Victorian maternal and child health nurses’ family violence practices and training needs: a cross-sectional analysis of routine data
Leesa Hooker A C , Jan Nicholson A , Kelsey Hegarty B , Lael Ridgway A and Angela Taft AA Judith Lumley Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Level 3 George Singer Building, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic. 3086, Australia.
B Department of General Practice, Faculty Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, 780 Elizabeth Street, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Vic. 3053, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: l.hooker@latrobe.edu.au
Australian Journal of Primary Health 27(1) 43-49 https://doi.org/10.1071/PY20043
Submitted: 28 February 2020 Accepted: 22 June 2020 Published: 10 September 2020
Abstract
This study investigated maternal and child health (MCH) nurse family violence clinical practices, practice gaps and future family violence training needs. Descriptive analysis was conducted of routine data collected as part of a larger MCH nurse family violence training project conducted in 2018. A purposive sample of routine data (2017–18) was analysed from six Victorian metropolitan and four regional and rural areas that were experiencing high rates of violence, as indicated by police reports. Descriptive statistics and regression analyses were used to identify rates of nurse family violence screening, safety planning and referral, with practice differences analysed across locations. MCH nurses ask only one in two clients about family violence at the mandated 4-week postnatal clinic visit. Overall, metropolitan nurses screen for family violence at higher rates than rural nurses. Safety planning rates were low (1.3%), suggesting that screening is not translating to disclosure rates equivalent to state-wide prevalence (~14–17%) or police data. Nurse referrals are even lower (<1%), with practice differences noted across reporting systems. Despite data collection limitations, analysis of routine data shows significant gaps in nurse family violence screening and response practices. This evidence reinforces the need for systems changes to address family violence and other maternal health and social issues.
Additional keywords: child health services, community health education, early intervention, maternal–child health centres, secondary prevention.
References
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2013) 4906.0 – Personal safety, Australia, 2016. (ABS: Canberra, ACT, Australia) Available at https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4906.0Chapter2002012 [Verified 23 July 2020]Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2017) 4906.0 – Personal safety, Australia, 2016. (ABS: Canberra, ACT, Australia) Available at https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/4906.0 [Verified 23 July 2020]
Baird K, Creedy DK, Saito AS, Eustace J (2018) Longitudinal evaluation of a training program to promote routine antenatal enquiry for domestic violence by midwives. Women and Birth 31, 398–406.
Campo M, Tayton S (2015) Domestic and family violence in regional, rural and remote communities. Technical report, Child Family Community Australia Practitioner Resource, Australian Institute of Family Studies, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
Cann K, Withnell S, Shakespeare J, Doll H, Thomas J (2001) Domestic violence: a comparative survey of levels of detection, knowledge, and attitudes in healthcare workers. Public Health 115, 89–95.
Centre for Community Child Health (2011) Evaluation of the implementation of the MCH key ages and stages service activity framework: year 1 (2010) progress report. Department of Education and Early Childhood Development, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
Crime Statistics Agency (2017) Victoria Police: family violence portal data from the Victoria Police Law Enforcement Assistance Program. (State Government: Melbourne, Vic., Australia) Available at https://www.crimestatistics.vic.gov.au/family-violence-data-portal [Verified 23 July 2020]
Crombie N, Hooker L, Reisenhofer S (2017) Nurse and midwifery education and intimate partner violence: a scoping review. Journal of Clinical Nursing 26, 2100–2125.
| Nurse and midwifery education and intimate partner violence: a scoping review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27412048PubMed |
Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) (2019) Maternal and Child Health Service Practice Guidelines. (DHHS: Melbourne, Vic., Australia) Available at https://www2.health.vic.gov.au/about/publications/policiesandguidelines/maternal-child-health-service-practice-guidelines [Verified 13 July 2020]
Forsdike K, O’Connor M, Castle D, Hegarty K (2019) Exploring Australian psychiatrists’ and psychiatric trainees’ knowledge, attitudes and preparedness in responding to adults experiencing domestic violence. Australasian Psychiatry 27, 64–68.
García-Moreno C, Hegarty K, d’Oliveira AFL, Koziol-MacLain J, Colombini M, Feder G (2015) The health-systems response to violence against women. Lancet 385, 1567–1579.
| The health-systems response to violence against women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25467583PubMed |
Gartland D, Hemphill SA, Hegarty K, Brown SJ (2011) Intimate partner violence during pregnancy and the first year postpartum in an Australian pregnancy cohort study. Maternal and Child Health Journal 15, 570–578.
