Environmental factors structuring the assemblage of aquatic insects in an epigean and hypogean stretch of a Neotropical karst stream
V. M. Martins
A B and R. L. Ferreira A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Centro de Estudos em Biologia Subterrânea, Departamento de Ecologia e Conservação, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Campus Universitário, 3037, CEP 37200-000, Lavras, MG, Brazil.
B Corresponding author. Email: vanessa.belbelita@gmail.com
Marine and Freshwater Research 72(7) 1027-1032 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF20229
Submitted: 24 July 2020 Accepted: 23 November 2020 Published: 1 February 2021
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to identify which variables structure the assemblage of aquatic insects in the subterranean environment, because knowledge about how subterranean communities are structured in rivers with hypogean sections is still emerging. In addition to identifying whether the hypogean assemblage is structured in the same way as the epigean assemblage, we sought to identify whether the environmental restrictions caused by the subterranean habitat resulted in reduced species richness and abundance compared with the epigean habitat. We sampled a 345-m stretch of a stream in Brazil and collected aquatic insects from both the epigean and hypogean environments. In the stream stretch investigated, there was a positive relationship between richness and the percentage of immersion, fine substrate and organic matter, and a negative relationship between richness and conductivity. We also verified differences between the epigean and hypogean environments regarding composition. The variables that best explained the overall assemblage structure included the epigean–hypogean environment and the percentage of coarse and fine substrate. Given the differences between these environments, we emphasise the need for management actions in karst regions that consider the discontinuity of these regions’ river communities to conserve all components of diversity.
Keywords: benthic assemblages in a karst stream, cave, epigean, physical habitat.
References
Anderson, M., Gorley, R. N., and Clarke, R. K. (2008). ‘Permanova+ for PRIMER: Guide to Software and Statistical Methods.’ (Primer-E: Plymouth, UK.)Arimoro, F. O., and Ikomi, R. B. (2009). Ecological integrity of upper Warri River, Niger Delta using aquatic insects as bioindicators. Ecological Indicators 9, 455–461.
| Ecological integrity of upper Warri River, Niger Delta using aquatic insects as bioindicators.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Culver, D. C., and Pipan, T. (2009). ‘The Biology of Caves and Other Subterranean Habitats.’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.)
Death, R. G. (1989). The effect of a cave on benthic invertebrate communities in a South Island stream. New Zealand Natural Science Journals 16, 67–78.
Gooch, J. L., and Glazier, D. S. (1991). Temporal and spatial patterns in mid-Appalachian springs. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 123, 29–49.
| Temporal and spatial patterns in mid-Appalachian springs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hansen, A. J., di Castri, F., and Naiman, R. J. (1988). Ecotones: what and why? Biology International 17, 9–46.
Heino, J., Mykra, H., Kotanen, J., and Muotka, T. (2007). Ecological filters and variability in stream macroinvertebrate communities: do taxonomic and functional structure follow the same path? Ecography 30, 217–230.
| Ecological filters and variability in stream macroinvertebrate communities: do taxonomic and functional structure follow the same path?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Herbst, D. B. (2001). Gradients of salinity stress, environmental stability and water chemistry as a templet for defining habitat types and physiological strategies in inland salt waters. In ‘Saline Lakes’. pp. 209–219. (Springer: Dordrecht, Netherlands.)
Lammert, M., and Allan, J. D. (1999). Assessing biotic integrity of streams: effects of scale in measuring the influence of land use/cover and habitat structure on fish and macroinvertebrates. Environmental Management 23, 257–270.
| Assessing biotic integrity of streams: effects of scale in measuring the influence of land use/cover and habitat structure on fish and macroinvertebrates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 9852191PubMed |
Martins, V. M., and Ferreira, R. L. (2020). Limiting similarity in subterranean ecosystems: a case of niche differentiation in Elmidae (Coleoptera) from epigean and hypogean environments. Hydrobiologia 847, 593–604.
| Limiting similarity in subterranean ecosystems: a case of niche differentiation in Elmidae (Coleoptera) from epigean and hypogean environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McNie, P. M., and Death, R. G. (2017). The effect of agriculture on cave–stream invertebrate communities. Marine and Freshwater Research 68, 1999–2007.
| The effect of agriculture on cave–stream invertebrate communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Milesi, S. V., Dolédec, S., and Melo, A. S. (2016). Substrate heterogeneity influences the trait composition of stream insect communities: an experimental in situ study. Freshwater Science 35, 1321–1329.
| Substrate heterogeneity influences the trait composition of stream insect communities: an experimental in situ study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Moseley, M. (2009). Are all caves ecotones? Cave and Karst Science 36, 53–58.
