Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Differences in shell strength of native and non-native oysters do not extend to size classes that are susceptible to a generalist predator

Emma M. Wilkie A B and Melanie J. Bishop A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: em.wilkie.dorp@gmail.com

Marine and Freshwater Research 63(12) 1201-1205 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF12078
Submitted: 16 March 2012  Accepted: 30 August 2012   Published: 12 December 2012

Abstract

Whether non-native species proliferate to pest status can depend on top-down control from native predators. Among epifaunal molluscs, the shell serves as a main line of anti-predator defence and shell strength may determine the ease with which generalist predators can penetrate prey. We assessed whether, in eastern Australia, the faster growth of the non-native Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas, than that of the native Saccostrea glomerata comes at the cost of reduced investment in shell thickening, rendering the non-native oyster more susceptible to a generalist predator, the muricid gastropod Morula marginalba. Laboratory tests confirmed that among larger (>50-mm shell height) oysters, the shells of C. gigas were weaker than those of similar-sized S. glomerata. There were, however, no differences in shell strength or thickness between smaller S. glomerata and C. gigas of the size consumed by M. marginalba. In the absence of shell-strength differences among smaller oysters, M. marginalba preferentially consumed native over non-native oysters. When, however, M. marginalba had no choice of prey item, C. gigas was consumed at the same rate as the native oyster. Our results add to growing evidence that the invasion of C. gigas in eastern Australian estuaries is, at present, causing minimal disruption to trophic relationships.

Additional keywords : biological invasions, force, instron, r-selection, trade-off.


References

Anderson, M. J., and Connell, S. D. (1999). Predation by fish on intertidal oysters. Marine Ecology Progress Series 187, 203–211.
Predation by fish on intertidal oysters.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bayne, B. L. (2002). A physiological comparison between Pacific oysters Crassostrea gigas and Sydney rock oysters Saccostrea glomerata: food, feeding and growth in a shared marine habitat. Marine Ecology Progress Series 232, 163–178.
A physiological comparison between Pacific oysters Crassostrea gigas and Sydney rock oysters Saccostrea glomerata: food, feeding and growth in a shared marine habitat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bazzaz, F. A., Chiariello, N. R., Coley, P. D., and Pitelka, L. E. (1987). Allocating resources to reproduction and defence. Bioscience 37, 58–67.
Allocating resources to reproduction and defence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bishop, M. J., and Peterson, C. H. (2006). When r-selection may not predict introduced-species proliferation: predation of a nonnative oyster. Ecological Applications 16, 718–730.
When r-selection may not predict introduced-species proliferation: predation of a nonnative oyster.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bishop, M. J., Krassoi, F. R., McPherson, R. G., Browne, K. A., Summerhayes, S. A., Wilkie, E. M., and O’Connor, W. A. (2010). Change in wild-oyster assemblages of Port Stephens, NSW, Australia, since commencement of non-native Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) aquaculture. Marine and Freshwater Research 61, 714–723.
Change in wild-oyster assemblages of Port Stephens, NSW, Australia, since commencement of non-native Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) aquaculture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXnvFKqtbk%3D&md5=4e9be1588b556fc83c5c98ff12258a11CAS |

Brown, K. M. (1998). The role of shell strength in selective foraging by crayfish for gastropod prey. Freshwater Biology 40, 255–260.
The role of shell strength in selective foraging by crayfish for gastropod prey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Carriker, M. R. (1955). Critical review of biology and control of oyster drills, Urosalpinx and Eupleura. Special Scientific Report of the US Fish and Wildlife Service 148, 1–150.

Currey, J. D. (1979). The effect of drying on the strength of mollusc shells. Journal of Zoology 188, 301–308.
The effect of drying on the strength of mollusc shells.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Diana, J. S. (2009). Aquaculture production and biodiversity conservation. Bioscience 59, 27–38.
Aquaculture production and biodiversity conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dinamani, P. (1991). The Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg, 1793) in New Zealand. In ‘Estuarine and Marine Bivalve Mollusk Culture’. (Ed. W. Menzel.) pp. 343–352. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL.)

Escapa, M., Isacch, J. P., Daleo, P., Alberti, J., Iribarne, O., Borges, M., Dos Santos, E. P., Gagliardini, D. A., and Lasta, M. (2004). The distribution and ecological effects of the introduce Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg, 1793) in northern Patagonia. Journal of Shellfish Research 23, 765–772.

