Differential wear of feathers in the polymorphic New Zealand Fantail (Rhipidura fuliginosa) – a selective advantage of melanism?
Kathryn Mackinven A B C and James V. Briskie AA School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand.
B Present address: Research & Innovation, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand.
C Corresponding author. Email: kathryn.mackinven@canterbury.ac.nz
Emu 114(2) 154-159 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU13047
Submitted: 5 October 2012 Accepted: 27 August 2013 Published: 13 February 2014
Abstract
The New Zealand Fantail (Rhipidura fuliginosa) has two discrete colour morphs. The plumage of the black morph is almost entirely melanised whereas the pied morph is only partially melanised. This difference is most striking in the tail, with the rectrices of the black morph being black whereas all but the central pair of rectrices in the pied morph are white. To understand the selective advantages of differences in melanisation between the two morphs, we compared rates of missing or broken rectrices, and the degree of wear along the edges of the vanes. Using both museum skins and live-caught birds, we found no difference in the rate of missing feathers between morphs but rates of breakage and wear of feathers were significantly higher among pied-morph Fantails. The difference was most prominent late in the breeding season when activity levels are expected to be highest. By comparing homologous feathers differing only in level of melanisation, our results support the hypothesis that feathers containing melanin exhibit increased resistance to breakage and wear. Although this suggests that black-morph Fantails obtain an advantage in reduced wear of feathers, the benefit that white feathers provide to pied-morph Fantails to counter increased costs of feather wear is not clear.
Additional keywords: museum specimens, moult, plumage morphs, trade-offs.
References
Atkinson, K. (2004). The adaptive significance of plumage polymorphism. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.Atkinson, K., and Briskie, J. V. (2007). Frequency distribution and environmental correlates of plumage polymorphism in the Grey Fantail Rhipidura fuliginosa. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 34, 273–281.
| Frequency distribution and environmental correlates of plumage polymorphism in the Grey Fantail Rhipidura fuliginosa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Barrowclough, G. F., and Sibley, F. C. (1980). Feather pigmentation and abrasion: test of a hypothesis. Auk 97, 881–883.
Blackburn, A. (1965). Breeding of the North Island Fantail. Notornis 12, 127–137.
Bonser, R. H. C. (1995). Melanin and the abrasion resistance of feathers. Condor 97, 590–591.
| Melanin and the abrasion resistance of feathers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Burtt, E. H. Jr (1986). ‘An Analysis of Physical, Physiological and Optical Aspects of Avian Coloration with Emphasis on Wood-Warblers.’ Ornithological Monographs 38. (American Ornithologists’ Union: Washington, DC)
Butler, M., and Johnson, A. S. (2004). Are melanised feather barbs stronger? Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 285–293.
| Are melanised feather barbs stronger?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14668312PubMed |
Caughley, G. (1969). Genetics of melanism in the Fantail Rhipidura fuliginosa. Notornis 16, 237–240.
Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., and Buchner, A. (1996). GPOWER: a general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 28, 1–11.
| GPOWER: a general power analysis program.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fitzpatrick, S. (1998). Birds’ tails as signalling devices: markings, shape, length and feather quality. American Naturalist 151, 157–173.
| Birds’ tails as signalling devices: markings, shape, length and feather quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1cnit1yqtg%3D%3D&md5=a6b191f3db28421e9f67b944b1d758c2CAS | 18811415PubMed |
Fitzpatrick, S., and Price, P. (1997). Magpies’ tails: damage as an indicator of quality. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 40, 209–212.
| Magpies’ tails: damage as an indicator of quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ginn, H. B., and Melville, D. S. (1983). ‘Moult in Birds.’ British Trust for Ornithology Guide 19. (British Trust for Ornithology: Tring, UK.)
Hervieux, D. P., Zwickel, F. C., and Lewis, R. A. (1993). Variations in courtship among Blue Grouse: do some males breed more than others? Canadian Journal of Zoology 71, 1079–1083.
| Variations in courtship among Blue Grouse: do some males breed more than others?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Higgins, P. J., Peter, J. M., and Cowling, S. J. (Eds) (2006). ‘Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds. Vol. 7: Boatbill to Starlings.’ (Oxford University Press: Melbourne.)
Jabloński, P. G. (1999). A rare predator exploits prey escape behavior: the role of tail-fanning and plumage contrast in foraging of the Painted Redstart (Myioborus pictus). Behavioral Ecology 10, 7–14.
| A rare predator exploits prey escape behavior: the role of tail-fanning and plumage contrast in foraging of the Painted Redstart (Myioborus pictus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kose, M., and Møller, A. P. (1999). Sexual selection, feather breakage and parasites: the importance of white tail spots in the Barn Swallow (Hirundo rustica). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 45, 430–436.
| Sexual selection, feather breakage and parasites: the importance of white tail spots in the Barn Swallow (Hirundo rustica).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lank, D. B. (2002). Diverse processes maintain plumage polymorphisms in birds. Journal of Avian Biology 33, 327–330.
| Diverse processes maintain plumage polymorphisms in birds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McLean, I. G. (1989). Feeding behaviour of the Fantail (Rhipidura fuliginosa). Notornis 36, 99–106.
Powlesland, M. H. (1982). A breeding study of the South Island Fantail (Rhipidura fuliginosa fuliginosa). Notornis 29, 181–195.
Roulin, A. (2007). Melanin pigmentation negatively correlates with preening effort in Barn Owls. Functional Ecology 21, 264–271.
| Melanin pigmentation negatively correlates with preening effort in Barn Owls.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Swaddle, J. P., Witter, M. S., Cuthill, I. C., Budden, A., and McCowen, P. (1996). Plumage condition affects flight performance in Common Starlings: implications for developmental homeostasis, abrasion and moult. Journal of Avian Biology 27, 103–111.
| Plumage condition affects flight performance in Common Starlings: implications for developmental homeostasis, abrasion and moult.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thomas, A. L. R. (1993). The aerodynamic costs of asymmetry in the wings and tail of birds: asymmetric birds can’t fly round tight corners. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London – B. Biological Sciences 254, 181–189.
| The aerodynamic costs of asymmetry in the wings and tail of birds: asymmetric birds can’t fly round tight corners.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |