Challenges of commissioning and contracting for integrated care in the National Health Service (NHS) in England
Rachael AddicottThe King’s Fund, 11–13 Cavendish Square, London, W1G 0AN, UK. Email: r.addicott@kingsfund.org.uk
Australian Journal of Primary Health 22(1) 50-54 https://doi.org/10.1071/PY15067
Submitted: 5 May 2015 Accepted: 28 July 2015 Published: 2 September 2015
Abstract
For many years there has been a separation between purchasing and provision of services in the English National Health Service (NHS). Many studies report that this commissioning function has been weak: purchasers have had little impact or power in negotiations with large acute providers, and have had limited strategic control over the delivery of care. Nevertheless, commissioning has become increasingly embedded in the NHS structure since the arrival of Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) in 2012. Recently, some of these CCGs have focused on how they can contract and commission in different ways to stimulate greater collaboration across providers. This paper examines experiences of commissioning and contracting for integrated care in the English NHS, based on a series of national-level interviews and case studies of five health economies that are implementing novel contracting models. The cases illustrated here demonstrate early experiments to drive innovation through contracting in the NHS that have largely relied on the vision of individual teams or leaders, in combination with external legal, procurement and actuarial support. It is unlikely that this approach will be sustainable or replicable across the country or internationally, despite the best intentions of commissioners. Designing and operating novel contractual approaches will require considerable determination, alongside advanced skills in procurement, contract management and commissioning. The cost of developing new contractual approaches is high, and as the process is difficult and resource-intensive, it is likely that dedicated teams or programs will be required to drive significant improvement.
References
Addicott R, Shortell S (2014) How ‘accountable’ are accountable care organizations? Health Care Management Review 39, 270–278.| How ‘accountable’ are accountable care organizations?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24393832PubMed |
Appleby J, Harrison T, Hawkins L, Dixon A (2012) ‘Payment by results: how can payment systems help to deliver better care?’ (The King’s Fund: London, UK)
Bennett C, Ferlie E (1996) Contracting in theory and in practice: Some evidence from the NHS. Public Administration 74, 49–66.
| Contracting in theory and in practice: Some evidence from the NHS.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Billings J, de Weger E (2015) Contracting for integrated health and social care: a critical review of four models Journal of Integrated Care 23, 153–175.
| Contracting for integrated health and social care: a critical review of four modelsCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Doran T, Kontopantelis E, Reeves D, Sutton M, Ryan AM (2014) Setting performance targets in pay for performance programmes: what can we learn from QOF? BMJ 348, g1595–g1601.
| Setting performance targets in pay for performance programmes: what can we learn from QOF?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24594910PubMed |
Hudson B (2015) Public and patient engagement in commissioning in the English NHS: an idea whose time has come? Public Management Review 17, 1–16.
| Public and patient engagement in commissioning in the English NHS: an idea whose time has come?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kumar G, Quigley J, Singh M, Keeping S, Pitman R, Carroll S (2014) Do local enhanced services in primary care improve outcomes? Results from a literature review Quality in Primary Care 22, 157–169.
Marshall L, Chalesworth A, Hurst J (2014) ‘The NHS payment system: evolving policy and emerging evidence.’ (Nuffield Trust: London, UK)
Sanderson J, Lonsdale C, Mannion R, Matharu T (2015) Towards a framework for enhancing procurement and supply chain management practice in the NHS: Lessons for managers and clinicians from a synthesis of the theoretical and empirical literature Health Services and Delivery Research 3, 1–134.
| Towards a framework for enhancing procurement and supply chain management practice in the NHS: Lessons for managers and clinicians from a synthesis of the theoretical and empirical literatureCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sheaff R, Charles N, Mahon A, Chambers N, Morando V, Exworthy M, Byng R, Mannion R, Llewellyn S (2015) NHS commissioning practice and health system governance: a mixed-methods realistic evaluation. Health Services and Delivery Research 3, 1–184.
| NHS commissioning practice and health system governance: a mixed-methods realistic evaluation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
