declaration of funding
Funding for the study was provided through the National Health and Medical Research Council Partnership Grant APP1134433 (Developing and implementing systems to optimise treatment, care and support among people diagnosed with HIV), as well as the state health departments of the Australian Capital Territory, New South Wales, Northern Territory, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria and Western Australia.
Author contributions
All authors contributed to the study design and interpretation of findings. DM oversaw data collection, conducted qualitative analysis, and drafted the manuscript. DM and SP undertook data collection. SP coded the data. All authors reviewed and commented on drafts of the manuscript and agreed with the final version.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the other study investigators (Basil Donovan, Christopher Fairley, Andrew Grulich, Rebecca Guy, Fengyi Jin, Limin Mao, Asha Persson) and members of the study’s advisory group (Lisa Bastian, Jeanne Ellard, Chris Howard, Suzy Mulhotra, John Rule, Christine Selvey).
References
[1] Elsesser SA, Oldenburg CE, Biello KB, Mimiaga MJ, Safren SA, Egan JE, et al. Seasons of risk: anticipated behavior on vacation and interest in episodic antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among a large national sample of U.S. men who have sex with men (MSM). AIDS Behav 2016; 20 1400–7.| Seasons of risk: anticipated behavior on vacation and interest in episodic antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among a large national sample of U.S. men who have sex with men (MSM).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26538056PubMed |
[2] Van den Berghe W, Nöstlinger C, Hospers H, Laga M. International mobility, sexual behaviour and HIV-related characteristics of men who have sex with men residing in Belgium. BMC Public Health 2013; 13 968
| International mobility, sexual behaviour and HIV-related characteristics of men who have sex with men residing in Belgium.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[3] Kaufman MR, Fuhrel-Forbis AR, Kalichman SC, Eaton LA, Cain D, Cherry C, et al. On holiday: a risk behavior profile for men who have vacationed at gay resorts. J Homosex 2009; 56 1134–44.
| On holiday: a risk behavior profile for men who have vacationed at gay resorts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19882431PubMed |
[4] Lee VC, Sullivan PS, Baral SD. Global travel and HIV/STI epidemics among men who have sex with men: what does the future hold? Sex Health 2017; 14 51–8.
| Global travel and HIV/STI epidemics among men who have sex with men: what does the future hold?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28055822PubMed |
[5] Benotsch EG, Martin AM, Espil FM, Nettles CD, Seal DW, Pinkerton SD. Internet use, recreational travel, and HIV risk behaviors in men who have sex with men. J Community Health 2011; 36 398–405.
| Internet use, recreational travel, and HIV risk behaviors in men who have sex with men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20924778PubMed |
[6] Brown G, Prestage G, Down I, Ellard J, Triffitt K. Not so different? comparison of risk profile of gay men who acquired HIV while travelling with those who acquired HIV in Australia. Health Promot J Austr 2018; 29 58–64.
| Not so different? comparison of risk profile of gay men who acquired HIV while travelling with those who acquired HIV in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29700942PubMed |
[7] Alvarez-del Arco D, Fakoya I, Thomadakis C, Pantazis N, Touloumi G, Gennotte AF, et al. High levels of postmigration HIV acquisition within nine European countries. AIDS 2017; 31 1979–88.
| High levels of postmigration HIV acquisition within nine European countries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28857779PubMed |
[8] Taylor TN, DeHovitz J, Hirshfield S. Intersectional stigma and multi-level barriers to HIV testing among foreign-born black men from the Caribbean. Front Public Health 2020; 7 373
| Intersectional stigma and multi-level barriers to HIV testing among foreign-born black men from the Caribbean.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31998675PubMed |
[9] Wiewel EW, Torian LV, Hanna DB, Bocour A, Shepard CW. Foreign-born persons diagnosed with HIV: where are they from and where were they infected? AIDS Behav 2015; 19 890–8.
| Foreign-born persons diagnosed with HIV: where are they from and where were they infected?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25524308PubMed |
[10] Pachankis JE, Hatzenbuehler ML, Berg RC, Fernández-Dávila P, Mirandola M, Marcus U, et al. Anti-LGBT and anti-immigrant structural stigma: an intersectional analysis of sexual minority men’s HIV risk when migrating to or within europe. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2017; 76 356–66.
| Anti-LGBT and anti-immigrant structural stigma: an intersectional analysis of sexual minority men’s HIV risk when migrating to or within europe.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28787329PubMed |
[11] Lewis NM, Wilson K. HIV risk behaviours among immigrant and ethnic minority gay and bisexual men in North America and Europe: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med 2017; 179 115–28.
| HIV risk behaviours among immigrant and ethnic minority gay and bisexual men in North America and Europe: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28260636PubMed |
[12] Medland NA, Chow EPF, Read THR, Ong JJ, Chen M, Denham I, et al. Incident HIV infection has fallen rapidly in men who have sex with men in Melbourne, Australia (2013–2017) but not in the newly-arrived Asian-born. BMC Infect Dis 2018; 18 410
| Incident HIV infection has fallen rapidly in men who have sex with men in Melbourne, Australia (2013–2017) but not in the newly-arrived Asian-born.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30126355PubMed |
[13] Buttram ME, Kurtz SP. Risk and protective factors associated with gay neighborhood residence. Am J Mens Health 2013; 7 110–8.
| Risk and protective factors associated with gay neighborhood residence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22948299PubMed |
[14] Egan JE, Frye V, Kurtz SP, Latkin C, Chen M, Tobin K, et al. Migration, neighborhoods, and networks: approaches to understanding how urban environmental conditions affect syndemic adverse health outcomes among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav 2011; 15 35–50.
| Migration, neighborhoods, and networks: approaches to understanding how urban environmental conditions affect syndemic adverse health outcomes among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[15] Boyatzis RE. Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Sage Publications, Inc; 1998.
