Assessing the importance of livestock water use in basins
S. E. Cook A B , M. S. Andersson A and M. J. Fisher AA International Centre for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia.
B Corresponding author. Email: s.cook@cgiar.org
The Rangeland Journal 31(2) 195-205 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ09007
Submitted: 15 January 2009 Accepted: 5 May 2009 Published: 19 June 2009
Abstract
Recent concern over food prices has triggered a renewed interest in agricultural production systems. While attention is focused mainly on cropping, a complete analysis of food production systems should recognise the importance of livestock as major consumers of resources – in particular water – and as providers of food and other products and services. We propose that there is a need to examine not just food systems in isolation, but combined food and water systems, both of which are described as in a critical condition. From this broader perspective, it appears even more important to understand livestock systems because first, a total evaluation of agricultural water productivity – the gain from water consumed by agriculture – cannot be made without understanding the complexities of livestock-containing systems and; second, because in most tropical river basins, livestock systems are the major consumers of water.
To identify total water productivity of livestock-containing systems, we describe concepts of agricultural water productivity and review the complexities of tracking the flow of water through livestock-containing systems: from inputs as evapotranspiration (ET) of forage and crops to outputs of valued animal products or services. For the second part, we present preliminary results from water use accounts analysis for several major river basins, which reveal that for Africa at least, livestock systems appear to be the major water consumers. Yet, little is known about the fate of water as it passes through these systems.
We propose that livestock-containing systems offer substantial scope for increasing total water productivity and that there is considerable merit in improving the capacity to analyse water consumption and water productivity through such systems. Without removing this major source of uncertainty, the potential for systemic improvement to meet the world food and water crisis remains undefined and hence under-acknowledged.
Additional keywords: food security, livestock systems, poverty, rangeland, water productivity.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the BFP Karkheh team of the CPWF and to Michael Peters (International Centre for Tropical Agriculture, CIAT) for comments on earlier versions of this manuscript.
Ahmad M. D.,
Biggs T.,
Turral H., Scott C. A.
(2006) Application of SEBAL approach and MODIS time-series to map vegetation water use patterns in the data scarce Krishna river basin of India. Water Science and Technology 53, 83–90.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
(verified 16 May 2009).
Fath B. D.
(2004) Network analysis applied to large-scale cyber-ecosystems. Ecological Modelling 171, 329–337.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
(accessed 30 April 2009).
Liu J.,
Williams J. R.,
Zehnder A. J. B., Yang H.
(2007) GEPIC – modeling wheat yield and crop water productivity with high resolution on a global scale. Agricultural Systems 94, 478–493.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
(accessed 21 April 2009).
Postel S.
(2001) Growing more food with less water. Scientific American 284(2), 46.
| PubMed |
(verified 16 May 2009).
Terrasson I.,
Fisher M. J.,
Andah W., Lemoalle J.
(2009) Yields and water productivity of rainfed grain crops in the Volta Basin, West Africa. Water International 34, 104–118.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
(verified 16 May 2009).
Zoebl D.
(2006) Is water productivity a useful concept in agricultural water management? Agricultural Water Management 84, 265–273.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
