A typology of Australian beef producers and the sustainability challenge
Taylah Faulkner
A * , Bradd Witt A B and Heather Bray C
A
B
C
Abstract
Increasing public, consumer and researcher interest in agricultural sustainability is being paralleled by industry and supply chain activities aimed at addressing environmental, social and financial aspects of contemporary farming systems. Activities and practices at the farm level are important for the sustainability credentials of beef supply chains. Therefore, understanding and working with the perceptions, attitudes and motivations of those managing grazing lands and rangelands are critical to sustainability efforts. This study draws on a survey of 367 Australian beef producers to determine typologies of worldviews and attitudes that influence how industry engages both externally and internally with sustainability. The analysis identified four groups of beef producers on the basis of their perceptions of their industry’s sustainability, public support, and attitudes towards industry emissions. Two groups (referred to as Vulnerable majority and OK with the status quo) were very positive in their views of industry sustainability and were less concerned about their industry’s greenhouse gas emissions and associated challenges. The other two groups (labelled Moderate quarter and Open minority), although still reasonably positive in their view of industry sustainability, were more likely to acknowledge industry greenhouse gas emissions and climate-related challenges. Producer attitudes to public perceptions, and the degree to which they feel public support for their industry, had a significant influence in separating out the groups identified in this study. The findings have implications for engaging producers and the success of programs and policies designed to influence acceptance, and adoption, of sustainability-related technologies and practices. The findings also highlighted significant potential tensions and misunderstandings on how producers perceive public expectations and attitudes towards their industry. It is important that these different attitudes are accounted for in sustainability communication, especially that which is aimed at engaging producers.
Keywords: adoption, beef producer perceptions, climate attitudes, communication, producer engagement, public engagement, sustainability, typology.
References
ABARES (2016) ‘Land use of Australia 2010-11.’ (Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences) Available at https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/abares/aclump/documents/2010-11%20nlum%20summary%20statistics.pdf
Ahteensuu M (2012) Assumptions of the deficit model type of thinking: ignorance, attitudes, and science communication in the debate on genetic engineering in agriculture. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25, 295-313.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Ariyawardana A, Ganegodage K, Mortlock MY (2017) Consumers’ trust in vegetable supply chain members and their behavioural responses: a study based in Queensland, Australia. Food Control 73, 193-201.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Australian Beef Sustainability Framework (2017) 2017 Framework Report, Australia, Australian Beef Sustainability Framework. Available at https://www.sustainableaustralianbeef.com.au/globalassets/beef-sustainability/documents/absf-2017.pdf
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2016) Cattle and beef market study. Interim report, Australia. Available at https://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/1128%20Beef%20and%20cattle%20report_D08.pdf
Barnes AP, Islam M, Toma L (2013) Heterogeneity in climate change risk perception amongst dairy farmers: a latent class clustering analysis. Applied Geography 41, 105-115.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bartlett MS (1954) A note on the multiplying factors for various χ2 approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Methodological 16, 296-298.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Baur I, Dobricki M, Lips M (2016) The basic motivational drivers of northern and central European farmers. Journal of Rural Studies 46, 93-101.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Berry HL, Botterill LC, Cockfield G, Ding N (2016) Identifying and measuring agrarian sentiment in regional Australia. Agriculture and Human Values 33, 929-941.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Binks B, Stenekes N, Kruger H, Kancans R (2018) ‘Snapshot of Australia’s Agricultural Workforce.’ (ABARES: Canberra, ACT, Australia) 10.25814/5c09cefb3fec5
Blair KJ, Moran D (2023) Worldviews, values and perspectives towards the future of the livestock sector. Animal - Science Proceedings 14, 316.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bohnet IC, Roberts B, Harding E, Haug KJ (2011) A typology of graziers to inform a more targeted approach for developing natural resource management policies and agricultural extension programs. Land Use Policy 28, 629-637.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bray H, Ankeny R (2017) Reframing GM communication: from deficit to discussion and engagement. Farm Policy Journal 14, 33-41.
