Ground Parrots and fire in east Gippsland, Victoria: habitat occupancy modelling from automated sound recordings
Lucas A. BluffDepartment of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, 574 Main Street, Bairnsdale, Vic. 3875, Australia. Email: lucas.bluff@delwp.vic.gov.au
Emu 116(4) 402-410 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU16014
Submitted: 12 February 2016 Accepted: 6 June 2016 Published: 15 September 2016
Abstract
The peak-and-decline in the density of eastern populations of Ground Parrot (Pezoporus wallicus) with increasing time since fire is one of the best-documented post-fire responses of any Australian animal. However, existing studies have typically shown this relationship within a set of sites highly likely to be occupied by Ground Parrots, rather than demonstrating that fire history affects whether a site is occupied. This paper describes a landscape-scale, targeted survey of Ground Parrots at 80 heathland sites between Marlo and Mallacoota, Victoria. Selection of sites was stratified by combinations of time since fire and modelled predictions of the distribution of Ground Parrots. All sites were sampled 10 times in late 2013 using automated sound recorders, and a subset of 23 sites had at least one traditional, observer-based physical survey. Both time since fire and the species-distribution model were significantly associated with the probability of Ground Parrots occupying a site. The most parsimonious occupancy model was applied to two earlier datasets from the study area, and provided indirect evidence for an inferred decline in Ground Parrot occupancy in recent decades. Landscape modelling of the expected total area occupied by Ground Parrots between 1979 and 2013 suggested a strong peak would have occurred in the late 1990s; suitability of habitat over much of the landscape is now declining. Finally, given that many Australian fauna species are responsive to fire, this study shows that assumptions behind the management of such species can be tested efficiently by combining legacy datasets and literature with contemporary data collection and modelling methods.
Additional keywords: fire ecology, fire management, heathland, monitoring, Pezoporus wallicus, survey methods, threatened species.
References
Baird, I. A., Catling, P. C., and Ive, J. R. (1994). Fire planning for wildlife management: a decision support system for Nadgee Nature Reserve, Australia. International Journal of Wildland Fire 4, 107–121.| Fire planning for wildlife management: a decision support system for Nadgee Nature Reserve, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Baker, J., and Whelan, R. J. (1994). Ground Parrots and fire at Barren Grounds, New South Wales: a long-term study and an assessment of management implications. Emu 94, 300–304.
| Ground Parrots and fire at Barren Grounds, New South Wales: a long-term study and an assessment of management implications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Baker, J., Whelan, R. J., Evans, L., Moore, S., and Norton, M. (2010). Managing the Ground Parrot in its fiery habitat in south-eastern Australia. Emu 110, 279–284.
| Managing the Ground Parrot in its fiery habitat in south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bramwell, M. D., Downe, J. M., Hines, H. B., Kemp, J. E., Mazzer, T. M., O’Neill, G. C., and Trumbull-Ward, A. V. (1992). Flora and fauna of the Yeerung Forest Block. Ecological Survey Report 43, Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Orbost, Victoria.
Bryant, S. (1991). The Ground Parrot, Pezoporus wallicus, in Tasmania: distribution, density and conservation status. Department of Parks, Wildlife and Heritage, Hobart.
Burbidge, A. H., Rolfe, J., McNee, S., Newbey, B., and Williams, M. (2007). Monitoring population change in the cryptic and threatened Western Ground Parrot in relation to fire. Emu 107, 79–88.
| Monitoring population change in the cryptic and threatened Western Ground Parrot in relation to fire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chan, K., and Mudie, D. (2004). Variation in vocalisations of the Ground Parrot at its northern range. Australian Journal of Zoology 52, 147–158.
| Variation in vocalisations of the Ground Parrot at its northern range.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cheal, D. (2010). Growth stages and tolerable fire intervals for Victoria’s native vegetation data sets. Fire and Adaptive Management Report 84, Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne.
DSE (2004). EVC/Bioregion benchmark for vegetation quality assessment: East Gippsland Lowlands bioregion. Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne.