| Intimate partner violence during pregnancy and the first year postpartum in an Australian pregnancy cohort study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20628799PubMed |
Hegarty K, McKibbin G, Hameed M, Koziol-McLain J, Feder G, Tarzia L, Hooker L (2020a) Health practitioners’ readiness to address intimate partner abuse: a qualitative meta-synthesis. PLoS One 15, e0234067
| Health practitioners’ readiness to address intimate partner abuse: a qualitative meta-synthesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32544160PubMed |
Hegarty K, Spangaro J, Koziol-McLain J, Walsh J, Lee A, Kyei-Onanjiri M, Matthews R, Valpied J, Chapman J, Hooker L, McLindon E, Spurway K (2020b) Sustainability of identification and response to domestic violence in antenatal care (the SUSTAIN study): final report. Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety (ANROWS), Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Hooker L, Small R, Humphreys C, Hegarty K, Taft A (2015) Applying normalization process theory to understand implementation of a family violence screening and care model in maternal and child health nursing practice: a mixed method process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial. Implementation Science 10, 39
| Applying normalization process theory to understand implementation of a family violence screening and care model in maternal and child health nursing practice: a mixed method process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25890352PubMed |
Hooker L, Small R, Taft A (2016) Understanding sustained domestic violence identification in maternal and child health nurse care: process evaluation from a 2-year follow-up of the MOVE trial. Journal of Advanced Nursing 72, 533–544.
| Understanding sustained domestic violence identification in maternal and child health nurse care: process evaluation from a 2-year follow-up of the MOVE trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26564793PubMed |
Hooker L, Versteegh L, Lindgren H, Taft A (2020) Differences in help-seeking behaviors and perceived helpfulness of services between abused and non-abused postpartum women: a cross sectional survey of Australian postpartum women. Health and Social Care in the Community 28, 958–968.
| Differences in help-seeking behaviors and perceived helpfulness of services between abused and non-abused postpartum women: a cross sectional survey of Australian postpartum women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31833144PubMed |
Hughes J, Chau S, Poff DC (2011) ‘They’re not my favourite people’: what mothers who have experienced intimate partner violence say about involvement in the child protection system. Children and Youth Services Review 33, 1084–1089.
| ‘They’re not my favourite people’: what mothers who have experienced intimate partner violence say about involvement in the child protection system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Humphreys C (2008) Problems in the system of mandatory reporting of children living with domestic violence. Journal of Family Studies 14, 228–239.
| Problems in the system of mandatory reporting of children living with domestic violence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Humphreys C, Absler D (2011) History repeating: child protection responses to domestic violence. Child & Family Social Work 16, 464–473.
| History repeating: child protection responses to domestic violence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
James L, Brody DP, Hamilton ZP (2013) Risk factors for domestic violence during pregnancy: a meta-analytic review. Violence and Victims 28, 359–380.
| Risk factors for domestic violence during pregnancy: a meta-analytic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23862304PubMed |
McLean C, Koziol-McLain J (2018) Health response to family violence: 2017 violence intervention programme evaluation. (Centre for Interdisciplinary Trauma Research, Auckland University of Technology: Auckland, New Zealand) Available at https://niphmhr.aut.ac.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/226486/2017_VIP_Evaluation_Report_final.pdf [Verified 23 July 2020]
NSW Ministry of Health (2016) Domestic violence routine screening program: snapshot report 14. NSW Ministry of Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
O’Doherty L, Hegarty K, Ramsay J, Davidson LL, Feder G, Taft A (2015) Screening women for intimate partner violence in health-care settings. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 7, CD007007
Ramsay J, Rutterford C, Gregory A, Dunne D, Eldridge S, Sharp D, Feder G (2012) Domestic violence: knowledge, attitudes, and clinical practice of selected UK primary healthcare clinicians. The British Journal of General Practice 62, e647–e655.
| Domestic violence: knowledge, attitudes, and clinical practice of selected UK primary healthcare clinicians.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22947586PubMed |
Reisenhofer S, Taft A (2013) Women’s journey to safety – the transtheoretical model in clinical practice when working with women experiencing intimate partner violence: a scientific review and clinical guidance. Patient Education and Counseling 93, 536–548.
State of Victoria (2016a) Ending family violence: Victoria’s plan for change. State Government of Victoria, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
State of Victoria (2016b) Royal commission into family violence: summary and recommendations. Victorian Government Printer, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
Taft AJ, Hooker L, Humphreys C, Hegarty K, Walter R, Adams C, Agius P, Small R (2015) Maternal and child health nurse screening and care for mothers experiencing domestic violence (MOVE): a cluster randomised trial. BMC Medicine 13, 150
Tandon SD, Parillo KM, Jenkins C, Duggan AK (2005) Formative evaluation of home visitors’ role in addressing poor mental health, domestic violence, and substance abuse among low-income pregnant and parenting women. Maternal and Child Health Journal 9, 273–283.
| Formative evaluation of home visitors’ role in addressing poor mental health, domestic violence, and substance abuse among low-income pregnant and parenting women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16240078PubMed |
World Health Organization (WHO) (2013a) Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
World Health Organization (WHO) (2013b) Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women: WHO clinical and policy guidelines. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.