| Google Scholar |
Bray HJ, Zambrano SC, Chur-Hansen A, Ankeny RA (2016a) Not appropriate dinner table conversation? Talking to children about meat production. Appetite 100, 1-9.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Bray S, Walsh D, Phelps D, Rolfe J, Broad K, Whish G, Quirk M (2016b) Climate Clever Beef: options to improve business performance and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in northern Australia. Rangeland Journal 38, 207-218.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Brett J (2011) Fair share: country and city in Australia. Quarterly Essay 42, 1-67.
| Google Scholar |
Cawood M (2013) The facts are not the story: do community perceptions of Australian agriculture really matter? Farm Policy Journal 10, 1-7.
| Google Scholar |
Chapman M, Satterfield T, Chan KMA (2019) When value conflicts are barriers: can relational values help explain farmer participation in conservation incentive programs? Land Use Policy 82, 464-475.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Clark T (2008) ‘We’re Over-Researched Here!’ Exploring accounts of research fatigue within qualitative research engagements. Sociology 42, 953-970.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Coleman GJ, Hemsworth PH, Hemsworth LM, Munoz CA, Rice M (2022) Differences in public and producer attitudes toward animal welfare in the red meat industries. Frontiers in Psychology 13, 875221.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Creemers S, Van Passel S, Vigani M, Vlahos G (2019) Relationship between farmers’ perception of sustainability and future farming strategies: a commodity-level comparison. AIMS Agriculture and Food 4, 613-642.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Daloğlu I, Nassauer JI, Riolo RL, Scavia D (2014) Development of a farmer typology of agricultural conservation behavior in the American Corn Belt. Agricultural Systems 129, 93-102.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Danioni F, Barni D (2021) Value priorities, impression management and self-deceptive enhancement: once again, much substance and a little bit of style. The Journal of Social Psychology 161, 146-159.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Danioni F, Coen S, Rosnati R, Barni D (2020) The relationship between direct and indirect measures of values: is social desirability a significant moderator? European Review of Applied Psychology 70, 100524.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Dean AJ, Lindsay J, Fielding KS, Smith LDG (2016) Fostering water sensitive citizenship: community profiles of engagement in water-related issues. Environmental Science & Policy 55, 238-247.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Dobricki M (2011) Basic human values in the Swiss population and in a sample of farmers. Swiss Journal of Psychology 70, 119-127.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Dunlap RE, Beus CE, Howell RE, Waud J (1993) What is sustainable agriculture? An empirical examination of faculty and farmer definitions. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 3, 5-41.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Emtage N, Herbohn J, Harrison S (2007) Landholder profiling and typologies for natural resource-management policy and program support: potential and constraints. Environmental Management 40, 481-92.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Faulkner T, Witt B, Bray H (2022) Telling our story: communicators’ perceptions of challenges and solutions for sustainability communication within the Australian beef industry. Journal of Science Communication 21, A04.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Foguesatto CR, Borges JAR, Machado JAD (2019) Farmers’ typologies regarding environmental values and climate change: evidence from southern Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production 232, 400-407.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Food and Agriculture Organization (2017) ‘A Literature Review on Frameworks and Methods for Measuring and Monitoring Sustainable Agriculture.’ (Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome) Available at https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/3cc9d3c5-3288-4999-8799-8df8d10abd50/content
Genç R (2017) The importance of communication in sustainability & sustainable strategies. Procedia Manufacturing 8, 511-516.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Gleeson T, Turner C, Drinan J (2006) ‘Australian Values – Rural Policies. Australian Values - Rural Policies: Symposium 2000.’ (Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation: Canberra, Australia) Available at https://agrifutures.com.au/wp-content/uploads/publications/05-009.pdf
Graham T, Abrahamse W (2017) Communicating the climate impacts of meat consumption: the effect of values and message framing. Global Environmental Change 44, 98-108.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Greiner R (2015) Motivations and attitudes influence farmers’ willingness to participate in biodiversity conservation contracts. Agricultural Systems 137, 154-165.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Groth TM, Curtis A, Mendham E, Toman E (2017) Examining the agricultural producer identity: utilising the collective occupational identity construct to create a typology and profile of rural landholders in Victoria, Australia. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 60, 628-646.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Grunert KG (2011) Sustainability in the food sector: a consumer behaviour perspective. International Journal on Food System Dynamics 2, 207-2018.
