Factors affecting the survival of Indus River dolphin and species tolerance towards anthropogenic pressures
Mohd Shahnawaz Khan
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
WWF India, 172 B Lodi Estate, New Delhi 110 003, India. Email: shahnawaz.khan.aligarh@gmail.com
Marine and Freshwater Research 68(7) 1245-1250 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF16001
Submitted: 2 January 2016 Accepted: 5 September 2016 Published: 10 October 2016
Abstract
There is broad consensus among ecosystem experts that river dolphins, as top predators, can structure riverine ecosystems and benefit biodiversity. The effects of dolphins on rivers and vice versa do not operate in isolation, but are context dependent, being conditioned by other factors such as human interference. Based on the aforesaid presumption, the focus of the present study was on quantifying the factors responsible for the decline of the Indus River dolphin and species tolerance towards these factors in the upper sub-basin of the Indus River system (River Beas, India). Dolphins avoided (r = –0.667; P = 0.001) the study section with higher disturbance, until some other factors, such as prey availability, came into play. Species occupancy was significantly different for different flow seasons and was associated with deep pools, eddy currents, and low disturbance index. The results indicated a marked decrease in species occurrence above a disturbance index level of 44. The findings of the present study contribute towards a better understanding of the complex ecological interactions of river dolphins with their environment and provide valuable insights into the wider conservation status of other threatened components of sympatric freshwater biodiversity that can further help in designing effective conservation measures for the ecosystem as a whole.
Additional keywords: conservation, threats.
References
Abell, R., Thieme, M. L., Revenga, C., Bryer, M., Kottelat, M., Bogutskaya, N., Coad, B., Mandrak, N., Balderas, S. C., Bussing, W., Stiassny, M. L. J., Skelton, P., Allen, G. R., Unmack, P., Naseka, A., Rebecca, N. G., Sindorf, N., Robertson, J., Armijo, E., Higgins, J. V., Heibel, T. J., Wikramanayake, E., Olson, D., Lopez, H. L., Reis, R. E., Lundberg, J. G., Sabaj Pérez, M. H., and Petry, P. (2008). Freshwater ecoregions of the world: a new map of biogeographic units for freshwater biodiversity conservation. Bioscience 58, 403–414.| Freshwater ecoregions of the world: a new map of biogeographic units for freshwater biodiversity conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Anderson, J. (1879). ‘Anatomical and Zoological Researches: Comprising an Account of the Zoological Results of the Two Expeditions to Western Yunnan in 1868 and 1875, and a Monograph of the Two Cetacean Genera Platanista and Orcella [sic].’ (B. Quaritch: London.)
Bashir, T., Khan, A., Gautam, P., and Behera, S. K. (2010). Abundance and prey availability assessment of Ganges River dolphin (Platanista gangetica gangetica) in a stretch of Upper Ganges River, India. Aquatic Mammals 36, 19–26.
| Abundance and prey availability assessment of Ganges River dolphin (Platanista gangetica gangetica) in a stretch of Upper Ganges River, India.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Behera, S. K., Nawab, A., and Rajkumar, B. (2008). Preliminary investigations confirming the occurrence of Indus River dolphin Platanista gangetica minor in River Beas, Punjab, India. Journal of Bombay Natural History Society 105, 90–91.
Berger, J. (1991). Pregnancy incentives, predation constraints and habitat shifts: experimental and field evidence for wild bighorn sheep. Animal Behaviour 41, 61–77.
| Pregnancy incentives, predation constraints and habitat shifts: experimental and field evidence for wild bighorn sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Boo, E. (1990) ‘Ecotourism: The Potentials and Pitfalls.’ (World Wildlife Fund: Washington, DC, USA.)
Boyle, S. A., and Samson, F. B. (1985). Effects of non-consumptive recreation on wildlife: a review. Wildlife Society Bulletin 13, 110–116.
Braulik, G. T. (2006). Status assessment of the Indus River dolphin Platanista gangetica minor, March–April 2001. Biological Conservation 129, 579–590.
| Status assessment of the Indus River dolphin Platanista gangetica minor, March–April 2001.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Braulik, G. T. (2012). Conservation ecology and phylogenetics of the Indus River Dolphin (Platanista gangetica minor). Ph.D. Thesis, University of St Andrews, Fife, UK.
