Register      Login
Reproduction, Fertility and Development Reproduction, Fertility and Development Society
Vertebrate reproductive science and technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

112 The effect of biological extenders on in vitro induction of the acrosome reaction in bovine spermatozoa

L. Gatenby A and K. R. Bondioli A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

School of Animal Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 32(2) 183-183 https://doi.org/10.1071/RDv32n2Ab112
Published: 2 December 2019

Abstract

Biological extenders in semen are used to protect the integrity of the sperm cells during cryopreservation. The two most common extenders are egg yolk and milk, and initial experiments describing heparin capacitation for IVF were conducted with semen frozen in egg yolk extender. However, semen of many bulls used for IVF is frozen in milk-based extender, and it is not clear whether this affects the response to heparin capacitation. This study aims to assess whether the use of milk- or egg-based extenders in frozen-thawed bovine semen affects sperm's ability to undergo the acrosome reaction, utilising either the endogenous progesterone pathway or calcium ionophore A23187 to induce the acrosome reaction following heparin capacitation. Frozen semen from 12 bulls (6 using egg yolk citrate-based extender containing 20% egg yolk, and 6 using milk-based extender) was used for no less than 3 replicates each. All semen was commercially processed and cryopreserved using the same methodology. Semen was thawed and separated using a Percoll gradient and centrifugation at 400 × g for 10 min, then incubated for 4 h in a capacitating medium containing heparin (10 μg mL−1) at a concentration of 1 × 106 sperm mL−1. Capacitated sperm were then introduced to progesterone (10 μM) or A23187 (10 μM) for acrosome induction and stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated peanut agglutinin (5 μg mL−1). After treatment and staining, the sperm were analysed using flow cytometry to determine the percentage of populations with fluorescent acrosomes, indicating an exposed acrosome and an ongoing acrosome reaction. Fluorescent microscopy was also used to confirm fluorescence in acrosome-reacting samples. Results were analysed as a 2 × 3 factorial design by ANOVA with extender and acrosome induction treatment as factors. For egg yolk-extended semen, the mean percent of acrosome-reacted sperm was 83.7 (±6.8), 81.8 (±7), and 15.0 (±7.5) for sperm treated with progesterone, A23187, and heparin only, respectively. Compared to milk-extended semen, for which the mean percent acrosome-reacted was 15.0 (±8.2), 14.8 (±7.4), and 12.0 (±6.8) for progesterone, A23187, and heparin only, respectively. Significant differences were observed between extenders, with egg yolk-extended semen having a significantly greater response to acrosome reaction-inducing agents than semen extended with milk-based extenders (P < 0.05). Also, it was observed that progesterone induced a similar percentage of acrosome reactions as A23187. Variation between bulls in the response to heparin capacitation has been observed and cannot be eliminated in this study. The difference observed between extenders warrants further study with a split ejaculate design. The possibility that the semen extender used during cryopreservation affects the response to heparin capacitation suggests that this should be accounted for in IVF protocols to increase the efficiency of this technology.