[16] The Kirby Institute. Monitoring HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake in Australia (Issue #1, June 2019). The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney; 2019.
[17] Callander D, Mooney-Somers J, Keen P, Guy R, Duck T, Bavinton BR, et al. Australian ‘gayborhoods’ and ‘lesborhoods’: a new method for estimating the number and prevalence of adult gay men and lesbian women living in each Australian postcode. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 2020; 34 2160–76.
| Australian ‘gayborhoods’ and ‘lesborhoods’: a new method for estimating the number and prevalence of adult gay men and lesbian women living in each Australian postcode.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[18] Whitfield THF, John SA, Rendina HJ, Grov C, Parsons JT. Why I quit pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)? A mixed-method study exploring reasons for PrEP discontinuation and potential re-initiation among gay and bisexual men. AIDS Behav 2018; 22 3566–75.
| Why I quit pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)? A mixed-method study exploring reasons for PrEP discontinuation and potential re-initiation among gay and bisexual men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29404756PubMed |
[19] Kubicek K, Beyer WJ, Wong CF, Kipke MD. Engaging young men in the HIV prevention and care continua: experiences from young men of color who have sex with men. AIDS Educ Prev 2019; 31 325–43.
| Engaging young men in the HIV prevention and care continua: experiences from young men of color who have sex with men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31361519PubMed |
[20] Spinelli MA, Laborde N, Kinley P, Whitacre R, Scott HM, Walker N, et al. Missed opportunities to prevent HIV infections among pre-exposure prophylaxis users: a population-based mixed methods study, San Francisco, United States. J Int AIDS Soc 2020; 23 e25472
| Missed opportunities to prevent HIV infections among pre-exposure prophylaxis users: a population-based mixed methods study, San Francisco, United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32294338PubMed |
[21] Blashill AJ, Brady JP, Rooney BM, Rodriguez-Diaz CE, Horvath KJ, Blumenthal J, et al. Syndemics and the PrEP cascade: results from a sample of young Latino men who have sex with men. Arch Sex Behav 2020; 49 125–35.
| Syndemics and the PrEP cascade: results from a sample of young Latino men who have sex with men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31591666PubMed |
[22] Holt M, Lee E, Lea T, Bavinton B, Broady T, Mao L, et al. HIV preexposure prophylaxis cascades to assess implementation in Australia: results from repeated, national behavioral surveillance of gay and bisexual men, 2014–2018. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2020; 83 e16–22.
| HIV preexposure prophylaxis cascades to assess implementation in Australia: results from repeated, national behavioral surveillance of gay and bisexual men, 2014–2018.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31913993PubMed |
[23] Newman PA, Guta A, Lacombe-Duncan A, Tepjan S. Clinical exigencies, psychosocial realities: negotiating HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis beyond the cascade among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Canada. J Int AIDS Soc 2018; 21 e25211
| Clinical exigencies, psychosocial realities: negotiating HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis beyond the cascade among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Canada.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30474351PubMed |
[24] Pathela P, Jamison K, Blank S, Daskalakis D, Hedberg T, Borges C. The HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) cascade at NYC sexual health clinics: navigation is the key to uptake. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2020; 83 357–64.
| The HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) cascade at NYC sexual health clinics: navigation is the key to uptake.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31904700PubMed |
[25] Frye V, Latka MH, Koblin B, Halkitis PN, Putnam S, Galea S, et al. The urban environment and sexual risk behavior among men who have sex with men. J Urban Health 2006; 83 308–24.
| The urban environment and sexual risk behavior among men who have sex with men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16736379PubMed |
[26] Kelly BC, Carpiano RM, Easterbrook A, Parsons JT. Sex and the community: the implications of neighbourhoods and social networks for sexual risk behaviours among urban gay men. Soc Health Illn 2012; 34 1085–102.
| Sex and the community: the implications of neighbourhoods and social networks for sexual risk behaviours among urban gay men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[27] Koblin BA, Egan JE, Rundle A, Quinn J, Tieu H-V, Cerdá M, et al. Methods to measure the impact of home, social, and sexual neighborhoods of urban gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. PLoS ONE 2013; 8 e75878
| Methods to measure the impact of home, social, and sexual neighborhoods of urban gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24146785PubMed |
[28] Cassels S, Meltzer D, Loustalot C, Ragsdale A, Shoptaw S, Gorbach PM. Geographic mobility, place attachment, and the changing geography of sex among African American and Latinx MSM who use substances in Los Angeles. J Urban Health 2020; 97 609–22.
| Geographic mobility, place attachment, and the changing geography of sex among African American and Latinx MSM who use substances in Los Angeles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32996024PubMed |
[29] Ghaziani A. Why gayborhoods matter: the street empirics of urban sexualities. In: Bitterman A, Hess DB, editors. The life and afterlife of gay neighborhoods renaissance and resurgence. Springer; 2020. pp. 87–113.
[30] Hermanstyne KA, Green HD, Cook R, Tieu H-V, Dyer TV, Hucks-Ortiz C, et al. Social network support and decreased risk of seroconversion in black MSM: results of the BROTHERS (HPTN 061) study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2018; 78 163–8.
| Social network support and decreased risk of seroconversion in black MSM: results of the BROTHERS (HPTN 061) study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29424789PubMed |
[31] Grulich A, Nigro S, Chan C, Patel P, Bavinton B, Holt M, et al. Trends in HIV and HIV prevention indicators in gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in NSW, 2015–2019: implications for new interventions and for monitoring and evaluation in a new NSW HIV strategy. Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney; 2020.