| Google Scholar |
Gustafson A, Rice RE (2016) Cumulative advantage in sustainability communication: unintended implications of the knowledge deficit model. Science Communication 38, 800-811.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hall C, Wreford A (2011) Adaptation to climate change: the attitudes of stakeholders in the livestock industry. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 17, 207-222.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hampton JO, Jones B, Mcgreevy PD (2020) Social license and animal welfare: developments from the past decade in Australia. Animals 10, 2237.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Hansen J (1996) Is agricultural sustainability a useful concept? Agricultural Systems 50, 117-143.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hansson H, Sok J (2021) Perceived obstacles for business development: construct development and the impact of farmers’ personal values and personality profile in the Swedish agricultural context. Journal of Rural Studies 81, 17-26.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hansson H, Lagerkvist CJ, Vesala KM (2018) Impact of personal values and personality on motivational factors for farmers to work with farm animal welfare: a case of Swedish dairy farmers. Animal Welfare 27, 133-145.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Happer C, Philo G (2013) The role of the media in the construction of public belief and social change. Journal of Social and Political Psychology 1, 321-336.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hawcroft LJ, Milfont TL (2010) The use (and abuse) of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last 30 years: a meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30, 143-158.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Henderson J, Coveney J, Ward PR, Taylor AW (2011) Farmers are the most trusted part of the Australian food chain: results from a national survey of consumers. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 35, 319-24.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Henry B, Charmley E, Eckard R, Gaughan JB, Hegarty R (2012) Livestock production in a changing climate: adaptation and mitigation research in Australia. Crop & Pasture Science 63, 191-202.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Howley P, Yadav L, Hynes S, Donoghue CO, Neill SO (2014) Contrasting the attitudes of farmers and the general public regarding the ‘multifunctional’ role of the agricultural sector. Land Use Policy 38, 248-256.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Howley P, Buckley C, O Donoghue C, Ryan M (2015) Explaining the economic ‘irrationality’ of farmers’ land use behaviour: the role of productivist attitudes and non-pecuniary benefits. Ecological Economics 109, 186-193.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hurst B, Johnston KA, Lane AB (2020) Engaging for a social licence to operate (SLO). Public Relations Review 46, 101931.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hyland JJ, Jones DL, Parkhill KA, Barnes AP, Williams AP (2015) Farmers’ perceptions of climate change: identifying types. Agriculture and Human Values 33, 323-339.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hyland JJ, Heanue K, Mckillop J, Micha E (2018a) Factors influencing dairy farmers’ adoption of best management grazing practices. Land Use Policy 78, 562-571.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hyland JJ, Heanue K, Mckillop J, Micha E (2018b) Factors underlying farmers’ intentions to adopt best practices: the case of paddock based grazing systems. Agricultural Systems 162, 97-106.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kaiser HF (1970) A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika 35, 401-415.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kaiser HF (1974) An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 39, 31-36.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kessler A, Parkins JR, Huddart Kennedy E (2016) Environmental Harm and ‘the Good Farmer’: conceptualizing discourses of environmental sustainability in the beef industry. Rural Sociology 81, 172-193.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kim H, Lee TH (2018) Strategic CSR communication: a moderating role of transparency in trust building. International Journal of Strategic Communication 12, 107-124.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kolandai-Matchett K (2009) Mediated communication of ‘sustainable consumption’ in the alternative media: a case study exploring a message framing strategy. International Journal of Consumer Studies 33, 113-125.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Levenshus A, Lemon L (2017) The minimised face of internal communication: an exploration of how public relations agency websites frame internal communication and its connection to social media. Public Relations Journal 11, 1-19.
| Google Scholar |
Leviston Z, Price JC, Bates LE (2011) Key influences on the adoption of improved land management practice in rural Australia: the role of attitudes, values and situation. Rural Society 20, 142-159.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Liu T, Bruins RJF, Heberling MT (2018) Factors influencing farmers’ adoption of best management practices: a review and synthesis. Sustainability 10, 432.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Lush D (2018) The right to farm versus the right to choose: society is having the final say. Farm Policy Journal 15, 4-11.