Oliver, I., and Beattie, A. J. (1996). Invertebrate morphoespecies as surrogates for species: a case study. Conservation Biology 10, 99–109.
| Invertebrate morphoespecies as surrogates for species: a case study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Palmer, M. A., Menninger, H. L., and Bernhardt, E. (2010). River restoration, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity: a failure of theory or practice? Freshwater Biology 55, 205–222.
| River restoration, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity: a failure of theory or practice?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Peck, D. V., Herlihy, A. T., Hill, B. H., Hughes, R. M., Kaufmann, P. R., Klemm, D. J., Lazorchak, J. M., McCormick, F. H., Peterson, S. A., Ringold, P. L., Magee, T., and Cappaert, M. R. (2006). Western pilot study: field operations manual for wadeable streams. EPA/620/R-06/ 003, US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC, USA.
Pellegrini, T. G., Pompeu, P. S., and Ferreira, R. L. (2018). Cave benthic invertebrates in south-eastern Brazil: are there ‘key’ factors structuring such communities? Marine and Freshwater Research 69, 1762–1770.
| Cave benthic invertebrates in south-eastern Brazil: are there ‘key’ factors structuring such communities?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Poff, N. L. (1997). Landscape filters and species traits: towards mechanistic understanding and prediction in stream ecology. The North American Benthological Society 16, 391–409.
| Landscape filters and species traits: towards mechanistic understanding and prediction in stream ecology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Poff, N. L. R., and Ward, J. V. (1990). Physical habitat template of lotic systems: recovery in the context of historical pattern of spatiotemporal heterogeneity. Environmental Management 14, 629–645.
| Physical habitat template of lotic systems: recovery in the context of historical pattern of spatiotemporal heterogeneity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Poole, G. C. (2002). Fluvial landscape ecology: addressing uniqueness within the river discontinuum. Freshwater Biology 47, 641–660.
| Fluvial landscape ecology: addressing uniqueness within the river discontinuum.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Prommi, T., and Payakka, A. (2015). Aquatic insect biodiversity and water quality parameters of streams in northern Thailand. Sains Malaysiana 44, 707–717.
| Aquatic insect biodiversity and water quality parameters of streams in northern Thailand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Prous, X., Ferreira, R. L., and Parentoni, R. (2004). Ecotone delimitation: epigean–hypogean transition in cave ecosystems. Austral Ecology 29, 374–382.
| Ecotone delimitation: epigean–hypogean transition in cave ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Prous, X., Ferreira, R. L., and Jacobi, C. M. (2015). The entrance as a complex ecotone in a Neotropical cave. Journal of Speleology 44, 177–189.
| The entrance as a complex ecotone in a Neotropical cave.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ratton, P., Ferreira, R. L., and Pompeu, P. S. (2018). Fish community of a small karstic Neotropical drainage and its relationship with the physical habitat. Marine and Freshwater Research 69, 1312–1320.
| Fish community of a small karstic Neotropical drainage and its relationship with the physical habitat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schneck, F., Schwarzbold, A., and Melo, A. S. (2011). Substrate roughness affects stream benthic algal diversity, assemblage composition, and nestedness. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 30, 1049–1056.
| Substrate roughness affects stream benthic algal diversity, assemblage composition, and nestedness.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Simpson, A., Turner, I., Brantley, E., and Helms, B. (2014). Bank erosion hazard index as an indicator of near-bank aquatic habitat and community structure in a southeastern Piedmont stream. Ecological Indicators 43, 19–28.
| Bank erosion hazard index as an indicator of near-bank aquatic habitat and community structure in a southeastern Piedmont stream.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Taylor, E. L. S., and Ferreira, R. L. (2012). Determinants on the structure of an aquatic invertebrate community in a neotropical limestone cave. Revista Brasileira de Espeleologia 2, 1–12.
Therriault, T. W., and Kolasa, J. (1999). Physical determinants of richness, diversity, evenness and abundance in natural aquatic microcosms. Hydrobiologia 412, 123–130.
| Physical determinants of richness, diversity, evenness and abundance in natural aquatic microcosms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Trajano, E., and Andrade, R. (2005). Biologia subterrânea. In ‘Espeleologia: noções básicas’. (Eds A. Aules and L. Zogbi.) pp. 25–32. (RedeEspeleo Brasil: São Paulo, Brazil.)
Tundisi, J. G., and Tundisi, T. M. (2008). ‘Limnologia.’ (Oficina de texto: São Paulo, Brazil.)
Vannote, R. L., Minshall, G. W., Cummins, K. W., Sedell, J. R., and Cushing, C. E. (1980). The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37, 130–137.
| The river continuum concept.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Winemiller, K. O., Flecker, A. S., and Hoeinghaus, D. J. (2010). Patch dynamics and environmental heterogeneity in lotic ecosystems. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 29, 84–99.
| Patch dynamics and environmental heterogeneity in lotic ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wood, P. J. (1997). Biological effects of fine sediment in the lotic environment. Environmental Management 21, 203–217.
| Biological effects of fine sediment in the lotic environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 9008071PubMed |