Fiske, I. J., and Chandler, R. B. (2011). unmarked: an R package for fitting hierarchical models of wildlife occurrence and abundance. Journal of Statistical Software 43, 1–23.
| unmarked: an R package for fitting hierarchical models of wildlife occurrence and abundance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fox, B. J. (1982). Fire and mammalian secondary succession in an Australian coastal heath. Ecology 63, 1332–1341.
| Fire and mammalian secondary succession in an Australian coastal heath.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gaston, K. J., Blackburn, T. M., Greenwood, J. D., Gregory, R. D., Quinn, R. M., and Lawton, J. H. (2000). Abundance-occupancy relationships. Journal of Applied Ecology 37, 39–59.
| Abundance-occupancy relationships.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gibson, L., Barrett, B., and Burbidge, A. (2007). Dealing with uncertain absences in habitat modelling: a case study of a rare ground-dwelling parrot. Diversity & Distributions 13, 704–713.
| Dealing with uncertain absences in habitat modelling: a case study of a rare ground-dwelling parrot.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Guillera-Arroita, G., Lahoz-Monfort, J. J., MacKenzie, D. I., Wintle, B. A., and McCarthy, M. A. (2014). Ignoring imperfect detection in biological surveys is dangerous: a response to ‘Fitting and interpreting occupancy models’. PLoS One 9, e99571.
| Ignoring imperfect detection in biological surveys is dangerous: a response to ‘Fitting and interpreting occupancy models’.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25075615PubMed |
Higgins, P. J. (Ed.) (1999). ‘Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic birds. Vol. 4: Parrots to Dollarbird.’ (Oxford University Press: Melbourne.)
Johst, K., and Drechsler, M. (2003). Are spatially correlated or uncorrelated disturbance regimes better for the survival of species? Oikos 103, 449–456.
| Are spatially correlated or uncorrelated disturbance regimes better for the survival of species?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kavanagh, R. P., Loyn, R. H., Smith, G. C., Taylor, R. J., and Catling, P. C. (2004). Which species should be monitored to indicate ecological sustainability in Australian forest management? In ‘Conservation of Australia’s Forest Fauna’. 2nd edn. (Ed. D. Lunney.) pp. 959–987. (Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales: Sydney.)
Kelly, L. T., Nimmo, D. G., Spence-Bailey, L. M., Haslem, A., Watson, S. J., Clarke, M. J., and Bennett, A. F. (2011). Influence of fire history on small mammal distributions: insights from a 100-year post-fire chronosequence. Diversity & Distributions 17, 462–473.
| Influence of fire history on small mammal distributions: insights from a 100-year post-fire chronosequence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kelly, L. T., Bennett, A. F., Clarke, M. F., and McCarthy, M. A. (2015). Optimal fire histories for biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology 29, 473–481.
| Optimal fire histories for biodiversity conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25163611PubMed |
Liu, C., White, M., and Newell, G. (2011). Measuring and comparing the accuracy of species distribution models with presence–absence data. Ecography 34, 232–243.
| Measuring and comparing the accuracy of species distribution models with presence–absence data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXntFyhsbo%3D&md5=04552cb832d57daa3ec67b4e90388af8CAS |
Liu, C., White, M., Newell, G., and Griffioen, P. (2013). Species distribution modelling for conservation planning in Victoria, Australia. Ecological Modelling 249, 68–74.
| Species distribution modelling for conservation planning in Victoria, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
MacKenzie, D. I., and Bailey, L. L. (2004). Assessing the fit of site-occupancy models. Journal of Agricultural Biological & Environmental Statistics 9, 300–318.
| Assessing the fit of site-occupancy models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
MacKenzie, D. I., Nichols, J. D., Lachman, G. B., Droege, S., Royle, J. A., and Langtimm, C. A. (2002). Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83, 2248–2255.
| Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
MacKenzie, D. I., Nichols, J. D., Royle, J. A., Pollock, K. H., Bailey, L. L., and Hines, J. E. (2006). ‘Occupancy Estimation and Modelling.’ (Elsevier Academic Press: London.)
Mazerolle, M. J. (2014). AICcmodavg: model selection and multimodel inference based on (Q)AIC(c). R package, version 2.01. Available at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/AICcmodavg [Verified 9 October 2014].
McFarland, D. C. (1991a). The biology of the Ground Parrot, Pezoporus wallicus, in Queensland. III. Distribution and abundance. Wildlife Research 18, 199–213.
| The biology of the Ground Parrot, Pezoporus wallicus, in Queensland. III. Distribution and abundance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McFarland, D. C. (1991b). The biology of the Ground Parrot, Pezoporus wallicus, in Queensland. II. Spacing, calling and breeding behaviour. Wildlife Research 18, 185–197.
| The biology of the Ground Parrot, Pezoporus wallicus, in Queensland. II. Spacing, calling and breeding behaviour.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McFarland, D. C. (1991c). The biology of the Ground Parrot, Pezoporus wallicus, in Queensland. I. Microhabitat use, activity cycle and diet. Wildlife Research 18, 169–184.
| The biology of the Ground Parrot, Pezoporus wallicus, in Queensland. I. Microhabitat use, activity cycle and diet.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Meredith, C. W., and Isles, A. C. (1980). A study of the Ground Parrot (Pezoporus wallicus) in Victoria. Environmental Studies Division Publication 304, Ministry of Conservation, Melbourne.
Meredith, C. W., and Jaremovic, R. (1990). Current status and management of the Ground Parrot in Victoria. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Technical Report Series 58, Department of Conservation and Environment, Melbourne.
Meredith, C. W., Gilmore, A. W., and Isles, A. C. (1984). The Ground Parrot (Pezoporus wallicus Kerr) in south-eastern Australia: a fire-adapted species? Australian Journal of Ecology 9, 367–380.
| The Ground Parrot (Pezoporus wallicus Kerr) in south-eastern Australia: a fire-adapted species?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Monamy, V., and Fox, B. J. (2010). Responses of two species of heathland rodents to habitat manipulation: vegetation density thresholds and the habitat accommodation model. Austral Ecology 35, 334–347.
| Responses of two species of heathland rodents to habitat manipulation: vegetation density thresholds and the habitat accommodation model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Murphy, S. A., Joseph, L., Burbidge, A. H., and Austin, J. (2011). A cryptic and critically endangered species revealed by mitochondrial DNA analyses: the Western Ground Parrot. Conservation Genetics 12, 595–600.
| A cryptic and critically endangered species revealed by mitochondrial DNA analyses: the Western Ground Parrot.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
R Core Team (2014). ‘R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.’ Version 3.1.1. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria.) Available at http://www.R-project.org [Verified 11 July 2014].
Reilly, P. (1991). The effect of wildfire on bird populations in a Victorian coastal habitat. Emu 91, 100–106.
| The effect of wildfire on bird populations in a Victorian coastal habitat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Royle, A. J., and Nichols, J. D. (2003). Estimating abundance from repeated presence–absence data or point counts. Ecology 84, 777–790.
| Estimating abundance from repeated presence–absence data or point counts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Watson, S. J., Taylor, R. S., Nimmo, D. G., Kelly, L. T., Haslem, A., Clarke, M. F., and Bennett, A. F. (2012). Effects of time since fire on birds: how informative are generalized fire response curves for conservation management? Ecological Applications 22, 685–696.
| Effects of time since fire on birds: how informative are generalized fire response curves for conservation management?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22611864PubMed |
Welsh, A. H., Lindenmayer, D. B., and Donnelly, C. F. (2013). Fitting and interpreting occupancy models. PLoS One 8, e52015.
| Fitting and interpreting occupancy models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhtlCqtL0%3D&md5=a85252ed8b78a6a51e5c2086783b2f8aCAS | 23326323PubMed |
Whelan, R. J., and Baker, J. (1996). Modelling reservations: a comment on Baird et al. 1994. International Journal of Wildland Fire 6, 1–3.
| Modelling reservations: a comment on Baird et al. 1994.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Whelan, R. J., Rodgerson, L., Dickman, C. R., and Sutherland, E. F. (2002). Critical life cycles of plants and animals: developing a process-based understanding of population changes in fire prone landscapes. In ‘Flammable Australia: The Fire Regimes and Biodiversity of a Continent’. (Eds R. A. Bradstock, J. E. Williams and A. M. Gill.) pp. 94–124. (Cambridge University Press: New York.)