Braulik, G. T., Bhatti, Z. I., Ehsan, T., Hussain, B., Khan, A. R., Khan, A., Khan, U., Kundi, K., Rajput, R., Reichert, A. P., Northridge, S. P., Bhaagat, H. B., and Garstang, R. (2012a). Robust abundance estimate for endangered river dolphin subspecies in South Asia. Endangered Species Research 17, 201–215.
| Robust abundance estimate for endangered river dolphin subspecies in South Asia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Braulik, G. T., Smith, B. D., and Chaudhry, S. (2012b) Platanista gangetica ssp. minor (Indus Dolphin, Indus River Dolphin, Susu). In ‘The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species’, ver. 2012. (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.) Available at http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/41757/0 [Verified 15 September 2016].
Braulik, G. T., Noureen, U., Arshad, M., and Reeves, R. R. (2015). Review of status, threats, and conservation management options for the endangered Indus River blind dolphin. Biological Conservation 192, 30–41.
| Review of status, threats, and conservation management options for the endangered Indus River blind dolphin.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Burnham, K. P., Anderson, D. R., and Laake, J. L. (1980). Estimation of density from line transect sampling of biological populations. Wildlife Monographs 72, 1–202.
Dudgeon, D. (2003). The contribution of scientific information to the conservation and management of freshwater biodiversity in tropical Asia. Hydrobiologia 500, 295–314.
| The contribution of scientific information to the conservation and management of freshwater biodiversity in tropical Asia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Edwards, J. (1983). Diet shifts in moose due to predator avoidance. Oecologia 60, 185–189.
| Diet shifts in moose due to predator avoidance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gill, J. A., and Sutherland, W. J. (2000). Predicting the consequences of human disturbance from behavioural decisions. In ‘Behaviour and Conservation’. (Eds L. M. Gosling and W. J. Sutherland.) pp. 51–64. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)
Gill, J. A., Norris, K., and Sutherland, W. J. (2001). Why behavioural responses may not reflect the population consequences of human disturbance. Biological Conservation 97, 265–268.
| Why behavioural responses may not reflect the population consequences of human disturbance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gilliam, J. F., and Fraser, D. F. (1987). Habitat selection under predation hazard: test of a model with foraging minows. Ecology 68, 1856–1862.
| Habitat selection under predation hazard: test of a model with foraging minows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gutzwiller, K. J., Wiedemann, R. T., Clements, K. L., and Anderson, S. H. (1994). Effects of human intrusion on song occurrence and singing consistency in subalpine birds. The Auk 111, 28–37.
| Effects of human intrusion on song occurrence and singing consistency in subalpine birds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hill, D., Hockin, D., Price, D., Tucker, P., Morris, R., and Treweek, J. (1997). Bird disturbance: improving the quality and utility of disturbance research. Journal of Applied Ecology 34, 275–288.
| Bird disturbance: improving the quality and utility of disturbance research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jensen, E. L., Dill, L. M., and Cahill, J. F. (2011). Applying behavioral–ecological theory to plant defense: light-dependent movement in Mimosa pudica suggests a trade-off between predation risk and energetic reward. American Naturalist 177, 377–381.
| Applying behavioral–ecological theory to plant defense: light-dependent movement in Mimosa pudica suggests a trade-off between predation risk and energetic reward.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21460546PubMed |
Khan, M. S. (2010). Conservation status and habitat use pattern of otters in Hastinapur Wildlife Sanctuary, Uttar Pradesh; India. M.Sc. Thesis, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India.
Khan, M. S. (2013). Indus River dolphin: the survivor of River Beas, Punjab, India. Current Science 104, 1464–1465.
Lima, S. L. (1998). Stress and decision making under the risk of predation: recent developments for behavioural, reproductive, and ecological perspective. Advances in the Study of Behavior 27, 215–290.
| Stress and decision making under the risk of predation: recent developments for behavioural, reproductive, and ecological perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lima, S. L., and Zollner, P. A. (1996). Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11, 131–135.
| Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3M7itFCjtQ%3D%3D&md5=e8bf3b65ec5e7fe45cdb9b4abb032261CAS |
McKinney, M. L. (1997). How do rare species avoid extinction? A paleontological view. In ‘The Biology of Rarity: Causes and Consequences of Rare–Common Differences’. (Eds W. E. Kunin and K. J. Gaston.) pp. 110–129. (Chapman & Hall: London, UK.)
