Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Sexually transmissible infections (STI) and HIV testing and diagnosis among Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal adolescents in contact with the Australian justice system: a cross-sectional study

Patricia Taflan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9094-2082 A * , Paul L. Simpson A , Mandy Wilson B , Jocelyn Jones B , Basil Donovan C , Janaki Amin D , Sally Nathan A and Tony Butler A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

B National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.

C The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

D Department of Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

* Correspondence to: p.taflan@unsw.edu.au

Handling Editor: Joseph Tucker

Sexual Health 20(4) 303-314 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH23028
Submitted: 6 February 2023  Accepted: 23 May 2023   Published: 22 June 2023

© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Background: It is unclear what factors are associated with sexually transmissible infections (STI) and HIV testing and diagnosis among justice-involved adolescents, and if these differ for Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander peoples.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 465 justice-involved adolescents (aged 14–17 years) from Australia was conducted between 2016 and 2018. Participants were asked about sexual behaviours, STI/HIV knowledge, and prior STI diagnoses and testing.

Results: Approximately 38% (n = 130) of those sexually active had ever been screened for STI/HIV and 17.8% (n = 23) had been diagnosed with an STI. No participant reported living with HIV. For Aboriginal participants, being male (aOR 3.6, 95% CI 1.3–10.1) and having under three sexual partners in the past 12 months (aOR 3.1, 95% CI 1.2–8.0) was associated with never having had an STI/HIV test. For non-Aboriginal participants, being male (aOR 2.7, 95%CI 1.2–5.7), single (aOR 2.4, 95% CI 1.2–4.9), attending school (aOR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1–5.1), not having sought sexual health information (aOR 2.8, 95% CI 1.4–5.8), and having a lower STI/HIV knowledge score (aOR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1–5.0) were associated with never having had an STI/HIV test. Factors associated with STI diagnosis were non-heterosexual sexual orientation (aOR 5.6, 95% CI 1.1–28.2), transactional sex (aOR 11.2, 95% CI 3.0–41.3), and having sought sexual health information (aOR 3.5, 95% CI 1.0–12.5).

Conclusions: Males, particularly Aboriginal male adolescents, should be engaged with sexual health promotion and testing services as soon as they come into contact with the justice system. Approaches should consider different cultural, gender and sexual orientations.

Keywords: Aboriginal, adolescents, Australia, justice-involved, sexual behaviours, sexual health, sexually transmissible infections, STI diagnosis, STI/HIV testing.

Introduction

Young people, those in custodial settings, and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples (First Nations people, respectfully hereafter Aboriginal peoples) are recognised as priority populations in Australian national sexually transmissible infections (STI)1 and HIV2 strategies, with prevention and increasing testing rates identified as priority areas for action.1,2

These groups are often-intersecting as Aboriginal peoples are substantially over-represented in the Australian juvenile detention population. One half (50%) of the young people in detention on an average night in the 2021 June quarter were Aboriginal, yet only 6% of the Australian population aged 10–17 years are Aboriginal.3 This is due to a wide range of complex factors linked to colonisation, including social and economic disadvantage, targeted police practices, and increased likelihood of conviction.4

Detained young people have poorer health than their community counterparts and this includes sexual health. A global scoping review found that the detained youth population had a younger age of sexual debut, were less consistent in using contraception or condoms and had a higher prevalence of sharing injecting equipment compared to their community counterparts, resulting in an increased prevalence of STIs.5 However, despite these risk behaviours, HIV diagnosis among detained youth was low in high-income countries.5

In Australia, the number of HIV diagnoses has been declining in recent years and is lower for young people compared to those aged 30 years and over.6 However, young people in Australia, aged 15–19 years, have higher STI notification rates per 100 000 population compared to the overall community (in the year 2021, these were 926.2 vs 362.7 for chlamydia and 136 vs 109.4 for gonorrhoea).6 While infectious syphilis rates have remained lower for the 15–19-year-old group compared to the overall population, these rates have been increasing in the past 10 years (17 per 100 000 population in 2021 compared to 1.4 in 2012 with a peak of 18.7 in 2019).6

Community surveys of adolescents in Australia indicated that 4.1% of school students in Years 10, 11 and 12 (normally aged between 15 and 18 years) had ever been tested for HIV (with no robust data on how many had ever been tested for STIs) and among those sexually active, 2.3% had ever been diagnosed with an STI.7 Over half (51%) of young Aboriginal Australians aged between 16 and 19 years reported being tested for STIs and among these, 15% had ever been diagnosed with an STI.8

Although there is literature on STI testing among young people in the wider community,7,9 including Aboriginal young peoples,8,10,11 in Australia and internationally, few studies have examined the sexual health of justice-involved adolescents. Justice-involved populations are typically underrepresented in, or excluded from, mainstream community health surveys, particularly those based on household sampling methods. Additionally, previous studies on this population have mostly focused on sexual risk behaviours1214 and/or estimating STI and HIV rates,1520 and rarely examined factors associated with STI/HIV testing or diagnosis.

To address this gap, we analysed data from the first Australian survey on the sexual and reproductive health needs of justice-involved adolescents to examine factors associated with not getting STI/HIV tested and a prior STI diagnosis. In this study, the term justice-involved refers to those who had come into contact with the police or the courts and were living in the community at the time of the survey. By examining these factors this study can contribute to understanding need for Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal adolescents, and to connecting and tailoring STI prevention education and services to this priority population.

Materials and methods

Design

The Juvenile Offender Sexual Health Survey is a cross-sectional survey, using a non-random sampling strategy. The survey took place between June 2016 and August 2018 in Queensland (Qld) and Western Australia (WA).

Participants

Justice-involved adolescents, 14–17 years old from Qld and WA, and living in the community were recruited to participate in the study in one of two ways: (1) referral by program coordinators from community-based organisations and youth drop in centres, referral by project coordinators of drug and alcohol services operated by the Western Australia Department of Health or referral by administrators, principals and teachers of independent or flexi-learning schools or colleges: institutions that aim to re-engage young people who had been out of the formal school system (397 participants were recruited using this approach); or (2) by recruiting young people outside of Magistrates’ Court in Qld and from the Children’s Court in WA (68 participants were recruited using this approach). As part of the recruitment process, flyers were put up in waiting rooms in youth centres and flexi-schools and presentations about the project were delivered to staff and adolescents. All participants, excluding those recruited from the Children’s Court in WA, were given AUD$50 in cash or as a gift card upon completion of the survey as reimbursement for their time.

Survey instrument

A computer assisted telephone interview was used by a trained interviewer. The survey collected information on socio-demographics, history of contact with the justice system, mental health history, reproductive health, sexual health, knowledge of HIV, STI and hepatitis, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination, alcohol and drug use and tobacco smoking.

At the end of the survey, participants were given exit interviews to ensure they had not been negatively affected by the questions. Referrals for mental health or sexual health services were given as needed/requested (for more details about the debrief process, see the Changing Direction report).21

Outcome variables

The two outcome variables – STI/HIV testing and STI/HIV diagnosis – were measured by asking participants whether they had ever had an STI/HIV test or had ever been diagnosed with an STI or HIV. Response options for these questions were ‘yes, in the last year’, ‘yes, more than a year ago’, ‘no’ and ‘prefer not to say’. Those who indicated the latter were excluded from analyses. The first two response options were combined to indicate whether someone ever had an STI/HIV test or had ever been diagnosed. Lifelong testing and diagnosis were chosen as outcome variables over testing and diagnosis in the past year due to the young age of the population involved in this study (14–17 years old). For those who reported being diagnosed with STI/HIV, a follow-up question allowed them to choose which infections they had been diagnosed with among chlamydia, gonorrhoea, syphilis, trichomoniasis, herpes, HPV, HIV/AIDS and/or other.

Covariates and explanatory variables

Covariates included: gender (male/female), age (in years or in months, specified in the analysis), Aboriginal status (Aboriginal/non-Aboriginal), Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia (ARIA – city and major regional centre/regional centres and other regional areas),A ever been in juvenile detention (yes/no), current legal status (on a sentence or order/not on a sentence or order), currently attending school (yes/no), sexual orientation (heterosexual/non-heterosexual), relationship status (single/in a relationship) and ever had sex (yes/no).

The explanatory variables included: age when first had sex (under 14/14 years and over), number of sexual partners in the past 12 months (under three/three and over), condom use in the past 12 months (all of the time/not all of the time), drunk or high last time had sex (yes/no), unwanted sex last time had sex (yes/no), had transactional sex for drugs or money (yes/no), worked as a sex worker (yes/no), used the internet to look for potential sexual partners (yes/no), met face-to-face with potential sexual partner that you first met on the internet (yes/no), sought sexual information from a person, service or agency (yes/no), sought sexual information from internet (yes/no), STI/HIV knowledge score (higher score nine points and above/lower score eight points and below – 12 true/false statements, each correct answer was assigned a point), used any drugs (yes/no), injected any drugs (yes/no) and current alcohol use disorder (yes/no – using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for children and adolescents).22

A more detailed explanation of the recoding of these variables is included in the supplementary material.

Statistical analysis

Categorical data are presented as frequencies and proportions, and continuous data as medians, unless recoded dichotomously. Categorical data stratified by Aboriginal status are presented with the chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test significance values (if more than 20% of cells had expected counts of less than 5). To compare medians stratified by Aboriginal status, the K samples median test was used.

To identify factors associated with never tested for STI/HIV and STI/HIV diagnosis, separate univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were conducted. Analysis of factors associated with never having had an STI/HIV test was restricted to participants who had had sex.

After conducting univariate logistic regressions (Tables A and B in the Supplementary material), variables with a significance level lower than or equal to 0.2 (P ≤ 0.2) were entered into the multivariate logistic regression models. In addition, key demographic variables such as gender, age, Aboriginal status and ARIA were also included and kept in the multivariate regression models regardless of the significance level. Backwards stepwise logistic regression with a threshold of statistical significance of 0.05 was then used to arrive at the best models for predicting never having had an STI/HIV test and STI/HIV diagnosis.

The final models present the adjusted odds ratios (aOR), the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) and corresponding P-values.

Separate multivariate analyses for Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal samples were performed for never had an STI/HIV test. The same could not be done for the STI/HIV diagnosis model as the number of events was too small.

Data analyses were conducted in IBM SPSS Statistics 26.

Ethics approval and consent

Research ethics approval was sought and given for participants to be treated as mature minors.23 Nevertheless, prospective participants were asked by recruiters if they could contact their parents/guardians for permission to allow them to participate in the survey. Most participants refused this request preferring to give consent themselves. Recruiters were required to administer a Gillick Competency checklist to ensure that all respondents met the criteria of a mature minor.24 This manner of obtaining consent has been used in other studies.25,26

Approval for the study was obtained from the University of New South Wales Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (HC13308), the Western Australia Aboriginal Health Ethics Committee (WAAHEC 625), and Curtin University (HRE0133). Permission was also granted in Western Australia by the North Metropolitan Health Service Mental Health Research Ethics Committee (22_2016), the North Metropolitan and East Metropolitan Health Services’ Research Governance, and the Department of the Justice Research Application Advisory Committee (ref 2016/02161).

Results

Participant characteristics (Table 1)

Overall, 463 participants were included in the analysis. The majority (63.1%) were male, and the median age was 16 years (IQR 15–16). Aboriginal participants represented approximately 44% (n = 202) of the sample. Most (91.2%) identified as heterosexual, followed by bisexual (6.2%) and gay/lesbian/queer/unsure (2.6%). Almost one in three (28.1%) indicated that they had been in juvenile detention and over one third (36.2%) said that at the time of the survey, they were on a sentence or order. Nearly two thirds (63.3%) reported that they were attending school.

Table 1.Participant characteristics by Aboriginal status.

Overall (n = 463)Aboriginal (n = 202)Non-Aboriginal (n = 261)P-valueA
Gender
 Male292 (63.1)124 (61.4)168 (64.4)0.510
 Female171 (36.9)78 (38.6)93 (35.6)
Age (years)
 Median (IQR)16 (15–16)15 (14–16)16 (15–17)0.002
ARIA
 Cities and major regional centres348 (77.5)136 (69.0)212 (84.1)<0.001
 Regional centres and other regional areas101 (22.5)61 (31.0)40 (15.9)
Juvenile detention
 Ever been130 (28.1)54 (26.7)76 (29.1)0.571
Current legal status
 On a sentence or order165 (36.2)78 (39.2)87 (33.9)0.239
School
 Currently attending293 (63.3)137 (67.8)156 (59.8)0.075
Sexual orientation
 Heterosexual414 (91.2)183 (92.9)231 (89.9)0.262
 Other (homosexual, lesbian, bisexual, queer, unsure/undecided)40 (8.8)14 (7.1)26 (10.1)
Relationship status
 Single318 (68.8)150 (74.3)168 (64.6)0.026
 In a relationship144 (31.2)52 (25.7)92 (35.4)
Sex
 Ever had sex346 (76.0)131 (66.2)215 (83.7)<0.001
Sexual health information
 Sought sexual health information – not from internet137 (30.3)52 (26.4)85 (33.3)0.112
 Sought sexual health information from internet57 (12.6)15 (7.6)42 (16.5)0.005
STI/HIV knowledge
 Higher score101 (22.5)30 (15.3)71 (28.1)0.001
 Lower score348 (77.5)166 (84.7)182 (71.9)
Drugs
 Ever used any drugs374 (80.8)152 (75.2)222 (85.1)0.008
 Ever injected any drugs34 (7.3)8 (4.0)26 (10.0)0.014
Alcohol
 Current alcohol use disorder196 (43.2)64 (32.5)132 (51.4)<0.001
For those who have had sexOverall (n = 346)Aboriginal (n = 131)Non-Aboriginal (n = 215)P-valueA
Age when first had sex
 Under 14 years142 (41.3)61 (46.9)81 (37.9)0.097
 14 years and over202 (58.7)69 (53.1)133 (62.1)
 Median (IQR)14 (13–14)14 (13–14)14 (13–15)0.350
Number of sexual partners in the past 12 months
 Under three183 (53.4)72 (55.4)111 (52.1)0.556
 Three and over160 (46.6)58 (44.6)102 (47.9)
 Median (IQR)2 (1–4)2 (1–4)3 (1–4)0.623
Gender of sexual partners in the past 12 months
 Heterosexual males20173128
  Female199 (99)73 (100)126 (98)<0.001
  Male1 (0.5)01 (1)
  Male and female1 (0.5)01 (1)
 Heterosexual females883651
  Male86 (98)35 (97)50 (98)<0.001
  Female1 (1)1 (3)0
  Male and female1 (1)01 (2)
Condom use in the past 12 months
 All of the time135 (42.2)62 (52.5)73 (36.1)0.004
Drunk or high last time had sex128 (38.8)47 (37.3)81 (39.7)0.663
Did not want to have sex last time had sex28 (8.5)15 (12.1)13 (6.4)0.072
Ever had transactional sex (for drugs or money)22 (6.5)3 (2.3)19 (9.0)0.014
Ever worked as sex worker3 (0.9)1 (0.8)2 (0.9)1.000
Used the internet to look for potential sexual partners41 (12.9)13 (11.1)28 (13.9)0.479
 Met face-to-face with a potential sexual partner that you first met on the internet25 (61.0)8 (61.5)17 (60.7)0.960
STIs/HIV
 Ever tested (STI/HIV)130 (37.9)47 (35.9)83 (39.2)0.544
  In the past year107 (31.2)41 (31.3)66 (31.1)0.457
  Over a year ago23 (6.7)6 (4.6)17 (8.0)
  Ever diagnosed (STI)23 (17.8)5 (10.6)18 (22.0)0.106

Data presented as numbers and percentage of those who answered each question. Populations do not necessarily add to total due to missing values.

Bold P-value indicates statistical significance (P ≤ 0.05).

AP-value used for comparison between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal samples.

Approximately three quarters (n = 346) of participants indicated that they had had sex. Among those, 41.0% (n = 142) had sex for the first time before turning 14 years old. The median number of sexual partners in the past 12 months was two (IQR 1–4) and 42.2% of participants said they had always used a condom in those past 12 months. Among those who had sex, there was a high degree of concordance between self-reported heterosexuality and the gender of their sexual partners in the past 12 months (99% of heterosexual males and 98% of heterosexual females only had sex with partners of the opposite sex). The last time they had sex, 38.8% reported being high or drunk at the time and 8.5% said it was unwanted. Just under one third (30.3%) of participants had sought sexual health information with just over one in 10 (12.6%) through online sources. Almost one quarter (22.5%) received a higher STI/HIV knowledge score. Most participants (80.8%) used drugs, 7.3% had injected drugs, and just under half (43.2%) were assessed as having a current alcohol use disorder. Over one third (n = 130) of the sexually active participants had ever been screened and 17.8% (n = 23) of these said they had been diagnosed with an STI. No participant reported being diagnosed with HIV.

Aboriginal participants were more likely than non-Aboriginal participants to be younger (median age 15 years vs 16 years; P = 0.002) and live in a regional centre or other regional area (31% vs 15.9%; P < 0.001). Aboriginal participants were more likely to be single (74.3% vs 64.6%; P = 0.026) and to have always worn a condom in the past 12 months (52.5% vs 36.1%; P = 0.004) compared to non-Aboriginal participants. However, they were less likely to have had sex (66.2% vs 83.7%; P < 0.001), had transactional sex (2.3% vs 9.0%; P = 0.014), used the internet to look for sexual health information (7.6% vs 16.5%; P = 0.005), and have a higher STI/HIV knowledge score (15.3% vs 28.1%; P = 0.001). Non-Aboriginal participants were more likely to have used drugs (85.1% vs 75.2%; P = 0.008), have injected drugs (10.0% vs 4.0%; P = 0.014) and to have an alcohol use disorder (51.4% vs 32.5%; P < 0.001) compared to their Aboriginal counterparts.

Factors associated with never having had an STI/HIV test (Table 2)

Factors significantly associated with never having had an STI/HIV test for the entire sample included: being male (uOR 1.8, 95%CI 1.2–2.7; aOR 2.8, 95% CI 1.5–5.0), single (uOR 2.7, 95% CI 1.8- 4.2; aOR 2.4, 95% CI 1.4–4.3), never having been in juvenile detention (uOR 2.2, 95% CI 1.4–3.5; aOR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1–3.6), attending school (uOR 2.6, 95% CI 1.7–4.0; aOR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1–3.5), having had less than three sexual partners in the past 12 months (uOR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3–3.3; aOR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1–3.4), not engaging in transactional sex (uOR 4.9, 95% CI 1.9–12.8; aOR 4.0, 95% CI 1.3–12.7), never having sought sexual health information (uOR 3.0, 95% CI 2.0–4.7; aOR 2.4, 95% CI 1.4–4.2), and having a lower STI/HIV knowledge score (uOR 3.3, 95% CI 2.1–5.3; aOR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3–4.2). The model for Aboriginal participants saw being male (aOR 3.6, 95% CI 1.3–10.1) and having had less than three sexual partners in the past 12 months (aOR 3.1, 95% CI 1.2–8.0) as the only significant factors retained. The model for the non-Aboriginal sample saw being male (aOR 2.7, 95% CI 1.2–5.7), single (aOR 2.4, 95% CI 1.2–4.9), attending school (aOR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1–5.1), never having sought sexual health information (aOR 2.8, 95% CI 1.4–5.8) and having a lower STI/HIV knowledge score (aOR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1–5.0) significantly associated with never having had an STI/HIV test.

Table 2.Factors associated with never having had an STI/HIV test.

OverallOverallAboriginalNon-Aboriginal
uOR (95% CI)P-valueaOR (95% CI)P-valueaOR (95% CI)P-valueaOR (95% CI)P-value
Gender
 FemaleRefRefRefRef
 Male1.80 (1.19, 2.73)0.0052.75 (1.53, 4.96)0.0013.63 (1.31, 10.07)0.0132.65 (1.23, 5.69)0.012
Age (in months)0.95 (0.94, 0.97)<0.0010.98 (0.96, 1.00)0.0680.98 (0.95, 1.02)0.3940.97 (0.94, 1.00)0.089
Aboriginal status
 Aboriginal1.54 (1.01, 2.34)0.043RefAA
 Non-AboriginalRef1.21 (0.69, 2.12)0.501
ARIA
 Regional centres/other regional areasRefRefRefRef
 Cities/major regional centres1.14 (0.70, 1.87)0.591.37 (0.73, 2.59)0.3271.94 (0.76, 4.96)0.1640.84 (0.33, 2.13)0.713
Sexual orientation
 Non-heterosexualRefRefRefRef
 Heterosexual2.22 (1.15, 4.29)0.0181.50 (0.58, 3.91)0.4061.50 (0.26, 8.58)0.6471.61 (0.50, 5.21)0.426
Relationship status
 In a relationshipRefRefRefRef
 Single2.71 (1.77, 4.15)<0.0012.42 (1.37, 4.25)0.0022.36 (0.88, 6.34)0.092.39 (1.16, 4.91)0.018
Ever been in juvenile detention
 YesRefRefRefRef
 No2.23 (1.44, 3.45)<0.0012.01 (1.11, 3.64)0.0222.53 (0.93, 6.86)0.0691.72 (0.78, 3.76)0.177
Currently going to school
 NoRefRefRefRef
 Yes2.63 (1.73, 4.00)<0.0011.97 (1.10, 3.53)0.0221.80 (0.70, 4.60)0.222.35 (1.08, 5.13)0.031
Number of sexual partners in the past 12 months
 Three or moreRefRefRefRef
 Under three2.09 (1.34, 3.26)0.0011.95 (1.11, 3.41)0.023.07 (1.17, 8.03)0.0221.51 (0.73, 3.13)0.271
Transactional sex for drugs or money
 YesRefRefBRef
 No4.86 (1.85, 12.77)0.0014.02 (1.27, 12.73)0.0182.85 (0.83, 9.74)0.095
Sought sexual health information – not from internet
 YesRefRefRefRef
 No3.36 (1.90, 5.92)<0.0012.43 (1.39, 4.24)0.0022.10 (0.82, 5.39)0.1212.83 (1.38, 5.80)0.004
STI/HIV knowledge score
 HigherRefRefRefRef
 Lower3.31 (2.08, 5.26)<0.0012.32 (1.28, 4.21)0.0062.45 (0.85, 7.03)0.0972.34 (1.10, 4.98)0.028
Condom use past 12 months
 Not all of the timeRefRefRefRef
 All of the time1.92 (1.21, 3.05)0.0061.23 (0.69, 2.18)0.480.54 (0.20, 1.43)0.2122.03 (0.94, 4.38)0.073
Used internet to look for potential sexual partners
 YesRefRefRefRef
 No2.24 (1.20, 4.19)0.0121.26 (0.55, 2.92)0.5882.68 (0.52, 13.89)0.2410.97 (0.34, 2.73)0.952
Sought sexual health information from internet
 YesRefRefRefRef
 No3.36 (1.90, 5.92)<0.0011.62 (0.73, 3.60)0.2381.40 (0.29, 6.69)0.6771.71 (0.64, 4.59)0.283
Ever used drugs
 YesRefRefRefRef
 No3.81 (1.84, 7.88)<0.0011.37 (0.57, 3.29)0.4781.28 (0.37, 4.43)0.6931.22 (0.32, 4.59)0.77
Ever injected drugs
 No3.82 (1.85, 7.87)<0.001RefRefRef
 YesRef1.01 (0.40, 2.57)0.9870.43 (0.07, 2.58)0.3581.33 (0.43, 4.11)0.625
Current alcohol use disorder
 YesRefRefRefRef
 No2.75 (1.81, 4.19)<0.0011.27 (0.73, 2.21)0.3961.18 (0.47, 2.97)0.7251.38 (0.67, 2.85)0.384

Bold P-value indicates statistical significance (P ≤ 0.05).

The aOR and 95% CI values of the variables that were not significant and excluded from the final model (in italics) were obtained by adding and then removing each non-significant variable from the final model.

uOR, unadjusted odds ratio; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; Ref, reference group.

AModels for Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal samples exclude Aboriginal status as a variable in the analysis.

BNumber of events too low.

Factors associated with STI diagnosis (Table 3)

As no participant reported ever being diagnosed with HIV, the following model refers to STI diagnosis only. After adjusting for gender, age, Aboriginal status and ARIA, factors significantly associated with an STI diagnosis were non-heterosexual sexual orientation (uOR 3.0, 95% CI 1.0–9.3; aOR 5.6, 95% CI 1.1–28.2), transactional sex for drugs or money (uOR 9.0, 95% CI 2.9–28.0; aOR 11.2, 95% CI 3.0–41.3), and having sought sexual health information online (uOR 2.7, 95% CI 1.0–7.2; aOR 3.5, 95% CI 1.0–12.5).

Table 3.Factors associated with STI diagnosis.

Overall
uOR (95% CI)P-valueaOR (95% CI)P-value
Gender
 Female2.03 (0.81, 5.10)0.132Ref
 MaleRef1.08 (0.29, 4.10)0.907
Age (in months)0.99 (0.95, 1.03)0.690.96 (0.92, 1.01)0.142
Aboriginal status
 AboriginalRefRef0.406
 Non-Aboriginal2.36 (0.82, 6.85)0.1131.75 (0.47, 6.61)
ARIA
 Cities and major regional centresRefRef
 Regional centres and other regional areas1.32 (0.46, 3.77)0.6081.33 (0.36, 4.93)0.67
Sexual orientation
 HeterosexualRefRef
 Non-heterosexual3.02 (0.98, 9.25)0.0545.63 (1.13, 28.16)0.035
Transactional sex for drugs or money
 NoRefRef
 Yes9.00 (2.89, 28.01)<0.00111.20 (3.04, 41.32)<0.001
Sought sexual health information from internet
 NoRefRef
 Yes2.73 (1.04, 7.20)0.0423.54 (1.00, 12.53)0.05
Condom use in the past 12 months
 All of the timeRefRef
 Not all of the time4.10 (1.15, 14.69)0.033.31 (0.80, 13.71)0.1
STI/HIV knowledge score
 LowerRefRef
 Higher2.03 (0.82, 5.06)0.1262.73 (0.79, 9.39)0.111
Current sentence or order
 YesRefRef
 No2.24 (0.82, 6.14)0.1181.80 (0.51, 6.37)0.361
Number of sexual partners in the plast 12 months
 Under threeRefRef
 Three or more2.44 (0.89, 6.66)0.0832.29 (0.68, 7.76)0.183
Used internet to look for potential sexual partners
 NoRefRef
 Yes2.54 (0.84, 7.72)0.11.95 (0.50, 7.50)0.334
Sought sexual health information – not from internet
 NoRefRef
 Yes1.95 (0.78, 4.90)0.1541.57 (0.45, 5.48)0.481

Bold P-value indicates statistical significance (P ≤ 0.05).

The aOR and 95% CI values of the variables that were not significant and were excluded from the final model (in italics) were obtained by adding and then removing each non-significant variable from the final model.

uOR, unadjusted odds ratio; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; Ref, reference group.

Discussion

This study aimed to describe the sexual behaviours of a sample of justice-involved adolescents in Australia (WA and Qld), and examine the factors associated with never having been tested for STI/HIV and ever having an STI diagnosis, as self-reported by the participants.

Just over one third (37.9%) of the participants who reported being sexually active had ever been tested for STIs or HIV. Australian guidelines for STI testing recommend that all sexually active young people should be offered STI testing at least annually.27 Even fewer participants (31.2%) indicated they had been tested for STIs or HIV in the year prior to interview. While our study is looking at STI and HIV testing rates combined, this is higher than STI testing rates in the Australian general population in 2019 where 14.9% of 15–29-year-olds had at least one chlamydia/gonorrhoea test in the prior year,28 but lower than testing rates in the Aboriginal community where 41.0% of sexually active 16–19-year-olds reported being tested for an STI in the year prior to interview.8 In our study, we found no significant differences in self-reported STI/HIV testing rates between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal participants. Considering a large proportion of our sample reported not always using a condom (almost 60%), had their sexual debut before 14 years of age (41.3%), and had multiple sexual partners in the past 12 months (46.6%), increasing testing in this population is crucial for reducing STI transmission rates and preventing possible infertility issues caused by leaving these infections untreated.

Male participants were approximately two and a half times more likely to have never been tested for STI/HIV compared to female participants. These odds increased to three and a half times for Aboriginal male participants. This finding is consistent with previous research showing that males, regardless of age or justice-involved status, were less likely than females to get tested2931 possibly due to having less contact with health services in general. Additionally, previous research suggests young men are more worried about the STI testing procedures than young women.32 For testing rates to increase, sexual health services need to better engage with justice-involved males before or as soon as they come into contact with the justice system. As proposed by previous studies, wider involvement from family, school and community might also play an important role in engaging adolescents with sexual health services.33 Additionally, community-based sexual health education programs that consider culture and gender might help increase testing and reduce STI rates among Aboriginal adolescents.34 Sexual health education should not only focus on the medical aspects, but also try to tackle perceptions of stigma, with regards to STI testing and diagnosis. Stigma has been identified as an important factor for both Aboriginal35 and non-Aboriginal populations.32

Being single was significantly associated with never having had an STI/HIV test for the non-Aboriginal sample. Previous community-based research looking at STI testing in students at a regional NSW university reported similar findings – those in de facto relationships had the highest STI testing rates.36 In certain relationships, young women have less power to negotiate safe sex practices and therefore may use STI testing as an alternative.37 Similarly, US-based research on heterosexual young adults indicated that mistrust and miscommunication were prevalent for those in exclusive sexual partnerships, and STI testing was commonly used as a risk reduction strategy after exposure to risky sexual behaviours.38

Those who have never been to juvenile detention were more likely to have never had an STI/HIV test. This is probably due to the fact that on admission to Australian youth detention centres, young people undergo a health screening and are offered testing for HIV and some STIs.39 However, due to the cross-sectional nature of this study, we cannot determine whether testing occurred prior, during or after a detention episode.

Attending school was associated with never having had an STI/HIV test for the non-Aboriginal sample, but not for the Aboriginal sample. This finding is difficult to interpret; however, past studies indicated that stigma plays a large role in stopping individuals from getting tested.32 In addition, structural barriers such as location and clinic opening times40 might also affect testing accessibility for young people who attend school.

A factor associated with never having had an STI/HIV test in the Aboriginal sample was less than three sexual partners in the past 12 months. This is consistent with previous community-based studies from Australia,9 Canada41 and the US.42 It is hypothesised that those with less than three sexual partners do not feel at risk and thus believe STI/HIV testing would not be necessary. Similarly, those who never engaged in transactional sex are more likely to have never had an STI/HIV test.

Regarding STI/HIV knowledge, in the non-Aboriginal sample, those who have never sought information about sexual health and those who obtained a lower STI/HIV knowledge score were more likely to have never had an STI/HIV test. While the STI/HIV knowledge score factor did not reach statistical significance in the Aboriginal sample, the P-value was close to achieving statistical significance (P = 0.068). STI knowledge was identified as a factor associated with STI testing in past community-based Aboriginal10 and non-Aboriginal43 research. Overall, these findings suggest that better STI knowledge is needed among justice-involved adolescents and that with better sexual health education, perhaps even those who do not consider themselves at risk of an STI would be more inclined to seek testing. Additionally, given the young age of sexual debut, this population should be engaged in education earlier than adolescents who are not involved with the justice system. In terms of sexual health education, STI prevention and testing, criminal justice and health agencies should work together to better support and provide appropriate health education and services to these young people. For Aboriginal adolescents, considering the disproportionate number who are justice-involved, sexual health delivery should be culturally appropriate and collaborations should include Aboriginal Community-Controlled health services who have expertise in providing culturally safe and accessible care for, and with Aboriginal communities.44,45 An example of a culturally appropriate campaign in the community is the Mary G 2014 campaign for Aboriginal young people in WA.46 Successful collaborations across sectors would result in less STI community transmission and improved sexual health for justice-involved adolescents.

Nearly one in five (17.8%) participants reported ever having had a positive STI diagnosis, compared to 2.3% of secondary school students7 and 15.0% of 16–19-year-old Aboriginal Australians.8 In this respect, our sample appears to be more similar to young Aboriginal Australians rather than Australian secondary school students, potentially due to the fact that Aboriginal adolescents are over-represented in the justice system. Participants reporting engagement in transactional sex for drugs or money, who identified as non-heterosexual and had sought sexual health information online were more likely to report a past STI diagnosis. Although some of the number of events was low for this analysis, some findings are consistent with previous US research on at-risk homeless youth which indicated that transactional sex was associated with STI diagnosis.47 With regards to sexual orientation, our findings are consistent with Australian data which indicated that gay men and other men who have sex with men were more at-risk for an STI than heterosexual individuals.1

Limitations

The findings of this survey are not generalisable to the entire population of justice-involved adolescents as non-random sampling was used. Causality cannot be inferred as the study was cross-sectional.

Response options to the question ‘have you ever been screened for STI or HIV’ did not allow for differentiation between being tested for STI and being tested for HIV. Therefore, we do not know if the ‘yes’ refers to only one of these (and which one) or both. Additionally, this survey used self-reported data, so there might be some under-reporting of sensitive issues.

Conclusion

This study examined the sexual behaviours, STI/HIV testing, and STI/HIV diagnosis reported by a sample of justice-involved adolescents. The findings support the need for sexual health services to work collaboratively across government sectors and with the Aboriginal community-controlled sector to provide appropriate education, testing and support. Engaging with young males, particularly young Aboriginal males, is important as STI/HIV testing rates were significantly lower than for young females in this study. Differences in STI diagnoses based on sexual orientation indicate that STI prevention and testing approaches should additionally be tailored to consider the different sexual orientations of adolescents. Collaboration between community-based organisations, the justice system and health agencies is required to increase education and testing in this population, and for reducing STI community transmission rates.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available online.

Data availability

The data that support this study cannot be publicly shared due to ethical or privacy reasons and may be shared upon reasonable request to Tony Butler (tbutler@unsw.edu.au).

Disclaimer

Any material published or made publicly available by the researchers cannot be considered as either endorsed or an expression of the policies or view by the Western Australian Department of Justice and Western Australian Department of Health. Any errors of omission or commission are the responsibility of the researchers.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Declaration of funding

The project was funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Project Grant No.1043693.

Acknowledgements

We thank the WA Aboriginal reference group, Michael Mitchell, Amanda Sibosado, Rose Murray, Lisa Bastian and Jude Bevan. We acknowledge the assistance of the Western Australian Department of Justice, Western Australian Department of Health, Queensland and Western Australia community youth-based organisations and drop-in centres, flexi-schools and colleges. We are particularly grateful to all the young people who agreed to be part of the survey. We also acknowledge the interviewers Ellen Barton, Marlene Duffy, Pat Kefalas, Deborah Olow and Lara Watchirs-Connolly.

References

Australian Government Department of Health. Fourth national sexually transmissible infections strategy 2018-2022. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health; 2018. Available at https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2022/06/fourth-national-sexually-transmissible-infections-strategy-2018-2022.pdf [accessed 14 July 2022].

Australian Government Department of Health. Eighth national HIV strategy 2018-2022. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health; 2018. Available at https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2022/06/eighth-national-hiv-strategy-2018-2022.pdf [accessed 14 July 2022].

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Youth detention population in Australia 2021. Cat. no. JUV 136. Canberra: AIHW; 2021 Available at https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/youth-justice/youth-detention-population-in-australia-2021/contents/summary [Accessed 14 July 2022].

NSW Government Communities and Justice. Reducing Aboriginal overrepresentation in the criminal justice system 2018-2021. NSW: Communities and Justice; 2020. Available at https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwj32taD3vn-AhXebPEDHSD0DL8QFnoECAcQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.justice.nsw.gov.au%2FDocuments%2Freducing-aboriginal-overrepresentation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3VI2vNfBkPLjaxLMJ3OQZ0 [accessed 15 May 2023].

Borschmann R, Janca E, Carter A, Willoughby M, Hughes N, Snow K, Stockings E, Hill NTM, Hocking J, Love A, Patton GC, Sawyer SM, Fazel S, Puljević C, Robinson J, Kinner SA. The health of adolescents in detention: a global scoping review. The Lancet Public Health 2020; 5(2): e114-e126.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

The Kirby Institute. HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmissible infections in Australia: annual surveillance report 2021. Sydney: Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney; 2021.

Fisher CM, Waling A, Kerr L, Bellamy R, Ezer P, Mikolajczak G, Brown G, Carman M, Lucke J. 6th National Survey of Australian Secondary Students and Sexual Health 2018 (ARCSHS Monograph Series No. 113). Bundoora: Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health & Society, La Trobe University; 2019. doi:10.26181/5c80777f6c35e

Ward J, Elliott S, Bryant J, Donovan B, Pitts M, Wand H, Kaldor J. The GOANNA survey 2. Results of the second Australian survey of knowledge, relationships, behaviour and health service access relating to sexually transmissible infections (STIs) and blood borne viruses (BBVs) among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander young people. Adelaide, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI); 2020. Available at https://youngdeadlyfree.org.au/goanna2/ [accessed 16 December 2022].

Hendry NA, Brown G, Dowsett GW, Carman M. Association between sexually transmissible infection testing, numbers of partners and talking to partners and friends about sexual health: survey of young adults. Sex Health 2017; 14(4): 378-382.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

10  Bell S, Aggleton P, Ward J, Murray W, Silver B, Lockyer A, Ferguson T, Fairley CK, Whiley D, Ryder N, Donovan B, Guy R, Kaldor J, Maher L. Young Aboriginal people’s engagement with STI testing in the Northern Territory, Australia. BMC Public Health 2020; 20(1): 1-9.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

11  Ward J, Bryant J, Wand H, Pitts M, Smith A, Delaney-Thiele D, Worth H, Kaldor J. The GOANNA survey 1. Sexual Health and relationships in young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: results from the first national study assessing knowledge, risk practices and health service use in relation to sexually transmitted infections and blood borne viruses. 2014. Available at https://kirby.unsw.edu.au/report/goanna-survey-july-2014 [accessed 16 December 2022].

12  Romero EG, Teplin LA, McClelland GM, Abram KM, Welty LJ, Washburn JJ. A longitudinal study of the prevalence, development, and persistence of HIV/sexually transmitted infection risk behaviors in delinquent youth: implications for health care in the community. Pediatrics 2007; 119(5): e1126-e1141.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

13  Kelly PJ, Bair RM, Baillargeon J, German V. Risk behaviors and the prevalence of Chiamydia in a Juvenile detention facility. Clin Pediatr 2000; 39(9): 521-527.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

14  Mistler G, Kirkwood K, Potter E, Cashin A. Young offenders in New South Wales, Australia and the need for remedial sexual health education. Sex Educ 2008; 8(4): 439-449.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

15  Templeton DJ, Tyson BA, Meharg JP, Habgood KE, Bullen PM, Malek S, McLean R. Aboriginal health worker screening for sexually transmissible infections and blood-borne viruses in a rural Australian juvenile correctional facility. Sex Health 2010; 7(1): 44-48.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

16  Wiehe SE, Rosenman MB, Aalsma MC, Scanlon ML, Fortenberry JD. Epidemiology of sexually transmitted infections among offenders following arrest or incarceration. Am J Public Health 2015; 105(12): e26-e32.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

17  Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network and Juvenile Justice NSW. 2015 young people in custody health survey: full report. Sydney: Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network; 2017. Available at www.justicehealth.nsw.gov.au%2Fpublications%2F2015YPICHSReportwebreadyversion.PDF&usg=AOvVaw2sDdrxDmaxtDZCC4nT6bvg [accessed 16 December 2022].

18  Indig D, Vecchiato C, Haysom L, Beilby R, Carter J, Champion U, Gaskin C, Heller E, Kumar S, Mamone N, Muir P, van den Dolder P, Whitton G. 2009 NSW young people in custody health survey: full report. Sydney: Justice Health and Juvenile Justice; 2011. Available at Fwww.justicehealth.nsw.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fypichs-full.pdf&usg=AOvVaw18DlsaJwKJkAGP_9aV5zh9 [accessed 16 December 2022].

19  New South Wales Department of Juvenile Justice. 2003 NSW young people in custody health survey. Key findings report. Sydney: NSW Department of Juvenile Justice; 2003. Available at www.justicehealth.nsw.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fypichs.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0NtRC8AqmHk09UajPXy4KW [accessed 16 December 2022].

20  Kenny DT, Nelson P, Butler T, Lennings C, Allerton M, Champion U. NSW young people on community orders health survey 2003-2006: key findings report. The University of Sydney; 2006. Available at www.justicehealth.nsw.gov.au%2Fpublications%2Fypco-report.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2TWtwuzaJVIoemWuhFO4sq [accessed 16 December 2022].

21  Butler T, Yap L, Ton B, Jones J, Nathan S, Donovan B, Sullivan E, Steele M, Heffernan E, Davison S, Meurk C, Schess J, Harden S, Amin J, Fisher CM. Changing direction: sexual and reproductive health needs of justice-involved young people in Australia. Sydney: School of Population Health, UNSW; 2021.

22  Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Harnett Sheehan K, Janavs J, Weiller E, Keskiner A, Schinka J, Knapp E, Sheehan MF, Dunbar GC. The validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) according to the SCID-P and its reliability. Eur Psychiatry 1997; 12(5): 232-241.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

23  Bird S. Consent to medical treatment: the mature minor. Aust Fam Physician 2011; 40(3): 159-160.
| Google Scholar |

24  Griffith R. What is Gillick competence? Hum Vaccin Immunother 2016; 12(1): 244-247.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

25  McGillivray L, Rheinberger D, Wang J, Burnett A, Torok M. Non-disclosing youth: a cross sectional study to understand why young people do not disclose suicidal thoughts to their mental health professional. BMC Psychiatry 2022; 22(1): 3.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

26  Agrawal S, Morain SR. Who calls the shots? The ethics of adolescentself-consent for HPV vaccination. J Med Ethics 2018; 44(8): 531-535.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

27  Australasian Society for HIV, Viral Hepatitis and Sexual Health Medicine (ASHM). Funded by the Australian Government Department of Health. Australian STI management guidelines for use in primary care [internet]. Australia: ASHM; 2021 [updated December 2021; cited 16 December 2022]. Available at https://sti.guidelines.org.au/populations-and-situations/young-people/

28  The Kirby Institute. Tracking the progress 2020: national sexually transmissible infections strategy. 2021. Available at https://kirby.unsw.edu.au/report/tracking-progress-2020-executive-summaries [accessed 16 December 2022].

29  Martin-Smith HA, Okpo EA, Bull ER. Exploring psychosocial predictors of STI testing in University students. BMC Public Health 2018; 18(1): 664.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

30  Nguyen PLT, Bruno R, Alati R, Lenton S, Burns L, Dietze PM. Self-reported recent testing and diagnosis for sexually transmitted infections among regular ecstasy users in Australia, 2011–2012. Drug Alcohol Rev 2014; 33(2): 211-214.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

31  Tyler K, Melander L. The effect of drug and sexual risk behaviours with social network and non-network members on homeless youths’ sexually transmissible infections and HIV testing. Sex Health 2010; 7(4): 434-440.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

32  Denison HJ, Bromhead C, Grainger R, Dennison EM, Jutel A. Barriers to sexually transmitted infection testing in New Zealand: a qualitative study. A N Z J Public Health 2017; 41(4): 432-437.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

33  Crocker BCS, Pit SW, Hansen V, John-Leader F, Wright ML. A positive approach to adolescent sexual health promotion: a qualitative evaluation of key stakeholder perceptions of the Australian Positive Adolescent Sexual Health (PASH) Conference. BMC Public Health 2019; 19(1): 681.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

34  Strobel N, Ward J. Education programs for Indigenous Australians about sexually transmitted infections and blood borne viruses. Canberra: AIHW; 2012. Available at https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/indigenous-australians/education-programs-for-indigenous-australians-abou/contents/table-of-contents [accessed 16 December 2022].

35  Nursing and Midwifery Office Queensland, Cultural Capability Statewide Team. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adolescent sexual health guideline. Brisbane: Queensland Health; 2013. Available at https://www.health.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/161541/adolescent_sexual_health_guideline.pdf [accessed 16 December 2022].

36  MacPhail C, Dune T, Dillon G, Rahman S, Khanam R, Jenkins L, Britton M, Green B, Edwards C, Stevenson A. Knowledge and attitudes to sexual health and STI testing for students at an Australian regional university: a cross-sectional study. JANZSSA – J Aust N Z Student Serv Assoc 2017; 49(1): 36-48 Available at https://janzssa.scholasticahq.com/article/1337-knowledge-and-attitudes-to-sexual-health-and-sti-testing-for-students-at-an-australian-regional-university-a-cross-sectional-study.
| Google Scholar |

37  Teitelman AM, Calhoun J, Duncan R, Washio Y, McDougal R. Young women’s views on testing for sexually transmitted infections and HIV as a risk reduction strategy in mutual and choice-restricted relationships. Appl Nurs Res 2015; 28(3): 215-221.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

38  Hotton AL, French AL, Hosek SG, Kendrick SR, Lemos D, Brothers J, Kincaid SL, Mehta SD. Relationship dynamics and sexual risk reduction strategies among heterosexual young adults: a qualitative study of sexually transmitted infection clinic attendees at an urban Chicago health center. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2015; 29(12): 668-674.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

39  Justice Health and Forensic Health Network. Early detection program for blood borne viruses and sexually transmissible infections (policy number 1.363). Matraville: NSW Government; 2016. Available at https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjdt5e4j4D9AhU9tWMGHW9RA-MQFnoECAsQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.justicehealth.nsw.gov.au%2Fabout-us%2Fright-to-information%2F1-363_policy_0416.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1PWSSX0s_E0ChvJSH7pF6E [accessed 16 December 2022].

40  Shoveller J, Johnson J, Rosenberg M, Greaves L, Patrick DM, Oliffe JL, Knight R. Youth’s experiences with STI testing in four communities in British Columbia, Canada. Sex Transm Infect 2009; 85(5): 397-401.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

41  Cragg A, Steenbeek A, Asbridge M, Andreou P, Langille D. Sexually transmitted infection testing among heterosexual Maritime Canadian university students engaging in different levels of sexual risk taking. Can J Public Health 2016; 107(2): e149-e154.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

42  Caldeira KM, Singer BJ, O’Grady KE, Vincent KB, Arria AM. HIV testing in recent college students: prevalence and correlates. AIDS Educ Prev 2012; 24(4): 363-376.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

43  Denison HJ, Bromhead C, Grainger R, Dennison EM, Jutel A. What influences university students to seek sexually transmitted infection testing?: a qualitative study in New Zealand. Sex Reprod Healthc 2018; 16: 56-60.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

44  Aboriginal Health & Medical Research Council. Aboriginal communities improving Aboriginal health: an evidence review on the contribution of Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services to improving Aboriginal health. Sydney: AH&MRC; 2015. Available at https://www.ahmrc.org.au/publication/aboriginal-communities-improving-aboriginal-health/ [accessed 16 December 2022].

45  Pearson O, Schwartzkopff K, Dawson A, Hagger C, Karagi A, Davy C, Brown A, Braunack-Mayer A. Aboriginal community controlled health organisations address health equity through action on the social determinants of health of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Australia. BMC Public Health 2020; 20(1): 1859.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

46  Australian Indigenous Health Info Net. Comedian Mary G talks about sex to Aboriginal youth in WA. 2014. Available at https://healthinfonet.ecu.edu.au/about/news/2117/ [accessed 16 December 2022].

47  Tyler KA, Whitbeck LB, Chen X, Johnson K. Sexual health of homeless youth: prevalence and correlates of sexually transmissible infections. Sex Health 2007; 4(1): 57-61.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Footnotes

A The ‘city and major regional centre’ category includes Brisbane, Perth, the Gold Coast and the Sunshine Coast. The ‘regional centres and other regional areas’ category includes all other locations in Queensland and Western Australia.