| Google Scholar |
Lyons J, Utych SM (2023) You’re Not From Here!: the consequences of urban and rural identities. Political Behavior 45, 75-101.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Maia de Souza D, Petre R, Jackson F, Hadarits M, Pogue S, Carlyle CN, Bork E, McAllister T (2017) A review of sustainability enhancements in the beef value chain: state-of-the-art and recommendations for future improvements. Animals 7, 26.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Malek L, Umberger W, Goddard E (2019) Is anti-consumption driving meat consumption changes in Australia? British Food Journal 121, 123-138.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Marinescu V, Fox B, Cristea D, Roventa-Frumusani D, Marinache R, Branea S (2021) Talking about sustainability: How the media construct the public’s understanding of sustainable food in Romania. Sustainability 13, 4609.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Marshall NA, Stokes CJ, Webb NP, Marshall PA, Lankester AJ (2014) Social vulnerability to climate change in primary producers: a typology approach. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 186, 86-93.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Mazur N, Curtis A, Rogers M (2013) Do you see what I see? Rural landholders’ belief in climate change. Society & Natural Resources 26, 75-85.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
McAllister I (2009) ‘Public Opinion Towards Rural & Regional Australia: results from the ANU Poll.’ (Australian National University: Canberra, ACT, Australia) Available at https://csrm.cass.anu.edu.au/sites/default/files/docs/2024/11/2009-11-20_ANUpoll_rural_and_regional_report_0_1.pdf
Meat & Livestock Australia (2020a) ‘Fast Facts: Australia’s Beef Industry.’ (Meat & Livestock Australia: Australia) Available at https://www.mla.com.au/globalassets/mla-corporate/prices--markets/documents/trends--analysis/fast-facts--maps/2020/mla-beef-fast-facts-2020.pdf
Meat & Livestock Australia (2020b) ‘The Australian Red Meat Industry’s Carbon Neutral by 2030 Roadmap.’ (Meat & Livestock Australia) Available at https://updates.mla.com.au/globalassets/mla-corporate/research-and-development/program-areas/environment-and-sustainability/2689-mla-cn30-roadmap_d3.pdf
Meat & Livestock Australia (2021) ‘Financial snapshot of sheep and cattle farms.’ (Meat & Livestock Australia) Available at https://www.mla.com.au/prices-markets/market-news/2021/all-you-need-to-know-about-farm-profitability/
Meijboom FLB, Visak T, Brom FWA (2006) From trust to trustworthiness: why information is not enough in the food sector. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19, 427-442.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Metcalfe J (2019) Comparing science communication theory with practice: an assessment and critique using Australian data. Public Understanding of Science 28, 382-400.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Neldner V, Laidlaw M, Mcdonald K, Mathieson M, Melzer R, Seaton R, McDonald WJF, Hobson R, Limpus C (2017) ‘Scientific review of the impacts of land clearing on threatened species in Queensland.’ (Queensland Government: Brisbane, Qld, Australia) Available at https://www.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0024/209517/land-clearing-impacts-threatened-species.pdf
Ngigi MW, Müller U, Birner R (2018) Farmers’ intrinsic values for adopting climate-smart practices in Kenya: empirical evidence from a means-end chain analysis. Climate and Development 10, 614-624.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Page C, Witt B (2022) A leap of faith: regenerative agriculture as a contested worldview rather than as a practice change issue. Sustainability 14, 14803.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Pannell D, Marshall G, Barr N, Curtis A, Vanclay F, Wilkinson R (2006) Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 1407-1424.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Peel D, Berry HL, Botterill LC, Cockfield G (2021) Exploring domains of contemporary Australian agrarianism. Journal of Sociology 59, 385-402.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Porter SR, Whitcomb ME, Weitzer WH (2004) Multiple surveys of students and survey fatigue. New Directions for Institutional Research 2004, 63-73.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Pretty J (2008) Agricultural sustainability: concepts, principles and evidence. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 363, 447-65.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Red Meat Advisory Council (2019) ‘Red Meat 2030.’ (Red Meat Advisory Council: Australia) Available at https://www.rmac.com.au/_files/ugd/50d783_c60d1519d2e34d609eff5830c7124450.pdf
Reichelt N, Nettle R, Paschen J, Russel A, Wagner T, Sherriff L, Evans A, Doonan B, Mcgregor H (2022) ‘A review of global adoption practices and outcomes, and recommendations for implementation within the Australian Red Meat Industry.’ (Meat & Livestock Australia: Australia) Available at https://www.mla.com.au/contentassets/27a5d616731249c3afa727365aedb825/l.adp.2110---global-adoption-review---final-report---published.pdf
Rivera M, Knickel K, Delos Rios I, Ashkenazy A, Pears DQ, Chebach T, Šūmane S (2018) Rethinking the connections between agricultural change and rural prosperity: a discussion of insights derived from case studies in seven countries. Journal of Rural Studies 59, 242-251.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Schwartz SH, Verkasalo M, Antonovsky A, Sagiv L (1997) Value priorities and social desirability: much substance, some style. British Journal of Social Psychology 36, 3-18.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Simmons BA, Wilson KA, Dean AJ (2020) Landholder typologies illuminate pathways for social change in a deforestation hotspot. Journal of Environmental Management 254, 109777.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Thorburn PJ, Wilkinson SN, Silburn DM (2013) Water quality in agricultural lands draining to the Great Barrier Reef: a review of causes, management and priorities. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 180, 4-20.
| Google Scholar |
Tscharntke T, Clough Y, Wanger TC, Jackson L, Motzke I, Perfecto I, Vandermeer J, Whitbread A (2012) Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biological Conservation 151, 53-59.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Velten S, Leventon J, Jager N, Newig J (2015) What Is sustainable agriculture? A systematic review. Sustainability 7, 7833-7865.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Voconiq (2020) ‘Community trust in rural industries: a national survey.’ (Voconiq: Australia) Available at https://agrifutures.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/CTiRI_A-national-survey_2020.pdf
Voconiq (2021) ‘Community Trust in Australia’s Rural Industries: Year 2 national survey.’ (Voconiq: Australia) Available at https://agrifutures.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/CTRI-Report-Year-Two.pdf
Ward PR, Henderson J, Coveney J, Meyer S (2011) How do South Australian consumers negotiate and respond to information in the media about food and nutrition? Journal of Sociology 48, 23-41.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Weder F, Lemke S, Tungarat A (2019) (Re)storying sustainability: the use of story cubes in narrative inquiries to understand individual perceptions of sustainability. Sustainability 11, 5264.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Witt GB, Witt K, Carter R, Beeton R (2007) ‘Urban people’s views of farmers, rural land management and conservation: clarifying ‘the public interest’ in rural land management and rural issues for better communication and relationship building.’ (The University of Queensland: Gatton, Qld, Australia) 10.13140/RG.2.1.2176.8166
Witt G, Witt K, Carter R, Gordon A (2009) Exploring the ‘city-bush divide’: what do urban people really think of farmers and rural land management? Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 16, 168-180.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Witt B, Sauvage C, Witt K, Gillespie N, Ariyawardana A (2020) ‘Evaluating the impact and effectiveness of the Australian Beef Sustainability Framework.’ (Meat & Livestock Australia) Available at https://www.mla.com.au/contentassets/079a923a5b51443181d9dc2657d56375/e.cem.1909_final_report.pdf
Witt GB, Althor G, Colvin RM, Witt KJ, Gillespie N, Mccrea R, Lacey J, Faulkner T (2021) How environmental values influence trust and beliefs about societal oversight and need for regulation of the Australian cattle industry. Environmental Research Letters 16, 34006.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Worsley A, Wang W, Ridley S (2015) Australian adults’ knowledge of Australian agriculture. British Food Journal 117, 400-411.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Zahl-Thanem A, Burton RJF, Vik J (2021) Should we use email for farm surveys? A comparative study of email and postal survey response rate and non-response bias. Journal of Rural Studies 87, 352-360.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
