Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Pacific Conservation Biology Pacific Conservation Biology Society
A journal dedicated to conservation and wildlife management in the Pacific region.
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > PC > PC23040 > Fulltext
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 30(1)

Compliance is not necessarily good science. The Environmental Protection Authority’s vertebrate fauna survey guidelines should be revised

Graham G. Thompson https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3128-0776 A B * and Scott A. Thompson A C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Terrestrial Ecosystems, 10 Houston Place, Mt Claremont, WA 6010, Australia.

B School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.

C School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia.

* Correspondence to: graham@terrestrialecosystems.com

Handling Editor: Mike Calver

Pacific Conservation Biology 30, PC23040 https://doi.org/10.1071/PC23040
Submitted: 13 September 2023  Accepted: 12 November 2023  Published: 4 December 2023

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

Context

The Western Australian Environmental Protection Authority’s (EPA’s) terrestrial fauna survey guidelines for detailed surveys recommends a two-season survey with a minimum of one, or a few survey sites, for each fauna habitat.

Aims

This study demonstrates that in two common fauna habitat types and probably most others, this survey effort is unlikely to provide an indication of species richness and abundance.

Methods

A pit and funnel trapping program targeting small ground dwelling mammals and reptiles was replicated in 20 trapping sites over two survey periods in two different fauna habitat types.

Results

For most project areas, compliance with the EPA’s guidelines is unlikely to provide better quality data on species richness than publicly available from a desktop assessment.

Conclusion

It is difficult to provide an adequate scientific justification for undertaking low intensity surveys when desktop surveys will mostly provide better quality information for an environmental impact assessment (EIA), and these surveys probably should not be approved by an animal ethics committee.

Implications

When preparing for and undertaking vertebrate fauna surveys for an EIA, environmental practitioners should place greater emphasis on the scientific validity and robustness of the proposed surveys rather than just complying with an EPA technical guidance. The EPA’s technical vertebrate fauna survey guidance should be completely rewritten.

Keywords: animal ethics, environmental consultants, environmental practitioners, impact assessments, mammals, reptiles, vertebrate fauna surveys, Western Australia.

References

Burbidge AA, McKenzie NL, Fuller PJ (2008) Long-tailed Dunnart Sminthopsis longicaudata. In ‘The mammals of Australia’. (Eds S van Dyck, R Strahan) pp. 148–150. (Reed New Holland: Sydney)

Chao A, Chiu C-H (2016) Species richness: estimation and comparsion. Available at onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118445112.stat03432.pub2 [accessed 13 September 2023]

Chazdon RL, Colwell RK, Denslow JS, Guariguata MR (1998) Statistical methods for estimating species richness of woody regeneration in primary and secondary rain forests of northeastern Costa Rica. In ‘Forest biodiversity research, monitoring and modelling: conceptual background and old world case studies’. (Eds F Dallmeier, JA Comiskey) pp. 285–309. (Parthenon: Paris)

Colwell RK (2013) EstimateS 9.1.0 user’s guide. Available at http://purl.oclc.org/estimates [accessed 13 September 2023]

Environmental Protection Authority (2016) Environmental factor guideline – terrestrial fauna. Environmental Protection Authority, Perth. Available at https://www.epa.wa.gov.au/sites/default/files/Policies_and_Guidance/Guideline-Terrestrial-Fauna-131216_3.pdf

EPA (2020) Technical guidance – terrestrial vertebrate fauna surveys for environmental impact assessment. Environmental Protection Authority, Perth. Available at https://www.epa.wa.gov.au/sites/default/files/Policies_and_Guidance/2020.09.17%20-%20EPA%20Technical%20Guidance%20-%20Vertebrate%20Fauna%20Surveys%20-%20Final.pdf

Fraser JL, Thompson GG, Moro D (2003) Adequacy of terrestrial fauna surveys for the preparation of Environmental Impact Assessments in the mining industry of Western Australia. Ecological Management & Restoration 4, 187-192.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK (2011) Estimating species richness. In ‘Frontiers in measuring biodiversity.’ (Eds AE Magurran, BJ McGill) pp. 39–54. (Oxford University Press: New York)

Longino JT, Coddington J, Colwell RK (2002) The ant fauna of a tropical rain forest: estimating species richness three different ways. Ecology 83, 689-702.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Magurran AE (2004) ‘Measuring biological diversity.’ (Blackwell: Oxford)

National Health and Medical Research Council (2013) ‘Australian code for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes.’ (National Health and Medical Research Council: Canberra)

Payne AL, Van Vreeswyk AME, Pringle HJR, Leighton KA, Hening P (1998) A inventory and condition survey of the sandstone-yalgoo-paynes find area, Western Australia. Agriculture Western Australia, Perth.

Pringle HJR, Van Vreeswyk AME, Gilligan SA (1994) An inventory and condition survey of rangelands in the North-eastern Goldfields, Western Australia. Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin No. 87, Perth.

Sherrod PH (2001) Nonlinear regression analysis program. Available at http://www.nlreg.com [accessed 13 September 2023]

Thompson GG (2007) Terrestrial vertebrate fauna surveys for the preparation of environmental impact assessments; how can we do it better? A Western Australian example. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 27, 41-61.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Thompson GG, Thompson SA (2020) A comparison of an environmental impact assessment (EIA) vertebrate fauna survey with a post-approval fauna salvage program: consequences of not adhering to EIA survey guidelines, a Western Australian example. Pacific Conservation Biology 26, 412-419.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Thompson GG, Thompson SA, Withers PC, Fraser J (2007) Determining adequate trapping effort and species richness using species accumulation curves for environmental impact assessments. Austral Ecology 32, 570-580.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Threatened Species Scientific Committee (2016) Approved Conservation Advice (incorporating listing advice) for the Banksia Woodlands of the Swan Coastal Plain ecological community. Available at https://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/publicshowcommunity.pl?id=131 [accessed 13 September 2023]

Van Vreeswyk AM, Leighton KA, Payne AL, Henning P (2004) An inventory and condition survey of the Pilbara region Western Australia. Department of Agriculture and Food, Perth.