Facon, B., Genton, B. J., Shykoff, J., Jarne, P., Estoup, A., and David, P. (2006). A general eco-evolutionary framework for understanding bioinvasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21, 130–135.
A general eco-evolutionary framework for understanding bioinvasions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fairweather, P. G., and Underwood, A. J. (1983). The apparent diet of predators and biases due to difference handling times of their prey. Oecologia 56, 169–179.
The apparent diet of predators and biases due to difference handling times of their prey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Grosholz, E. (2002). Ecological and evolutionary consequences of coastal invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17, 22–27.
Ecological and evolutionary consequences of coastal invasions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Harding, J. M., Kingsley-Smith, P., Savini, D., and Mann, R. (2007). Comparison of predation signatures left by Atlantic oyster drills (Urosalpinx cinerea Say, Muricidae) and veined rapa whelks (Rapana venosa Valenciennes, Muricidae) in bivalve prey. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 352, 1–11.
Comparison of predation signatures left by Atlantic oyster drills (Urosalpinx cinerea Say, Muricidae) and veined rapa whelks (Rapana venosa Valenciennes, Muricidae) in bivalve prey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Holliday, J. E., and Nell, J. A. (1985). Concern over Pacific oyster in Port Stephens. Australian Fisheries 44, 29–31.

Hughes, R. N., and Dunkin, S. B. (1984). Behavioural components of prey selection by dogwhelks, Nucella lapillus (L.), feeding on mussels, Mytilus edulis L., in the laboratory. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 77, 45–68.
Behavioural components of prey selection by dogwhelks, Nucella lapillus (L.), feeding on mussels, Mytilus edulis L., in the laboratory.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hughes, R. N., and Seed, R. (1995). Behavioural mechanisms of prey selection in crabs. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 193, 225–238.

Kennedy, V. S., Shaw, K. S., and Newell, R. I. E. (2009). Discriminatory predation by three invertebrates on eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) compared with non-native Suminoe oysters (C. ariakensis). Invertebrate Biology 128, 16–25.
Discriminatory predation by three invertebrates on eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) compared with non-native Suminoe oysters (C. ariakensis).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Krassoi, F. R., Brown, K. R., Bishop, M. J., Kelaher, B. P., and Summerhayes, S. (2008). Condition-specific competition allows coexistence of competitively superior exotic oysters with native oysters. Journal of Animal Ecology 77, 5–15.
Condition-specific competition allows coexistence of competitively superior exotic oysters with native oysters.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Leonard, G. H., Bertness, M. D., and Yund, P. O. (1999). Crab predation, waterborne cues, and inducible defences in the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis. Ecology 80, 1–14.

Liszka, D., and Underwood, A. J. (1990). An experimental design to determine preferences for gastropod shells by a hermit-crab. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 137, 47–62.
An experimental design to determine preferences for gastropod shells by a hermit-crab.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lodge, D. (1993). Biological invasions: lessons for ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 8, 133–137.
Biological invasions: lessons for ecology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3M7itVymug%3D%3D&md5=ca3963e42c51ea29482dab8031d8c08eCAS |

Moran, M. J. (1985). Distribution and dispersion of the predatory intertidal gastropod, Morula marginalba. Marine Ecology Progress Series 22, 41–52.
Distribution and dispersion of the predatory intertidal gastropod, Morula marginalba.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Moran, M. J., Fairweather, P. G., and Underwood, A. J. (1984). Growth and mortality of the predatory intertidal whelk Morula marginalba Blainville (Muricidae): the effects of different species of prey. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 75, 1–17.
Growth and mortality of the predatory intertidal whelk Morula marginalba Blainville (Muricidae): the effects of different species of prey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Morton, B. (2004). Predator-prey interactions between Lepsiella vinosa (Gastropoda: Muricidae) and Xenostrobus inconstans (Bivalvia: Mytilidae) in a southwest Australian marsh. The Journal of Molluscan Studies 70, 237–245.
Predator-prey interactions between Lepsiella vinosa (Gastropoda: Muricidae) and Xenostrobus inconstans (Bivalvia: Mytilidae) in a southwest Australian marsh.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Morton, B. (2008). Attack responses of the southern Australian whelk, Lepsiella vinosa (Lamarck, 1822) (Gastropoda: Muricidae), to novel bivalve prey: an experimental approach. Biological Invasions 10, 1265–1275.
Attack responses of the southern Australian whelk, Lepsiella vinosa (Lamarck, 1822) (Gastropoda: Muricidae), to novel bivalve prey: an experimental approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Morton, B., Peharda, M., and Harper, E. M. (2007). Drilling and chipping patterns of bivalve prey predation by Hexaplex trunculus (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Muricidae). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 87, 933–940.
Drilling and chipping patterns of bivalve prey predation by Hexaplex trunculus (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Muricidae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nakaoka, M. (2000). Nonlethal effects of predators on prey populations: predator-mediated change in bivalve growth. Ecology 81, 1031–1045.
Nonlethal effects of predators on prey populations: predator-mediated change in bivalve growth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Newell, R. I. E., Kennedy, V. S., and Shaw, K. S. (2007). Comparative vulnerability to predators, and induced defence responses, of eastern oysters Crassostrea virginica and non-native Crassostrea ariakensis oysters in Chesapeake Bay. Marine Biology 152, 449–460.
Comparative vulnerability to predators, and induced defence responses, of eastern oysters Crassostrea virginica and non-native Crassostrea ariakensis oysters in Chesapeake Bay.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

