Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Reproduction, Fertility and Development Reproduction, Fertility and Development Society
Vertebrate reproductive science and technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

194 Superovulation response does not affect embryo development of pronuclear microinjected embryos in the goat

N. Buzzell A , S. Blash A , K. Miner A , M. Schofield A , J. Pollock A , N. Hawkins A , M. Hevy A and W. Gavin A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

LFB USA Inc., Framingham, MA, USA

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 31(1) 221-222 https://doi.org/10.1071/RDv31n1Ab194
Published online: 3 December 2018

Abstract

Superovulation of donor animals is essential in the production of transgenic founder goats generated through microinjection. There can be a marked variable response to the exogenous hormones used for superovulation. The objective of this study was to examine how the superovulatory response of individual goats affected the ability of the fertilized, microinjected embryos to develop into offspring. The donors were superovulated using a progesterone implant on Day 0, a prostaglandin injection at Day 7, 2 injections ~12 h apart of 32 to 36 mg of FSH on Day 12 to 15, progesterone implant removal on Day 14, bred by intact bucks several times starting on Day 15 to 16, an injection of 50 μg of gonadotropin-releasing hormone, and surgical collection of 1- to 2-cell embryos from retrograde flushing of the oviduct on Day 17 (~24-48 h, 1-2 days after breeding). Surgical collection allows for an accurate ovulation point (OP) count before the oviduct being retrograde flushed and ova collected and counted. Data from donor animals were grouped by superovulatory response based on OP counts of 1-10, 11-20, 21-30, or >30. The number of donors that contributed per group were 130, 280, 175, and 52, respectively. The recovery rate was 76, 72, 68, and 62%, respectively. After collection, ova were viewed under a dissecting microscope and assessed for fertilization by identifying pronuclei, and 1 pronucleus was microinjected. The fertilization rate was 47, 52, 51, and 56%, respectively. The survivability rate after microinjection was 80, 76, 75, and 76%, respectively. Surviving embryos were transferred (3-5) into recipient goats following a 2- to 6-h in vitro culture (as 1- to 2-cell embryos), allowing for a suitable period to assess viability post-injection. Further in vitro development rates were not assessed because of the short timeframe the embryos stayed in culture. The conception rates were 71, 56, 65, and 53%, respectively, and abortion rates were 23, 10, 14, and 9%, respectively. As some recipients received embryos from multiple donors, this data could not be included in the analysis as identifying which offspring were from the corresponding embryo group could not be confirmed. Data were analysed using SAS software (version 9.4, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The Wald chi square test under linear regression was used to analyse the number of offspring produced per embryo transferred. No significant differences were found between groups (all P-values were > 0.05). This analysis indicated that the range of superovulation response does not affect the developmental competence of the pronuclear microinjected embryo or the ability to produce viable offspring.


Table 1.  Comparison of the donor ovulation counts, number of embryos transferred, offspring produced and overall efficiency
Click to zoom