Mohan, R. S. L. (1989). Conservation and management of the Ganges river dolphin, Platanista gangetica, in India. In ‘Biology and Conservation of the River Dolphins: Proceedings of the Workshop on Biology and Conservation of the Platanistoid Dolphin’, 28–30 October 1986, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China. (Eds W. F. Perrin, R. L. Brownell Jr, K. Zhou, and J. Liu.) IUCN Species Survival Commission Occasional Paper 3, pp. 64–69. (IUCN: Gland, Switzerland.)
Mohan, R. S. L., and Kelkar, N. (2015). Ganges River dolphin. In ‘Mammals of South Asia’. Vol. II. (Eds A. J. T. Jhonsingh and N. Manjrekar.) pp. 43–70. (Prentice Hall : Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.)
Morris, D. W., and Davidson, D. L. (2000). Optimally foraging mice match patch use with habitat differences in fitness. Ecology 81, 2061–2066.
| Optimally foraging mice match patch use with habitat differences in fitness.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Norusis, M. J. (1994). ‘SPSS/PC+ Statistic 7.3 for IBMPC/XT/AT and PS/2.’ (SPSS International: Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.)
Quesnelle, P. E., Lindsay, K. E., and Fahrig, L. (2014). Low reproductive rate predicts species sensitivity to habitat loss: a meta-analysis of wetland vertebrates. PLoS One 9, e90926.
| Low reproductive rate predicts species sensitivity to habitat loss: a meta-analysis of wetland vertebrates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24651675PubMed |
Reeves, R. R., Smith, B. D., and Kasuya, T. (Eds) (2000). ‘Biology and Conservation of Freshwater Cetaceans in Asia’. (IUCN: Gland, Switzerland.)
Sergio, F., Newton, I., Marchesi, L., and Pedrini, P. (2006). Ecologically justified charisma: preservation of top predators delivers biodiversity conservation. Journal of Applied Ecology 43, 1049–1055.
| Ecologically justified charisma: preservation of top predators delivers biodiversity conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shelford, V. E. (1931). Some concepts of bioecology. Ecology 12, 455–467.
| Some concepts of bioecology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sinha, R. K., and Sharma, G. (2003). Current status of the Ganges River dolphin, in the River Kosi and Son, Bihar India. Journal of Bombay Natural History Society 100, 27–37.
Smith, A. (1996). The river dolphins: the road to extinction. In ‘The Conservation of Whales and Dolphins’. (Eds M. P. Simmonds and J. D. Hutchinson.) pp. 355–390. (Wiley: New York.)
Smith, B. D., and Reeves, R. R. (2000). Survey methods for population assessment of Asian river dolphins. In ‘Biology and Conservation of Freshwater Cetaceans in Asia’. (Eds R. R. Reeves, B. D. Smith and T. Kasuya.) Occasional Papers of the IUCN Species Survival Commission 23, pp. 97–115. (IUCN: Gland, Switzerland.)
Steidl, R. J., and Anthony, R. G. (2000). Experimental effects of human activity on breeding bald eagles. Ecological Applications 10, 258–268.
Turvey, S. T., Pitman, R. L., Taylor, B. L., Barlow, J., and Akamatsu, T. (2007). First human-caused extinction of a cetacean species? Biology Letters 3, 537–540.
| First human-caused extinction of a cetacean species?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17686754PubMed |
Turvey, S. T., Risley, C. L., Barrett, L. A., Yujiang, H., and Ding, W. (2012). River dolphins can act as population trend indicators in degraded freshwater systems. PLoS One 7, e37902.
| River dolphins can act as population trend indicators in degraded freshwater systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38Xot12rs70%3D&md5=747b0f4194fed1222249e0212da3f354CAS | 22666410PubMed |
Vidal, O., Barlow, J., Hurtado, L. A., Torre, J., Cendón, P., and Ojeda, Z. (1997). Distribution and abundance of the Amazon River dolphin (Inia geoffrensis) and the tucuxi (Sotalia fluviatilis) in the upper Amazon River. Marine Mammal Science 13, 427–445.
| Distribution and abundance of the Amazon River dolphin (Inia geoffrensis) and the tucuxi (Sotalia fluviatilis) in the upper Amazon River.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zollner, P. A., and Lima, S. L. (1997). Landscape level perceptual abilities in white-footed mice: perceptual range and the detection of forested habitat. Oikos 80, 51–60.
| Landscape level perceptual abilities in white-footed mice: perceptual range and the detection of forested habitat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