O’Connor, W. A., and Dove, M. C. (2009). The changing face of oyster culture in New South Wales, Australia. Journal of Shellfish Research 28, 803–811.
The changing face of oyster culture in New South Wales, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Reimer, O., and Tedengren, M. (1996). Phenotypic improvements of morphological defenses in the mussel Mytilus edulis induced by exposure to the predator Asterias rubens. Oikos 75, 383–390.
Phenotypic improvements of morphological defenses in the mussel Mytilus edulis induced by exposure to the predator Asterias rubens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rilov, G., and Crooks, J. A. (2009). Marine bioinvasions: conservation hazards and vehicles for ecological understanding. Biological Invasions of Marine Ecosystems 204, 3–11.
Marine bioinvasions: conservation hazards and vehicles for ecological understanding.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rodley, S., and Davis, A. (2009). Does shell thickness explain selective consumption of the invasive Pacific oyster by the muricid gastropod, Bedeva hanleyi? In ‘Triennial Conference, Molluscs 2009’, Brisbane, 25–27 November 2009. p. 66. (Malacological Society of Australasia: Brisbane.)

Ruesink, J. L., Lenihan, H. S., Trimble, A. C., Heiman, K. W., Micheli, F., Byers, J. E., and Kay, M. C. (2005). Introduction of non-native oysters: ecosystem effects and restoration implications. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 36, 643–689.
Introduction of non-native oysters: ecosystem effects and restoration implications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ruiz, G. M., Carlton, J. T., Grosholz, E. D., and Hines, A. H. (1997). Global invasions of marine and estuarine habitats by non-indigenous species: mechanisms, extent and consequences. American Zoologist 37, 621–632.

Sakai, A. K., Allendorf, F. W., Holt, J. S., Lodge, D. M., Molofsky, J., With, K. A., Baughman, S., Cabin, R. J., Cohen, J. E., Ellstrand, N. C., McCauley, D. E., O’Neil, P., Parker, I. M., Thompson, J. N., and Weller, S. G. (2001). The population biology of invasive species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32, 305–332.
The population biology of invasive species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Silva, A. C. F., Hawkins, S. J., Boaventura, D. M., Brewster, E., and Thompson, R. C. (2010). Use of the intertidal zone by mobile predators: influence of wave exposure, tidal phase and elevation on abundance and diet. Marine Ecology Progress Series 406, 197–210.

Stearns, S. C. (1976). Life history tactics: a review of the ideas. The Quarterly Review of Biology 51, 3–47.
Life history tactics: a review of the ideas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaE283itlWluw%3D%3D&md5=71d3f47dc9f626ade21ddf9b9789b4cdCAS |

Summerhayes, S. A., Kelaher, B. P., and Bishop, M. J. (2009). Spatial patterns of wild oysters in the Hawkesbury River, NSW, Australia. Journal of Shellfish Research 28, 447–451.
Spatial patterns of wild oysters in the Hawkesbury River, NSW, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thomson, J. M. (1959). The naturalization of the Pacific oyster in Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 10, 144–149.
The naturalization of the Pacific oyster in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Trimble, A. C., Ruesink, J. L., and Dumbauld, B. R. (2009). Factors preventing the recovery of a historically overexploited shellfish species, Ostrea lurida Carpenter 1864. Journal of Shellfish Research 28, 97–106.
Factors preventing the recovery of a historically overexploited shellfish species, Ostrea lurida Carpenter 1864.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Troost, K. (2010). Causes and effects of a highly successful marine invasion: case-study of the introduced Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas in continental NW European estuaries. Journal of Sea Research 64, 145–165.
Causes and effects of a highly successful marine invasion: case-study of the introduced Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas in continental NW European estuaries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Underwood, A. J., and Barrett, G. (1990). Experiments on the influence of oysters on the distribution, abundance and sizes of the gastropod Bembecium auratum in a mangrove swamp in New South Wales, Australia. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 137, 25–45.
Experiments on the influence of oysters on the distribution, abundance and sizes of the gastropod Bembecium auratum in a mangrove swamp in New South Wales, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Vermeij, G. J. (1976). Interoceanic differences in vulnerability of shelled prey to crab predation. Nature 260, 135–136.
Interoceanic differences in vulnerability of shelled prey to crab predation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Vermeij, G. J. (1987). ‘Evolution and Escalation: an Ecological History of Life.’ (Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.)

Wilkie, E. M., Bishop, M. J., and O’Connor, W. A. (2012). Are native Saccostrea glomerata and invasive Crassostrea gigas oysters’ habitat equivalents for epibenthic communities in south-eastern Australia? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 420–421, 16–25.
Are native Saccostrea glomerata and invasive Crassostrea gigas oysters’ habitat equivalents for epibenthic communities in south-eastern Australia?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |