Livestock water productivity: implications for sub-Saharan Africa
D. Peden A B , G. Taddesse A and A. Haileslassie AA International Livestock Research Institute, PO Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
B Corresponding author. Email: d.peden@cgiar.org
The Rangeland Journal 31(2) 187-193 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ09002
Submitted: 14 January 2009 Accepted: 8 April 2009 Published: 19 June 2009
Abstract
Water is essential for agriculture including livestock. Given increasing global concern that access to agricultural water will constrain food production and that livestock production uses and degrades too much water, there is compelling need for better understanding of the nature of livestock–water interactions. Inappropriate animal management along with poor cropping practices often contributes to widespread and severe depletion, degradation and contamination of water. In developed countries, diverse environmental organisations increasingly voice concerns that animal production is a major cause of land and water degradation. Thus, they call for reduced animal production. Such views generally fail to consider their context, applicability and implications for developing countries.
Two global research programs, the CGIAR ‘Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management and Agriculture’ and ‘Challenge Program on Water and Food’ have undertaken studies of the development, management and conservation of agricultural water in developing countries. Drawing on these programs, this paper describes a framework to systematically identify key livestock–water interactions and suggests strategies for improving livestock and water management especially in the mixed crop–livestock production systems of sub-Saharan Africa. In contrast to developed country experience, this research suggests that currently livestock water productivity compares favourably with crop water productivity in Africa. Yet, great opportunities remain to further reduce domestic animals’ use of water in the continent. Integrating livestock and water planning, development and management has the potential to help reduce poverty, increase food production and reduce pressure on the environment including scarce water resources. Four strategies involving technology, policy and institutional interventions can help achieve this. They are choosing feeds that require relatively little water, conserving water resources through better animal and land management, applying well known tools from the animal sciences to increase animal production, and strategic temporal and spatial provisioning of drinking water. Achieving integrated livestock–water development will require new ways of thinking about, and managing, water by water- and animal-science professionals.
Additional keywords: animal production, feed, land degradation, crop–livestock systems, water accounting, water conservation, sustainability.
Acknowledgements
This paper presents findings from PN37, ‘Nile Basin Livestock Water Productivity’, a project of the CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food in collaboration with the CGIAR Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture. We acknowledge with gratitude the scientific advice and encouragement provided by David Molden, Deborah Bossio and Shirley Tarawali.
Amede T.,
Geheb K., Douthwaite B.
(2009) Enabling the uptake of livestock–water productivity interventions in the crop–livestock systems of sub-Saharan Africa. The Rangeland Journal 31, 223–230.
(verified 20 April 2009).
Cook S. E.,
Andersson M. S., Fisher M. J.
(2009) Assessing the importance of livestock water use in basins. The Rangeland Journal 31, 195–205.
(verified 20 April 2009).
Descheemaeker K.,
Raes D.,
Nyssen J.,
Poessen M.,
Haile M., Deckers J.
(2009) Changes in water flows and water productivity upon vegetation regeneration on degraded hillslopes in northern Ethiopia: a water balance modelling exercise. The Rangeland Journal 31, 237–249.
Falkenmark M.,
Klohn W.,
Lundqvist J.,
Postel S.,
Rockstrom J.,
Seckler D.,
Shuval H., Wallace J.
(1998) Water scarcity as a key factor behind global food insecurity: round table discussion. Ambio 27, 148–154.
Gebreselassie S.,
Peden D.,
Haileslassie A., Mpairwe D.
(2009) Factors affecting livestock water productivity: animal scale analysis using previous cattle feeding trials in Ethiopia. The Rangeland Journal 31, 251–258.
Haileslassie A.,
Peden D.,
Gebreselassie S.,
Amede T.,
Wagnew A., Taddesse G.
(2009) Livestock water productivity in the Blue Nile Basin: assessment of farm scale heterogeneity. The Rangeland Journal 31, 213–222.
Molden D., Sakthivadivel R.
(1999) Water accounting to assess uses and productivity of water. International Journal of Water Resources Development 15, 55–71.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Renault D., Wallendar W.
(2000) Nutritional water productivity and diets. Agricultural Water Management 45, 275–296.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Saeed I., El-Nadi A.
(1998) Forage sorghum yield and water use efficiency under variable irrigation. Irrigation Science 18, 67–71.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sala O.,
Parton W.,
Joyce A., Lauenroth W.
(1988) Primary production of the Central Grasslands of the United States. Ecology 69, 40–45.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sinclair T. R.,
Tanner C. B., Bennett J. M.
(1984) Water-use efficiency in crop production. Bioscience 34, 36–40.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
